ELUCIDATING THE ROLE OF CD44 EXPRESSION ON MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS WITHIN THE TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT

The tumor microenvironment is comprised of a vast array of heterogeneous cells including both normal and neoplastic cells. The tumor stroma recruitment process has been exploited for an effective gene delivery technique using bone marrow derived MSC. Targeted migration of the MSC toward the tumor microenvironment, while successful, is not yet fully understood. This study was designed to assess the role of CD44 in the migration of MSC toward the tumor microenvironment and to determine the implications of CD44-deficient MSC within the tumor stroma. Inhibition of MSC migration was evaluated through a variety of methods in vitro and in vivo including CD44 receptor knockdown, CD44 antagonists, CD44 neutralizing antibodies and small molecule inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases. Blocking CD44 signaling through MMP inhibition was characterized by lack of intracellular domain cleavage and lead to the decrease in Twist gene expression. A functional relationship between CD44 and Twist expression was confirmed by chromatin immunoprecipitation. Next, a series of murine tumor models were used to examine the role of CD44 deficient stroma within the tumor microenvironment. Labeled transgenic CD44 knockout (KO) MSC or wild type (WT) C57/B6 MSC were used to analyze the stromal incorporation within murine breast carcinomas (EO771 and 4T1). Subsequent tumors were analyzed for vessel formation (CD31), and the presence of tumor associated fibroblast (TAF) markers, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), fibroblast activation protein (FAP), and fibroblast specific protein (FSP). The tumors with CD44KO MSC cells had less vessel formation than the tumors with WT MSC. The lack of fibroblastic TAF population as defined by FAP/FSP expression by the CD44KO MSC admixed tumors suggest that the bone marrow derived population of MSC were unable to contribute to the fibroblastic stromal population. Subsequently, a bone marrow transplantation experiment confirmed the endogenous migratory deficiencies of the CD44KO bone marrow derived stromal cells toward the tumor microenvironment in vivo. WT mice with CD44KO bone marrow had less CD44KOderived tumor stroma compared to mice with WT bone marrow. These results indicate that CD44 is crucial to stromal cell migration and incorporation to the tumor microenvironment as TAF.

Integrins in human T cell function: Transdominant regulation, conformational constraints, and intracellular effectors

Integrin adhesion molecules have both positive and negative potential in the regulation of peripheral blood T cell (PB T cell) activation, yet their mechanism of action in the mediation of human T lymphocyte function remains largely undefined. The goals of this study then were to elucidate integrin signaling mechanisms in PB T cells.^ By ligating $\beta$1 integrins with mAb 18D3, it was demonstrated that costimulation of PB T cell proliferation induced by coimmobilizing antibodies specific for $\beta$1, $\beta$2, and $\beta$7 integrin subfamilies in conjunction with the anti-CD3 mAb OKT3 was inhibited. Costimulation of T cell proliferation induced by non-integrins CD4, CD26, CD28, CD44, CD45RA, or CD45RO was unaffected. Inhibition of costimulation correlated with diminished IL-2 production. In his manner, $\beta$1 integrins could regulate heterologous integrins of the $\beta$2 and $\beta$7 subfamilies in a transdominant fashion. It was also demonstrated that integrin costimulation of T cell activation was acutely sensitive to the structural conformation of $\beta$1 integrins. Using the cyclic hexapeptide CWLDVC (TBC772, which is based on the $\alpha4\beta1$ integrin binding site in fibronectin) in soluble form, it was shown that integrins locked into a conformation displaying a neo-epitope called the ligand induced binding site (LIBS) recognized by mAb 15/7 were inhibited from sending mitogenic signals to T cells. When BSA-conjugated TBC772 was coimmobilized with anti-CD3 mAb OKT3, costimulation of proliferation occurred. This suggested that temporally uncoupling integrin receptor occupancy from receptor crosslinking inhibited $\beta$1 integrin signaling mechanisms. When subsets of PB T cells were examined to determine those initially activated by integrins within 6 hours of activation, costimulation induced intracellular accumulation of IL-2 predominantly in the CD4$\sp+$ and CD45RO$\sp+$ T cell subsets. This was similar to a number of PB T cell costimulatory molecules including CD26, CD43, CD44. Only CD28 costimulated IL-2 production from both CD45RA$\sp+$ and CD45RO$\sp+$ subpopulations.^ The GTPase Rho has been implicated in regulating integrin mediated stress fiber formation and anchorage dependent growth in fibroblasts, so studies were initiated to determine if Rho played a role in integrin dependent T cell function. In order to perform this, a technique based on scrape-loading was developed to incorporate macromolecules into PB T cells that maintained their functional activity. With this technique, C3 exoenzyme from Clostridium botulinum was incorporated into PB T cells. C3 ADP-ribosylates Rho proteins on Asn$\sp{41},$ which is in close proximity to the Rho effector domain, rendering it inactive. It was demonstrated that functional Rho is not required for basal or upregulated PB T cell adhesion to $\beta$1 integrin substrates, however PB T cell homotypic aggregation induced by PMA, which is an event mediated predominantly by the integrin $\rm\alpha L\beta2,$ was delayed. PB T cells lacking Rho function displayed altered cell morphology on $\beta$1 integrin ligands, producing stellate, dendritic-like pseudopodia. Rho activity was also found to be required for integrin dependent costimulation of proliferation. When intracellular accumulation of IL-2 was measured, inactivation of Rho prevented both integrin and CD28 costimulatory activity. Rho was identified to lie upstream of signals mediating PKC activation and Ca$\sp{++}$ fluxes, as PMA and ionomycin activation of PB T cells was unaffected by the inactivation of Rho. ^

