Tp53-dependent repression of cell cycle target genes: Global and mechanistic analysis

Most studies of p53 function have focused on genes transactivated by p53. It is less widely appreciated that p53 can repress target genes to affect a particular cellular response. There is evidence that repression is important for p53-induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. It is less clear if repression is important for other p53 functions. A comprehensive knowledge of the genes repressed by p53 and the cellular processes they affect is currently lacking. We used an expression profiling strategy to identify p53-responsive genes following adenoviral p53 gene transfer (Ad-p53) in PC3 prostate cancer cells. A total of 111 genes represented on the Affymetrix U133A microarray were repressed more than two fold (p ≤ 0.05) by p53. An objective assessment of array data quality was carried out using RT-PCR of 20 randomly selected genes. We estimate a confirmation rate of >95.5% for the complete data set. Functional over-representation analysis was used to identify cellular processes potentially affected by p53-mediated repression. Cell cycle regulatory genes exhibited significant enrichment (p ≤ 5E-28) within the repressed targets. Several of these genes are repressed in a p53-dependent manner following DNA damage, but preceding cell cycle arrest. These findings identify novel p53-repressed targets and indicate that p53-induced cell cycle arrest is a function of not only the transactivation of cell cycle inhibitors (e.g., p21), but also the repression of targets that act at each phase of the cell cycle. The mechanism of repression of this set of p53 targets was investigated. Most of the repressed genes identified here do not harbor consensus p53 DNA binding sites but do contain binding sites for E2F transcription factors. We demonstrate a role for E2F/RB repressor complexes in our system. Importantly, p53 is found at the promoter of CDC25A. CDC25A protein is rapidly degraded in response to DNA damage. Our group has demonstrated for the first time that CDC25A is also repressed at the transcript level by p53. This work has important implications for understanding the DNA damage cell cycle checkpoint response and the link between E2F/RB complexes and p53 in the repression of target genes. ^

c-{\it mos\/} RNA expression in somatic cells and its physiological significance in cell cycle progression

The c-mos proto-oncogene, which is expressed at relatively high levels in male and female germ cells, plays a key role in oocyte meiotic maturation. The c-mos gene product in oocytes (p39$\sp{\rm c-mos}$) is necessary and sufficient to initiate meiosis. p39$\sp{\rm c-mos}$ is also an essential component of the cytostatic factor, which is responsible for arresting vertebrate oocytes at the second meiotic metaphase by stabilizing the maturation promoting factor (MPF). MPF is a universal regulator of both meiosis and mitosis. Much less is understood about c-mos expression and function in somatic cells. In addition to gonadal tissues, c-Mos has been detected in some somatic tissues and non-germ cell lines including NIH 3T3 cells as a protein termed p43$\sp{\rm c-mos}$. Since c-mos RNA transcripts were not previously detected in this cell line by Northern blot or S1 protection analyses, a search was made for c-mos RNA in NIH 3T3 cells. c-mos transcripts were detected using the highly sensitive RNA-PCR method and RNase protection assays. Furthermore, cell cycle analyses indicated that expression of c-mos RNA is tightly controlled in a cell cycle dependent manner with highest levels of transcripts (approximately 5 copies/cell) during the G2 phase.^ In order to determine the physiological significance of c-mos RNA expression in somatic cells, antisense mos was placed under the control of an inducible promoter and introduced into either NIH 3T3 cells or C2 cells. It was found that a basal level of expression of antisense mos resulted in interference with mitotic progression and growth arrest. Several nuclear abnormalities were observed, especially the appearance of binucleated and multinucleated cells as well as the extrusion of microvesicles containing cellular material. These results indicate that antisense mos expression results in a block in cytokinesis. In summary, these results establish that c-mos expression is not restricted to germ cells, but instead indicate that c-mos RNA expression occurs during the G2 stage of the cell cycle. Furthermore, these studies demonstrate that the c-mos proto-oncogene plays an important role in cell cycle progression. As in meiosis, c-mos may have a similar but not identical function in regulating cell cycle events in somatic cells, particularly in controlling mitotic progression via activation/stabilization of MPF. ^

Molecular consequences of the loss of 3'→5' exonuclease activity of DNA polymerases delta and epsilon

