6 resultados para Differential ability
em DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center
Resumo:
The human GSTP1 gene has been shown, conclusively, to be polymorphic. The three main GSTP1 alleles, GSTP1*A, GSTP1*B, and GSTP1*C, encode proteins which differ in the 3-dimensional structure of their active sites and in their function in phase II metabolism of carcinogens, mutagens, and anticancer agents. Although, it is well established that GSTP1 is over expressed in many human tumors and that the levels of GSTP1 expression correlate directly with tumor resistance to chemotherapy and inversely with patient survival, the significance of the polymorphic GSTP1 gene locus on tumor response to chemotherapy remains unclear. The goal of this project was to define the role and significance of the polymorphic GSTP1 gene locus in GSTP1-based tumor drug resistance and as a determinant of patient response to chemotherapy. The hypothesis to be tested was that the polymorphic GSTP1 gene locus will confer to tumors a differential ability to metabolize cisplatin resulting in a GSTP1 genotype-based sensitivity to cisplatin. The study examined: (a) whether the different GSTP 1 alleles confer different levels of cellular protection against cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity, (b) whether the allelic GSTP1 proteins metabolize cisplatin with different efficiencies, and (c) whether the GSTP1 genotype is a determinant of tumor response to cisplatin therapy. The results demonstrate that the GSTP1 alleles differentially protect tumors against cisplatin-induced apoptosis and clonogenic cell kill in the rank order: GSTP1*C > GSTP1*B > GSTP1*A. The same rank order was observed for the kinetics of GSTP1-catalyzed cisplatin metabolism, both in cell-free and cellular systems, to the rate-limiting monoglutathionyl-platinum metabolite, which was characterized, for the first time, by mass spectral analysis. Finally, this study demonstrates that both GSTP1 genotype and the level of GSTP1 expression significantly contribute to tumor sensitivity to cisplatin treatment. Overall, the results of this project show that the polymorphic GSTP1 gene locus plays a significant role in tumor sensitivity to cisplatin treatment. Furthermore, these studies have contributed to the overall understanding of the significance of the polymorphic GSTP1 gene locus in tumor resistance to cancer chemotherapy and have provided the basis for further investigations into how this can be utilized to optimize and individualize cancer chemotherapy for cancer patients. ^
Resumo:
Retinoids have been found to be effective in the prevention of premalignant lesions and second primary cancers in the upper aerodigestive tract. Further development of retinoids for prevention and therapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) requires a better understanding of their mechanism of action on the growth and differentiation of such cells. I have chosen to employ cultured HNSCC cell lines as a model system for investigating the mechanism underlying the effects of retinoids. These cells are useful because all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) inhibits their proliferation. Furthermore, two HNSCC cell lines were found to express three squamous differentiation (SqD) markers characteristic of normal keratinocytes and ATRA suppressed the expression of these markers as reported for normal keratinocytes. It is thought that nuclear retinoic acid receptors (RARs and RXRs), which act as DNA-binding transcription modulating factors, mediate the effects of retinoids on the growth and differentiation of normal and tumor cells. I found that all four cell lines examined expressed RAR-$\alpha ,$ RAR-$\tau ,$ and RXR-$\alpha$ and three of four expressed RAR-$\beta .$ ATRA treatment increased the level of RAR-$\alpha ,$ -$\beta ,$ and -$\tau$ in four cell lines. Two HNSCC cell lines that exhibited a progressive increase in the expression of SqD markers during growth in culture also showed a concurrent decrease in RAR-$\beta$ level. Moreover, increasing concentrations of RA suppressed the SqD marker while inducing RAR-$\beta$ mRNA. Several synthetic retinoids which exhibit a preference for binding to specific nuclear RARs showed a differential ability to inhibit cell proliferation, transactivate transcription of the reporter genes (CAT and luciferase) from the RA response element (RARE) of the RAR-$\beta$ gene, and induce RAR-$\beta$ expression. Those retinoids that were effective inducers of RAR-$\beta$ also suppressed SqD effectively, indicating an inverse relationship exists between the expression of RAR-$\beta$ and SqD. This inverse relationship suggests a role for RAR-$\beta$ in the suppression of SqD. ^
