Molecular mechanism of jet fuel induced immune suppression

Dermal exposure to jet fuel suppresses the immune response. Immune regulatory cytokines, and biological modifiers, including platelet activating factor, prostaglandin E2, and interleukin-10 have all been implicated in the pathway leading to immunosuppression. It is estimated that approximately 260 different hydrocarbons are found in JP-8 (jet propulsion-8) jet fuel, and the identity of the immunotoxic compound is not known. The recent availability of synthetic jet fuel (S-8), which is devoid of aromatic hydrocarbons, made it feasible to design experiments to test the hypothesis that the aromatic hydrocarbons are responsible for jet fuel induced immune suppression. Applying S-8 to the skin of mice does not up-regulate the expression of epidermal cyclooxygenase-2 nor does it induce immune suppression. Adding back a cocktail of 7 of the most prevalent aromatic hydrocarbons found in jet fuel to S-8 up-regulated cyclooxygenase-2 expression and induced immune suppression. Cyclooxygenase-2 induction can be initiated by reactive oxygen species (ROS). JP-8 treated keratinocytes increased ROS production, S-8 did not. Antioxidant pre-treatment blocked jet fuel induced immune suppression and cyclooxygenase-2 up-regulation. Accumulation of reactive oxygen species induces oxidant stress and affects activity of ROS sensitive transcription factors. JP-8 induced activation of NFκB while S-8 did not. Pre-treatment with antioxidants blocked activation of NFκB and parthenolide, an NFκB inhibitor, blocked jet fuel induced immune suppression and cyclooxygenase-2 expression in skin of treated mice. p65 siRNA transfected keratinocytes demonstrated NFκB is critically involved in jet fuel induced COX-2 expression. These findings clearly implicate the aromatic hydrocarbons found in jet fuel as the agents responsible for inducing immune suppression, in part by the production of reaction oxygen species, NFκB dependent up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2, and the production of immune regulatory factors and cytokines. ^

TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: SMALL-VOLUME INFUSION PUMPS

"Technology assessment is a comprehensive form of policy research that examines the short- and long-term social consequences of the application or use of technology" (US Congress 1967).^ This study explored a research methodology appropriate for technology assessment (TA) within the health industry. The case studied was utilization of external Small-Volume Infusion Pumps (SVIP) at a cancer treatment and research center. Primary and secondary data were collected in three project phases. In Phase I, hospital prescription records (N = 14,979) represented SVIP adoption and utilization for the years 1982-1984. The Candidate Adoption-Use (CA-U) diffusion paradigm developed for this study was germane. Compared to classic and unorthodox curves, CA-U more accurately simulated empiric experience. The hospital SVIP 1983-1984 trends denoted assurance in prescribing chemotherapy and concomitant balloon SVIP efficacy and efficiency. Abandonment of battery pumps was predicted while exponential demand for balloon SVIP was forecast for 1985-1987. In Phase II, patients using SVIP (N = 117) were prospectively surveyed from July to October 1984; the data represented a single episode of therapy. The questionnaire and indices, specifically designed to measure the impact of SVIP, evinced face validity. Compeer group data were from pre-SVIP case reviews rather than from an inpatient sample. Statistically significant results indicated that outpatients using SVIP interacted socially more than inpatients using the alternative technology. Additionally, the hospital's education program effectively taught clients to discriminate between self care and professional SVIP services. In these contexts, there was sufficient evidence that the alternative technology restricted patients activity whereas SVIP permitted patients to function more independently and in a social lifestyle, thus adding quality to life. In Phase III, diffusion forecast and patient survey findings were combined with direct observation of clinic services to profile some economic dimensions of SVIP. These three project phases provide a foundation for executing: (1) cost effectiveness analysis of external versus internal infusors, (2) institutional resource allocation, and (3) technology deployment to epidemiology-significant communities. The models and methods tested in this research of clinical technology assessment are innovative and do assess biotechnology. ^