Dopamine-stimulated dephosphorylation of connexin 36 mediates AII amacrine cell uncoupling.

Gap junction proteins form the substrate for electrical coupling between neurons. These electrical synapses are widespread in the CNS and serve a variety of important functions. In the retina, connexin 36 (Cx36) gap junctions couple AII amacrine cells and are a requisite component of the high-sensitivity rod photoreceptor pathway. AII amacrine cell coupling strength is dynamically regulated by background light intensity, and uncoupling is thought to be mediated by dopamine signaling via D(1)-like receptors. One proposed mechanism for this uncoupling involves dopamine-stimulated phosphorylation of Cx36 at regulatory sites, mediated by protein kinase A. Here we provide evidence against this hypothesis and demonstrate a direct relationship between Cx36 phosphorylation and AII amacrine cell coupling strength. Dopamine receptor-driven uncoupling of the AII network results from protein kinase A activation of protein phosphatase 2A and subsequent dephosphorylation of Cx36. Protein phosphatase 1 activity negatively regulates this pathway. We also find that Cx36 gap junctions can exist in widely different phosphorylation states within a single neuron, implying that coupling is controlled at the level of individual gap junctions by locally assembled signaling complexes. This kind of synapse-by-synapse plasticity allows for precise control of neuronal coupling, as well as cell-type-specific responses dependent on the identity of the signaling complexes assembled.

THE EFFECT OF GABAMIMETICS ON NEUROTRANSMITTER RECEPTOR BINDING AND FUNCTION IN RAT BRAIN

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is a major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system and alterations in central GABAergic transmission may contribute to the symptoms of a number of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Because of this relationship, numerous laboratories are attempting to develop agents which will selectively enhance GABA neurotransmission in brain. Due to these efforts, several promising compounds have recently been discovered. Should these drugs prove to be clinically effective, they will be used to treat chronic neuropsychiatric disabilities and, therefore, will be administered for long periods of time. Accordingly, the present investigation was undertaken to determine the neurochemical consequences of chronic activation of brain GABA systems in order to better define the therapeutic potential and possible side-effect liability of GABAmimetic compounds.^ Chronic (15 day) administration to rats of low doses of amino-oxyacetic acid (AOAA, 10 mg/kg, once daily), isonicotinic acid hydrazide (20 mg/kg, b.i.d.), two non-specific inhibitors of GABA-T, the enzyme which catabolizes GABA in brain, or (gamma)-acetylenic GABA (10 mg/kg, b.i.d.) a catalytic inhibitor of this enzyme, resulted in a significant elevation of brain and CSF GABA content throughout the course of treatment. In addition, chronic administration of these drugs, as well as the direct acting GABA receptor agonists THIP (8 mg/kg, b.i.d.) or kojic amine (18 mg/kg, b.i.d.) resulted in a significant increase in dopamine receptor number and a significant decrease in GABA receptor number in the corpus striatum of treated animals as determined by standard in vitro receptor binding techniques. Changes in the GABA receptor were limited to the corpus striatum and occurred more rapidly than did alterations in the dopamine receptor. The finding that dopamine-mediated stereotypic behavior was enhanced in animals treated chronically with AOAA suggested that the receptor binding changes noted in vitro have some functional consequence in vitro.^ Coadministration of atropine (a muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonist) blocked the GABA-T inhibitor-induced increase in striatal dopamine receptors but was without effect on receptor alterations seen following chronic administration of direct acting GABA receptor agonists. Atropine administration failed to influence the drug-induced decreases in striatal GABA receptors.^ Other findings included the discovery that synaptosomal high affinity ('3)H-choline uptake, an index of cholinergic neuronal activity, was significantly increased in the corpus striatum of animals treated acutely, but not chronically, with GABAmimetics.^ It is suggested that the dopamine receptor supersensitivity observed in the corpus striatum of animals following long-term treatment with GABAmimetics is a result of the chronic inhibition of the nigrostriatal dopamine system by these drugs. Changes in the GABA receptor, on the other hand, are more likely due to a homospecific regulation of these receptors. An hypothesis based on the different sites of action of GABA-T inhibitors vis-a-vis the direct acting GABA receptor agonists is proposed to account for the differential effect of atropine on the response to these drugs.^ The results of this investigation provide new insights into the functional interrelationships that exist in the basal ganglia and suggest that chronic treatment with GABAmimetics may produce extrapyramidal side-effects in man. In addition, the constellation of neurochemical changes observed following administration of these drugs may be a useful guide for determining the GABAmimetic properties of neuropharmacological agents. ^

