Molecular basis for class V beta-tubulin effects on microtubule assembly and paclitaxel resistance.

Vertebrates produce at least seven distinct beta-tubulin isotypes that coassemble into all cellular microtubules. The functional differences among these tubulin isoforms are largely unknown, but recent studies indicate that tubulin composition can affect microtubule properties and cellular microtubule-dependent behavior. One of the isotypes whose incorporation causes the largest change in microtubule assembly is beta5-tubulin. Overexpression of this isotype can almost completely destroy the microtubule network, yet it appears to be required in smaller amounts for normal mitotic progression. Moderate levels of overexpression can also confer paclitaxel resistance. Experiments using chimeric constructs and site-directed mutagenesis now indicate that the hypervariable C-terminal region of beta5 plays no role in these phenotypes. Instead, we demonstrate that two residues found in beta5 (Ser-239 and Ser-365) are each sufficient to inhibit microtubule assembly and confer paclitaxel resistance when introduced into beta1-tubulin; yet the single mutation of residue Ser-239 in beta5 eliminates its ability to confer these phenotypes. Despite the high degree of conservation among beta-tubulin isotypes, mutations affecting residue 365 demonstrate that amino acid substitutions can be context sensitive; i.e. an amino acid change in one isotype will not necessarily produce the same phenotype when introduced into a different isotype. Modeling studies indicate that residue Cys-239 of beta1-tubulin is close to a highly conserved Cys-354 residue suggesting the possibility that disulfide formation could play a significant role in the stability of microtubules formed with beta1- but not with beta5-tubulin.

Role of organic cation transporters in the renal secretion of nucleoside analogs

The mammalian kidney maintains homeostasis of the extracellular environment and eliminates toxic substances from the body, in part via secretion by the organic cation transporters (OCT). Some nucleosides are also secreted by the kidney. Previous work indicated that the deoxyadenosine analog, 2′ -deoxytubercidin (dTub), is secreted by mouse kidney through the OCTs. This study examines the role of OCTs in the renal secretion of dTub and other nucleoside analogs. ^ Using the Xenopus laevis oocyte expression system, the basolateral type rat organic cation transporter rOCT1 was shown to transport dTub and other nucleosides. The positive charged form of dTub (dTub +) appears to be the substrate for rOCT1. Tetraethylammonium (TEA) and dTub competitively inhibit the other's uptake by rOCT1 in a manner consistent with their interaction at a common site. Although 67% homologous with rOCT1, rOCT2 does not mediate the uptake of these nucleosides. Kinetic studies demonstrated the difference in substrate specificity between rOCT1 and rOCT2 to be largely due to a poor affinity of rOCT2 for dTub+. This difference in affinity is located within transmembrane domains 2–7 as determined by chimeric constructs. ^ OCT1 knockout mice were used to evaluate the role of OCT1 in the renal secretion of dTub. No significant difference in tissue distribution and urinary excretion of dTub was observed between the knockout and wild-type mice, indicating that OCT1 is not necessary for the renal secretion of dTub. Apical transporters are postulated to participate in its active secretion. To characterize a possible apical transporter, we screened several renal cell lines for a nucleoside-sensitive OCT. American opossum kidney proximal tubule cells (OK) express a TEA efflux transporter that is inhibited by dTub and other nucleoside analogs. This carrier is metabolic-dependent and distinct from the cloned OCTs to date, i.e. it is sodium- and proton-independent. In conclusion, dTub is a good substrate for OCT1; however, this OCT is not necessary for its renal secretion in mice. The novel TEA efflux transporter identified in OK cells is likely to participate in the renal secretion of dTub and perhaps other nucleoside analogs. ^

Advances in progenitor cell therapy using scaffolding constructs for central nervous system injury.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Current clinical therapy is focused on optimization of the acute/subacute intracerebral milieu, minimizing continued cell death, and subsequent intense rehabilitation to ameliorate the prolonged physical, cognitive, and psychosocial deficits that result from TBI. Adult progenitor (stem) cell therapies have shown promise in pre-clinical studies and remain a focus of intense scientific investigation. One of the fundamental challenges to successful translation of the large body of pre-clinical work is the delivery of progenitor cells to the target location/organ. Classically used vehicles such as intravenous and intra arterial infusion have shown low engraftment rates and risk of distal emboli. Novel delivery methods such as nanofiber scaffold implantation could provide the structural and nutritive support required for progenitor cell proliferation, engraftment, and differentiation. The focus of this review is to explore the current state of the art as it relates to current and novel progenitor cell delivery methods.

