THE DOMAINS OF THE CATALYTIC SUBUNIT OF THE EUKARYOTIC RNA DEGRADING EXOSOME, RRP44P, HAVE DISTINCT FUNCTIONS

The exosome is a 3’ to 5’ exoribonuclease complex that consists of ten essential subunits. In the cytoplasm, the exosome degrades mRNA in a general mRNA turnover pathway and in several mRNA surveillance pathways. In the nucleus, the exosome processes RNA precursors to form small, stable, mature RNA species, including rRNA, snRNA, and snoRNA. In addition to processing these RNAs, the nuclear exosome is also involved in degrading aberrantly processed forms of these RNAs, and others, including mRNA. The 3’ to 5’ exoribonuclease activity of the exosome is contributed by the RNB domain of the only catalytically active subunit, Rrp44p, a member of the RNase II family of enzymes. In addition to the RNB domain, Rrp44p consists of three putative RNA binding domains and has an uncharacterized N-terminus, which includes a CR3 region and PIN domain. In an effort to characterize the cellular functions of the domains of Rrp44p, this study identified a second nuclease active site in the PIN domain. Specifically, the PIN domain exhibits endoribonuclease activity in vitro and is essential for exosome function. Further analysis of the nuclease activities of Rrp44p indicate a role for the exoribonuclease activity of Rrp44p in the cytoplasmic and nuclear exosome. This work has also characterized the CR3 region of Rrp44p, a region that has not yet been characterized in any other protein. This region is needed for the majority, if not all, of the cytoplasmic exosome functions as well as for interaction with the exosome. The CR3 region, along with a histidine residue in the N-terminus of Rrp44p, may coordinate a zinc atom. Preliminary evidence supports a role for this coordination in exosome function. Further investigation, however, is needed to determine the molecular dependence of the exosome on the CR3 region of Rrp44p. Despite its initial discovery thirteen years ago, the essential function of Rrp44p, and the exosome, is not yet known. The studies presented here, however, indicate that the essential function of Rrp44p and the exosome is in the nucleus and depends on the nuclease activities of Rrp44p.

The Role of the Arched Helicases in Exosome-Mediated Function

RNA processing and degradation are two important functions that control gene expression and promote RNA fidelity in the cell. A major ribonuclease complex, called the exosome, is involved in both of these processes. The exosome is composed of ten essential proteins with only one catalytically active subunit, called Rrp44. While the same ten essential subunits make up both the nuclear and cytoplasmic exosome, there are nuclear and cytoplasmic exosome cofactors that promote specific exosome functions in each of the cell compartments. To date, it is unclear how the exosome distinguishes between RNA substrates. We hypothesize that compartment specific cofactors may promote the substrate specificity of the exosome. In this work, I characterize several cofactors of the exosome, both nuclear and cytoplasmic. First, I describe the arch domain, which is a unique domain in a nuclear and a cytoplasmic cofactor of the exosome. Specifically, I show that the arch domain of the nuclear exosome cofactor, Mtr4, is required for specific exosome-mediated activities and overlaps functionally with the exosome-associated exonuclease, Rrp6. Further, I show that the arch domain of Ski2 is required for the degradation of normal and aberrant mRNAs. Additionally, this work describes in detail the Mtr4 domains involved in the physical association with other RNA processing proteins. Further, I characterize the minimal Mtr4-binding region in a third exosome cofactor, Trf5. Understanding how exosome cofactors synergistically promote exosome function will provide us a better understanding of how the exosome complex precisely regulates its catalytic activities. As described here, cofactors play a major role in determining the substrate specificity of the nuclear and cytoplasmic exosome. Moreover, specific accessory domains, which are not involved in the catalytic function of the cofactor, are required for substrate targeting of the eukaryotic RNA exosome.

