Differential expression of urate oxidase in rat liver

An affinity-purified monospecific antibody was prepared to study the differential expression of the peroxisomal enzyme urate oxidase in rat liver during development and in various metabolic states. Monospecific antibody for urate oxidase was affinity purified from a pool of antibodies initially produced against a mixture of proteins from a Percoll density gradient fraction. Immunogold staining of samples of the gradient fraction and rat liver tissue with the affinity-purified antibody demonstrated labelling of peroxisomal core structures. Screening of liver homogenates from rats at different developmental stages using immunoblot analysis demonstrated low levels of urate oxidase prior to 20 days of age; at 20 days of age, urate oxidase levels are 2-fold greater than the 15-day old levels and approximate adult levels. Catalase expression during rat development mimicked the differential expression pattern of urate oxidase. The increase between days 15 and 20 was determined to be independent of the process of weaning. Administration of exogenous glucocorticoid hormone to 10-day old rats resulted in a precocious rise (2.5-fold) in urate oxidase levels, but adrenalectomy at 10 days of age did not cause decreased expression in the fourth week of life. In adult animals, exogenous glucocorticoid did not influence urate oxidase levels, but adrenalectomized rats had urate oxidase levels that were 40 percent of control expression 4 days post-surgery. Catalase expression was not influenced by glucocorticoid status in these studies. Glucocorticoid regulation of urate oxidase expression appears to be one part of a more complex mechanism controlling levels of the enzyme. Exogenous glucocorticoid administration influenced urate oxidase levels in an age-dependent manner; in addition, it is possible that the control mechanism for urate oxidase may include factors which can modulate expression in the absence of glucocorticoids. The effect of glucocorticoids on urate oxidase expression can not be extended to include all peroxisomal proteins, since catalase is unaffected. Glucocorticoids appear to participate in the complex regulation of urate oxidase expression; glucocorticoids influence urate oxidase specifically and do not modulate all peroxisomal proteins. ^

Expression and regulation of a hematopoietic proteoglycan core protein gene during hematopoiesis

Factors involved in regulating tissue specific gene expression play a major role in cell differentiation. In order to further understand the differentiation events occurring during hematopoiesis, a myeloid specific gene was characterized, the expression pattern during hematopoiesis was analyzed, and the mechanisms governing its regulation were assessed. Previously, our laboratory isolated an anonymous cDNA clone, pD-D1, which displayed preferential expression in myeloid cells. From nucleotide sequencing of overlapping cDNA clones I determined that the D-D1 message encodes a hematopoietic proteoglycan core protein (HpPG). The expression pattern of the gene was assessed by in situ hybridization of bone marrow and peripheral blood samples. The gene was shown to be expressed, at variable levels, in all leukocytes analyzed, including cells from every stage of neutrophil development. In an attempt to ascertain the differentiation time point in which the HpPG gene is initially expressed, more immature populations of leukemic myeloblasts were assessed by northern blot analysis. Though the initial point of expression was not obtained, an up-regulatory event was discovered corresponding to a time point in which granule genesis occurs. This finding is consistent with prior observations of extensive packaging of proteoglycans into the secretory granules of granule producing hematopoietic cells. The HpPG gene was also found to be expressed at low levels in all stages of lymphocyte development analyzed, suggesting that the HpPG gene is initially expressed before the decision for myeloid-lymphoid differentiation. To assess the mechanism for the up-regulatory event, a K562 in vitro megakaryocytic differentiation system was used. Nuclear run-off analyses in this system demonstrated the up-regulation to be under transcriptional control. In addition, the HpPG gene was found to be down regulated during macrophage differentiation of HL60 cells and was also shown to be transcriptionally controlled. These results indicate that there are multiple points of transcriptional regulation of the HpPG gene during differentiation. Furthermore, the factors regulating the gene at these time points are likely to play an important role in the differentiation of granule producing cells and macrophages. ^

Analysis of endogenous retinoic acid receptor expression and function in murine melanoma cells

