Radiolabeled human monoclonal IgM for intracompartmental cancer therapy

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with i.v. administered radiolabeled IgG can selectively irradiate tumor cells in vivo. However, it only provides effective therapy for lymphomas. Intracompartmental RIT with radiolabeled human monoclonal IgM may allow curative treatment of solid tumors by increasing tumor deposition of radioactivity, reducing systemic toxicity and allowing repeated administration. This hypothesis was tested in nude mouse models with IgM radiolabeled with indium-111 $\rm(\sp{111}In)$ or yttrium-90 $\rm(\sp{90}Y).$ The use of two radioisotopes, $\rm\sp{111}In$ for imaging and $\rm\sp{90}Y$ for therapy, allow for more quantitative and cautious development of RIT.^ Radiolabled 2B12, an IgM reactive with human ovarian carcinomas was tested by i.v. and intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration in nude mice bearing i.p. nodules of a human ovarian carcinoma cell line (SKOV3 NMP2). Radiolabeled CR4E8, an IgM reactive with human squamous cell carcinomas was tested by i.v. and intralesional (i.l.) administration in nude mice bearing subcutaneous tumors of a human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell line (886). These two models were selected to test proof of concept. Radiolabeled irrelevant IgM (CH-1B9), and $\rm\sp{90}Y$-aggregate served as specificity controls. Biodistribution was performed by excising, weighing and then measuring the radioactivity of tumor and normal organs. Therapy was conducted with i.p. $\rm\sp{90}Y$-labeled 2B12 using both single and fractionated administration and with i.l. $\rm\sp{90}Y$-labeled CR4E8 using single administration. Mice were monitored for tumor response, survival and systemic toxicity.^ Intracompartmental administration of radiolabeled IgM produced immediate high and prolonged tumor deposition of radioactivity with low normal tissue uptake. In contrast, i.v. administration resulted in low tumor, but high liver and spleen uptake. Similar biodistributions were demonstrated for $\rm\sp{111}In$- and $\rm\sp{90}Y$-labeled IgM. Intraperitoneal therapy with $\rm\sp{90}Y$-labeled 2B12 increased survival by approximately 12 days for every 100 $\rm\mu Ci$ of activity without significant toxicity for single (0-300 $\rm\mu Ci)$ and fractionated (150-510 $\rm\mu Ci)$ administration. Intralesional therapy with $\rm\sp{90}Y$-labeled CR4E8 (150-400 $\rm\mu Ci)$ induced prolonged complete regressions. Significant local or systemic toxicity was not observed.^ Intracompartmental RIT with radiolabeled tumor-reactive human monoclonal IgM can selectively irradiate tumor cells. Intracompartmental radiolabled IgM can significantly extend the survival of treated mice with minimal toxicity. It deserves further development as a new cancer therapy. ^

Population and molecular evolution studies on the Melanocortin 1 receptor locus implicate its role in human pigmentation variation

Human pigmentation is a complex trait with the observed variation caused by the varied production of eumelanin (brown/black melanins) and phaeomelanin (red/yellow melanins) by the melanocytes. The melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R), a G protein-coupled receptor expressed in the melanocytes, is a regulator eu- and phaeomelanin synthesis, and MC1R mutations causing skin and coat color changes are known in many mammals. To understand the role of MC1R in human pigmentation variation, I have sequenced the MC1R gene in 121 individuals sampled from world populations. In addition, I have sequenced the MC1R gene in common and pygmy chimpanzees, gorilla, orangutan, and baboon to study the evolution of MC1R and to infer the ancestral human MC1R sequence. The ancestral MC1R sequence is observed in all 25 African individuals studied, but at lower frequencies in the other populations examined, especially in East and Southeast Asians. The Arg163Gln variant is absent in the Africans studied, almost absent in Europeans, and at a low frequency in Indians, but is at an exceptionally high frequency (70%) in East and Southeast Asians. To further evaluate the role of MC1R variants in human pigmentation variation, I have combined these molecular evolution and population studies with functional assays on MC1R variants and primate MC1Rs. ^