Resumo:
Using a human terato-carcinoma cell line, PA-1, the functional role of the oncogenes and tumor suppressor gene involved in the multistep process of carcinogenesis have been analyzed. The expression of AP-2 was strongly correlated with the susceptibility to ras transformation. The differential responsiveness to growth factors between stage 1 ras resistant cells and stage 2 ras susceptible cells was observed, indicating that the ability of stage 2 cells to respond to the mutated ras oncogenes in transformation correlated with the ability to be stimulated by certain growth factors. Using differential screening of cDNA libraries, a number of differentially expressed cDNA clones was isolated. One of those, clone 12, is overexpressed in ras transformed stage 3 cells. The amino acid sequence of clone 12 is almost identical to a mouse LLrep3 gene that was growth-regulated, and 78% similar to a yeast ribosomal protein S4. These results suggest that the S4 gene may be involved in regulation of growth. Clone 9 is expressed in stage 1 ras resistant cells (3.5-kb and 3.0-kb transcripts) but the expression of this clone in stage 2 ras susceptible cells and stage 3 ras-transformed cells is greatly diminished. The expression of this cDNA clone was increased to at least five fold in ras resistant cells and nontumorigenic hybrids treated with retinoic acid but not increased in retinoic acid treated ras susceptible cells, ras transformed cells and the tumorigenic segregants. Partial sequence of this clone showed no homology to the sequences in Genbank. These findings suggest that clone 9 could be a suppressor gene or the genes that are involved in the biochemical pathway of tumor suppression or neurogenic differentiation. The apparent pleiotropic effect of the loss of this suppressor gene function support Harris' proposal that tumor suppressor genes regulate differentiation. The tumor suppressor gene may act as negative regulator of tumor growth by controlling gene expression in differentiation. ^
Resumo:
Loss of chromosome 10 represents the most common cytogenetic abnormality in high grade gliomas (glioblastoma multiforme). To identify genes involved in the malignant progression of human gliomas, a subtractive hybridization was performed between a tumorigenic glioblastoma cell line (LG11) and a nontumorgenic hybrid cell (LG11.3) containing an introduced chromosome 10. LG11 mRNA was subtracted from LG11.3 cDNA to produce cDNA probes enriched for sequences whose expression differs quantitatively from the parental tumorigenic cells. Both known and novel sequences were identified as a result of the subtraction. Northern blot analysis was then used to confirm differential expression of several subtracted clones. One novel clone, clone 17, identified a 2.6 kb message that showed a consistent two to four fold increase in expression in the LG11.3 nontumorigenic cells. Clone 17 (340 bp) was used successfully to screen for a near full-length version, RIG (regulated in glioma), which was 2,569 bp in size. The RIG cDNA sequence showed homology to clone 17 and to an anonymous EST (IB666), but to no previously identified genes. This screening effort also identified several independent clones representing novel sequences, most of which failed to show increased expression in the nontumorigenic GBM cells. Tissue distribution studies of RIG indicated highest levels of expression in human brain with appreciably lower levels in heart and lung. In vitro transcription and translation experiments demonstrated the ability of RIG to direct the synthesis of a 13 kD protein product. However, open reading frame analysis revealed no identify with previously described motifs or any known proteins. Using a combination of somatic cell hybrid panels and in situ hybridization, the RIG gene was mapped to chromosome 11p14-11p15. Further study of RIG and related gene products may provide insight into the negative regulation of glial oncogenesis. ^
Resumo:
