Annexin A5-Conjugated Polymeric Micelles For Dual SPECT and Optical Detection of Apoptosis

Apoptosis, a form of programmed cell death, is critical to homoeostasis, normal development, and physiology. Dysregulation of apoptosis can lead to the accumulation of unwanted cells, such as occurs in cancer, and the removal of needed cells or disorders of normal tissues, such as heart, neurodegenerative, and autoimmune diseases. Noninvasive detection of apoptosis may play an important role in the evaluation of disease states and response to therapeutic intervention for a variety of diseases. It is desirable to have an imaging method to accurately detect and monitor this process in patients. In this study, we developed annexin A5-conjugated polymeric micellar nanoparticles dual-labeled with a near-infrared fluorescence fluorophores (Cy7) and a radioisotope (111In), named as 111In-labeled annexin A5-CCPM. In vitro studies demonstrated that annexin A5-CCPM could strongly and specifically bind to apoptotic cells. In vivo studies showed that apoptotic tissues could be clearly visualized by both single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and fluorescence molecular tomography (FMT) after intravenous injection of 111In-labeled Annexin A5-CCPM in 6 different apoptosis models. In contrast, there was little signal in respective healthy tissues. All the biodistribution data confirmed imaging results. Moreover, histological analysis revealed that radioactivity count correlated with fluorescence signal from the nanoparticles, and both signals co-localized with the region of apoptosis. In sum, 111In-labeled annexin A5-CCPM allowed visualization of apoptosis by both nuclear and optical imaging techniques. The complementary information acquired with multiple imaging techniques should be advantageous in improving diagnostics and management of patients.

An analysis of the revenue policy -making process of the Texas Legislature

The purpose of this dissertation was to develop a conceptual framework which can be used to account for policy decisions made by the House Ways and Means Committee (HW&MC) of the Texas House of Representatives. This analysis will examine the actions of the committee over a ten-year period with the goal of explaining and predicting the success of failure of certain efforts to raise revenue.^ The basis framework for modelling the revenue decision-making process includes three major components--the decision alternatives, the external factors and two competing contingency theories. The decision alternatives encompass the particular options available to increase tax revenue. The options were classified as non-innovative or innovative. The non-innovative options included the sales, franchise, property and severance taxes. The innovative options were principally the personal and corporate income taxes.^ The external factors included political and economic constraints that affected the actions of the HW&MC. Several key political constraints on committee decision-making were addressed--including public attitudes, interest groups, political party strength and tradition and precedents. The economic constraints that affected revenue decisions included court mandates, federal mandates and the fiscal condition of the nation and the state.^ The third component of the revenue decision-making framework included two alternative contingency theories. The first alternative theory postulated that the committee structure, including the individual member roles and the overall committee style, resulted in distinctive revenue decisions. This theory will be favored if evidence points to the committee acting autonomously with less concern for the policies of the Speaker of the House. The Speaker assignment theory, postulated that the assignment of committee members shaped or changed the course of committee decision-making. This theory will be favored if there was evidence that the committee was strictly a vehicle for the Speaker to institute his preferred tax policies.^ The ultimate goal of this analysis is to develop an explanation for legislative decision-making about tax policy. This explanation will be based on the linkages across various tax options, political and economic constraints, member roles and committee style and the patterns of committee assignment. ^