There have been numerous reports over the past several years on the ability of vitamin A analogs (retinoids) to modulate cell proliferation, malignant transformation, morphogenesis, and differentiation in a wide variety of cell types and organisms. Two families of nuclear retinoid-inducible, trans-acting, transcription-enhancing receptors that bear strong DNA sequence homology to thyroid and steroid hormone receptors have recently been discovered. The retinoic acid receptors (RARs) and retinoid X receptors (RXRs) each have at least three types designated $\alpha,$ $\beta,$ and $\gamma,$ which are encoded by separate genes and expressed in a tissue and cell type-specific manner. We have been interested in the mechanism by which retinoids inhibit tumor cell proliferation and induce differentiation. As a model system we have employed several murine melanoma cell lines (S91-C2, K1735P, and B16-F1), which are sensitive to the growth-inhibitory and differentiation-inducing effects of RA, as well as a RA-resistant subclone of one of the cell lines (S91-C154), in order to study the role of the nuclear RARs in these effects. The initial phase of this project consisted of the characterization of the expression pattern of the three known RAR and RXR types in the murine melanoma cell lines in order to determine whether any differences exist which may elucidate a role for any of the receptors in RA-induced growth inhibition and differentiation. The novel finding was made that the RAR-$\beta$ gene is rapidly induced from undetectable levels by RA treatment at the mRNA and protein level, and that the induction of RAR-$\beta$ by other biologically active retinoids correlated with their ability to inhibit the growth of the highly RA-sensitive S91-C2 cell line. This suggests a role for RAR-$\beta$ in the growth inhibiting effect of retinoids. The second phase of this project involves the stable expression of RAR-$\beta$ in the S91-C2 cells and the RAR-$\beta$ receptor-null cell line, K1735P. These studies have indicated an inverse correlation between RAR-$\beta$ expression and proliferation rate. ^

Gene expression in sea urchin development: Study of {\it LpS1\/} gene regulation and cloning and characterization of the {\it SpKrox}-{\it 1\/} gene

Cell differentiation are associated with activation of cell lineage-specific genes. The $LpS{\it 1}\beta$ gene of Lytechinus pictus is activated at the late cleavage stage. $LpS{\it 1}\beta$ transcripts accumulate exclusively in aboral ectoderm lineages. Previous studies demonstrated two G-string DNA-elements, proximal and distal G-strings, which bind to an ectoderm-enriched nuclear factor. In order to define the cis-elements which control positive expression of the $LpS{\it 1}\beta$ gene, the regulatory region from $-$108 to +17 bp of the $LpS{\it 1}\beta$ gene promoter was characterized. The ectoderm G-string factor binds to a G/C-rich region larger than the G-string itself and the binding of the G-string factor requires sequences immediately downstream from the G-string. These downstream sequences are essential for full promoter activity. In addition, only 108 bp of $LpS{\it 1}\beta\ 5\sp\prime$ flanking DNA drives $LpS{\it 1}\beta$ gene expression in aboral ectoderm/mesenchyme cells. Therefore, for positive control of $LpS{\it 1}\beta$ gene expression, two regions of 5$\sp\prime$ flanking DNA are required: region I from base pairs $-$762 to $-$511, and region II, which includes the G/C-rich element, from base pairs $-$108 to $-$61. A mesenchyme cell repressor element is located within region I.^ DNA-binding proteins play key roles in determination of cell differentiation. The zinc finger domain is a DNA-binding domain present in many transcription factors. Based on homologies in zinc fingers, a zinc finger-encoding gene, SpKrox-1, was cloned from S. purpuratus. The putative SpKrox-1 protein has all structural characteristics of a transcription factor: four zinc fingers for DNA binding; acidic domain for transactivation; basic domain for nuclear targeting; and leucine zipper for dimerization. SpKrox-1 RNA transcripts showed a transient expression pattern which correlates largely with early embryonic development. The spatial expression of SpKrox-1 mRNA was distributed throughout the gastrula and larva ectodermal wall. However, SpKrox-1 was not expressed in pigment cells. The SpKrox-1 gene is thus a marker of a subset of SMCs or ectoderm cells. The structural features, and the transient temporal and restricted spatial expression patterns suggest that SpKrox-1 plays a role in a specific developmental event. ^

Comparative studies of Hox genes in mammalian limb and vertebral pattern formation

