Human Trafficking Victims and Their Children: Assessing Needs, Vulnerabilities, Strengths, and Survivorship

Given the increased awareness and attention to human trafficking, including the establishment of federal laws and policies, federally funded task forces that provide law enforcement responses, and specialized victim services, it is important to assess the impact of these procedures and services on survivors/victims of international human trafficking and their immigrant children. By federal definition, certified victims of international human trafficking are eligible for all services provided to refugees in this country, including reunification with their minor children. This research is based on a qualitative study conducted in Austin and Houston, Texas with human trafficking victims/survivors. The project’s goal was to gain an understanding of the needs of human trafficking survivors after their rescue, their overall integration into American life, and the subsequent needs of their immigrant children after reunification. The project objectives examined the factors that either promote or hinder self-sufficiency, the determination of social service needs, and policy and practice recommendations to strengthen survivors, their children and their families living both locally and abroad. For this project, nine (n = 9) in-depth interviews were conducted with adult foreign-born victims of human trafficking. Researchers gathered data using a semi-structured questionnaire that queried about factors that promote or hinder victims’ services and needs. Interviews were conducted in participants’ homes using bilingual research staff and/or trained interpreters, were digitally-recorded, and subsequently transcribed. Participation in this study was completely voluntary. Specific steps were taken to ensure that the participants’ identities were protected. Open coding of data was utilized and the data were subsequently organized or grouped into properties and later developed into contextual themes around the research questions. The findings are grounded with the use of direct quotes from participants. As a result of progressive U.S. policy, many victims of human trafficking are being reunited with their minor children. Immigrant children are one of the largest and fastest growing populations in the U.S. and for a variety of reasons are vulnerable to exploitation. Research also indicates that victims of trafficking are identified by traffickers because of their perceived “vulnerabilities” or lack of opportunities (Clark, 2003). Therefore, it is important that practices and policies are developed to address the unique needs of these families with an eye toward positive outcomes for parent and child safety and well-being. Social service providers are provided a toolkit that may be utilized before and during the reunification period.

Commentary: “Human Trafficking Victims and Their Children: Assessing Needs, Vulnerabilities, Strengths, and Survivorship"

A commentary on Busch-Armendariz, Nsonwu, and Heffron’s article, “Human Trafficking Victims and Their Children: Assessing Needs, Vulnerabilities, Strengths, and Survivorship,” noting key findings and calling for further research.

Practitioners' Views of Family Strengths: A Delphi Study

Reported is a research study to assess the opinions of family practitioners on the status of families in Oklahoma. Researchers employed the Delphi method to achieve consensus among key informants in the family practice field about the strengths and weaknesses of Oklahoma families, threats facing families in the state, and means to strengthening family life in Oklahoma. The study yielded qualitative data from the key informants, which the researchers then condensed into response categories to feed back to informants to rate. Family practitioners identified resilience, spirituality, and access to support systems as the greatest strengths, and listed substance abuse, poverty, and generational cycles of dysfunction as the greatest weaknesses of Oklahoma families. Recommendations by these practitioners are given for improvements in addressing family needs.

Commentary on "Practitioners’ Views of Family Strengths: A Delphi Study"

Commentary on "Practitioners’ Views of Family Strengths: A Delphi Study"

Trends in utilization of computer tomography (CT) scans for victims of motor vehicle collision (MVCs) in a level I trauma center from 1996 to 2006

Purpose. To evaluate trends in the utilization of head, abdominal, thoracic and other body regions CTs in the management of victims of MVC at a level I trauma center from 1996 to 2006.^ Method. From the trauma registry, I identified patients involved in MVC's in a level I trauma center and categorized them into three age groups of 13-18, 19-55 and ≥56. I used International Classification of Disease (ICD-9-CM) codes to find the type and number of CTs examinations performed for each patient. I plotted the mean number of CTs per patient against year of admission to find the crude estimate of change in utilization pattern for each type of CT. I used logistic regression to assess whether repetitive CTs (≥ 2) for head, abdomen, thorax and other body regions were associated with age group and year of admission for MVC patients. I adjusted the estimates for gender, ethnicity, insurance status, mechanism and severity of injury, intensive care unit admission status, patient disposition (dead or alive) and year of admission.^ Results. Utilization of head, abdominal, thoracic and other body regions CTs significantly increased over 11-year period. Utilization of head CT was greatest in the 13-18 age group, and increased from 0.58 CT/patient in 1996 to 1.37 CT/patient in 2006. Abdominal CTs were more common in the ≥56+ age group, and increased from 0.33 CT/patient in 1996 to 0.72 CT/patient in 2006. Utilization of thoracic CTs was higher in the 56+ age group, and increased from 0.01 CT/patient in 1996 to 0.42 CT/patient in 2006. Utilization of other CTs did not change materially during the study period for adolescents, adults or older adults. In the multivariable analysis, after adjustment for potential confounders, repetitive head CTs significantly increased in the 13-18 age group (95% CI: 1.29-1.87, p=<0.001) relative to the 19-55 age group. Repetitive thoracic CT use was lower in adolescents (95% CI: 0.22-0.70, p=<0.001) relative to the 19-55 age group.^ Conclusion. There has been a substantial increase in the utilization of head, abdominal, thoracic and other CTs in the management of MVC patients. Future studies need to identify if increased utilization of CTs have resulted in better health outcome for these patients. ^

Family Strengths: A Long Tradition

Alvin Sallee, Angelo Giardino, and Robert Sanborn discuss the latest issue of Journal of Family Strengths, celebrating the centennial of the Children's Bureau.

Applying the Strengths Perspective to Increase Safety and Weil-Being: Views from Families and Providers

Consensus about the value of the strengths perspective is developing among child welfare and family service practitioners. Yet, few first-hand reports are available from the perspectives of family members and interdisciplinary service providers about the principles most important for engaging and supporting family members to achieve needed outcomes. This paper briefly highlights principles most often cited as key to application of the strengths perspective and compares first-hand accounts from family members and service providers. These views were elicited through focus groups facilitated by a community-based family support program.Implications for strengths-based practice with families are discussed.