6 resultados para E1A associated p300 protein
em DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center
Resumo:
Galactosyltransferase (GalTase) is localized in the Golgi, where it functions in oligosaccharide synthesis, as well as on the cell surface where it serves as a cell adhesion molecule. GalTase-specific adhesions are functional in a number of important biological events, including F9 embryonal carcinoma (EC) cell adhesions. GalTase-based adhesions are formed by recognition and binding to terminal N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) residues on its glycoprotein counterpart on adjacent cell surfaces. The object of this work has been to investigate the formation and function of GalTase-specific adhesions during F9 cell growth and differentiation. We initially investigated GalTase synthesis during differentiation and found that the increase in GalTase activity was specific for the Golgi compartment; surface GalTase levels remained constant during differentiation. These data indicated that the increase in cell adhesions expected with increased cell-matrix interaction in differentiated F9 cells is not the consequence of increased surface GalTase expression and, more interestingly, that the two pools of GalTase are under differential regulation. Synthesis and recognition of the consociate glycoprotein component was next investigated. Surface GalTase recognized several surface glycoproteins in a pattern that changes with differentiation. Uvomorulin, lysosome-associated membrane protein-1 (LAMP-1), and laminin were recognized by surface GalTase and are, therefore, potential components in GalTase-specific adhesions. Furthermore, these interactions were aberrant in an adhesion-defective F9 cell line that results, at least in part, from abnormal oligosaccharide synthesis. The function played by surface GalTase in growth and induction of differentiation was examined. Inhibition of surface GalTase function by a panel of reagents inhibited F9 cell growth. GalTase expression at both the transcription and protein levels were differentially regulated during the cell cycle, with surface expression greatest in the G1 phase. Disruption of GalTase adhesion by exposure to anti-GalTase antibodies during this period resulted in extension of the G2 phase, a result similar to that seen with agents known to inhibit growth and induce differentiation. Finally, other studies have suggested that a subset of cell adhesion molecules have the capability to induce differentiation in EC cells systems. We have determined in F9 cells that dissociating GalTase adhesion by galactosylation of and release of the consociate glycoproteins induces differentiation, as defined by increased laminin synthesis. The ability to induce differentiation by surface galactosylation was greatest in cells grown in cultures promoting cell-cell adhesions, relative to cultures with minimal cell-cell interactions. ^
Resumo:
Involvement of E. coli 23S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) in decoding of termination codons was first indicated by the characterization of a 23S rRNA mutant that causes UGA-specific nonsense suppression. The work described here was begun to test the hypothesis that more 23S rRNA suppressors of specific nonsense mutations can be isolated and that they would occur non-randomly in the rRNA genes and be clustered in specific, functionally significant regions of rRNA.^ Approximately 2 kilobases of the gene for 23S rRNA were subjected to PCR random mutagenesis and the amplified products screened for suppression of nonsense mutations in trpA. All of the suppressor mutations obtained were located in a thirty-nucleotide part of the GTPase center, a conserved rRNA sequence and structure, and they and others made in that region by site-directed mutagenesis were shown to be UGA-specific in their suppression of termination codon mutations. These results proved the initial hypothesis and demonstrated that a group of nucleotides in this region are involved in decoding of the UGA termination codon. Further, it was shown that limitation of cellular availability or synthesis of L11, a ribosomal protein that binds to the GTPase center rRNA, resulted in suppression of termination codon mutations, suggesting the direct involvement of L11 in termination in vivo.^ Finally, in vivo analysis of certain site-specific mutations made in the GTPase center RNA demonstrated that (a) the G$\cdot$A base pair closing the hexanucleotide hairpin loop was not essential for normal termination, (b) the "U-turn" structure in the 1093 to 1098 hexaloop is critical for normal termination, (c) nucleotides A1095 and A1067, necessary for the binding to ribosomes of thiostrepton, an antibiotic that inhibits polypeptide release factor binding to ribosomes in vitro, are also necessary for normal peptide chain termination in vivo, and (d) involvement of this region of rRNA in termination is determined by some unique subset structure that includes particular nucleotides rather than merely by a general structural feature of the GTPase center.^ This work advances the understanding of peptide chain termination by demonstrating that the GTPase region of 23S rRNA participates in recognition of termination codons, through an associated ribosomal protein and specific conserved nucleotides and structural motifs in its RNA. ^
Resumo:
The K1 gene of Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) encodes a transmembrane glycoprotein bearing a functional immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM). Previously, we reported that the K1 protein induced plasmablastic lymphomas in K1 transgenic mice, and that these lymphomas showed enhanced Lyn kinase activity. Here, we report that systemic administration of the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappaB) inhibitor Bay 11-7085 or an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody significantly reduced K1 lymphoma growth in nude mice. Furthermore, in KVL-1 cells, a cell line derived from a K1 lymphoma, inhibition of Lyn kinase activity by the Src kinase inhibitor PP2 decreased VEGF induction, NF-kappaB activity, and the cell proliferation index by 50% to 75%. In contrast, human B-cell lymphoma BJAB cells expressing K1, but not the ITAM sequence-deleted mutant K1, showed a marked increase in Lyn kinase activity with concomitant VEGF induction and NF-kappaB activation, indicating that ITAM sequences were required for the Lyn kinase-mediated activation of these factors. Our results suggested that K1-mediated constitutive Lyn kinase activation in K1 lymphoma cells is crucial for the production of VEGF and NF-kappaB activation, both strongly implicated in the development of KSHV-induced lymphoproliferative disorders.
Resumo:
Bloom syndrome (BS) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by dwarfism, immunodeficiency, impaired fertility, and most importantly, early development of a broad range of cancers. The hallmark of BS cells is hyper-recombination, characterized by a drastically elevated frequency of sister chromatid exchange (SCE). BLM, the gene mutated in BS, encodes a DNA helicase of the RecQ protein family. BLM is thought to participate in several DNA transactions and to interact with many proteins involved in DNA replication, recombination, and repair. However, the precise function of BLM and the BLM-dependent anti-tumor mechanism remain obscure. ^ A novel protein, BLAP75 (BLM-associated polypeptide, 75KD), was identified to form an evolutionarily conserved complex with BLM and DNA topoisomerase IIIα (Topo IIIα). Our work demonstrates that loss of BLAP75 destabilized BLM and Topo IIIα proteins. BLAP75 colocalized with BLM in subnuclear foci in response to DNA damage and the recruitment of BLM to these foci was BLAP75-dependent. Moreover, depletion of BLAP75 by siRNA resulted in an elevated SCE rate similar to cells depleted of BLM by siRNA. In addition, RNAi-mediated silencing of BLAP75 greatly diminished cell viability. This cellular deficiency was rescued by expression of wild type BLAP75 but not BLAP75 with mutated conserved domain III, which abrogated the interaction between BLAP75, BLM and Topo IIIα, suggesting that the integrity of BLM-Topo IIIα-BLAP75 complex might be critical for cell survival. Finally, I found that BLAP75 was phosphorylated during mitosis and upon various DNA-damaging agents, implying that BLAP75 might also function in mitosis and DNA damage response. ^ Taken together, this study has defined BLAP75 as an integral component of the BLM complex to maintain genome stability. Our findings provide insights into the molecular mechanisms of the BLM helicase pathway and tumorigenesis process associated with these mechanisms. ^
Resumo:
A common pathological hallmark of most neurodegenerative disorders is the presence of protein aggregates in the brain. Understanding the regulation of aggregate formation is thus important for elucidating disease pathogenic mechanisms and finding effective preventive avenues and cures. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease, is a selective neurodegenerative disorder predominantly affecting motor neurons. The majority of ALS cases are sporadic, however, mutations in superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) are responsible for about 20% of familial ALS (fALS). Mutated SOD1 proteins are prone to misfold and form protein aggregates, thus representing a good candidate for studying aggregate formation. The long-term goal of this project is to identify regulators of aggregate formation by mutant SOD1 and other ALS-associated disease proteins. The specific aim of this thesis project is to assess the possibility of using the well-established Drosophila model system to study aggregation by human SOD1 (hSOD1) mutants. To this end, using wild type and the three mutant hSOD1 (A4V, G85R and G93A) most commonly found among fALS, I have generated 16 different SOD1 constructs containing either eGFP or mCherry in-frame fluorescent reporters, established and tested both cell- and animal-based Drosophila hSOD1 models. The experimental strategy allows for clear visualization of ectopic hSOD1 expression as well as versatile co-expression schemes to fully investigate protein aggregation specifically by mutant hSOD1. I have performed pilot cell-transfection experiments and verified induced expression of hSOD1 proteins. Using several tissue- or cell type-specific Gal4 lines, I have confirmed the proper expression of hSOD1 from established transgenic fly lines. Interestingly, in both Drosophila S2 cells and different fly tissues including the eye and motor neurons, robust aggregate formation by either wild type or mutant hSOD1 proteins was not observed. These preliminary observations suggest that Drosophila might not be a good experimental organism to study aggregation and toxicity of mutant hSOD1 protein. Nevertheless this preliminary conclusion implies the potential existence of a potent protective mechanism against mutant hSOD1 aggregation and toxicity in Drosophila. Thus, results from my SOD1-ALS project in Drosophila will help future studies on how to best employ this classic model organism to study ALS and other human brain degenerative diseases.