Divergence of anterior-posterior (AP) limb pattern and differences in vertebral column morphology are the two main examples of mammalian evolution. The Hox genes (homeobox containing gene) have been implicated in driving evolution of these structures. However, regarding Hox genes, how they contribute to the generation of mammalian morphological diversities, is still unclear. Implementing comparative gene expression and phenotypic rescue studies for different mammalian Hox genes could aid in unraveling this mystery. In the first part of this thesis, the expression pattern of Hoxd13 gene, a key Hox gene in the establishment of the limb AP pattern, was examined in developing limbs of bats and mice. Bat forelimbs exhibit a pronounced asymmetric AP pattern and offer a good model to study the molecular mechanisms that contribute to the variety of mammalian limbs. The data showed that the expression domain of bat Hoxd13 was shifted prior to the asymmetric limb plate expansion, whereas its domain in mice was much more symmetric. This finding reveals a correlation between the divergence of Hoxd13 expression and the AP patterning difference in limb development. The second part of this thesis details a phenotypic rescue approach by human HOXB1-9 transgenes in mice with Hoxb1-9 deletion, The mouse mutants displayed homeosis in cervical and anterior thoracic vertebrae. The human transgenes entirely rescued the mouse mutants, suggesting that these human HOX genes have similar functions to their mouse orthologues in anterior axial skeletal patterning. The anterior expressing human HOXB transgenes such as HOXB1-3 were expressed in the mouse embryonic trunk in a similar manner as their murine orthologues. However, the anterior boundary of human HOXB9 expression domain was more posterior than that of the mouse Hoxb9 by 2-3 somites. These data provide the molecular support for the hypothesis that Hox genes are responsible for maintaining similar anterior axial skeletal architectures cervical and anterior thoracic regions, but different architectures in lumbar and posterior thoracic regions between humans and mice. ^

Transcriptional and translational regulators of gene expression in germ cell development

Germ cell development is a highly coordinated process driven, in part, by regulatory mechanisms that control gene expression. Not only transcription, but also translation, is under regulatory control to direct proper germ cell development. In this dissertation, I have focused on two regulators of germ cell development. One is the homeobox protein RHOX10, which has the potential to be both a transcriptional and translational regulator in mouse male germ cell development. The other is the RNA-binding protein, Hermes, which functions as a translational regulator in Xenopus laevis female germ cell development. ^ Rhox10 is a member of reproductive homeobox gene X-(linked (Rhox) gene cluster, of which expression is developmentally regulated in developing mouse testes. To identify the cell types and developmental stages in which Rhox10 might function, I characterized its temporal and spatial expression pattern in mouse embryonic, neonatal, and adult tissues. Among other things, this analysis revealed that both the level and the subcellular localization of RHOX10 are regulated during germ cell development. To understand the role of Rhox10 in germ cell development, I generated transgenic mice expressing an artificial microRNA (miRNA) targeting Rhox10. While this artificial miRNA robustly downregulated RHOX10 protein expression in vitro, it did not significantly reduce RHOX10 expression in vivo. So I next elected to knockdown RHOX10 levels in spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs), which I found highly express both Rhox10 mRNA and RHOX10 protein. Using a recently developed in vitro culture system for SSCs combined with a short-hairpin RNA (shRNA) approach, I strongly depleted RHOX10 expression in SSCs. These RHOX10-depleted cells exhibited a defect in the ability to form stem cell clusters in vitro. Expression profiling analysis revealed many genes regulated by Rhox10, including many meiotic genes, which could be downstream of Rhox10 in a molecular pathway that controls SSC differentiation. ^ RNA recognition motif (RRM) containing protein, Hermes is localized in germ plasm, where dormant mRNAs are also located, of Xenopus oocytes, which implicates its role in translational regulator. To understand the function of Hermes in oocyte meiosis, I used a morpholino oligonucleotide (MO) based knockdown approach. Microinjection of Hermes MO into fully grown oocytes, which are arrested in meiotic prophase, caused acceleration of oocytes reentry into meiosis (i.e., maturation) upon progesterone induction. Using a candidate approach, I identified at least three targets of Hermes: Ringo/Spy, Xcat2, and Mos. Ringo/Spy and Mos are known to have functions in oocyte maturation, while Ringo/Spy, Xcat2 mRNA are localized in the germ plasm of oocytes, which drives germ cell specification after fertilization. This led me to propose that Hermes functions in both oocyte maturation and germ cell development through its ability to regulate 3 crucial target mRNAs. ^

