Studies of the mechanism of daunorubicin carcinogenesis: Modulation by vitamin E

Daunorubicin (DNR) is an anthracycline antibiotic used as a cancer chemotherapeutic agent. However, it causes mammary adenocarcinomas in female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. Vitamin E (E) has been found to reduce DNR carcinogenicity. I investigated the mechanism of DNR carcinogenicity and its interaction with E in SD rats by studying DNR-DNA adduct formation and the influence of E status on DNR clearance and free radical producing and detoxifying enzymes.^ The hypothesis was that DNR exerts its tumorigenic effect via free radicals generated during redox cycling and production of reactive intermediates capable of forming DNA adducts. E was postulated to act as a protective agent through a combination of its antioxidant property, modulation of drug clearance and levels of free radical producing and detoxifying enzymes.^ DNA adduct formation was measured by the nuclease P1 $\sp{32}$P-post labeling assay. In vitro, DNR was activated by rat liver microsomes and either NADPH or cumene hydrogen peroxide (CuOOH). Rat liver DNA incubated with this mixture formed two adducts when the cofactor was NADPH and three adducts when CuOOH was used. In vivo, SD rats were treated with i.v. doses of DNR. No detectable DNR-DNA adducts were formed in liver or mammary DNA in vivo, although there was an intensification of endogenous DNA adducts.^ Groups, 1, 2, 3 and 4 of weanling female SD rats were fed 0, 100, 1,000 and 10,000 mg $\alpha$-tocopheryl acetate/kg diet respectively. A comparison of Groups 1 and 4 showed no effect of E status on clearance of 10 mg tritiated DNR/kg body weight over 72 hours. However, liver cleared DNR at a faster rate than mammary epithelial cells (MEC).^ Xanthine oxidase, which catalyzes DNR redox cycling, was significantly decreased in liver and MEC of rats in group 4 compared to groups 1, 2, and 3. Detoxifying enzymes were not dramatically affected by E supplementation. Quinone reductase in MEC was significantly increased in group 4 compared to other groups. Overall, the liver had higher levels of free radical detoxifying enzymes compared to MEC.^ These data support a role of free radicals in DNR carcinogenicity because (1) endogenous DNA adducts formed due to free radical insult are further intensified by DNR treatment in vivo, (2) MEC, the specific target of DNR carcinogenicity, cannot rapidly clear DNR and have a lower free radical detoxifying capability than liver, (3) E supplementation caused lowering of free radical generating potential via xanthine oxidase, and increased DNR detoxification due to elevation of quinone reductase in MEC. ^

SYNTHETIC PROBES FOR STUDYING TUFTSIN-RECEPTOR INTERACTIONS ON HUMAN POLYMORPHONUCLEAR LEUKOCYTES

Tuftsin is an immunopotentiating tetrapeptide of the sequence L-Thr-L-Lys-L-Pro-L-Arg with anti-microbial and anti-tumor enhancing capabilities. These enhancing functions are manifested through the host's granulocytes and monocytes. In delineating tuftsin's mechanism of action, both radiolabeled and fluorescent probes were synthesized. The radiolabeled probe of tuftsin, L-proly-3,4-('3)H(N) -tuftsin, was obtained through the synthesis and subsequent catalytic hydrogenation of L-3,4-dehydroprolyl ('3)-tuftsin using tritium gas. This procedure yielded a probe with a specific activity of 44.9 Ci/mmole. This radiolabeled probe of tuftsin was used in competitive inhibition studies with tuftsin, the tuftsin analogues Lys-Pro-Arg, Thr-Lys-Pro-Arg(NO(,2)) and (DELTA)('3)-pro('3) -tuftsin as well as with the chemotactic peptide f-Met-Leu-Phe. From the competitive binding curves, the K(,D) for tuftsin was estimated to be 80 nM, a value that approaches the concentration of tuftsin that evokes a half maximal biological response. The approximate Ki's for the tuftsin analogues (33 nM) approached that of tuftsin itself (40 nM). On the other hand, approximately a two log difference in the Ki was seen with the chemotactic tripeptide, indicating that tuftsin may indeed be acting through the chemotactic peptide receptor. This conclusion is further strengthened by studies using an N-terminal derivitized mono-fluoresceinated tuftsin probe and image intensification microscopy. These studies showed that like the chemotactic peptide, tuftsin initially binds to diffusely distributed receptors on the surface of human granulocytes. The tuftsin-receptor complexes then rapidly redistribute to form patches (5 min @ 37(DEGREES)C) which are then internalized. Whether redistribution and internalization of tuftsin-receptor complexes is crucial in effecting a biological response, or simply an intermediary point leading ultimately to degradation, is still not clear. This process, however, may provide the target cell with an early time point in modulating the biological effects of tuftsin through down-regulation of cell surface receptor sites. ^