2 resultados para Graft
em DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center
Resumo:
Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is known to induce a beneficial anti-tumor immune response called graft-versus-tumor (GVT) activity. However, GVT activity is closely associated with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a potentially fatal immune response against antigens on normal recipient tissues. The T-cell populations mediating these two processes are often overlapping, but studies have shown that some donor T-cells can be tumor-specific. Therefore, the goal of this study was to develop strategies for preferentially activating donor T-cells capable of mediating GVT activity but not GVHD. The three hypotheses tested were: (1) Pre-transplant immunization of BMT donors with a recipient-derived tumor cell vaccine will induce a relative increase in GVT activity as compared to GVHD. (2) Post-transplant tumor immunization of BMT recipients will enhance GVT activity without exacerbating GVHD. (3) Pre-transplant immunization of BMT donors against a tumor-specific antigen will enhance GVT activity without exacerbating GVHD. ^ To test the first two hypotheses, C3H.SW mice (MHC-matched donors) were immunized with a C57BL/6 (recipient)-derived tumor cell vaccine (leukemia or fibrosarcoma) prior to BMT, or recipients were immunized starting one month after BMT. Both donor and recipient immunization led to a significant increase in GVT activity (enhanced recipient survival and decreased tumor growth). However, donor immunization also increased fatal GVHD, which was at least partially due to activation of alloreactive T-cells recognizing the immunodominant minor histocompatibility antigen B6dom1. GVT immunity following recipient immunization was not associated with an exacerbation of GVHD or a response to B6dom1. ^ To test the third hypothesis, influenza nucleoprotein (NP) was used as a model tumor antigen. C3H.SW donors were immunized against NP prior to BMT, which led to a significant increase in GVT activity. Although recipients were not completely protected against growth of antigen loss variant tumors, there was no increase in GVHD. ^ In conclusion, (1) immunization of allogeneic BMT donors with a recipient-derived tumor cell vaccine substantially increases GVT activity but also exacerbates GVHD, (2) post-transplant tumor immunization of allogeneic BMT recipients significantly increases GVT activity and survival without exacerbating GVHD, and (3) immunization of allogeneic BMT donors against a tumor-specific antigen significantly enhances GVT activity without exacerbating GVHD. ^
Resumo:
IMMUNOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF EXTRACORPOREAL PHOTOPHERESIS IN CUTANEOUS T CELL LYMPHOMA AND GRAFT VERSUS HOST DISEASE Publication No.___________ Lisa Harn-Ging Shiue, B.S. Supervisory Professor: Madeleine Duvic, M.D. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an effective, low-risk immunomodulating therapy for leukemic cutaneous T cell lymphoma (L-CTCL) and graft versus host disease (GVHD), but whether the mechanism(s) of action in these two diseases is (are) identical or different is unclear. To determine the effects of ECP in vivo, we studied regulatory T cells (T-regs), cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), and dendritic cells (DCs) by immunofluorescence flow cytometry in 18 L-CTCL and 11 GVHD patients before and after ECP at Day 2, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. In this study, ECP was effective in 12/18 L-CTCL patients with a 66.7% overall response rate (ORR) and 6/11 GVHD patients with a 54.5% ORR. Prior to ECP, the percentages of CD4+Foxp3+ T cells in 9 L-CTCL patients were either lower (L-CTCL-Low, n=2) or higher (L-CTCL-High, n=7) than normal. Five of the 7 GVHD patients had high percentages of CD4+Foxp3+ T cells (GVHD-High). Six of 7 L-CTCL-High patients had >80% CD4+Foxp3+ T cells which were correlated with tumor cells, and were responders. Both L-CTCL-High and GVHD-High patients had decreased percentages of CD4+Foxp3+ and CD4+Foxp3+CD25- T cells after 3 months of treatment. CD4+Foxp3+CD25+ T cells increased in GVHD-High patients but decreased in L-CTCL-High patients after 3 months of ECP. In addition, numbers of CTLs were abnormal. We confirmed that numbers of CTLs were low in L-CTCL patients, but high in GVHD patients prior to ECP. After ECP, CTLs increased after 1 month in 4/6 L-CTCL patients whereas CTLs decreased after 6 months in 3/3 GVHD patients. Myeloid (mDCs) and plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) were also low at baseline in L-CTCL and GVHD patients confirming the DC defect. After 6 months of ECP, numbers and percentages of mDCs and pDCs increased in L-CTCL and GVHD. MDCs were favorably increased in 8/12 L-CTCL responders whereas pDCs were favorably increased in GVHD patients. These data suggest that ECP is favorably modulating the DC subsets. In L-CTCL patients, the mDCs may orchestrate Th1 cell responses to overcome immune suppression and facilitate disease regression. However, in GVHD patients, ECP is favorably down-regulating the immune system and may be facilitating immune tolerance to auto-or allo-antigens. In both L-CTCL and GVHD patients, DCs are modulated, but the T cell responses orchestrated by the DCs are different, suggesting that ECP modulates depending on the immune milieu. _______________