The Role of Consistency and Diversity in Building Knowledge in Family Preservation

Family preservation has been criticized for implementing programs that are not theoretically founded. One result of this circumstance is a lack of information regarding processes and outcomes of family preservation services. The knowledge base of family preservation is thus rather limited at present and will remain limited unless theory is consistently integrated within individual programs. A model for conceptualizing how theoretical consistency may be implemented within programs is presented and applied to family preservation. It is also necessary for programs to establish theoretical consistency before theoretical diversity, both within individual and across multiple programs, in order to advance the field in meaningful ways. A developmental cycle of knowledge generation is presented and applied to family preservation.

Family Preservation Journal, 1998, Volume 3, Issue 1. (Entire issue)

Entire issue (large pdf file) Articles include: The Role of Consistency and Diversity in Building Knowledge in Family Preservation. Debora J. Cavazos Dylla and Marianne Berry The Weekly Adjustment Indicators Checklist: An Application in the Child Welfare Field. Michael H. Epstein, Madhavi Jayanthi, Janet McKelvey, Deborah Holderness, Erin Frankenberry, Cassandra Lampkin, Molly McGrath, and Kari White Intensive Family Preservation Services: a Short History but a Long Past. Kellie B. Reed and Raymond S. Kirk Collaborative Conversations for Change: A Solution-Focused Approach to Family Centered Practice. Donald F. Fausel

Diversity of neuronal connexins in the mammalian retina

Many neurons in the mammalian retina are electrically coupled by intercellular channels or gap junctions, which are assembled from a family of proteins called connexins. Numerous studies indicate that gap junctions differ in properties such as conductance and tracer permeability. For example, A-type horizontal cell gap junctions are permeable to Lucifer Yellow, but B-type horizontal cell gap junctions are not. This suggests the two cell types express different connexins. My hypothesis is that multiple neuronal connexins are expressed in the mammalian retina in a cell type specific manner. Immunohistochemical techniques and confocal microscopy were used to localize certain connexins within well-defined neuronal circuits. The results of this study can be summarized as follows: AII amacrine cells, which receive direct input from rod bipolar cells, are well-coupled to neighboring AIIs. In addition, AII amacrine cells also form gap junctions with ON cone bipolar cells. This is a complex heterocellular network. In both rabbit and primate retina, connexin36 occurs at dendritic crossings in the AII matrix as well as between AIIs and ON cone bipolar cells. Coupling in the AII network is thought to reduce noise in the rod pathway while AII/bipolar gap junctions are required for the transmission of rod signals to ON ganglion cells. In the outer plexiform layer, connexin36 forms gap junctions between cones and between rods and cones via cone telodendria. Cone to cone coupling is thought to reduce noise and is partly color selective. Rod to cone coupling forms an alternative rod pathway thought to operate at intermediate light intensity. A-type horizontal cells in the rabbit retina are strongly coupled via massive low resistance gap junctions composed from Cx50. Coupling dramatically extends the receptive field of horizontal cells and the modulation of coupling is thought to change the strength of the feedback signal from horizontal cells to cones. Finally, there are other coupled networks, such as B-type horizontal cells and S1/S2 amacrine cells, which do not use either connexin36 or Cx50. These results confirm the hypothesis that multiple neuronal connexins are expressed in the mammalian retina and these connexins are localized to particular retinal circuits. ^

Diversity in T cell costimulation by alpha4beta1 integrin

T cell activation requires antigen-specific T cell receptor signals that spatially and temporally coincide with a second costimulatory signal. CD28 and α4β1 integrin both function as T cell costimulators, but their individual mechanisms remain elusive. By directly comparing CD3-dependent functions and signaling pathways employed by these two costimulatory receptors, aspects of their individual signaling mechanisms are explored. We determined that CD28 and α4β1 integrins both use Src-family kinase Lck and MAPK Erk, but to different extents and functional ends. After identifying functional differences between CD28 and integrin costimulatory pathways, the focus of the study turned to integrin signaling in naïve and memory T cell subsets. CD45RO T cells are fully co-activated by natural β1 integrin ligands fibronectin (FN) and VCAM-1, β1 monoclonal antibody 33B6, as well as α4β1 monoclonal antibody 19H8 which binds a combinatorial epitope of the α4β1 heterodimer. While CD28 fully costimulates CD45RA T cells, the degree of activation from integrin ligands varies. FN costimulates CD3-dependent proliferation, IL-2 secretion, and early activation markers CD25 and CD69. However, β1 antibody 33B6, which binds to the same T cell integrins (α4β1 and α5β1) as natural ligand FN, failed to costimulate proliferation or IL-2 in the CD45RA subset, but retained the ability to regulate CD25 and CD69. Unique aspects of 19H8 signaling involve early Erk activation and IL-2 independent proliferation. Signaling defects through 33B6 ligation correlates with poor adhesion under fluid flow conditions, suggesting a cytoskeletal basis for signaling. All together, these data provide evidence for a mechanism of α4β1 integrin signaling and describe functional differences between naïve and memory T cells. ^