Mechanisms by which nonsense codons downregulate T-cell receptor transcripts

Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) is a quality control mechanism that degrades aberrant mRNAs harboring premature termination codons (PTCs). Two out of three T-cell receptor β (TCRβ) transcripts carry PTCs as a result of error-prone programmed rearrangements that occur at this locus during lymphocyte maturation. PTCs decrease TCRβ mRNA levels to a much greater extent than mRNAs transcribed from non-rearranging genes. This robust decrease in TCRβ mRNA levels is not a unique characteristic of the T-cell environment or the TCRβ promoter. The simplest explanation for this is that PTC-bearing TCRβ mRNAs elicit a stronger NMD response. An alternative explanation is NMD collaborates with another mechanism to dramatically decrease PTC-bearing TCRβ mRNA levels. ^ In my dissertation, I investigated the molecular mechanism behind the strong decrease in TCRβ mRNA levels triggered by PTCs. To determine the location of this response, I performed mRNA half-life analysis and found that PTCs elicited more rapid TCRβ mRNA decay in the nuclear fraction, not the cytoplasmic fraction. Although decay was restricted to the nuclear fraction, PTC-bearing TCRβ transcript levels were extremely low in the cytoplasm, a phenomenon that I named the nonsense-codon induced partitioning shift (NIPS). I established that NIPS shares several qualities with NMD, including its dependence on translation and NMD factors. Several lines of evidence suggested that NIPS results from PTCs eliciting retention of TCRβ transcripts in the nuclear fraction. This retention, as well as rapid TCRβ mRNA decay, most likely occurs in either the nucleoplasm or the outer nuclear membrane, based on analysis of nuclear and cytoplasmic markers in the highly purified nuclei I used for my studies. To further address the location of decay, I asked whether nuclear or cytoplasmic RNA decay factors mediated the destruction of PTC-bearing mRNAs. My results suggested that a nuclear component of the 3'-to-5' exosome, as well as an endonucleolytic activity, are involved in the destruction of PTC-containing TCRβ mRNAs. Individual endogenous NMD substrates had differential requirements for nuclear and cytoplasmic exonucleases. In summary, my results provide evidence that PTCs trigger multiple mechanisms involving multiple decay factors to remove and regulate mRNAs in mammalian cells. ^

ROLE OF MIR-19A RELEASED BY INFLAMMATORY BREAST CANCER CELLS IN THE REGULATION OF DENDRITIC CELL FUNCTIONS: IN VITRO MODEL OF CROSSTALK IN THE TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT OF INFLAMMATORY BREAST CANCER

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare but very aggressive form of locally advanced breast cancer (1-6% of total breast cancer patients in United States), with a 5-year overall survival rate of only 40.5%, compared with 85% of the non-IBC patients. So far, a unique molecular signature for IBC able to explain the dramatic differences in the tumor biology between IBC and non-IBC has not been identified. As immune cells in the tumor microenvironment plays an important role in regulating tumor progression, we hypothesized that tumor-associated dendritic cells (TADC) may be responsible for regulating the development of the aggressive characteristics of IBC. MiRNAs can be released into the extracellular space and mediate the intercellular communication by regulating target gene expression beyond their cells of origin. We hypothesized that miRNAs released by IBC cells can induce an increased activation status, secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and migration ability of TADC. In an in vitro model of IBC tumor microenvironment, we found that the co-cultured of the IBC cell line SUM-149 with immature dendritic cells (iDCSUM-149) induced a higher degree of activation and maturation of iDCSUM-149 upon stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) compared with iDCs co-cultured with the non-IBC cell line SUM-159 (iDCSUM-159), resulting in: increased expression of the costimulatory and activation markers; higher production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-a, IL-6); and 3) higher migratory ability. These differences were due to the exosome-mediated transfer of miR-19a and miR-146a from SUM-149 and SUM-159, respectively, to iDCs, causing the downregulation of the miR-19a target genes PTEN, SOCS-1 and the miR-146a target genes IRAK1, TRAF6. PTEN, SOCS-1 and IRAK1, TRAF6 are important negative and positive regulator of cytokine- and TLR-mediated activation/maturation signaling pathway in DCs. Increased levels of IL-6 induced the upregulation of miR-19a synthesis in SUM-149 cells that was associated with the induction of CD44+CD24-ALDH1+ cancer stem cells (CSCs) with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) characteristics. In conclusion, in IBC tumor microenvironment IL-6/miR-19a axis can represent a self-sustaining loop able to maintain a pro-inflammatory status of DCs, leading to the development of tumor cells with high metastatic potential (EMT CSCs) responsible of the poor prognosis in IBC patients.