The DNA replication polymerases δ and ϵ have an inherent proofreading mechanism in the form of a 3'→5' exonuclease. Upon recognition of errant deoxynucleotide incorporation into DNA, the nascent primer terminus is partitioned to the exonuclease active site where the incorrectly paired nucleotide is excised before resumption of polymerization. The goal of this project was to identify the cellular and molecular consequences of an exonuclease deficiency. The proofreading capability of model system MEFs with EXOII mutations was abolished without altering polymerase function.^ It was hypothesized that 3'→5' exonucleases of polymerases δ and ϵ are critical for prevention of replication stress and important for sensitization to nucleoside analogs. To test this hypothesis, two aims were formulated: Determine the effect of the exonuclease active site mutation on replication related molecular signaling and identify the molecular consequences of an exonuclease deficiency when replication is challenged with nucleoside analogs.^ Via cell cycle studies it was determined that larger populations of exonuclease deficient cells are in the S-phase. There was an increase in levels of replication proteins, cell population growth and DNA synthesis capacity without alteration in cell cycle progression. These findings led to studies of proteins involved in checkpoint activation and DNA damage sensing. Finally, collective modifications at the level of DNA replication likely affect the strand integrity of DNA at the chromosomal level.^ Gemcitabine, a DNA directed nucleoside analog is a substrate of polymerases δ and ϵ and exploits replication to become incorporated into DNA. Though accumulation of gemcitabine triphosphate was similar in all cell types, incorporation into DNA and rates of DNA synthesis were increased in exonuclease defective cells and were not consistent with clonogenic survival. This led to molecular signaling investigations which demonstrated an increase in S-phase cells and activation of a DNA damage response upon gemcitabine treatment.^ Collectively, these data indicate that the loss of exonuclease results in a replication stress response that is likely required to employ other repair mechanisms to remove unexcised mismatches introduced into DNA during replication. When challenged with nucleoside analogs, this ongoing stress response coupled with repair serves as a resistance mechanism to cell death.^

SYSTEMIC TOXICITY IN RODENTS FOLLOWING ACUTE AND SUBCHRONIC INHALATION OF FORMALDEHYDE (FLOW CYTOMETRY, CELL CYCLE KINETICS, ALKALINE ELUTION)

Systemic toxicity was evaluated in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats and A-strain mice exposed to HCHO inhalation at 0, 0.5, 3, or 15 ppm for six hours/day, five days/week for up to 24 weeks. Toxicity was measured by flow cytometry to detect changes in cell cycle RNA and DNA content and by alkaline elution to detect DNA protein cross-link (DPC) formation.^ A G(,2)M block was detected in SD rat marrow following one week of exposure to 0.5, 3, or 15 ppm HCHO, but this block did not persist. No effect was noticed in mouse marrow. Only a minimal increase in RNA content was detected in rat or mouse marrow while exfoliated lung cells showed a significant increase in RNA activity after one week of exposure.^ Acute exposure in SD rats for four hours/day for one or three days at 150 ppm showed an increase in RNA activity in exfoliated lung cells but not in the marrow after one day. On the third day, dead cells were detected in exfoliated lung cells.^ In alkaline elution studies, no DPC were detected in marrow of SD rats after 24 weeks exposure up to 15 ppm. During acute exposures, a dose response relationship was detected in SD rat exfoliated lung cells which yielded cross-linking factors of 0.954, 1.237, and 1.417 following a four hour exposure to 15, 50, or 150 ppm, respectively. No DPC were detected in the marrow at 150 ppm. In vitro exposures to HCHO of CHO and SHE cells and rat marrow cells revealed the production of DPC and DNA-DNA cross-links.^ Cytoxan treatment of SD rats was used to provide positive controls for flow cytometry and alkaline elution. A drastic reduction in RNA content and cycling cells occurred one day following treatment. After four days, RNA content was greatly increased; and on day eleven the marrow had regenerated. DPCs were detected in both the marrow and the exfoliated lung cells.^ The lack of significant responses in SD rats and A-strain mice below 15 ppm HCHO is explainable by host defense mechanisms. Apparently, the mucociliary apparatus and enzymatic detoxification are sufficient to reduce systemic toxicity to low level concentrations of formaldehyde. ^

Motivational interviewing and feedback for college drinkers: Handling missing values with complete case analysis and multiple imputation