Minimal DNA sequences that control the cell lineage-specific expression of the pro$\alpha$2(I) collagen promoter in transgenic mice

The pattern of expression of the pro$\alpha$2(I) collagen gene is highly tissue-specific in adult mice and shows its strongest expression in bones, tendons, and skin. Transgenic mice were generated harboring promoter fragments of the mouse pro$\alpha$2(I) collagen gene linked to the Escherichia coli $\beta$-galactosidase or firefly luciferase genes to examine the activity of these promoters during development. A region of the mouse pro$\alpha$2(I) collagen promoter between $-$2000 and +54 exhibited a pattern of $\beta$-galactosidase activity during embryonic development that corresponded to the expression pattern of the endogenous pro$\alpha$2(I) collagen gene as determined by in situ hybridization. A similar pattern of activity was also observed with much smaller promoter fragments containing either 500 or 350 bp of upstream sequence relative to the start of transcription. Embryonic regions expressing high levels of $\beta$-galactosidase activity included the valves of the developing heart, sclerotomes, meninges, limb buds, connective tissue fascia between muscle fibers, osteoblasts, tendon, periosteum, dermis, and peritoneal membranes. The pattern of $\beta$-galactosidase activity was similar to the extracellular immunohistochemical localization of transforming growth factor-$\beta$1 (TGF-$\beta$1). The $-$315 to $-$284 region of the pro$\alpha$2(I) collagen promoter was previously shown to mediate the stimulatory effects of TGF-$\beta$1 on the pro$\alpha$2(I) collagen promoter in DNA transfection experiments with cultured fibroblasts. A construct containing this sequence tandemly repeated 5$\sp\prime$ to both a very short $\alpha$2(I) collagen promoter ($-$40 to +54) and a heterologous minimal promoter showed preferential activity in tail and skin of 4-week old transgenic mice. The pattern of expression mimics that of the $-$350 to +54 pro$\alpha$2(I) collagen promoter linked to a luciferase reporter gene in transgenic mice. ^

Transcriptional repression of serum amyloid A1 by AP -2 contributes to its liver -specific expression

Studies on the transcriptional regulation of serum amyloid A1 (SAA1) gene, a liver specific acute-phase gene, identified a regulatory element in its promoter that functioned to repress (SAA1) gene transcription in nonliver cells. This silencer element interacts with a nuclear protein that is detectable in HeLa cells, fibroblasts and placental tissues but not in liver or liver-derived cells. As the expression pattern of this repressor is consistent with its potential regulatory role in repressing SAA1 expression, and that many other liver gene promoters also contain this repressor binding site, we sought to investigate whether this repressor may have a broader functional role in repressing liver genes. ^ We have utilized protein purification, cell culture, transient and stable gene transfection, and molecular biology approaches to identify this protein and investigate its possible function in the regulation of (SAA1) and other liver genes. Analyses of amino acid sequence of the purified nuclear protein, and western blot and gel shift studies identified the repressor as transcription factor AP-2 or AP-2-like protein. Using transient transfection of DNA into cultured cells, we demonstrate that AP-2 can indeed function as a repressor to inhibit transcription of SAA1 gene promoter. This conclusion is supported by the following experimental results: (1) overexpression of AP-2 in hepatoma cells inhibits conditioned medium (CM)-induced expression of SAA1 promoter; (2) binding of AP-2 to the SAA1 promoter is required for AP-2 repression function; (3) one mechanism by which AP-2 inhibits SAA1 may be by antagonizing the activation function of the strong transactivator NFκB; (4) mutation of AP-2 binding sites results in derepression of SAM promoter in HeLa cells; and (5) inhibition of endogenous AP-2 activity by a dominant-negative mutant abolishes AP-2's inhibitory effect on SAM promoter in HeLa cells. In addition to the SAM promoter, AP-2 also can bind to the promoter regions of six other liver genes tested, suggesting that it may have a broad functional role in restricting the expression of many liver genes in nonliver cells. Consistent with this notion, ectopic expression of AP-2 also represses CM-mediated activation of human third component of complement 3 promoter. Finally, in AP-2-expressing stable hepatoma cell lines, AP-2 inhibits not only the expression of endogenous SAA, but also the expression of several other endogenous liver genes including albumin, α-fetoprotein. ^ Our findings that AP-2 has the ability to repress the expression of liver genes in nonliver cells opens a new avenue of investigation of negative regulation of gene transcription, and should improve our understanding of tissue-specific expression of liver genes. In summary, our data provide evidence suggesting a novel role of AP-2 as a repressor, inhibiting the expression of liver genes in nonliver cells. Thus, the tissue-specific expression of AP-2 may constitute an important mechanism contributing to the liver-specific expression of liver genes. ^

