Gene transfer by viral vectors

To initiate our clinical trial for chemotherapy protection, I established the retroviral vector system for human MDR1 cDNA gene transfer. The human MDR1 cDNA continued to be expressed in the transduced bone marrow cells after four cohorts of serial transplants, 17 months after the initial transduction and transplant. In addition, we used this retroviral vector pVMDR1 to transduce human bone marrow and peripheral blood CD34$\sp+$ cells on stromal monolayer in the presence of hematopoietic growth factors. These data suggest that the retroviral vector pVMDR1 could modify hematopoietic precursor cells with a capacity for long-term self renewal. Thus, it may be possible to use the MDR1 retroviruses to confer chemotherapeutic protection on human normal hematopoietic precursor cells of ovarian and breast cancer patients in whom high doses of MDR drugs may be required to control the diseases.^ Another promising vector system is recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vector. An impediment to use rAAV vectors is that production of rAAV vectors for clinical use is extremely cumbersome and labor intensive. First I set up the rAAV vector system in our laboratory and then, I focused on studies related to the production of rAAV vectors for clinical use. By using a self-inactivating retroviral vector carrying a selection marker under the control of the CMV immediate early promoter and an AAV genome with the deletion of both ITRs, I have developed either a transient or a stable method to produce rAAV vectors. These methods involve infection only and can generate high-titer rAAV vectors (up to 2 x 10$\sp5$ cfu/ml of CVL) with much less work.^ Although recombinant adenoviral vectors hardly infect early hematopoietic precursor cells lacking $\alpha\sb v\beta\sb5$ or $\alpha\sb v\beta\sb3$ integrin on their surface, but efficiently infect other cells, we can use these properties of adenoviral vectors for bone marrow purging as well as for development of new viral vectors such as pseudotyped retroviral vectors and rAAV vectors. Replacement of self-inactivating retroviral vectors by recombinant adenoviral vectors will facilitate the above strategies for production of new viral vectors. In order to accomplish these goals, I developed a new method which is much more efficient than the current methods to construct adenoviral vectors. This method involves a cosmid vector system which is utilized to construct the full-length recombinant adenoviral vectors in vitro.^ First, I developed an efficient and flexible method for in vitro construction of the full-length recombinant adenoviral vectors in the cosmid vector system by use of a three-DNA fragment ligation. Then, this system was improved by use of a two-DNA fragment ligation. The cloning capacity of recombinant adenoviral vectors constructed by this method to develop recombinant adenoviral vectors depends on the efficiency of transfection only. No homologous recombination is required for development of infectious adenoviral vectors. Thus, the efficiency of generating the recombinant adenoviral vectors by the cosmid method reported here was much higher than that by the in vitro direct ligation method or the in vivo homologous recombination method reported before. This method of the in vitro construction of recombinant adenoviral vectors in the cosmid vector system may facilitate the development of adenoviral vector for human gene therapy. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) ^

Differential Activity of the KRAS Oncogene by Method of Activation: Implications for Signaling and Therapeutic Intervention

Despite having been identified over thirty years ago and definitively established as having a critical role in driving tumor growth and predicting for resistance to therapy, the KRAS oncogene remains a target in cancer for which there is no effective treatment. KRas is activated b y mutations at a few sites, primarily amino acid substitutions at codon 12 which promote a constitutively active state. I have found that different amino acid substitutions at codon 12 can activate different KRas downstream signaling pathways, determine clonogenic growth potential and determine patient response to molecularly targeted therapies. Computer modeling of the KRas structure shows that different amino acids substituted at the codon 12 position influences how KRas interacts with its effecters. In the absence of a direct inhibitor of mutant KRas several agents have recently entered clinical trials alone and in combination directly targeting two of the common downstream effecter pathways of KRas, namely the Mapk pathway and the Akt pathway. These inhibitors were evaluated for efficacy against different KRAS activating mutations. An isogenic panel of colorectal cells with wild type KRas replaced with KRas G12C, G12D, or G12V at the endogenous loci differed in sensitivity to Mek and Akt inhibition. In contrast, screening was performed in a broad panel of lung cell lines alone and no correlation was seen between types of activating KRAS mutation due to concurrent oncogenic lesions. To find a new method to inhibit KRAS driven tumors, siRNA screens were performed in isogenic lines with and without active KRas. The knockdown of CNKSR1 (CNK1) showed selective growth inhibition in cells with an oncogenic KRAS. The deletion of CNK1 reduces expression of mitotic cell cycle proteins and arrests cells with active KRas in the G1 phase of the cell cycle similar to the deletion of an activated KRas regardless of activating substitution. CNK1 has a PH domain responsible for localizing it to membrane lipids making KRas potentially amenable to inhibition with small molecules. The work has identified a series of small molecules capable of binding to this PH domain and inhibiting CNK1 facilitated KRas signaling.