Bisphosphonates for metastatic bone disease in lung cancer

Bisphosphonates have proven effectiveness in preventing skeletal-related events (SREs) in advanced breast cancer, prostate cancer and multiple myeloma. The purpose of this study was to assess efficacy of bisphosphonates in preventing SREs, in controlling pain, and in increasing life expectancy in lung cancer patients with bone metastases.^ We performed an electronic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases up to April 4, 2010. Hand searching and searching in clinicaltrials.gov were also performed. Two independent reviewers selected all clinical trials that included lung cancer patients with bone metastases treated with bisphosphonates. We excluded articles that involved cancers other than lung, patients without bone metastasis and treatment other than bisphosphonates. Outcome questions answered were efficacy measured as overall pain control, overall improvement in survival and reduction in skeletal-related events or SREs (fracture, cord compression, radiation or surgery to the bone, hypercalcemia of malignancy). The quality of each study was evaluated using the Cochrane Back Review group questionnaire to assess risk of bias (0-worst to 11-best). Data extraction and quality assessments were independently performed by two assessors. Meta-analyses were performed where more than one study with similar outcomes were found.^ We identified eight trials that met our inclusion criteria. Three studies evaluated zoledronic acid, three pamidronate, three clodronate and two ibandronate. Two were placebocontrol trials while two had multi-group comparisons (radiotherapy, radionucleotides, and chemotherapy) and two had different bisphosphonate as active controls. Quality scores ranged from 1-4 out of 11 suggesting high risk of bias. Studies failed to report adequate explanation of randomization procedures, concealment of randomization and blinding. Metaanalysis showed that patients treated with zoledronic acid alone had lower rates of developing SREs compared to placebo at 21 months (RR=0.80, 95% CI=0.66-0.97, p=0.02). Meta-analyses also showed increased pain control when a bisphosphonate was added to the existing treatment modality like chemotherapy or radiation (RR=1.17, 95% CI=1.03-1.34, p=0.02). However, pain control was not statistically significantly different among various bisphosphonates when other treatment modalities were not present. Despite improvement in SRE and pain control, bisphosphonates failed to show improvement in overall survival (Difference in means=109.1 days, 95% CI= -51.52 – 269.71, p=0.183).^ Adding biphosphonates to standard care improved pain control and reduced SREs. Biphosphonates did not improve overall survival. Further larger studies with higher quality are required to stengthen the evidence.^ Keywords/MeSH terms Bisphosphonates/diphosphonates: generic, chemical and trade names.^

14-3-3 ZETA OVEREXPRESSION SERVES AS A NOVEL MOLECULAR SWITCH TURNING TGF-BETA FROM TUMOR SUPPRESSOR TO TUMOR PROMOTER

TGF-β plays an important role in differentiation and tissue morphogenesis as well as cancer progression. However, the role of TGF-β in cancer is complicate. TGF-β has primarily been recognized as tumor suppressor, because it can directly inhibit cell proliferation of normal and premalignant epithelial cell. However, in the last stage of tumor progression, TGF-β functions as tumor promoter to enhance tumor cells metastatic dissemination and expands metastatic colonies. Currently, the mechanism of how TGF-β switches its role from tumor suppressor to promoter still remains elusive. Here we identify that overexpression of 14-3-3ζ inhibits TGF-β’s cell cytostatic program through destabilizing p53 in non-transformed human mammary epithelial cells. Mechanistically, we found that 14-3-3ζ overexpression leads to 14-3-3σ downregulation, thereby activates PI3K/Akt signaling pathway and degrades p53, and further inhibits TGF-β induced p21 expression and cell cytostatic function. In addition, we found that overexpression of 14-3-3ζ promotes TGF-β induced breast cancer cells bone metastatic colonization through stabilizing Gli2, which is an important co-transcriptional factor for p-smad2 to activate PTHrP expression and bone osteolytic effect. Taken together, we reveal a novel mechanism that 14-3-3ζ dictates the tumor suppressor or metastases promoter activities of TGF-β signaling pathway through switching p-smad2 binding partner from p53 to Gli2. The expected results will not only provide us the better understanding of the important role of 14-3-3ζ in the early stage of breast cancer development, but also deeply impact our knowledge of signaling mechanisms underlying the complex roles of TGF-β in cancer, which will give us a more accurate strategy to determine when and how anti-TGF-β targeted therapy might be effective.