MicroRNA Regulation of Prostate Cancer Stem/Progenitor Cells and Prostate Cancer Development

Most human tumors contain a population of cells with stem cell properties, called cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are believed to be responsible for tumor establishment, metastasis, and resistance to clinical therapy. It’s crucial to understand the regulatory mechanisms unique to CSCs, so that we may design CSC-specific therapeutics. Recent discoveries of microRNA (miRNA) have provided a new avenue in understanding the regulatory mechanisms of cancer. However, how miRNAs may regulate CSCs is still poorly understood. Here, we present miRNA expression profiling in six populations of prostate cancer (PCa) stem/progenitor cells that possess distinct tumorigenic properties. Six miRNAs were identified to be commonly and differentially expressed, namely, four miRNAs (miR-34a, let-7b, miR-106a and miR-141) were under-expressed, and two miRNAs (miR-301 and miR-452) were over-expressed in the tumorigenic subsets compared to the corresponding marker-negative subpopulations. Among them, the expression patterns of miR-34, let-7b, miR-141 and miR-301 were further confirmed in the CD44+ human primary prostate cancer (HPCa) samples. We then showed that miR-34a functioned as a critical negative regulator in prostate CSCs and PCa development and metastasis. Over-expression of miR-34a in either bulk or CD44+ PCa cells significantly suppressed clonal expansion, tumor development and metastasis. Systemic delivery of miR-34a in tumor-bearing mice demonstrated a potent therapeutic effect again tumor progression and metastasis, leading to extended animal survival. Of great interest, we identified CD44 itself as a direct and relevant downstream target of miR-34a in mediating its tumor-inhibitory effects. Like miR-34a, let-7 manifests similar tumor suppressive effects in PCa cells. In addition, we observed differential mechanisms between let-7 and miR-34a on cell cycle, with miR-34a mainly inducing G1 cell-cycle arrest followed by cell senescence and let-7 inducing G2/M arrest. MiR-301, on the other hand, exerted a cell type dependent effect in regulating prostate CSC properties and PCa development. In summary, our work reveals that the prostate CSC populations display unique miRNA expression signatures and different miRNAs distinctively and coordinately regulate various aspects of CSC properties. Altogether, our results lay a scientific foundation for developing miRNA-based anti-cancer therapy.

