The Weekly Adjustment Indicators Checklist: An Application in the Child Welfare Field

Research on the effectiveness of various home-based interventions implemented in the 1980s and 1990s indicates that results have been equivocal. Because of the unique and complex behavioral challenges presented by each family and the need for individualized treatments and long-term interventions for these families, group research and evaluation designs are often insufficient in assessing effectiveness of home-based interventions. Alternative evaluation strategies are needed. The purpose of this exploratory study was two-fold: (a) to investigate the applicability and acceptability of the Weekly Adjustment Indicators Checklist (WAIC) in monitoring adult and child behaviors and (b) to monitor, on an on-going basis, the progress of a family referred to an urban family preservation and reunification program. The target family on whom data were collected consisted of a 13-year old girl and her foster parent who was her maternal aunt. The findings of this study indicate that the WAIC is applicable in monitoring the progress of children and adults in care and that it has the endorsement of its user, namely, the direct care provider. Other results of the study, limitations of the study, and future research needs are discussed.

Family Preservation Journal, 1998, Volume 3, Issue 1. (Entire issue)

Entire issue (large pdf file) Articles include: The Role of Consistency and Diversity in Building Knowledge in Family Preservation. Debora J. Cavazos Dylla and Marianne Berry The Weekly Adjustment Indicators Checklist: An Application in the Child Welfare Field. Michael H. Epstein, Madhavi Jayanthi, Janet McKelvey, Deborah Holderness, Erin Frankenberry, Cassandra Lampkin, Molly McGrath, and Kari White Intensive Family Preservation Services: a Short History but a Long Past. Kellie B. Reed and Raymond S. Kirk Collaborative Conversations for Change: A Solution-Focused Approach to Family Centered Practice. Donald F. Fausel

Association of ALLHAT investigator characteristics with participant recruitment

Clinical trials are often not successful because of the inability to recruit a sufficient number of patients. The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT), the largest antihypertensive trial ever conducted, provided highly generalized results and successful recruitment of over 42,000 participants. The overall purpose of this study was to examine the association of investigator characteristics with anti-hypertensive (AHT) participant recruitment in ALLHAT. This secondary data analyses collected data from the ALLHAT investigator profile survey and related investigator characteristics to recruitment success. The sample size was 502 investigators, with recruitment data from 37,947AHT participants. Recruitment was dichotomized by categorizing all sites with recruitment numbers at or above the overall median recruitment number of 46 as "Successful Recruitment". Frequency distributions and univariate and multivariate logistic regression were conducted. When adjusting for all other factors, Hispanic ethnicity, suburban setting, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMC) site type, number of clinical site staff working on the trial, study coordinator hours per week, medical conference sessions attended, the investigator's primary goal and the likelihood that a physician will convince a patient to continue on randomized treatment, have significant impacts on the recruitment success of ALLHAT investigators. Most of the ALLHAT investigators described their primary commitment as being towards their patients and not to scientific knowledge alone. However, investigators that distinguished themselves as leaders in research had greater recruitment success than investigators who were leaders in clinical practice. ALLHAT was a highly successful trial that proved that community based cardiovascular trials can be implemented on a large scale. Exploring characteristics of ALLHAT investigators provides data that can be generalized to sponsors, sites, and others interested in maximizing clinical trial recruitment numbers. Future studies should further evaluate investigator and study coordinator factors that impact cardiovascular clinical trial recruitment success.^