Targeted Multistage Delivery of Nanoparticles to the Bone Marrow

Bone marrow is a target organ site involved in multiple diseases including myeloproliferative disorders and hematologic malignancies and metastases from breast and prostate. Most of these diseases are characterized with poor quality of life, and the treatment options are only palliative due to lack of delivery mechanisms for systemically injected drugs which results in dose limitation to protect the healthy hematopoietic cells. Therefore, there is a critical need to develop effective therapeutic strategies that allow for selective delivery of therapeutic payload to the bone marrow. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems provide the opportunity to deliver drugs to the target tissue while decreasing exposure to normal tissues. E-selectin is constitutively expressed on the bone marrow vasculature, but almost absent in normal vessels, and therefore, E-selectin targeted drug delivery presents an ideal strategy for the delivery of therapeutic nanoparticles to the bone marrow. The objective of this study was to develop a novel bone marrow targeted multistage vector (MSV) via E-selectin for delivery of therapeutics and imaging agents. To achieve this goal, Firstly, an E-selectin thioaptamer (ESTA) ligand was identified through a two-step screening from a combinatorial thioaptamer library. Next, ESTA-conjugated MSV (ESTA-MSV) were developed and evaluated for their stability and binding to E-selectin expressing endothelial cells. Different types of nanoparticles including liposomes, quantum dots, and iron oxide nanoparticles were loaded into the porous structure of ESTA-MSV. In vivo targeting experiments demonstrated 8-fold higher accumulation of ESTA-MSV in the mouse bone marrow as compared to non-targeted MSV Furthermore, intravenous injection of liposomes loaded ESTA-MSV resulted in a significantly higher accumulation of liposome in the bone marrow space as compared to injection of non-targeted MSV or liposomes alone. Overall this study provides first evidence that E-selectin targeted multistage vector preferentially targets to bone marrow vasculature and delivers larger amounts of nanoparticles. This delivery strategy holds potential for the selective delivery of large amounts of therapeutic payload to the vascular niches in the bone marrow for the treatment of bone marrow associated diseases.

Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of breast cancer metastases

Introduction. Breast cancer is a highly variable disease, and long-term outcomes for individual patients are difficult to predict. We evaluated a retrospective cohort of early stage breast cancer (ESBC) patients based on a variety of clinical and epidemiological factors, specifically looking at the distribution of metastasis and associations with these clinical and epidemiological factors. ^ Methods. Patients were derived from the Early Stage Breast Cancer Repository (ESBCR) with a breast cancer diagnosed between 1985 and 2000. We conducted univariate and multivariate analysis of the data to evaluate associations between characteristics and occurrence of overall, visceral, and bone metastasis. Visceral metastasis was defined as lung, liver, peritoneal, lymph node (thoracic, abdominal, pelvis), and contralateral breast cancer. ^ Results. Overall, 394 (16%) patients developed a metastasis. Of these, 83% were visceral and 17% were bone. Multivariate analyses identified the following variables to be associated with metastasis: Any metastasis: age at diagnosis, stage, ER/PR status, hormone treatment, and type of surgery (1)Visceral metastasis: age at diagnosis, stage, hormone treatment, and type of surgery (2) Bone metastasis –Alcohol use, stage, and ER/PR status ^ Discussion/conclusion. ER-/PR- status has previously been found to be associated with bone metastasis, as we confirm in our cohort. We report an association between alcohol use and bone metastasis whereas previous studies find an association with recurrence. Distribution of metastases varies from previous studies. Typically, previous studies reported bone metastasis >30%, yet our study found 17%. Previous studies varied in design, and definition of visceral metastasis. Future research is needed to further elucidate prognostic factors associated with specific metastases A more thorough understanding of what might predict which ESBC patients will develop metastases can help direct future treatment. Future studies of this nature could include the Perou intrinsic subtypes, biomarkers like Ki-67, and genetic analyses such as Oncotype DX or MammaPrint.^