CELLULAR AND DEVELOPMENTAL FUNCTIONS OF THE XENOPUS ARVCF-CATENIN:KAZRIN COMPLEX

Xenopus ARVCF (xARVCF), a member of p120-catenin subfamily, binds cadherin cytoplasmic domains to enhance cadherin metabolic stability, or when dissociated, modulates Rho-family GTPases. We previously found that xARVCF binds directly to Xenopus KazrinA (xKazrinA), a widely expressed, conserved protein that bears little homology to established protein families. xKazrinA is also known to influence keratinocyte proliferation-differentiation and cytoskeletal activity. In my study, I first evaluated the expression pattern of endogenous Kazrin RNA and protein in Xenopus embryogenesis as well as in adult tissues. We then collaboratively predicted the helical structure of Kazrin’s coiled-coil domain, and I obtained evidence of Kazrin’s dimerization/oligomerization. In considering the intracellular localization of the xARVCF-catenin:xKazrin complex, I did not resolve xKazrinA in a larger ternary complex with cadherin, nor did I detect its co-precipitation with core desmosomal components. Instead, screening revealed that xKazrinA binds spectrin. This suggested a potential means by which xKazrinA localizes to cell-cell junctions, and indeed, biochemical assays confirmed a ternary xARVCF:xKazrinA:xβ2-spectrin complex. Functionally, I demonstrated that xKazrin stabilizes cadherins by negatively modulating the RhoA small-GTPase. I further revealed that xKazrinA binds to p190B RhoGAP (an inhibitor of RhoA), and enhances p190B’s association with xARVCF. Supporting their functional interaction in vivo, Xenopus embryos depleted of xKazrin exhibited ectodermal shedding, a phenotype that could be rescued with exogenous xARVCF. Cell shedding appeared to be caused by RhoA activation, which consequently altered actin organization and cadherin function. Indeed, I was capable of rescuing Kazrin depletion with ectopic expression of p190B RhoGAP. In addition, I obtained evidence that xARVCF and xKazrin participate in craniofacial development, with effects observed upon the neural crest. Finally, I found that xKazrinA associates further with delta-catenin and p0071-catenin, but not with p120-catenin, suggesting that Kazrin interacts selectively with additional members of the p120-catenin sub-family. Taken together, my study supports Kazrin’s essential role in development, and reveals KazrinA’s biochemical and functional association with ARVCF-catenin, spectrin and p190B RhoGAP.

Positional cloning and characterization of the human aniridia and murine small eye genes

Aniridia (AN) is a congenital, panocular disorder of the eye characterized by the complete or partial absence of the iris. The disease can occur in both the sporadic and familial forms which, in the latter case, is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait with high penetrance. The objective of this study was to isolate and characterize the genes involved in AN and Sey, and thereby to gain a better understanding of the molecular basis of the two disorders.^ Using a positional cloning strategy, I have approached and cloned from the AN locus in human chromosomal band 11p13 a cDNA that is deleted in two patients with AN. The deletions in these patients overlap by about 70 kb and encompass the 3$\sp\prime$ end of the cDNA. This cDNA detects a 2.7 kb mRNA encoded by a transcription unit estimated to span approximately 50 kb of genomic DNA. The message is specifically expressed in all tissues affected in all forms of AN, namely within the presumptive iris, lens, neuroretina, the superficial layers of the cornea, the olfactory bulbs, and the cerebellum. Sequence analysis of the AN cDNA revealed a number of motifs characteristic of certain transcription factors. Chief among these are the presence of the paired domain, the homeodomain, and a carboxy-terminal domain rich in serine, threonine and proline residues. The overall structure shows high homology to the Drosophila segmentation gene paired and members of the murine Pax family of developmental control genes.^ Utilizing a conserved human genomic DNA sequence as probe, I was able to isolate an embryonic murine cDNA which is over 92% homologous in nucleotide sequence and virtually identical at the amino acid level to the human AN cDNA. The expression pattern of the murine gene is the same as that in man, supporting the conclusion that it probably corresponds to the Sey gene. Its specific expression in the neuroectodermal component of the eye, in glioblastomas, but not in the neural crest-derived PC12 pheochromocytoma cell line, suggests that a defect in neuroectodermal rather mesodermal development might be the common etiological factor underlying AN and Sey. ^