Objective: In this secondary data analysis, three statistical methodologies were implemented to handle cases with missing data in a motivational interviewing and feedback study. The aim was to evaluate the impact that these methodologies have on the data analysis. ^ Methods: We first evaluated whether the assumption of missing completely at random held for this study. We then proceeded to conduct a secondary data analysis using a mixed linear model to handle missing data with three methodologies (a) complete case analysis, (b) multiple imputation with explicit model containing outcome variables, time, and the interaction of time and treatment, and (c) multiple imputation with explicit model containing outcome variables, time, the interaction of time and treatment, and additional covariates (e.g., age, gender, smoke, years in school, marital status, housing, race/ethnicity, and if participants play on athletic team). Several comparisons were conducted including the following ones: 1) the motivation interviewing with feedback group (MIF) vs. the assessment only group (AO), the motivation interviewing group (MIO) vs. AO, and the intervention of the feedback only group (FBO) vs. AO, 2) MIF vs. FBO, and 3) MIF vs. MIO.^ Results: We first evaluated the patterns of missingness in this study, which indicated that about 13% of participants showed monotone missing patterns, and about 3.5% showed non-monotone missing patterns. Then we evaluated the assumption of missing completely at random by Little's missing completely at random (MCAR) test, in which the Chi-Square test statistic was 167.8 with 125 degrees of freedom, and its associated p-value was p=0.006, which indicated that the data could not be assumed to be missing completely at random. After that, we compared if the three different strategies reached the same results. For the comparison between MIF and AO as well as the comparison between MIF and FBO, only the multiple imputation with additional covariates by uncongenial and congenial models reached different results. For the comparison between MIF and MIO, all the methodologies for handling missing values obtained different results. ^ Discussions: The study indicated that, first, missingness was crucial in this study. Second, to understand the assumptions of the model was important since we could not identify if the data were missing at random or missing not at random. Therefore, future researches should focus on exploring more sensitivity analyses under missing not at random assumption.^

Functional activation of p53 induces apoptosis in the absence of MDM2

The p53 tumor suppressor gene product is negatively regulated by the product of its downstream target, mdm2. The mdm2 oncogene abrogates p53 transactivation function. Amplification of mdm2 occurs in 36% of human sarcomas, which often retain p53 in wild type form, suggesting that overexpression of mdm2 in tumors results in p53 inactivation. Thus, the relationship of p53 to mdm2 is important in tumorigenesis. The deletion of mdm2 in the mouse results in embryonic lethality by 5.5 days post coitum. Embryonic lethality of the mdm2 null embryos was overcome by simultaneous loss of the p53 tumor suppressor, which substantiates the importance of the negative regulatory function of MDM2 on p53 function in vivo. These data suggest that the loss of MDM2 function allowed the constitutively active p53 protein to induce either a complete G1 arrest or the p53-dependent apoptotic pathway, resulting in the death of the mdm2−/− embryos.^ The present study examines the hypothesis that the absence of mdm2 induces apoptosis due to p53 activation. Viability of the p53−/−mdm2−/− mice has allowed establishment of mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) and a detailed examination of the properties of these cells. To introduce p53 into this system, and essentially recreate a mdm2 null cell, a temperature sensitive p53 (tsp53) point mutant (A135V) was used, which exhibits a nonfunctional, mutant conformation at 39°C and wild type, functional conformation at 32°C. Infected pools of p53−/− and p53−/−mdm2−/− MEFs with the tsp53 gene were established and single-cell clonal populations expressing tsp53 were selected. Shifting the cells from 39°C to 32°C caused p53−/−mdm2 −/− lines expressing tsp53 to undergo up to 80% apoptosis, which did not occur in the p53−/− lines expressing tsp53 nor the parental lines lacking p53 expression. Furthermore, the amount of p53 present in the clonal population determined the extent of apoptosis. Tsp53 is transcriptionally active in this system, however, it discriminates among different target promoters and does not induce the apoptosis effector targets bax or Fas/Apo1. ^ In summary, this study indicates that the presence or absence of mdm2 is the determining factor for the ability of p53 to trigger apoptosis in this system. The loss of mdm2 promotes p53-dependent apoptosis in MEFs in a cell cycle and dose-dependent manner. p53 is differentially phosphorylated in the presence and absence of mdm2, but does not induce the apoptosis effectors, bax or Fas/ Apo1. ^