TIME DEPENDENT ALTERATIONS IN CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DOPAMINE RECEPTORS INDUCED BY DOPAMINE AGONIST TREATMENT

Levodopa, the precursor of dopamine, is currently the drug of choice in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Recently, two direct dopamine agonists, bromocriptine and pergolide, have been tested for the treatment of Parkinson's disease because of reduced side effects compared to levodopa. Few studies have evaluated the effects of long-term treatment of dopamine agonists on dopamine receptor regulation in the central nervous system. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine whether chronic dopamine agonist treatment produces a down-regulation of striatal dopamine receptor function and to compare the results of the two classes of dopaminergic drugs.^ Levodopa with carbidopa, a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor, was administered orally to rats whereas bromocriptine and pergolide were injected intraperitoneally once daily. Several neurochemical parameters were examined from 1 to 28 days.^ Levodopa minimally decreased striatal D-1 receptor activity but increased the number of striatal D-2 binding sites. Levodopa increased the V(,max) of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in all brain regions tested. Protein blot analysis of striatal TH indicated a significant increase in the amount of TH present. Dopamine-beta-hydroxylase (DBH) activity was markedly decreased in all brain regions studied and mixing experiments of control and drug-treated cortices did not show the presence of an increased level of endogenous inhibitors.^ Bromocriptine treatment decreased the number of D-2 binding sites. Striatal TH activity was decreased and protein blot analysis indicated no change in TH quantity. The specificity of bromocriptine for striatal TH suggested that bromocriptine preferentially interacts with dopamine autoreceptors.^ Combination levodopa-bromocriptine was administered for 12 days. There was a decrease in both D-1 receptor activity and D-2 binding sites, and a decrease in brain HVA levels suggesting a postsynaptic receptor action. Pergolide produced identical results to the combination levodopa-bromocriptine studies.^ In conclusion, combination levodopa-bromocriptine and pergolide treatments exhibited the expected down-regulation of dopamine receptor activity. In contrast, levodopa appeared to up-regulate dopamine receptor activity. Thus, these data may help to explain, on a biochemical basis, the decrease in the levodopa-induced side effects noted with combination levodopa-bromocriptine or pergolide therapies in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. ^

Cellular mechanisms of operant and classical conditioning

The ability to associate a predictive stimulus with a subsequent salient event (i.e., classical conditioning) and the ability to associate an expressed behavior with the consequences (i.e., operant conditioning) allow for a predictive understanding of a changing environment. Although they are operationally distinct, there has been considerable debate whether at some fundamental level classical and operant conditioning are mechanistically distinct or similar. Feeding behavior of Aplysia (i.e., biting) was chosen as the model system and was successfully conditioned with appetitive forms of both operant and classical conditioning. The neuronal circuitry responsible for feeding is well understood and is suitable for cellular analyses, thus providing for a mechanistic comparison between these two forms of associative learning. ^ Neuron B51 is part of the feeding circuitry of Aplysia and is critical for the expression of ingestive behaviors. B51 also is a locus of plasticity following both operant and classical conditioning. Both in vivo and in vitro operant conditioning increased the input resistance and the excitability of B51. No pairing-specific changes in the input resistance were observed following both in vivo and in vitro classical conditioning. However, classical conditioning decreased the excitability of B51. Thus, both operant and classical conditioning modified the threshold level for activation of neuron B51, but in opposite directions, revealing key differences in the cellular mechanisms underlying these two forms of associative learning. ^ Next, the cellular mechanisms underlying operant conditioning were investigated in more detail using a single-cell analogue. The single-cell analogue successfully recapitulated the previous in vivo and in vitro operant conditioning results by increasing the input resistance and the excitability of B51. Both PKA and PKC were necessary for operant conditioning. Dopamine appears to be the transmitter mediating the reinforcement signal in this form of conditioning. A D1 dopamine receptor antibody revealed that the D1receptor localizes to the axon hillock, which is also the region that gives the strongest response when iontophoresing dopamine. ^ The studies presented herein, thus, provide for a greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying both of these forms of associative learning and demonstrate that they likely operate through distinct cellular mechanisms. ^