Arabinosylguanine: Metabolism, action, and lineage-specific cytotoxicity in human leukemia cells

9-β-D-arabinosylguanine (ara-G), an analogue of deoxyguanosine, has demonstrated T-lymphoblast selective anti-leukemia activity both in vitro and in vivo in cell lines and primary cells and in phase I investigations. The present work was initiated to identify factors that result in this selectivity. ^ The cytotoxicity of ara-G is manifest only after its phosphorylation. Experiments using cell lines transfected to overexpress specific nucleoside kinases demonstrated that the phosphorylation of ara-G to its monophosphate is by both cytoplasmic deoxycytidine kinase and mitochondria) deoxyguanosine kinase. Ara-G monophosphate is converted to its 5′-triphosphate (ara-GTP) in cells by these kinases and then incorporated into DNA. Mechanistic studies demonstrated that incorporation of ara-GTP into DNA was a necessary event for the induction of cell death. ^ Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies utilizing three human acute leukemia cell lines, CEM (T-lymphoblastic), Raji (B-lymphoblastic), and ML-1 (myeloid) were performed. CEM cells were most sensitive to ara-G-induced inhibition of colony formation, accumulated ara-GTP at a faster rate and to a greater degree than either Raji or ML-1, but incorporated the lowest number of ara-G molecules into DNA. The position of incorporation was internal and similar in all cell lines. The terminal elimination phase of ara-GTP was >24 h and similar in these cells. Comparisons between inhibition of colony formation and ara-GTP incorporation into DNA demonstrated that while within a cell line there was correlation among these parameters, between cell lines there was no relationship between number of incorporated ara-G molecules and ara-G(TP)-mediated toxicity suggesting that there were additional factors. ^ The expression of membrane bound Fas and Fast was unchanged in all cell lines. In contrast, there was a 2-fold increase in soluble Fast, which was found exclusively in CEM cells. Ara-G-mediated apoptosis in CEM occurred from all phases of the cell cycle and was abrogated partially by Fas antagonist antibodies. These data suggest that Fas-mediated cell death due to the liberation of sFasL may be responsible for the hypersensitivity to ara-G manifested by immature T-cells such as CEM. The role of Fas in ara-G induced death of acute T-lymphoblastic leukemia cells during therapy needs to be tested. ^

Pharmacogenetics of the human glutathione S-transferase P1 gene in the metabolism and therapeutic efficacy of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum

The human GSTP1 gene has been shown, conclusively, to be polymorphic. The three main GSTP1 alleles, GSTP1*A, GSTP1*B, and GSTP1*C, encode proteins which differ in the 3-dimensional structure of their active sites and in their function in phase II metabolism of carcinogens, mutagens, and anticancer agents. Although, it is well established that GSTP1 is over expressed in many human tumors and that the levels of GSTP1 expression correlate directly with tumor resistance to chemotherapy and inversely with patient survival, the significance of the polymorphic GSTP1 gene locus on tumor response to chemotherapy remains unclear. The goal of this project was to define the role and significance of the polymorphic GSTP1 gene locus in GSTP1-based tumor drug resistance and as a determinant of patient response to chemotherapy. The hypothesis to be tested was that the polymorphic GSTP1 gene locus will confer to tumors a differential ability to metabolize cisplatin resulting in a GSTP1 genotype-based sensitivity to cisplatin. The study examined: (a) whether the different GSTP 1 alleles confer different levels of cellular protection against cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity, (b) whether the allelic GSTP1 proteins metabolize cisplatin with different efficiencies, and (c) whether the GSTP1 genotype is a determinant of tumor response to cisplatin therapy. The results demonstrate that the GSTP1 alleles differentially protect tumors against cisplatin-induced apoptosis and clonogenic cell kill in the rank order: GSTP1*C > GSTP1*B > GSTP1*A. The same rank order was observed for the kinetics of GSTP1-catalyzed cisplatin metabolism, both in cell-free and cellular systems, to the rate-limiting monoglutathionyl-platinum metabolite, which was characterized, for the first time, by mass spectral analysis. Finally, this study demonstrates that both GSTP1 genotype and the level of GSTP1 expression significantly contribute to tumor sensitivity to cisplatin treatment. Overall, the results of this project show that the polymorphic GSTP1 gene locus plays a significant role in tumor sensitivity to cisplatin treatment. Furthermore, these studies have contributed to the overall understanding of the significance of the polymorphic GSTP1 gene locus in tumor resistance to cancer chemotherapy and have provided the basis for further investigations into how this can be utilized to optimize and individualize cancer chemotherapy for cancer patients. ^