There have been multiple reports which indicate that variations in $\beta$AR expression affect the V$\sb{\rm max}$ observed for the agonist-dependent activation of adenylylcyclase. This observation has been ignored by most researchers when V$\sb{\rm max}$ values obtained for wild type and mutant receptors are compared. Such an imprecise analysis may lead to erroneous conclusions concerning the ability of a receptor to activate adenylylcyclase. Equations were derived from the Cassel-Selinger model of GTPase activity and Tolkovsky and Levitzki's Collision Coupling model which predict that the EC$\sb{50}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$ for the activation of adenylylcyclase are a function of receptor number. Experimental results for L cell clones in which either hamster or human $\beta$AR were transfected at varying levels showed that EC$\sb{50}$ decreases and V$\sb{\rm max}$ increases as receptor number increases. Comparison of these results with simulations obtained from the equations describing EC$\sb{50}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$ showed a close correlation. This documents that the kinetic parameters of adenylylcyclase activation change with the level of receptor expression and relates this phenomenon to a theoretical framework concerning the mechanisms involved in $\beta$AR signal transduction.^ One of the terms used in the equations which expressed the EC$\sb{50}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$ as a function of receptor number is coupling efficiency, defined as $\rm k\sb1/k\sb{-1}$. Calculation of $\rm k\sb1/k\sb{-1}$ can be accomplished for wild type receptors with the easily measured experimental values of agonist K$\sb{\rm d}$, EC$\sb{50}$ and receptor number. This was demonstrated for hamster $\beta$AR which yielded a coupling efficiency of 0.15 $\pm$ 0.003 and human $\beta$AR which yielded a coupling efficiency of 0.90 $\pm$ 0.031. $\rm k\sb1/k\sb{-1}$ replaces the traditional qualitative evaluation of the ability to activate adenylylcyclase, which utilizes V$\sb{\rm max}$ without correction for variation in receptor number, with a quantitative definition that more accurately describes the ability of $\beta$AR to couple to G$\sb{\rm s}$.^ The equations which express the EC$\sb{50}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$ for adenylylcyclase activation as a function of receptor number and coupling efficiency were tested to determine whether they could accurately simulate the changes seen in these parameters during desensitization. Data from original desensitization experiments and data from the literature (24,25,52,54,83) were compared to simulated changes in EC$\sb{50}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$. In a variety of systems the predictions of the equations were consistent with the changes observed in EC$\sb{50}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$. In addition reductions in the calculated value of $\rm k\sb1/k\sb{-1}$ was shown to correlate well with $\beta$AR phosphorylation and to be minimally affected by sequestration and down-regulation. ^
Resumo:
The ability to regulate cell cycle progression is one of the differences that separates normal from tumor cells. A protein, which is frequently mutated or deleted in a majority of tumor cells, is the retinoblastoma protein (pRb). Previously, we reported that normal cells, which have a wild-type Rb pathway, can be reversibly arrested in the G1 phase of the cell cycle by staurosporine (ST), while tumor cells were unaffected by this treatment. As a result, ST may be used to protect normal cells against the toxic affects of chemotherapy. Here we set out to determine the mechanism(s) by which ST can mediate a reversible G1 arrest in pRb positive cells. To this end, we used an isogenic cell model system of normal human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC) with either intact pRb+ (p53-) or p53+ (pRb-) treated with ST. Our results show that pRb+ cells treated with low concentrations of ST, arrested in the G1 phase of the cell cycle; however, in pRb - cells there was no response. This was verified as a true G 1 arrest in pRb+ cells by two different methods for monitoring cell cycle kinetics and in two additional model systems for Rb (i.e. pRb -/- mouse embryo fibroblasts, and downregulation of RB with siRNA). Our results indicated that ST-mediated G1 arrest required pRb, which in turn initiated a cascade of events leading to inhibition of CDK4 and CDK2 activities and up-regulation of p21 protein. Further assessment of this pathway revealed the novel finding that Chk1 expression and activity were required for the Rb-dependent, ST-mediated G1 arrest. In fact, overexpression of Chk1 facilitated recovery from ST-mediated G1 arrest, an effect only observed in RB+ cells. Collectively, our data suggest pRb is able to cooperate with Chk1 to mediate a G1 arrest in pRb+ cells, but not in pRb- cells. The elucidation of this pathway can help identify novel agents that can be used to protect cancer patients against the debilitating affects of chemotherapy, by targeting only the normal proliferating cells in the body that are otherwise destroyed. ^