Retrospective cohort study to determine the effect of metformin on survival of diabetic patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Background: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer death in the United States. Despite advances in cancer treatment, prognosis of pancreatic cancer remains extremely poor with survival rates of 24% and 5% in 1 and 5 years, respectively. Many patients with pancreatic cancer have a history of diabetes and are treated with various antidiabetic regimens including metformin. In multiple retrospective studies, metformin has been associated with decreased risk of cancer and cancer-related mortality. Metformin has also been reported to inhibit the growth of cancer cells, both in vitro and in vivo.^ Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to examine the survival benefit of metformin in diabetic patients with pancreatic cancer at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). A dataset of 397 patients who carried the diagnosis of "Diabetes Mellitus" and "Pancreatic Cancer" at MD Anderson were screened for this study. ^ Results: Mean age of patients at diagnosis of cancer was 64.0 ± 8.7 years (range 37-84). The majority of the patients were male (65.6%) and of Caucasian race (78.5%). The most common antidiabetic regimen used were insulin and metformin (in 39.1% and 38.7%, respectively). Patients' cancer were staged as resectable in 34.1%, locally advanced unresectable in 29.1%, and disseminated disease in 36.7% of cases. Overall 1-year and 3-year survival rates for all stages combined were 51.8% and 7.6%, respectively. Earlier stage, metformin use, low CA19-9 level, better ECOG performance status, surgical intervention, negative surgical margins, and smaller tumor size were associated with longer survival. Metformin use was associated with a 33% decrease in risk of death (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.51-0.88). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression showed hazard ratio of 1.77 (95% CI 1.49-2.10) for cancer stage, 0.65 (95% CI 0.49-0.86) for metformin use, and 1.68 (95% CI 1.26-2.23) for CA 19-9 level above population median. ^ Conclusion: Our study suggests that metformin may improve the outcome in diabetic patients with pancreatic cancer independently of other known prognostic factors. Pancreatic cancer carries extremely poor prognosis; metformin may provide a suitable adjunct therapeutic option for pancreatic cancer in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.^

Correlation of blood type with thrombosis in pancreatic cancer patients

Objective: The study aimed to identify the risk factors involved in initiating thromboembolism (TE) in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients, with focus on ABO blood type. ^ Methods and Patients: There were 35.7% confirmed cases of TE and 64.3% cases remained free of TE (n=687). There were 12.7% only Pulmonary embolism (PE), 9% only Deep vein thrombosis (DVT), 53.5% only other sites, 3.3% combined PE and DVT, 8.6% combined PE and other sites, 9.8% combined DVT and other sites, and 3.3% all three combined cases. ^ Results: The risk factors for thrombosis identified by multivariate logistic regression were: history of previous anti-thrombotic treatment, tumor site in pancreatic body or tail, large tumor size, maximum glucose category more than 126 and 200 mg/dL. ^ The factors with worse overall survival by multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan Meier analyses were: locally advanced or metastatic stage, worsening performance status, high CA 19-9 levels, and HbA1C levels more than 6 %, at diagnosis. ^ There were 29.1% and 39.1% of the patients with thrombosis in the O and non-O blood type groups respectively. Both Non-O blood type (P=0.02) and the A, B and AB blood types (P= 0.007) were associated with thrombosis as compared to O type. The odds of thrombosis were nearly half in O blood type patients as compared to non-O blood type [OR-0.54 (95% C.I.- 0.37-0.79), P<0.001]. ^ Conclusion: A better understanding of the TE and PC relationship and involved risk factors may provide insights on tumor biology and patient response to prophylactic anticoagulation therapy.^

Relationship between enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and travelers' diarrhea in Mexico, from 1992 to 1997

