2 resultados para Colonização nasal
em DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center
Resumo:
Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become an increasing problem in the community. Nasal carriage of these bacteria has been shown to be a predisposing factor for infection and environmental contamination. This serious public health concern prompted an investigation to assess the pediatric nasal carriage of these bacteria in an effort to better understand the populations at risk and prevention of infection.^ This prospective study surveys 30 children from the Northwest Assistance Ministries (NAM) pediatric clinic from October 2008 to the present. Two nasal swabs were taken in 2-4 week intervals to determine S. aureus carrier status. Microbiologic tests were conducted to isolate and identify S. aureus from nasal cultures. Children with 2 cultures positive for S. aureus were classified as persistent carriers, those with 1 positive and 1 negative culture were classified as intermittent carriers, and those with 2 negative cultures were classified as noncarriers. This information was related to patient records and statistical analyses (X 2 and t-tests) were performed.^ Distribution of S. aureus carriage related to patient demographics (age, sex, & race) was showed no significant differences between S. aureus positive and S. aureus negative patient populations (p = 0.8). Additionally, the distribution of carrier status related to demographics also showed no significant difference (p = 0.8). Finally, the distribution of carrier status related to relevant medical history (immunizations current, past infection, & antibiotic use at time of swabbing) showed no significant difference (p = 0.4).^ This study is a snapshot of an ongoing study to assess the pediatric nasal carriage of S. aureus and MRSA. The inability to draw any reliable conclusion from the distribution of data is likely a result of an inadequate samples size. This is one of few studies assessing pediatric nasal carriage of S. aureus and targeting an underrepresented, Hispanic population is especially unique. Continuing this study allows for a better understanding of the epidemiology of this bacterium which will hopefully lead to appropriate interventions thus preventing future S. aureus infections.^
Resumo:
Background. MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) is a multi-drug resistant bacterium that is quite prevalent in social environments where close person-to-person contact and crowding are an issue. In dental settings, the likelihood of transmission of MRSA may be higher than among other healthcare practitioners because of the close proximity between a patient's nose (where MRSA colonizes) and the field of procedure (the mouth) to the dental professional. Objective. To estimate the prevalence of MRSA nasal colonization among dental professionals (dentists and dental hygienists) in the Greater Houston Metropolitan Area, Texas, and analyze its associations with demographic, professional and personal protective equipment-related variables. Methods. 800 dental professionals (400 dentists and 400 dental hygienists) were randomly selected in the Greater Houston Metropolitan Area. Multiple waves of nasal swab kits and a self-administered questionnaire were mailed to increase the response rate of the study population. The swabs were cultured on chromagenic agar growth medium and bacterial growth results were evaluated after 18 hours. Positively selected bacterial colonies were confirmed as MRSA by further culturing these isolated bacteria on blood agar plates. Associations between positive nasal swabs and self-reported professional practice patterns, personal protective equipment use and demographics were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. Main Results. Completed questionnaires and nasal swabs were received from 496 study participants (68%). Fourteen cultures were positive for MRSA (4.2% among dentists and 1.6% among dental hygienists, p=0.07). After adjusting for gender, dental hygienists had a significantly lower prevalence of nasal colonization of MRSA as compared to dentists (OR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05–0.75). No other significant associations or interactions were found. Conclusion. The prevalence of nasal colonization with MRSA among dentists is similar to that reported for health care workers in general, whereas prevalence among dental hygienists is only slightly above that of the general population (1%). Differences in practice patterns and use of personal protective equipment did not explain this difference in this study, and was possibly due either to residual confounding or unexplored risk factors. Increased prevalence of MRSA among dentists warrants further investigation as to the reason for the increased rate and to allow implementation of measures to avoid transmission and progression to disease. ^