HETEROGENEITY IN VIRUS EXPRESSION, TUMORIGENICITY, AND IN VITRO GROWTH PROPERTIES OF DRUG-RESISTANT CLONES OF AN RIII MOUSE MAMMARY TUMOR CELL LINE

Four 8-azaguanine (AG)-resistant and 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR)-resistant clones of a mouse mammary adenocarcinoma cell line, RIII 7387, were developed and analyzed for their tumorigenic properties, in vitro characteristics, and virus expression. These characteristics were analyzed for relationships of any of the cellular parameters and the ability of these lines to produce tumors in syngeneic animals.^ The results of this study demonstrated that the parental line consists of a heterogeneous population of cells. Doubling times, saturation densities, and 2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake varied between sublines. In addition, while all sublines were found to express both B-type and C-type viral antigenic markers, levels of the major B-type and C-type viral proteins varied in the subclones. The sublines also differed markedly in their response to the presence of dexamethasone, glutathione, and insulin in the tissue culture medium.^ Variations in retrovirus expression were convirmed by electron microscopy. Budding and extracellular virus particles were seen in the majority of the cell lines. Virus particles in one of the BUdR-resistant lines, BUD9, were found however, only in inclusions and vacuoles. The AG-resistant subline AGE11 was observed to be rich in intracytoplasmic A particles. The examination of these cell lines for the presence of retroviral RNA-dependent DNA polymerase (RT) activity revealed that some B-type RT activity could be found in the culture fluid of most of the cell lines but that little C-type RT activity could be found suggesting that the C-type virus particles expressed by these RIII clones contain a defective RT.^ Tumor clones also varied in their ability to form tumors in syngeneic RIII mice. Tumor incidence ranged from 50% to 100%. The majority of the tumors regressed within 30 days post infection.^ Statistical analysis indicated that while these clones varied in their characteristics, there was no correlation between the ability of these cell lines to form tumors in syngeneic mice and any of the other characteristics examined.^ These studies have confirmed and extended the growing evidence that tumors, regardless of their natural origin, consist of heterogeneous subpopulations of cells which may vary widely in their in vitro growth behavior, their antigenic expression, and their malignant properties. ^

THE EXPRESSION AND CELLULAR LOCALIZATION OF CC-CHEMOKINE RECEPTOR 5 (CCR5) AFTER TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY

Traumatic brain injury results from a primary insult and secondary events that together result in tissue injury. This primary injury occurs at the moment of impact and damage can include scalp laceration, skull fraction, cerebral contusions and lacerations as well as intracranial hemorrhage. Following the initial insult, a delayed response occurs and is characterized by hypoxia, ischemia, cerebral edema, and infection. During secondary brain injury, a series of neuroinflammatory events are triggered that can produce additional damage but may also help to protect nervous tissue from invading pathogens and help to repair the damaged tissue. Brain microglia and astrocytes become activated and migrate to the site of injury where these cells secrete immune mediators such as cytokines and chemokines. CC-chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is a member of the CC chemokine receptor family of seven transmembrane G protein coupled receptors. CCR5 is expressed in the immune system and is found in monocytes, leukoctyes, memory T cells, and immature dendritic cells. Upon binding to its ligands, CCR5 functions in the chemotaxis of these immune cells to the site of inflammation. In the CNS, CCR5 and its ligands are expressed in multiple cell types. In this study, I investigated whether CCR5 expression is altered in brain after traumatic brain injury. I examined the time course of CCR5 protein expression in cortex and hippocampus using quantitative western analysis of tissues from injured rat brain after mild impact injury. In addition, I also investigated the cellular localization of CCR5 before and after brain injury using confocal microscopy. I have observed that after brain injury CCR5 is upregulated in a time dependent manner in neurons of the parietal cortex and hippocampus. The absence of CCR5 expression in microglia and its delayed expression in neurons after injury suggests a role for CCR5 in neuronal survival after injury.