Folic acid fortification, maternal obesity and neural tube defects: Policy implications

In 1996, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) mandated that beginning in January 1998, flour and other enriched grain products be fortified with 140 μg of folic acid per 100 g of grain to prevent neural tube defects (NTDs) that occur in approximately 1 in 1,000 pregnancies in the United States (U.S.). Although this program has demonstrated important public health effects, it is argued that current fortification levels may not be enough to prevent all folic acid-preventable NTD cases. This study reviews published literature, on folic acid fortification in the U.S. and countries with mandatory folic acid fortification programs reported after 1992 and through January 2008. Published studies are evaluated to determine if the current level of folic acid fortification in the U.S. is adequate to prevent the most common forms of NTDs (spina bifida and anencephaly), particularly among overweight and obese women. ^ Although consistent improvement in blood folate levels of child bearing age women is reported in almost all studies, the RBC folate concentration has not reached the level associated with the most significant reduction of risk for NTDs (906 nmol/L); approximately half of the potentially preventable NTDs are prevented by fortification at the current U.S. level. Furthermore, the blood folate status of women in higher BMI categories (obese or overweight) has not improved as much as among women in lower BMI categories. Therefore, women classified as overweight or obese have not benefited from the preventive effects of folic acid fortification as much as normal or underweight women. ^ To reduce risk of folate preventable NTDs, especially in overweight and obese women, it may be necessary to increase the current level of folic acid fortification. However, further research is required to determine the optimal levels of fortification to achieve this goal without causing adverse health effects in the general population. ^

Hispanic incorporation and access to health care in Houston and Harris County, Texas: Adopting an Hispanic perspective to the Aday and Andersen model

This study examines Hispanic levels of incorporation and access to health care. Applying the Aday and Andersen framework for the study of access, the study examined the relationship between two levels of Hispanic incorporation into U.S. society, i.e., mainstream versus ethnic, and potential and realized measures of access to health care. Data for the study were drawn from a 1992 telephone survey of 600 randomly selected Hispanics in Houston and Harris County.^ The hypotheses tested were: (1) Hispanics who are incorporated into mainstream society are more likely to have better potential and realized access to health care than those who are incorporated into ethnic-group enclaves regardless of their socioeconomic status (SES), health status and health needs, and (2) there is no interaction between the levels of incorporation (mainstream or ethnic) and SES, health status, and health needs in predicting potential and realized access.^ The data analysis supported Hypothesis One for the two measures of potential access. The results of bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses indicated that for Hispanics in Houston and Harris County, being in the "mainstream" incorporation category increased their potential access to care, having "health insurance" and a "regular place of care". For the selected measure of realized access, having a "regular check-up", the analysis did not demonstrate statistically significant differences in having a regular check-up among Hispanics incorporated in the ethnic or mainstream incorporation categories.^ Hypothesis Two, that there is no interaction between the levels of incorporation and socioeconomic characteristics, health status, and health needs in predicting potential and realized access among Hispanics was supported by the data. The results of the logistic regression analysis showed that, after adjusting for socioeconomic status, health status, and health needs, the association between "level of incorporation" and the two measures of potential access ("health insurance" and having a "usual place of care") was not modified by the control variables nor by their interaction with level of incorporation. That is, the effect of incorporation on Hispanics' health insurance coverage, and having a usual place of care, was homogenous across Hispanics with different SES and health status.^ The main research implication of this dissertation is the employment of a theoretical framework for the assessment of cultural factors essential to research on migrating heterogeneous subpopulations. It also provided strategies to solve practical and methodological difficulties in the secondary analyses of data on these populations. ^