Regulation of {\it myogenin\/} transcription during mouse embryogenesis

The formation of skeletal muscle during vertebrate development involves the induction of mesoderm and subsequent generation of myoblasts that ultimately differentiate into mature muscles. The recent identification of a group of myogenic regulators that can convert fibroblasts to myoblasts has contributed to our understanding of the molecular events that underlie the establishment of the skeletal muscle phenotype. Members of this group of myogenic regulators share a helix-loop-helix (HLH) motif that mediates DNA binding. The myogenic HLH proteins bind to the consensus sequence CANNTG, referred to as an E-box, and activate muscle-specific transcription. In addition to E-boxes, other motifs, such as the MEF-2 binding site, have been shown to mediate muscle-specific transcription. The myogenic HLH proteins are expressed in the myogenic precursors in somites and limb buds, and in differentiated muscle fibers during embryogenesis, consistent with their roles as regulators for muscle development. The myogenic HLH proteins appear to auto-activate their own and cross-activate one another's expression in cultured cells. Myogenin is one of the myogenic HLH proteins and likely the regulator for terminal muscle differentiation. Myogenin is a common target of diverse regulatory pathways. To search for upstream regulators of myogenin, we studied regulation of myogenin transcription during mouse embryogenesis. We showed that the myogenin promoter contains a binding site for MEF-2, which can mediate indirectly the autoregulation of myogenin transcription. We found that a transgene under the control of a 1.5 kb 5$\sp\prime$ flanking sequence can recapitulate the temporal and spatial expression pattern of the endogenous myogenin gene during mouse embryogenesis. By tracing embryonic cells that activate myogenin-lacZ during embryogenesis, we found no evidence that lacZ was expressed in myogenic precursors migrating from somites to limb buds, suggesting the existence of regulators other than myogenic HLH proteins that can maintain cells in the myogenic lineage. Mutations of an E-box and a MEF-2 site in the myogenin promoter suppressed transcription in subsets of myogenic precursors in mouse embryos. These results suggest that myogenic HLH proteins and MEF-2 participate in separable regulatory pathways controlling myogenin transcription and provide evidence for positional regulation of myogenic regulators in the embryo. ^

Accessing novel developmental mechanisms in the mouse by gene trapping

Genetic analysis is a powerful method for analyzing the function of specific genes in development. I sought to identify novel genes in the mouse using a genetic analysis relying on the expression pattern and phenotype of mutated genes. To this end, I have conducted a gene trap screen using the vector $\rm SA\beta geo,$ a promoterless DNA construct that encodes a fusion protein with lacZ and neomycin resistance activities. Productive integration and expression of the $\beta$geo protein in embryonic stem (ES) cells requires integration into an active transcription unit. The endogenous regulatory elements direct reporter gene expression which reflects the expression of the endogenous gene. Of eight mouse lines generated from gene trap ES cell clones, four showed differential regulation of $\beta$geo activity during embryogenesis. These four were analyzed in more detail.^ Three of the lines RNA 1, RNA2 and RNA 3 had similar expression patterns, within subsets of cells in sites of embryonic hematopoiesis. Cloning of the trapped genes revealed that all three integrations had occurred within 45S rRNA precursor transcription units. These results imply that there exists in these cells some mechanism responsible for the efficient production of the $\beta$geo protein from an RNA polymerase I transcript that is not present in most of the cells in the embryo.^ The fourth line, GT-2, showed widespread, dynamic expression. Many of the sites of expression were important classic embryonic induction systems. Cloning of the sequences fused to the $5\sp\prime$ end of the $\beta$geo sequence revealed that the trapped gene contained significant sequence homology with a previously identified human sequence HumORF5. An open reading frame of this sequence is homologous to a group of eukaryotic proteins that are members of the RNA helicase superfamily I.^ Analysis of the gene trap lines suggests that potentially novel developmental mechanisms have been uncovered. In the case of RNA 1, 2 and 3, the differential production of ribosomal RNAs may be required for differentiation or function of the $\beta$geo positive hematopoietic cells. In the GT-2 line, a previously unsuspected temporal and spatial regulation of a putative RNA helicase implies a role for this activity during specific aspects of mouse development. ^