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between enterotoxigenic ETEC and travelers' diarrhea over a period of five years in Guadalajara, Mexico. Specifically, this study identified and characterized ETEC from travelers with diarrhea. The objectives were to study the colonization factor antigens, toxins and antibiotic sensitivity patterns in ETEC from 1992 to 1997 and to study the molecular epidemiology of ETEC by plasmid content and DNA restriction fragment patterns. ^ In this survey of travelers' diarrhea in Guadalajara, Mexico, 928 travelers with diarrhea were screened for enteric pathogens between 1992 and 1997. ETEC were isolated in 195 (19.9%) of the patients, representing the most frequent enteric pathogen identified. ^ A total of 31 antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were identified among ETEC isolates over the five-year period. ^ The 195 ETEC isolates contained two to six plasmids each, which ranged in size from 2.0 to 23 kbp. ^ Three different reproducible rRNA gene restriction patterns (ribotypes R-1 to R-3) were obtained among the 195 isolates with the enzyme, HindIII. ^ Colonization factor antigens (CFAs) were identified in 99 (51%) of the 195 ETEC strains studied. ^ Cluster analysis of the observations seen in the four assays all confirmed the five distinct groups of study-year strains of ETEC. Each group had a >95% similarity level of strains within the group and <60% similarity level between the groups. In addition, discriminant analysis of assay variables used in predicting the ETEC strains, reveal a >80% relationship between both the plasmid and rRNA content of ETEC strains and study-year. ^ These findings, based on laboratory observations of the differences in biochemical, antimicrobial susceptibility, plasmid and ribotype content, suggest complex epidemiology for ETEC strains in a population with travelers' diarrhea. The findings of this study may have implications for our understanding of the epidemiology, transmission, treatment, control and prevention of the disease. It has been suggested that an ETEC vaccine for humans should contain the most prevalent CFAs. Therefore, it is important to know the prevalence of these factors in ETEC in various geographical areas. ^ CFAs described in this dissertation may be used in different epidemiological studies in which the prevalence of CFAs and other properties on ETEC will be evaluated. Furthermore, in spite of an intense search in near 200 ETEC isolates for strains that may have clonal relationship, we failed to identify such strains. However, further studies are in progress to construct suitable live vaccine strains and to introduce several of CFAs in the same host organism by recombinant DNA techniques (Dr. Ann-Mari Svennerholm's lab). (Abstract shortened by UMI.)^

Role of ovarian cancer antigen CA125/MUC16 in development and cancer

Cancer antigen 125 (CA125) is a tumor antigen that is routinely used to monitor the disease progress and the outcome of treatment in ovarian cancer patients. Elevated serum levels of CA125 are detected in over 80% of epithelial ovarian cancer patients. CA125 is a high molecular weight (>1M Dalton) mucin-type glycoprotein encoded by the MUC16 gene on human chromosome 19. Although MUC16 has served as the best serum marker for monitoring growth of ovarian cancer, roles for MUC16 in normal physiology and ovarian cancer are largely unknown. To understand the biological functions of MUC16, I characterized a mouse Muc16 homolog on chromosome 9 by means of expression pattern profiling, phenotype analysis of Muc16 knockout mice, and in vitro and in vivo studies of Muc16 null transformed ovarian surface epithelial (OSE) cells. ^ The mouse Muc16 homolog shares a conserved genomic structure with human MUC16. In addition to being expressed in mouse ovarian cancer, mouse Muc16 mRNA and protein were expressed in the mesothelia covering the heart, lung, ovary, oviduct, spleen, testis, and uterus. The conserved genomic structure and expression pattern of mouse Muc16 to human MUC16 suggests that mouse Muc16 is the ortholog of human MUC16. To understand the biological functions of Muc16, I generated Muc16 knockout mice. Muc16 knockout mice were viable, fertile and normal by one year of age. However, between 18 and 24 months of age, Muc16 knockout mice developed various tissue abnormalities such as ovarian cysts and tumors of the liver and other peritoneal organs. To determine the role of MUC16 in ovarian cancer progression, I established Muc16 null transformed ovarian surface epithelial (OSE) cell lines, following the same method to develop mouse model of epithelial ovarian cancer (Orsulic et al., 2002). Loss of Muc16 did not affect cell morphology, cell proliferation rate, or tumorigenic potential. However, Muc16-null OSE cells showed decreased attachment to extracellular matrix proteins as well as to primary mouse peritoneal mesothelial cells. Peritoneal mesothelia are the most frequent implantation sites of ovarian cancer. Furthermore, a pilot transplantation assay suggests that Muc16 null transformed OSE cells formed less disseminated tumors in the peritoneal cavity compared to wild-type OSE cells. ^ In conclusion, these results demonstrate that MUC16 is not required for normal mouse development or reproduction, but plays important roles in tissue homeostasis, ovarian cancer cell adhesion and dissemination. This study provides the first in vivo evidence of the roles of MUC16 in development, as well as ovarian cancer progression and dissemination. These studies offer valuable insights into possible mechanisms of ovarian cancer development and potential molecular targets for ovarian cancer treatment. ^