Structural conservations and diversities of dsRNA viruses: Structural studies of the cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus by electron cryomicroscopy and 3D reconstruction

The Reoviridae virus family is a group of economically and pathologically important viruses that have either single-, double-, or triple-shelled protein layers enclosing a segmented double stranded RNA genome. Each virus particle in this family has its own viral RNA dependent RNA polymerase and the enzymatic activities necessary for the mature RNA synthesis. Based on the structure of the inner most cores of the viruses, the Reoviridae viruses can be divided into two major groups. One group of viruses has a smooth surfaced inner core, surrounded by complete outer shells of one or two protein layers. The other group has an inner core decorated with turrets on the five-fold vertices, and could either completely lack or have incomplete outer protein layers. The structural difference is one of the determinant factors for their biological differences during the infection. ^ Cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus (CPV) is a single-shelled, turreted virus and the structurally simplest member in Reoviridae. It causes specific chronic infections in the insect gut epithelial cells. Due to its wide range of insect hosts, CPV has been engineered as a potential insecticide for use in fruit and vegetable farming. Its unique structural simplicity, unparalleled capsid stability and ease of purification make CPV an ideal model system for studying the structural basis of dsRNA virus assembly at the highest possible resolution by electron cryomicroscopy (cryoEM) and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction. ^ In this thesis work, I determined the first 3D structure of CPV capsids using 100 kV cryoEM. At an effective resolution of 17 Å, the full capsid reveals a 600-Å diameter, T = 1 icosahedral shell decorated with A and B spikes at the 5-fold vertices. The internal space of the empty CPV is unoccupied except for 12 mushroom-shaped densities that are attributed to the transcriptional enzyme complexes. The inside of the full capsid is packed with icosahedrally-ordered viral genomic RNA. The interactions of viral RNA with the transcriptional enzyme complexes and other capsid proteins suggest a mechanism for RNA transcription and subsequent release. ^ Second, the interactions between the turret proteins (TPs) and the major capsid shell protein (CSPs) have been identified through 3D structural comparisons of the intact CPV capsids with the spikeless CPV capsids, which were generated by chemical treatments. The differential effects of these chemical treatment experiments also indicated that CPV has a significantly stronger structural integrity than other dsRNA viruses, such as the orthoreovirus subcores, which are normally enclosed within outer protein shells. ^ Finally, we have reconstructed the intact CPV to an unprecendented 8 Å resolution from several thousand of 400kV cryoEM images. The 8 Å structure reveals interactions among the 120 molecules of each of the capsid shell protein (CSP), the large protrusion protein (LPP), and 60 molecules of the turret protein (TP). A total of 1980 α-helices and 720 β-sheets have been identified in these capsid proteins. The CSP structure is largely conserved, with the majority of the secondary structures homologous to those observed in the x-ray structures of corresponding proteins of other reoviruses, such as orthoreovirus and bluetongue virus. The three domains of TP are well positioned to play multifunctional roles during viral transcription. The completely non-equivalent interactions between LPP and CSP and those between the anchoring domain of TP and CSP account for the unparalleled stability of this structurally simplest member of the Reoviridae. ^

Planning and implementation efficacy as a determinant of health risk communication outcomes: Case studies of the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS)

This study was conducted under the auspices of the Subcommittee on Risk Communication and Education of the Committee to Coordinate Environmental Health and Related Programs (CCEHRP) to determine how Public Health Service (PHS) agencies are communicating information about health risk, what factors contributed to effective communication efforts, and what specific principles, strategies, and practices best promote more effective health risk communication outcomes.^ Member agencies of the Subcommittee submitted examples of health risk communication activities or decisions they perceived to be effective and some examples of cases they thought had not been as effective as desired. Of the 10 case studies received, 7 were submitted as examples of effective health risk communication, and 3, as examples of less effective communication.^ Information contained in the 10 case studies describing the respective agencies' health risk communication strategies and practices was compared with EPA's Seven Cardinal Rules of Risk Communication, since similar rules were not found in any PHS agency. EPA's rules are: (1) Accept and involve the public as a legitimate partner. (2) Plan carefully and evaluate your efforts. (3) Listen to the public's specific concerns. (4) Be honest, frank, and open. (5) Coordinate and collaborate with other credible sources. (6) Meet the needs of the media. (7) Speak clearly and with compassion.^ On the basis of case studies analysis, the Subcommittee, in their attempts to design and implement effective health risk communication campaigns, identified a number of areas for improvement among the agencies. First, PHS agencies should consider developing a focus specific to health risk communication (i.e., office or specialty resource). Second, create a set of generally accepted practices and guidelines for effective implementation and evaluation of PHS health risk communication activities and products. Third, organize interagency initiatives aimed at increasing awareness and visibility of health risk communication issues and trends within and between PHS agencies.^ PHS agencies identified some specific implementation strategies the CCEHRP might consider pursuing to address the major recommendations. Implementation strategies common to PHS agencies emerged in the following five areas: (1) program development, (2) building partnerships, (3) developing training, (4) expanding information technologies, and (5) conducting research and evaluation. ^