1 resultado para Concept of the company
em DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (2)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (6)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (66)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (5)
- Aston University Research Archive (19)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (2)
- Bioline International (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (39)
- Brock University, Canada (52)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (8)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (4)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (9)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (40)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (8)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (2)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (6)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (8)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (10)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (8)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (55)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ Center for the Blue Economy - Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- Digital Knowledge Repository of Central Drug Research Institute (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Harvard University (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (12)
- Helvia: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Córdoba (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (12)
- Instituto Politécnico de Leiria (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (4)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (3)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (4)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (31)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (72)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (4)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (11)
- Repositório Digital da Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (15)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (3)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (4)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (3)
- University of Michigan (297)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (11)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (7)
Resumo:
This study is an analytical investigation of the nature and implications of the current conceptions of scientific misconduct, arguing that the question of what constitutes misconduct in science is significantly more complex than what conventionally has been believed. Complicating the definitions of misconduct are the differences between professional science and non-scientific professions, in their respective norms of what constitutes valid knowledge, and what counts as appropriate and inappropriate practice. While institutionalized science claims that there is clear differentiation between its standards of validity and those of the non-scientific professions, this paper argues that, when it comes to misconduct, the perceived boundaries between the scientific and non-scientific professions are breached; the practice standards that science currently employs in self-policing misconduct have come to resemble the minimal juridical standards of practice that other professions employ. This study attempts, despite erosion of these traditional boundaries, to move from legalistic standards of scientific practice to intramural standards of practice, and in so doing, to hold scientific practice to a higher standard than ordinary public conduct. The result is a clearer understanding of scientific misconduct to aid those individual scientists who are required to make onerous determinations about the appropriateness of specific practices by their peers. ^