Towards the identification of a tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 3p12: Physical mapping and candidate gene screening

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common malignant tumor of the kidney. Characterization of RCC tumors indicates that the most frequent genetic event associated with the initiation of tumor formation involves a loss of heterozygosity or cytogenetic aberration on the short arm of human chromosome 3. A tumor suppressor locus Nonpapillary Renal Carcinoma-1 (NRC-1, OMIM ID 604442) has been previously mapped to a 5–7 cM region on chromosome 3p12 and shown to induce rapid tumor cell death in vivo, as demonstrated by functional complementation experiments. ^ To identify the gene that accounts for the tumor suppressor activities of NRC-1, fine-scale physical mapping was conducted with a novel real-time quantitative PCR based method developed in this study. As a result, NRC-1 was mapped within a 4.6-Mb region defined by two unique sequences within UniGene clusters Hs.41407 and Hs.371835 (78,545Kb–83,172Kb in the NCBI build 31 physical map). The involvement of a putative tumor suppressor gene Robo1/Dutt1 was excluded as a candidate for NRC-1. Furthermore, a transcript map containing eleven candidate genes was established for the 4.6-Mb region. Analyses of gene expression patterns with real-time quantitative RT-PCR assays showed that one of the eleven candidate genes in the interval (TSGc28) is down-regulated in 15 out of 20 tumor samples compared with matched normal samples. Three exons of this gene have been identified by RACE experiments, although additional exon(s) seem to exist. Further gene characterization and functional studies are required to confirm the gene as a true tumor suppressor gene. ^ To study the cellular functions of NRC-1, gene expression profiles of three tumor suppressive microcell hybrids, each containing a functional copy of NRC-1, were compared with those of the corresponding parental tumor cell lines using 16K oligonucleotide microarrays. Differentially expressed genes were identified. Analyses based on the Gene Ontology showed that introduction of NRC-1 into tumor cell lines activates genes in multiple cellular pathways, including cell cycle, signal transduction, cytokines and stress response. NRC-1 is likely to induce cell growth arrest indirectly through WEE1. ^

Targeted Deletion Of Functionally Validated Enhancers Defines Their Role in Mouse Limb Development

Transcriptional enhancers are genomic DNA sequences that contain clustered transcription factor (TF) binding sites. When combinations of TFs bind to enhancer sequences they act together with basal transcriptional machinery to regulate the timing, location and quantity of gene transcription. Elucidating the genetic mechanisms responsible for differential gene expression, including the role of enhancers, during embryological and postnatal development is essential to an understanding of evolutionary processes and disease etiology. Numerous methods are in use to identify and characterize enhancers. Several high-throughput methods generate large datasets of enhancer sequences with putative roles in embryonic development. However, few enhancers have been deleted from the genome to determine their roles in the development of specific structures, such as the limb. Manipulation of enhancers at their endogenous loci, such as the deletion of such elements, leads to a better understanding of the regulatory interactions, rules and complexities that contribute to faithful and variant gene transcription – the molecular genetic substrate of evolution and disease. To understand the endogenous roles of two distinct enhancers known to be active in the mouse embryo limb bud we deleted them from the mouse genome. I hypothesized that deletion of these enhancers would lead to aberrant limb development. The enhancers were selected because of their association with p300, a protein associated with active transcription, and because the human enhancer sequences drive distinct lacZ expression patterns in limb buds of embryonic day (E) 11.5 transgenic mice. To confirm that the orthologous mouse enhancers, mouse 280 and 1442 (M280 and M1442, respectively), regulate expression in the developing limb we generated stable transgenic lines, and examined lacZ expression. In M280-lacZ mice, expression was detected in E11.5 fore- and hindlimbs in a region that corresponds to digits II-IV. M1442-lacZ mice exhibited lacZ expression in posterior and anterior margins of the fore- and hindlimbs that overlapped with digits I and V and several wrist bones. We generated mice lacking the M280 and M1442 enhancers by gene targeting. Intercrosses between M280 -/+ and M1442 -/+, respectively, generated M280 and M1442 null mice, which are born at expected Mendelian ratios and manifest no gross limb malformations. Quantitative real-time PCR of mutant E11.5 limb buds indicated that significant changes in transcriptional output of enhancer-proximal genes accompanied the deletion of both M280 and M1442. In neonatal null mice we observed that all limb bones are present in their expected positions, an observation also confirmed by histology of E18.5 distal limbs. Fine-scale measurement of E18.5 digit bone lengths found no differences between mutant and control embryos. Furthermore, when the developmental progression of cartilaginous elements was analyzed in M280 and M1442 embryos from E13.5-E15.5, transient development defects were not detected. These results demonstrate that M280 and M1442 are not required for mouse limb development. Though M280 is not required for embryonic limb development it is required for the development and/or maintenance of body size – adult M280 mice are significantly smaller than control littermates. These studies highlight the importance of experiments that manipulate enhancers in situ to understand their contribution to development.