PROSTATE CANCER STEM CELLS: DRUG TOLERANCE, EXPERIMENTAL RECONSTITUTION AND CASTRATION RESISTANCE

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the leading malignancies affecting men in the Western world. Although tremendous effort has been made towards understanding PCa development and developing clinical treatments in the past decades, the exact mechanisms of PCa are still not clearly understood. Emerging evidence has postulated that a population of stem cell-like cells inside a tumor, termed ‘cancer stem cells (CSCs)’, may be the cells responsible for tumor initiation, progression, recurrence, metastasis and therapy resistance. Like CSC studies in other cancer types, it has been reported that PCa also contains CSCs. However, there remain several unresolved questions that need to be clarified. First, the relationship between prostate CSCs (PCSCs) and therapy resistance (chemo- and radio-) is not known. Herein, we have found that not all CSCs are drug-tolerant, and not all drug-tolerant cells are CSCs. Second, whether primary human PCa (HPCa) actually contain PCSCs remains unclear, due to the well-known fact that we have yet to establish a reliable assay system that can reproducibly and faithfully reconstitute tumor regeneration from single HPCa cells. Herein, after utilizing more than 114 HPCa samples we have provided evidence that immortalized bone marrow-derived stromal cells (Hs5) can help dissociated HPCa cells generate undifferentiated tumors in immunodeficient NOD/SCID-IL2Rγ-/- mice, and the undifferentiated PCa cells seem to have a survival advantage to generate tumors. Third, the evolution of PCa from androgen dependent to the lethally castration resistant (CRPC) stage remains enigmatic, and the cells responsible for CRPC development have not been identified. Herein, we have found a putative cell population, ALDH+CD44+α2β1+ PCa cells that may represent a cell-of-origin for CRPC. Taken together, our work has improved our understanding of PCSC properties, possibly highlighting a potential therapeutic target for CRPC.

ROLE OF MIR-19A RELEASED BY INFLAMMATORY BREAST CANCER CELLS IN THE REGULATION OF DENDRITIC CELL FUNCTIONS: IN VITRO MODEL OF CROSSTALK IN THE TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT OF INFLAMMATORY BREAST CANCER

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare but very aggressive form of locally advanced breast cancer (1-6% of total breast cancer patients in United States), with a 5-year overall survival rate of only 40.5%, compared with 85% of the non-IBC patients. So far, a unique molecular signature for IBC able to explain the dramatic differences in the tumor biology between IBC and non-IBC has not been identified. As immune cells in the tumor microenvironment plays an important role in regulating tumor progression, we hypothesized that tumor-associated dendritic cells (TADC) may be responsible for regulating the development of the aggressive characteristics of IBC. MiRNAs can be released into the extracellular space and mediate the intercellular communication by regulating target gene expression beyond their cells of origin. We hypothesized that miRNAs released by IBC cells can induce an increased activation status, secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and migration ability of TADC. In an in vitro model of IBC tumor microenvironment, we found that the co-cultured of the IBC cell line SUM-149 with immature dendritic cells (iDCSUM-149) induced a higher degree of activation and maturation of iDCSUM-149 upon stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) compared with iDCs co-cultured with the non-IBC cell line SUM-159 (iDCSUM-159), resulting in: increased expression of the costimulatory and activation markers; higher production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-a, IL-6); and 3) higher migratory ability. These differences were due to the exosome-mediated transfer of miR-19a and miR-146a from SUM-149 and SUM-159, respectively, to iDCs, causing the downregulation of the miR-19a target genes PTEN, SOCS-1 and the miR-146a target genes IRAK1, TRAF6. PTEN, SOCS-1 and IRAK1, TRAF6 are important negative and positive regulator of cytokine- and TLR-mediated activation/maturation signaling pathway in DCs. Increased levels of IL-6 induced the upregulation of miR-19a synthesis in SUM-149 cells that was associated with the induction of CD44+CD24-ALDH1+ cancer stem cells (CSCs) with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) characteristics. In conclusion, in IBC tumor microenvironment IL-6/miR-19a axis can represent a self-sustaining loop able to maintain a pro-inflammatory status of DCs, leading to the development of tumor cells with high metastatic potential (EMT CSCs) responsible of the poor prognosis in IBC patients.