Maximizing efficacy of the hypomethylating drug 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine in human leukemia

5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (DAC) is a cytidine analogue that strongly inhibits DNA methylation, and was recently approved for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). To maximize clinical results with DAC, we investigated its use as an anti-cancer drug. We also investigated mechanisms of resistance to DAC in vitro in cancer cell lines and in vivo in MDS patients after relapse. We found DAC sensitized cells to the effect of 1-β-D-Arabinofuranosylcytosine (Ara-C). The combination of DAC and Ara-C or Ara-C following DAC showed additive or synergistic effects on cell death in four human leukemia cell lines in vitro, but antagonism in terms of global methylation. RIL gene activation and H3 lys-9 acetylation of short interspersed elements (Alu). One possible explanation is that hypomethylated cells are sensitized to cell killing by Ara-C. Turning to resistance, we found that the IC50 of DAC differed 1000 fold among and was correlated with the dose of DAC that induced peak hypomethylation of long interspersed nuclear elements (LINE) (r=0.94, P<0.001), but not with LINE methylation at baseline (r=0.05, P=0.97). Sensitivity to DAC did not significantly correlate with sensitivity to another hypomethylating agent 5-azacytidine (AZA) (r=0.44, P=0.11). The cell lines most resistant to DAC had low dCK, hENT1, and hENT2 transporters and high cytosine deaminase (CDA). In an HL60 leukemia cell line, resistance to DAC could be rapidly induced by drug exposure, and was related to a switch from monoallelic to biallelic mutation of dCK or a loss of wild type DCK allele. Furthermore, we showed that DAC induced DNA breaks evidenced by histone H2AX phosphorylation and increased homologous recombination rates 7-10 folds. Finally, we found there were no dCK mutations in MDS patients after relapse. Cytogenetics showed that three of the patients acquired new abnormalities at relapse. These data suggest that in vitro spontaneous and acquired resistance to DAC can be explained by insufficient incorporation of drug into DNA. In vivo resistance to DAC is likely due to methylation-independent pathways such as chromosome changes. The lack of cross resistance between DAC and AZA is of potential clinical relevance, as is the combination of DAC and Ara-C. ^

An evaluation of sleep hypnotic and stimulant effect on human performance using a computerized psychological test battery