Resumo:
The adenovirus type 5 E1A gene products have numerous functions in cells, which serve as useful tools in studying the mechanisms of either oncogenesis or tumor suppression. To understand the mechanisms of E1A-mediated tumor suppression, we introduced an Ad5 E1A gene into murine melanoma cells, and characterized E1A-mediated biological functions both in vitro and in vivo. The results of the study indicated that: (i) Ad5 E1A mediated tumor suppression in rodent tumor cells; (ii) E1A-mediated tumor suppression is associated with E1A-mediated apoptosis in vivo.^ To determine which functional region(s) of E1A is(are) required for E1A-mediated apoptosis and whether E1A-mediated apoptosis is required for E1A-mediated tumor suppression, we established stable transfectants of E1A mutants, which have deletion mutation at either the N-terminal (p300-binding) or the CR2 (pRb-binding) domain or both, and then characterized biological functions both in vitro and in vivo. The results of the study indicate that the CR2 domain of E1A is required for E1A-mediated apoptosis, while the N-terminal domain of E1A is dispensable. Interestingly, either of the two domains is able to mediate tumor suppression, since mutant E1A with a single deletion at either domain still suppressed tumor growth. Importantly, deletion mutations at both the N-terminal and the CR2 domains of E1A abrogated E1A-mediated tumor suppression, suggesting both regions are required for E1A-mediated tumor suppression. The results demonstrate that E1A-mediated apoptosis is not the only mechanism for E1A-mediated tumor suppression. Thus, the N-terminal and CR2 domains of E1A mediated two independent mechanisms of tumor suppression.^ To understand the mechanism of E1A-mediated apoptosis, we examined the temporal relationship of molecular events during the apoptotic cascades after UV radiation and serum depletion in both the E1A-expressing cells and parental cells. Kinetic analysis of JNK activity indicates that the JNK pathway is greatly increased in response to UV light in E1A transfectants, suggesting that extracellular stress stimuli have been converted into intracellular stress signals with greater magnitude in E1A transfectants than those in parental cells. Thus, E1A-mediated sensitization precedes these events. As ceramide has been proposed as second messenger and upstream activator of JNK pathway for stress-induced apoptosis, we also examined the roles of ceramide in apoptosis and the relationship with JNK pathway. The results indicate that E1A transfectants do not have increased sensitivity to ceramide. Therefore, E1A-mediated sensitization to UV radiation cannot be attributed to an increased sensitivity to ceramide. Furthermore, UV-induced JNK activation correlates with UV-induced apoptosis, while lethal dose of ceramide does not activate JNK. Thus, activation of JNK pathway is independent of the ceramide pathway. In addition, E1A transfectants also have increased activation of NF-kB in response to UV. These results suggest that E1A-mediated sensitization is an early event which associates with conversion of extracellular stress stimuli into amplified intracellular signals. The mechanism of E1A-mediated sensitization and its relationship with other pathways are discussed. ^