Deviation of the alloimmune response toward tolerance by chimeric class I MHC molecules

Class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules induce either accelerated rejection or prolonged survival of allografts, presumably because of the presence of immunogenic or tolerogenic epitopes, respectively. To explore the molecular basis of this phenomenon, three chimeric class I molecules were constructed by substituting the rat class I RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$ sequences with the N-terminus of HLA-A2.1 (N$\sp{\rm HLA-A2.1}$-RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$), the $\alpha\sb1$ helix (h) with $\rm\alpha\sb{1h}\sp{u}$ sequences ( ($\rm\alpha\sb{1h}\sp{u}$) -RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$) or the entire $\alpha\sb2$ domain (d) with $\rm\alpha\sb{2d}\sp{u}$ sequences ( ($\rm\alpha\sb{2d}\sp{u}$) -RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$). Wild type (WT) and chimeric cDNAs were sequenced prior to transfection into Buffalo (BUF; RT1$\sp{\rm b}$) hepatoma cells. Stable transfectants were injected subcutaneously (s.c.) into different hosts 7 days prior to challenge with a heart allograft. In BUF hosts, chimeric ($\rm\alpha\sb{1h}\sp{u}$) -RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$ accelerated the rejection of Wistar Furth (WF; RT1$\sp{\rm u}$) heart allografts, but had no effect on the survival of ACI (RT1$\sp{\rm a}$) grafts. In contrast, the ($\rm\alpha\sb{2d}\sp{u}$) -RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$ (containing $\rm\alpha\sb{1d}\sp{a}$ sequences) immunized BUF recipients toward RT1$\sp{\rm a}$ grafts. In WF hosts, WT-RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$ was a potent immunogen and accelerated ACI graft rejection, N$\sp{\rm HLA-A2.1}$-RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$ was less effective and ($\rm\alpha\sb{\rm 1h}\sp{u}\rbrack$-RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$ was not immunogenic. Thus, dominant and subdominant epitopes inducing in vivo sensitization to cardiac allografts are present in the $\alpha\sb1$ helix and the N-terminus, respectively. The failure of ($\rm\alpha\sb{2d}\sp{u}$) -RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$ transfectants (containing recipient-type $\alpha\sb{\rm 2d}$ sequences) to sensitize WF hosts toward ACI (RT1$\sp{\rm a}$) grafts, despite the presence of donor-type immunogenic $\alpha\sb{\rm 1d}\sp{\rm a}$, suggests that "self-$\alpha\sb2$" sequences displayed on chimeric antigens interfere with immunogenicity. The ($\rm\alpha\sb{1h}\sp{u}$) -RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$ transfectants injected s.c. prolonged the survival of WF (RT1$\sp{\rm u}$) hearts in ACI (RT1$\sp{\rm a}$) recipients. Furthermore, intra-portal injection of extracts from ($\rm\alpha\sb{1h}\sp{u}$) -RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$, but not WT-RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$ or RT1.A$\sp{\rm u}$, in conjunction with a brief cyclosporine course rendered ACI hosts permanently and specifically tolerant to donor-type WF cardiac allografts. Thus, immunodominant allodeterminants are present in the $\alpha\sb1$, but not the $\alpha\sb2$, domain of rat class I MHC molecules. Furthermore, the $\rm\alpha\sb{1h}\sp{u}$ immunogenic epitopes trigger tolerogenic responses when flanked by host-type N-terminal$\sp{\rm a}$ and $\rm\alpha\sb{2d}\sp{a}$ sequences. ^

Comparing the factorial structure, invariance, and predictive validity of transtheoretical model constructs for alcohol use across restricted and unrestricted settings

With substance abuse treatment expanding in prisons and jails, understanding how behavior change interacts with a restricted setting becomes more essential. The Transtheoretical Model (TTM) has been used to understand intentional behavior change in unrestricted settings, however, evidence indicates restrictive settings can affect the measurement and structure of the TTM constructs. The present study examined data from problem drinkers at baseline and end-of-treatment from three studies: (1) Project CARE (n = 187) recruited inmates from a large county jail; (2) Project Check-In (n = 116) recruited inmates from a state prison; (3) Project MATCH, a large multi-site alcohol study had two recruitment arms, aftercare (n = 724 pre-treatment and 650 post-treatment) and outpatient (n = 912 pre-treatment and 844 post-treatment). The analyses were conducted using cross-sectional data to test for non-invariance of measures of the TTM constructs: readiness, confidence, temptation, and processes of change (Structural Equation Modeling, SEM) across restricted and unrestricted settings. Two restricted (jail and aftercare) and one unrestricted group (outpatient) entering treatment and one restricted (prison) and two unrestricted groups (aftercare and outpatient) at end-of-treatment were contrasted. In addition TTM end-of-treatment profiles were tested as predictors of 12 month drinking outcomes (Profile Analysis). Although SEM did not indicate structural differences in the overall TTM construct model across setting types, there were factor structure differences on the confidence and temptation constructs at pre-treatment and in the factor structure of the behavioral processes at the end-of-treatment. For pre-treatment temptation and confidence, differences were found in the social situations factor loadings and in the variance for the confidence and temptation latent factors. For the end-of-treatment behavioral processes, differences across the restricted and unrestricted settings were identified in the counter-conditioning and stimulus control factor loadings. The TTM end-of-treatment profiles were not predictive of drinking outcomes in the prison sample. Both pre and post-treatment differences in structure across setting types involved constructs operationalized with behaviors that are limited for those in restricted settings. These studies suggest the TTM is a viable model for explicating addictive behavior change in restricted settings but calls for modification of subscale items that refer to specific behaviors and caution in interpreting the mean differences across setting types for problem drinkers. ^