Dimethylsphingosine evokes diverse cellular death modes in HL60

Among the barriers to successful cancer treatment is the acquired resistance that tumors undergo due to clonal evolution. Non-cross resistant drugs could add to the current options of chemotherapeutic drugs. In order to improve tumor response, investigators have been identifying defective death pathways acquired by specific cancer types, so to target directly those pathways. Sphingolipids have emerged as potential drugs for tumor-targeted therapy, and among them, Dimethylsphingosine (DMS), known to be a competitive inhibitor of Sphingosine Kinase (SK). DMS actions have been documented by several investigators, but the mechanisms by which DMS exerts cytotoxicity have not been fully investigated. We evaluated the cytotoxicity of DMS against human leukemia cell lines and against blasts isolated from leukemia patients. Cell line viability decreased proportionally to DMS concentration and treatment time. Resistant and MDR positive cell lines were the most sensitive, indicating DMS efficacy against human leukemia MDR. Importantly, leukemia samples showed a similar sensitivity to DMS, the first demonstration of DMS activity against fresh human leukemia specimens. Mechanistically we have demonstrated that DMS efficacy is due to its ability to induce cytotoxicity by inducing necrosis, apoptosis or both concomitantly, revealing a mixed-feature cell death mode never described before for DMS. Further, we have shown evidence suggesting pathways cross-talk, since apoptosis inhibition led to accelerated rate of necrosis. DMS diverse killing mechanisms and the high expression of SK in leukemias could explain DMS potent cytotoxicity. DMS-based regimens may increase response rates and therefore, improve leukemia treatment. ^

EXPOSURE OF PHARMACY PERSONNEL TO ANTINEOPLASTIC DRUGS

This dissertation consists of two parts: (1) Exposure of pharmacy personnel to antineoplastic drugs. The Salmonella reversion test was used to measure the mutagenic activities of urine concentrates from individuals preparing antineoplastic drugs for intravenous administration. Longitudinal studies were performed in which the total urine produced in 24-hour periods was collected, starting on a Sunday at 7 P.M. after a duty-free weekend and extending over an eight-day period. There was no detectable increase in mutagenic activity in the urine concentrates of three pharmacy administrators who had no contact with these drugs. All six individuals admixing drugs in open-faced, horizontal laminar flow hoods displayed a two-fold increase in mutagenesis by the fourth day with peak values of 2.7 to 24-fold occurring on days five and six, reduced values by day seven with a return to the spontaneous level by day eight. When four of the six positive individuals in the preceding experiment admixed comparable amounts of antineoplastic drugs in a closed-faced, vertical laminar flow hood, no increase in mutagenic activity was detected in their urine concentrates over the eight-day period. (2) Estimate of potential carcinogenic risks of antineoplastic drugs. Excision repair is the major repair system that is involved with the elimination of chemically induced DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) lesions. This DNA excision repair capability increases in mammalian species with longer life span such as humans. In this study, the effect of functional DNA excision repair on the mutagenesis invoked by 17 antineoplastic drugs was determined by using a Salmonella/Microsome assay which was expanded to include some uvr('+) counterparts of the excisionless (uvrB) tester strains routinely employed. Although extrapolation cannot be made from bacteria to humans, one should be able to make a qualitative comparison as to which antineoplastic drugs are more potentially carcinogenic to humans based on the effects of excision repair on their mutagenesis in bacteria. The tested antineoplastic drugs were divided into three classes: those requiring excision repair for mutagenesis; those producing nonrepairable genetic damage; and those producing mostly repairable premutational DNA lesions. ^

A comparison of adherence with minocycline treatment in Parkinson's disease and rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials

Background: Little is known about the effects on patient adherence when the same study drug is administered in the same dose in two populations with two different diseases in two different clinical trials. The Minocycline in Rheumatoid Arthritis (MIRA) trial and the NIH Exploratory Trials in Parkinson's disease (NET-PD) Futility Study I provide a unique opportunity to do the above and to compare methods measuring adherence. This study may increase understanding of the influence of disease and adverse events on patient adherence and will provide insights to investigators selecting adherence assessment methods in clinical trials of minocycline and other drugs in future.^ Methods: Minocycline adherence by pill count and the effect of adverse events was compared in the MIRA and NET-PD FS1 trials using multivariable linear regression. Within the MIRA trial, agreement between assay and pill count was compared. The association of adverse events with assay adherence was examined using multivariable logistic regression.^ Results: Adherence derived from pill count in the MIRA and NET-PD FS1 trials did not differ significantly. Adverse events potentially related to minocycline did not appear useful to predict minocycline adherence. In the MIRA trial, adherence measured by pill count appears higher than adherence measured by assay. Agreement between pill count and assay was poor (kappa statistic = 0.25).^ Limitations: Trial and disease are completely confounded and hence the independent effect of disease on adherence to minocycline treatment cannot be studied.^ Conclusion: Simple pill count may be preferred over assay in the minocycline clinical trials to measure adherence. Assays may be less sensitive in a clinical setting where appointments are not scheduled in relation to medication administration time, given assays depend on many pharmacokinetic and instrument-related factors. However, pill count can be manipulated by the patient. Another study suggested that self-report method is more sensitive than pill count method in differentiating adherence from non-adherence. An effect of medication-related adverse events on adherence could not be detected.^