Effects of Combined Bevacizumab and Paclitaxel on Tumor Interstitial Fluid Pressure in a Preclinical Breast Cancer Model

Effects of Combined Bevacizumab and Paclitaxel on Tumor Interstitial Fluid Pressure in a Preclinical Breast Cancer Model by Ricardo H. Alvarez Several mechanisms of cell resistance are often accountable for unsuccessful chemotherapy against cancer. Another reason, which has received increased attention, is the inefficient transport of anticancer drugs into tumor tissue. These impaired transports of chemotherapy into the tumor have been attributed to abnormal microvasculature and to pathologically increased tumor hypertension also called: interstitial fluid pressure (IFP). The pathophysiological processes leading to elevated tumor IFP are poorly understood. Here, in a preclinical breast cancer model, it is argued that a condition of raised IFP is a major factor in preventing optimal access of systemically administered chemotherapy agents. In our experimental model, we used a GILM2 human breast cancer in xenografts; mice were treated with different doses of paclitaxel –a widely used antimicrotubular agent, and bevacizumab –monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The proposed research project is designed to test the hypothesis that paclitaxel in combination with bevacizumab decreases the tumor IPF by restoring tumor permeability and increasing chemotherapy delivery. We demonstrated that the combination of paclitaxel and bevacizumab produced greater tumor control than either agent given alone and this combination reduced the IFP, producing an increment of 75% of apoptosis compared with the control arm. In addition, the intra-tumor paclitaxel quantification by liquid chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS) demonstrated that lower dose of both agents showed a synergistic effect compared with high dose of treatment, where there is no significantly increase of paclitaxel into the tumor. These preclinical results are likely to have broad implications for the utility of anti-angiogenic therapies alone and in combination with chemotherapeutic agents.

Diversity in T cell costimulation by alpha4beta1 integrin

T cell activation requires antigen-specific T cell receptor signals that spatially and temporally coincide with a second costimulatory signal. CD28 and α4β1 integrin both function as T cell costimulators, but their individual mechanisms remain elusive. By directly comparing CD3-dependent functions and signaling pathways employed by these two costimulatory receptors, aspects of their individual signaling mechanisms are explored. We determined that CD28 and α4β1 integrins both use Src-family kinase Lck and MAPK Erk, but to different extents and functional ends. After identifying functional differences between CD28 and integrin costimulatory pathways, the focus of the study turned to integrin signaling in naïve and memory T cell subsets. CD45RO T cells are fully co-activated by natural β1 integrin ligands fibronectin (FN) and VCAM-1, β1 monoclonal antibody 33B6, as well as α4β1 monoclonal antibody 19H8 which binds a combinatorial epitope of the α4β1 heterodimer. While CD28 fully costimulates CD45RA T cells, the degree of activation from integrin ligands varies. FN costimulates CD3-dependent proliferation, IL-2 secretion, and early activation markers CD25 and CD69. However, β1 antibody 33B6, which binds to the same T cell integrins (α4β1 and α5β1) as natural ligand FN, failed to costimulate proliferation or IL-2 in the CD45RA subset, but retained the ability to regulate CD25 and CD69. Unique aspects of 19H8 signaling involve early Erk activation and IL-2 independent proliferation. Signaling defects through 33B6 ligation correlates with poor adhesion under fluid flow conditions, suggesting a cytoskeletal basis for signaling. All together, these data provide evidence for a mechanism of α4β1 integrin signaling and describe functional differences between naïve and memory T cells. ^