Survey analysis on dental infection control & occupational safety from India---1999 & 2010

The objective was to study knowledge, attitudes, practice (KAP) and needs regarding infection control measures using two cross-sectional surveys from 1999 and 2010 conducted in India. Both data collection instruments had only about 35 comparable variables in common. In 1999, there were 456 respondents (dentists) who completed a self-administered survey instrument compared to 272 respondents in 2010. Both the 1999 and 2010 samples were mutually independent with no overlap, had regional differences, and therefore, were not completely comparable for changes in KAP over time. While almost all respondents from both surveys felt that education in dental safety was needed and wanted mandatory dental safety curriculum in dental schools, severe inadequacies in dental safety knowledge, protection against immunizable diseases, and practice of universal precaution were noted. Data from the study demonstrated that there is a substantial opportunity to improve the knowledge, attitude and practice of dental infection control and occupational safety in India. Few respondents (27%) reported that the infectious disease status of a patient is always known and a significant number reported that they had the right to refuse care for patients of known infectious disease status. This indicates that Stigma in treating HIV/AIDS patients remains a concern, which in turn suggests that a stronger focus on educating dentists about dental safety and on stigma and infectious disease is needed. Information obtained from this study could be utilized for developing policies oriented towards increasing dental safety educational efforts, in both dental schools as curriculum, and for practicing dentists through professional updates or continuing dental education.^

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in HIV-positive patients

The main aim of this study was to look at the association of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and HIV. A secondary goal was to look at the trend of CDI-related deaths in Texas from 1999-2011. To evaluate the coinfection of CDI and HIV, we looked at 2 datasets provided by CHS-TDSHS, for 13 years of study period from 1999-2011: 1) Texas death certificate data and 2) Texas hospital discharge data. An ancillary source of data was national level death data from CDC. We did a secondary data analysis and reported the age-adjusted death rates (mortality) and hospital discharge frequencies (morbidity) for CDI, HIV and for CDI+HIV coinfection.^ Since the turn of the century, CDI has reemerged as an important public health challenge due to the emergence of hypervirulent epidemic strains. From 1999-2011, there has been a significant upward trend in CDI-related death rates; in the state of Texas alone, CDI mortality rate has increased 8.7 fold in this time period at the rate of 0.2 deaths per year per 100,000 individuals. On the contrary, mortality due to HIV has decreased by 46% and has been trending down. The demographic groups in Texas with the highest CDI mortality rates were elderly aged 65+, males, whites and hospital inpatients. The epidemiology of C. difficile has changed in such a way that it is not only staying confined to these traditional high-risk groups, but is also being increasingly reported in low-risk populations such as healthy people in the community (community acquired C. difficile), and most recently immunocompromised patients. Among the latter, HIV can worsen the adverse health outcomes of CDI and vice versa. In patients with CDI and HIV coinfection, higher mortality and morbidity was found in young & middle-aged adults, blacks and males, the same demographic population that is at higher risk for HIV. As with typical CDI, the coinfection was concentrated in the hospital inpatients. Of all the CDI-related deaths in USA from 1999-2010, in the 25-44 year age group, 13% had HIV infection. Of all CDI-related inpatient hospital discharges in Texas from 1999-2011, in patients 44 years and younger, 17% had concomitant HIV infection. Therefore, HIV is a possible novel emerging risk factor for CDI.^

The application of principal component analysis on human development indicators: Temporal approach from 1999 to 2010

Background and Objective. Ever since the human development index was published in 1990 by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), many researchers started searching and corporative studying for more effective methods to measure the human development. Published in 1999, Lai’s “Temporal analysis of human development indicators: principal component approach” provided a valuable statistical way on human developmental analysis. This study presented in the thesis is the extension of Lai’s 1999 research. ^ Methods. I used the weighted principal component method on the human development indicators to measure and analyze the progress of human development in about 180 countries around the world from the year 1999 to 2010. The association of the main principal component obtained from the study and the human development index reported by the UNDP was estimated by the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. The main principal component was then further applied to quantify the temporal changes of the human development of selected countries by the proposed Z-test. ^ Results. The weighted means of all three human development indicators, health, knowledge, and standard of living, were increased from 1999 to 2010. The weighted standard deviation for GDP per capita was also increased across years indicated the rising inequality of standard of living among countries. The ranking of low development countries by the main principal component (MPC) is very similar to that by the human development index (HDI). Considerable discrepancy between MPC and HDI ranking was found among high development countries with high GDP per capita shifted to higher ranks. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient between the main principal component and the human development index were all around 0.99. All the above results were very close to outcomes in Lai’s 1999 report. The Z test result on temporal analysis of main principal components from 1999 to 2010 on Qatar was statistically significant, but not on other selected countries, such as Brazil, Russia, India, China, and U.S.A.^ Conclusion. To synthesize the multi-dimensional measurement of human development into a single index, the weighted principal component method provides a good model by using the statistical tool on a comprehensive ranking and measurement. Since the weighted main principle component index is more objective because of using population of nations as weight, more effective when the analysis is across time and space, and more flexible when the countries reported to the system has been changed year after year. Thus, in conclusion, the index generated by using weighted main principle component has some advantage over the human development index created in UNDP reports.^