Functional studies of the homeobox gene {\it Goosecoid\/} during mouse embryogenesis

A fundamental question in developmental biology is to understand the mechanisms that govern the development of an adult individual from a single cell. Goosecoid (Gsc) is an evolutionarily conserved homeobox gene that has been cloned in vertebrates and in Drosophila. In mice, Gsc is first expressed during gastrulation stages where it marks anterior structures of the embryo, this pattern of expression is conserved among vertebrates. Later, expression is observed during organogenesis of the head, limbs and the trunk. The conserved pattern of expression of Gsc during gastrulation and gain of function experiments in Xenopus suggested a function for Gsc in the development of anterior structures in vertebrates. Also, its expression pattern in mouse suggested a role in morphogenesis of the head, limbs and trunk. To determine the functional requirement of Gsc in mice a loss of function mutation was generated by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells and mice mutant for Gsc were generated.^ Gsc-null mice survived to birth but died hours after delivery. Phenotypic analysis revealed craniofacial and rib cage abnormalities that correlated with the second phase of Gsc expression in the head and trunk but no anomalies were found that correlated with its pattern of expression during gastrulation or limb development.^ To determine the mode of action of Gsc during craniofacial development aggregation chimeras were generated between Gsc-null and wild-type embryos. Chimeras were generated by the aggregation of cleavage stage embryos, taking advantage of two different Gsc-null alleles generated during gene targeting. Chimeras demonstrated a cell-autonomous function for Gsc during craniofacial development and a requirement for Gsc function in cartilage and mesenchymal tissues.^ Thus, during embryogenesis in mice, Gsc is not an essential component of gastrulation as had been suggested in previous experiments. Gsc is required for craniofacial development where it acts cell autonomously in cartilage and mesenchymal tissues. Gsc is also required for proper development of the rib cage but it is dispensable for limb development in mice. ^

Transcriptional regulation of the human {\it PAX6\/} gene

PAX6, a member of the paired-type homeobox gene family, is expressed in a partially and temporally restricted pattern in the developing central nervous system, and its mutation is responsible for human aniridia (AN) and mouse small eye (Sey). The objective of this study was to characterize the PAX6 gene regulation at the transcriptional level, and thereby gain a better understanding of the molecular basis of the dynamic expression pattern and the diversified function of the human PAX6 gene.^ Initially, we examined the transcriptional regulation of the PAX6 gene by transient transfection assays and identified multiple cis-regulatory elements that function differently in different cell lines. The transcriptional initiation site was identified by RNase protection and primer extension assays. Examination of the genomic DNA sequence indicated that the PAX6 promoter has a TATA like-box (ATATTTT) at $-$26 bp, and two CCAAT-boxes are located at positions $-$70 and $-$100 bp. A 38 bp ply (CA) sequence was located 992 bp upstream from the initiation site. Transient transfection assays in glioblastoma cells and leukemia cells indicate that a 92 bp region was required for basal level PAX6 promoter activity. Gel retardation assays showed that this 92 bp sequence can form four DNA-protein complexes which can be specifically competed by a 31-mer oligonucleotide containing a PAX6 TATA-like sequence or an adenovirus TATA box. The activation of the promoter is positively correlated with the expression of PAX6 transcripts in cells tested.^ Based on the results obtained from the in vitro transfection assays, we did further dissection assay and functional analysis in both cell-culture and transgenic mice. We found that a 5 kb upstream promoter sequence is required for the tissue specific expression in the forebrain region which is consistent with that of the endogenous PAX6 gene. A 267 bp cell-type specific repressor located within the 5 kb fragment was identified and shown to direct forebrain specific expression. The cell-type specific repressor element has been narrowed to a 30 bp region which contains a consensus E-box by in vitro transfection assays. The third regulatory element identified was contained in a 162 bp sequence (+167 to +328) which functions as a midbrain repressor, and it appeared to be required for establishing the normal expression pattern of the PAX6 gene. Finally, a highly conserved 216 bp sequence identified in intron 4 exhibited as a spinal cord specific enhancer. And this 216 bp cis-regulatory element can be used as a marker to trace the differentiation and migration of progenitor cells in the developing spinal cord. These studies show that the concerted action of multiple cis-acting regulatory elements located upstream and downstream of the transcription initiation site determines the tissue specific expression of PAX6 gene. ^

