Cardiomyocyte PDGFR-beta signaling is an essential component of the mouse cardiac response to load-induced stress.

PDGFR is an important target for novel anticancer therapeutics because it is overexpressed in a wide variety of malignancies. Recently, however, several anticancer drugs that inhibit PDGFR signaling have been associated with clinical heart failure. Understanding this effect of PDGFR inhibitors has been difficult because the role of PDGFR signaling in the heart remains largely unexplored. As described herein, we have found that PDGFR-beta expression and activation increase dramatically in the hearts of mice exposed to load-induced cardiac stress. In mice in which Pdgfrb was knocked out in the heart in development or in adulthood, exposure to load-induced stress resulted in cardiac dysfunction and heart failure. Mechanistically, we showed that cardiomyocyte PDGFR-beta signaling plays a vital role in stress-induced cardiac angiogenesis. Specifically, we demonstrated that cardiomyocyte PDGFR-beta was an essential upstream regulator of the stress-induced paracrine angiogenic capacity (the angiogenic potential) of cardiomyocytes. These results demonstrate that cardiomyocyte PDGFR-beta is a regulator of the compensatory cardiac response to pressure overload-induced stress. Furthermore, our findings may provide insights into the mechanism of cardiotoxicity due to anticancer PDGFR inhibitors.

Dual Targeting of Tumor Angiogenesis and Chemotherapy by Endostatin- Cytosine Deaminase-Uracil PhosphoribosylTransferase

Antiangiogenesis is a promising anti-tumor strategy through inhibition tumor vascularformation to suppress tumor growth. Targeting specific VEGF/R has been showntherapeutic benefits in many cancer types and become a first approvedantiangiogenic modalities by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in United States.However, interruption of homeostasis in normal tissues that is likely due to theinhibition of VEGF/R signaling pathway induces unfavorable side effects. Moreover,cytostatic nature of antiangiogenic drugs frequently causes less tumor cell specifickilling activity, and cancer cells escaped from cell death induced by these drugseven gain more malignant phenotypes, resulting in tumor invasion and metastasis.To overcome these issues, we developed a novel anti-tumor therapeutic EndoCDfusion protein which linked endostatin (Endo) to cytosine deaminase-uracilvphosphoribosyl transferase (CD). Endo targets unique tumor endothelial cells toprovide tumor-specific antiangiogenesis activity and also carries CD to the localtumor area, where it serves nontoxic prodrug 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC) enzymaticconversion reaction to anti-metabolite chemotherapy drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Wedemonstrated that 5-FU concentration was highly increased in tumor sites, resultingin high level of endothelial cells and tumor cells cytotoxic efficacy. Furthermore,EndoCD/5-FC therapy decreased tumor growth and colorectal liver metastasisincident compared with bevacizumab/5-FU treatment in human breast and colorectalliver metastasis orthotropic animal models. In cardiotoxicity safety profile,EndoCD/5-FC is a contrast to bevacizumab/5-FU; lower risk of cardiotoxicityinduction or heart function failure was found in EndoCD/5-FC treatment thanbevacizumab/5-FU does in mice. EndoCD/5-FC showed more potent therapeuticefficacy with high safety profile and provided stronger tumor invasion or metastasisinhibition than antiangiogenic drugs. Together, EndoCD fusion protein with 5-FCshowed dual tumor targeting activities including antiangiogenesis and tumor localchemotherapy, and it could serve as an alternative option for antiangiogenic therapy.

The mechanism of the pharmacological actions of dexrazoxane on different tissue types

Approximately 6,600 people die from acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) on an annual basis. During the past 10 to 15 years, there has been gradual overall improvements in the therapy of this disease, yet the majority of patients with AML succumb to this disease. In an attempt to improve current therapeutic strategies for AML, we became interested in a commercially available drug, dexrazoxane, which protects against anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. We have investigated dexrazoxane's (DEX) effects on different tissue types in an effort to determine its unique mechanism of action. Colony forming assays were used to evaluate stem-cell renewal of myeloid cells in vitro and median effect analysis was used to evaluate antagonism, synergism, or additivity. The anthracyclines, doxorubicin, daunorubicin, and idarubicin were individually combined with DEX in leukemic myeloid models to determine if the combination of the two drugs resulted in a synergistic, additive or antagonistic effect. Etoposide and cytosine arabinoside were also evaluated in combination with DEX using the same in vitro model and evaluated similarly. ^ Dexrazoxane in combination with any of the anthracyclines was schedule dependent. The combination of DEX and anthracycline resulted in a greater antitumor effect than anthracycline alone except for DEX administered 24 hours before doxorubicin or daunorubicin. These data were corroborated through median effect analysis. Etoposide in combination with dexrazoxane was synergistic for all combinations, and the combination of cytosine arabinoside and DEX was schedule dependent. In contrast, using an in vivo gastrointestinal model, DEX in combination with doxorubicin was antagonistic for almost all of the ratios used, except for the highest. A Withers' assay was used to evaluate toxicity on jejunal crypt cells. No effect was apparent for the combination of idarubicin and DEX, however, as seen with RZ, DEX in addition to radiation greatly potentiated the cytotoxic effects of radiation on crypts. These paradoxical effects of dexrazoxane were initially enigmatic, but after additional investigation, we propose a model that explains our findings. We conclude that DEX in combination with anthracyclines produces an additive to synergistic antileukemic response and may have therapeutic potential clinically. Additionally, DEX protects the gastrointestinal tract from doxorubicin toxicity, which could have clinical implications for the administration of greater doses of doxorubicin. ^