This study evaluated the administration-time-dependent effects of a stimulant (Dexedrine 5-mg), a sleep-inducer (Halcion 0.25-mg) and placebo (control) on human performance. The investigation was conducted on 12 diurnally active (0700-2300) male adults (23-38 yrs) using a double-blind, randomized sixway-crossover three-treatment, two-timepoint (0830 vs 2030) design. Performance tests were conducted hourly during sleepless 13-hour studies using a computer generated, controlled and scored multi-task cognitive performance assessment battery (PAB) developed at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Specific tests were Simple and Choice Reaction Time, Serial Addition/Subtraction, Spatial Orientation, Logical Reasoning, Time Estimation, Response Timing and the Stanford Sleepiness Scale. The major index of performance was "Throughput", a combined measure of speed and accuracy.^ For the Placebo condition, Single and Group Cosinor Analysis documented circadian rhythms in cognitive performance for the majority of tests, both for individuals and for the group. Performance was best around 1830-2030 and most variable around 0530-0700 when sleepiness was greatest (0300).^ Morning Dexedrine dosing marginally enhanced performance an average of 3% with reference to the corresponding in time control level. Dexedrine AM also increased alertness by 10% over the AM control. Dexedrine PM failed to improve performance with reference to the corresponding PM control baseline. With regard to AM and PM Dexedrine administrations, AM performance was 6% better with subjects 25% more alert.^ Morning Halcion administration caused a 7% performance decrement and 16% increase in sleepiness and a 13% decrement and 10% increase in sleepiness when administered in the evening compared to corresponding in time control data. Performance was 9% worse and sleepiness 24% greater after evening versus morning Halcion administration.^ These results suggest that for evening Halcion dosing, the overnight sleep deprivation occurring in coincidence with the nadir in performance due to circadian rhythmicity together with the CNS depressant effects combine to produce performance degradation. For Dexedrine, morning administration resulted in only marginal performance enhancement; Dexedrine in the evening was less effective, suggesting the 5-mg dose level may be too low to counteract the partial sleep deprivation and nocturnal nadir in performance. ^

Mechanisms of multidrug resistance: Differences between natural and acquired adriamycin -resistant human colon carcinoma cells

Mechanisms of multidrug resistance (MDR) were studied in two independent MDR sublines (AdR1.2 and SRA1.2) derived from the established human colon carcinoma cell line LoVo. AdR1.2 was developed by long-term continuous exposure of the cells to adriamycin (AdR) in stepwise increments of concentration, while SRA1.2 was selected by repetitive pulse treatments with AdR at a single concentration. In this dissertation, the hypothesis that the mechanism of drug resistance in SRA1.2 is different than that in AdR1.2 is tested. While SRA1.2 demonstrated similar biological characteristics when compared to the parental LoVo, AdR1.2 exhibited remarkable alterations in biological properties. The resistance phenotype of AdR1.2 was reversible when the cells were grown in the drug-free medium whereas SRA1.2 maintained its resistance for at least 10 months under similar conditions. Km and Vmax of carrier-mediated facilitated diffusion AdR transport were similar among the three lines. However, both resistant sublines exhibited an energy-dependent drug efflux. AdR1.2 appeared to possess an activated efflux pump, and a decreased nucleus-binding of AdR, whereas SRA1.2 showed merely a lower affinity in binding of AdR to the nuclei. Southern blot analysis showed no amplification of the MDR1 gene in either of the two resistant subclones. However, Western blot analysis using the C219 monoclonal antibody against P170 glycoprotein detected a Mr 150-kDa plasma protein (P150) in AdR1.2 but not in SRA1.2 or in the parental LoVo. In vitro phosphorylation studies revealed that P150 was a phosphoprotein; its phosphorylation was Mg$\sp{2+}$-dependent and could be enhanced by verapamil, an agent capable of increasing intracellular AdR accumulation in AdR1.2 cells. The phosphorylation studies also revealed elevated phosphorylation of a Mr 66-kDa plasma membrane protein that was detectable in the AdR1.2 revertant and in AdR1.2 when verapamil was present, suggesting that hyperphosphorylation of the Mr 66-kDa protein may be related to the reversal of MDR. SDS-PAGE of the plasma membrane protein demonstrated overproduction of a Mr 130-kDa, MDR-related protein in both the resistant sublines. The Mr 130-kDa, MDR-related protein in both the resistant sublines. The Mr 130-kDa protein was not immunoreactive with C219, but its absence in the AdR1.2 revertant and the parental LoVo suggests that it is an MDR-related plasma membrane protein. In conclusion, the results from this study support the author's hypothesis that the mechanisms responsible for "Acquired" and "Natural" MDR are not identical. ^