Study of retinoic acid signaling in cancer cells: Cloning and characterization of retinoic acid responsive genes

Retinoids such as all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) are promising agents for cancer chemoprevention and therapy. ATRA can cause growth inhibition, induction of differentiation and apoptosis of a variety of cancer cells. These effects are thought to be mediated by nuclear retinoids receptors which are involved in ligand-dependent transcriptional activation of downstream target genes. Using differential display, we identified several retinoic acid responsive genes in the head and neck squamous carcinoma cells and lung cancer cells, including tissue type transglutaminase, cytochrome P450-related retinoic acid hydroxylase, and a novel gene, designated RAIG1. RAIG1 has two transcripts of 2.4 and 6.8 kbp, respectively, that are generated by alternative selection of polyadenylation sites. Both transcripts have the same open reading frame that encodes a protein comprised of 357 amino acid residues. The deduced RAIG1 protein sequence contains seven transmembrane domains, a signature structure of G protein-coupled receptors. RAIG1 mRNA is expressed at high level in fetal and adult lung tissues. Induction of RAIG1 expression by ATRA is rapid and dose-dependent. A fusion protein of RAIG1 and the green fluorescent protein was localized in the cell surface membrane and perinuclear vesicles in transiently transfected cells. The locus for RAIG1 gene was mapped to a region between D12S358 and D12S847 on chromosome 12p12.3-p13. Our study of the novel retinoic acid induced gene RAIG1 provide evidence for a possible interaction between retinoid and G protein signaling pathways.^ We further examined RAIG1 expression pattern in a panel of 84 cancer cell lines of different origin. The expression level varies greatly from very high to non-detectable. We selected a panel of different cancer cells to study the effects of retinoids and other differentiation agents. We observed: (1) In most cases, retinoids (including all-trans retinoic acid, 4HPR, CD437) could induce the expression of RAIG-1 in cells from cancers of the breast, colon, head and neck, lung, ovarian and prostate. (2) Compare to retinoids, butyrate is often a more potent inducer of RAIG-1 expression in many cancer cells. (3) Butyrate, Phenylacetate butyrate, (R)P-Butyrate and (S)P-Butyrate have different impact on RAIG1 expression which varies among different cell lines. Our results indicate that retinoids could restore RAIG1 expression that is down-regulated in many cancer cells.^ A mouse homologous gene, mRAIG1, was cloned by 5$\sp\prime$ RACE reaction. mRAIG1 cDNA has 2105 bp and shares 63% identity with RAIG1 cDNA. mRAIG1 encodes a polypeptide of 356 amino acid which is 76% identity with RAIG1 protein. mRAIG1 protein also has seven transmembrane domains which are structurally identical to those of RAIG1 protein. Only one 2.2 kbp mRAIG1 transcript could be detected. The mRAIG1 mRNA is also highly expressed in lung tissue. The expression of mRAIG1 gene could be induced by ATRA in several mouse embryonal carcinoma cells. The induction of mRAIG1 expression is associated with retinoic acid-induced neuroectoderm differentiation of P19 cells. Similarity in cDNA and protein sequence, secondary structure, tissue distribution and inducible expression by retinoic acid strongly suggest that the mouse gene is the homologue of the human RAIG1 gene. ^