CHARACTERIZATION OF ALPHA-GALACTOSYLCERAMIDE AS A MUCOSAL ADJUVANT

Adjuvants are essential components of vaccine formulations that enhance adaptive immune responses to antigens, particularly for immunizations targeting the tolerogenic mucosal tissues, which are more biologically relevant for protective immunity against pathogens transmitted by the mucosal routes. Adjuvants possess the inherent capacity to bridge innate and adaptive immune responses through activating innate immune mediators. Here evidence is presented in support of the effectiveness of a synthetic glycolipid, alpha-Galactosylceramide (-GalCer), as an adjuvant for mucosal immunization with peptide and protein antigens, by oral and intranasal routes, to prime antigen-specific immune responses in multiple systemic and mucosal compartments. The adjuvant activity of -GalCer delivered by the intranasal route was manifested in terms of potent activation of NKT cells, an important innate immunity mediator, along with the activation of dendritic cells (DC) which serve as the professional antigen-presenting cells. Data from this investigation provide the first evidence for mucosal delivery as an effective means to harness the adjuvant potential of α-GalCer for priming as well as boosting cellular immune responses to co-administered immunogens. Unlike systemic administration where a single dose of α-GalCer leads to anergy of responding NKT cells and thus hinders delivery of booster immunizations, we demonstrated that administration of multiple doses of α-GalCer by the intranasal route affords repeated activation of NKT cells and the induction of broad systemic and mucosal immunity. This is specifically advantageous, and may be even essential, for vaccination regimens against mucosal pathogens such as the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the human papillomavirus (HPV), where priming of durable protective immunity at the mucosal portals of pathogen entry would be highly desirable.

Immune restoration of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in complete cytogenetic remission

Imatinib mesylate (IM) and Interferon-alfa (IFN-α) are currently the two most efficacious therapies for patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). IFN-α induces durable complete cytogentic remission (CCR) in about 25% of CML patients whereas IM, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, induces CCR in 50% of patients who are resistant to IFN-α and in 75% of patients in early chronic phase of CML. However, the detection of minimal residual disease without clinical relapse suggests that host immune surveillance plays a very important role in controlling the progression of disease. ^ T lymphocytes and dendritic cells (DC) are the two most crucial players in the immune system. In my study, we focused on the effects of treatment with either IM or IFN-α on the functions of both DC and T cells, as exemplified by the ability of DC to present antigen to T cells and activated T cells to synthesize cytokines. Our studies show that cytokine production by T cells activated through the T-cell receptor (TCR) was significantly lower in CML patients treated with IM, but not with IFN-α, when compared with activated T cells of control subjects. Suppression of T cell function by IM albeit transient and reversible, was through the downregulation of the phosphorylation of Zap-70, Lck, and LAT. ^ Our data also show that the myeloid DC (DC1) and the plasmacytoid DC (DC2) are lower in chronic phase CML. Whereas neither therapy restored the level of DC2 to normal levels, the number of DC1 was normalized by either therapy. However, only IFN-α, and not IM, restored DC2 function to normal, as exemplified by the production of IFN-α in response to exposure to live influenza virus. Moreover, in vitro differentiation and maturation of DC1 from monocyte precursors in patients receiving either therapy was not normal and was reflected in their ability to present antigen to autologous T cells. ^ In summary, we report that there are differences in immune responses of CML patients treated with IM or IFN-α that may be the result of long-term effects on the host immune system by the individual therapy. ^

The effects of proteasome inhibition in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and prostate cancer

The use of proteasome inhibitors in cancer has received much attention with the recent FDA approval of bortezomib (Velcade/PS-341). However, in the chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) clinical trial, bortezomib was not as effective as it was in vitro. Accordingly, results in prostate cancer were not remarkable, although regression of lymphadenopathy was observed. This response was also seen in CLL. ^ The proteasome degrades ∼80% of intracellular proteins. Although specific pathways affected by proteasome inhibitors are known, there are still unidentified mechanisms by which they induce apoptosis. The efficacy and mechanism of action of the reversible proteasome inhibitor bortezomib were compared to the novel irreversible inhibitor NPI-0052 in this study, and their mechanisms of action in CLL and prostate cancer were examined. ^ NPI-0052 inhibited proteasome activity and induced apoptosis with more rapid kinetics than bortezomib in CLL. Inhibition of proteasome activity with NPI-0052 was also more durable. Interestingly, bortezomib is cleared from the serum within 15min, which is insufficient time for bortezomib to effectively inhibit the proteasome. However, only 5min exposure was needed for NPI-0052 to produce maximal proteasome inhibition. The data suggest that bortezomib's slow kinetics and reversible nature limit its potential in vivo and the use of NPI-0052 should be considered. ^ In examining the mechanism(s) by which bortezomib and NPI-0052 induce apoptosis in CLL, both were found to elicit the ER stress pathway. A stromal cell co-culture system prevented apoptosis induced by both proteasome inhibitors, suggesting that if such factors in vivo were responsible for reducing bortezomib's efficacy, NPI-0052 would not prove useful either. Finally, Lyn, a Src family kinase (SFK), was decreased in response to bortezomib and NPI-0052 and correlated with apoptosis induction in CLL and prostate cancer. Both proteasome inhibitors specifically targeted Lyn rather than SFKs in general. ^ SFKs are overexpressed in cancer and involved in cell signaling, survival, and metastasis. In prostate cancer cells, both proteasome inhibition and Lyn-silencing significantly inhibited migration. Preliminary evidence also suggested that Lyn downregulation decreases invasion potential. Together, these data suggest that proteasome inhibitors are potential candidates for anti-metastasic therapy and further investigation is warranted for the use of Lyn-targeted therapy to treat metastases. ^