Traumatic brain injury stimulates hippocampal catechol-O-methyl transferase expression in microglia.

Outcome following traumatic brain injury (TBI) is in large part determined by the combined action of multiple processes. In order to better understand the response of the central nervous system to injury, we utilized an antibody array to simultaneously screen 507 proteins for altered expression in the injured hippocampus, a structure critical for memory formation. Array analysis indicated 41 candidate proteins have altered expression levels 24h after TBI. Of particular interest was catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT), an enzyme involved in metabolizing catecholamines released following neuronal activity. Altered catecholamine signaling has been observed after brain injury, and may contribute to the cognitive dysfunctions and behavioral deficits often experienced after TBI. Our data shows that COMT expression in the injured ipsilateral hippocampus was elevated for at least 14 d after controlled cortical impact injury. We found strong co-localization of COMT immunoreactivity with the microglia marker Iba1 near the injury site. Since dopamine transporter expression has been reported to be down-regulated after brain injury, COMT-mediated catecholamine metabolism may play a more prominent role in terminating catecholamine signaling in injured areas.

cAMP-dependent protein kinase and heterologous desensitization of the adenylyl cyclase

Previous experiments had shown no differences in desensitization in cells with mutations of the adenylyl cyclase or the cAMP-dependent protein kinase and had ruled out this kinase as a mediator of desensitization; however, the assays of adenylyl cyclase had been made at high concentrations of free magnesium. The work presented in this dissertation documents a role for cAMP-dependent protein kinase which became apparent with assays at low concentrations of free magnesium. (1) The adenylyl cyclase in membranes from wild type S49 lymphoma cells showed substantial desensitization after incubation of the intact cells with low concentrations of epinephrine (5-20 nM). This desensitization was heterologous, that is it reduced the subsequent responses of the adenylyl cyclase to both epinephrine and prostaglandin-E$\sb1$. (2) The adenylyl cyclase in membranes of S49 cyc$\sp-$ cells, which do not make cAMP in response to hormones, and S49 kin$\sp-$ cells, which lack cAMP-dependent protein kinase activity, showed no heterologous desensitization following incubation of the intact cells with low concentrations of hormones. (3) Heterologous desensitization of the adenylyl cyclase was induced by incubations of wild type cells with forskolin, which activates the adenylyl cyclase downstream of the hormone receptors, or dibutyryl-cAMP, which activates the cAMP-dependent protein kinase directly. (4) Site-directed mutagenesis was used to delete the cAMP-dependent protein kinase consensus phosphorylation sequences on the $\beta$-adrenergic receptor. Heterologous desensitization occurred in intact L-cells expressing the wild type receptor or the receptor lacking the C-terminal phosphorylation site; however, only homologous desensitization occurred when the phosphorylation site on the third intracellular loop of the receptor was deleted. (5) To test directly the effects of cAMP-dependent protein kinase on the adenylyl cyclase the catalytic subunit of the kinase was purified from bovine heart and incubated with adenylyl cyclase in plasma membrane preparations. In this cell-free system the kinase caused rapid heterlogous reductions of the responsiveness of the S49 wild type adenylyl cyclase. Additionally, the adenylyl cyclase in kin$\sp-$ membranes, which showed only homologous desensitization in the intact cell, was desensitization by cell-free incubation with the kinase.^ The epinephrine responsiveness was not affected in L-cell membranes expressing the $\beta$-adrenergic receptor lacking the cAMP-dependent protein kinase consensus sequence on the third intracellular loop. ^

Regulation of adenylyl cyclase by protein kinase C and P$\sb2$ purinergic agonists

Activation of protein kinase C (PKC) causes multiple effects on adenylyl cyclase (AC), (i) an inhibition of (hormone) receptor/G$\sb{\rm s}$ coupling, consistent with PKC modification of the receptor and (ii) a postreceptor sensitization consistent with a PKC-mediated modification of the stimulatory (G$\sb{\rm s}$) or inhibitory (G$\sb{\rm i}$) G-proteins or the catalyst (C) of AC. In L cells expressing the wild-type beta-adrenergic receptor ($\beta$AR) 4-$\beta$ phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) caused 2-3-fold increases in the K$\sb{\rm act}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$ for epinephrine-stimulated AC activity and an attenuation of GTP-mediated inhibition of AC. Deletion of a concensus site for PKC phosphorylation (amino acids 259-262) from the $\beta$AR eliminated the PMA-induced increase in the K$\sb{\rm act}$, but had no effect on the other actions of PMA. PMA also increased the K$\sb{\rm act}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$ for prostaglandin E$\sb1$ (PGE$\sb1$)-stimulated AC and the V$\sb{\rm max}$ for forskolin-stimulated AC. Maximal PMA-induced sensitizations were observed when AC was assayed in the presence of 10 $\mu$M GTP and 0.3 mM (Mg$\sp{++}$).^ Liao et al. (J. Biol. Chem. 265:11273-11284 (1990)) have shown that the P$\sb2$ purinergic receptor agonist ATP stimulates hydrolysis of 4,5 inositol bisphosphate (PIP$\sb2$) by phospholipase C (PLC) in L cells. To determine if agonists that stimulate PLC and PMA had similar effects on AC function we compared the effects of ATP and PMA. ATP caused a rapid 50-150% sensitization of PGE$\sb1$-, epinephrine-, and forskolin-stimulated AC activity with an EC$\sb{50}$ of 3 $\mu$M ATP. The sensitization was similar (i.e. Mg$\sp{++}$ and GTP sensitivity) to that caused by 10 nM PMA. However, unlike PMA ATP did not affect the K$\sb{\rm act}$ for hormone-stimulated AC and its effects were unaltered by down-regulation of PKCs following long term PMA treatment. Our results demonstrate that a PKC concensus site in the $\beta$AR, is required for the PMA-induced decrease in receptor/G$\sb{\rm s}$ coupling. Our data also indicate that activation of P$\sb2$ purinergic receptors by ATP may be important in the sensitization of AC in L cells. The mechanism behind this effect remains to be determined. ^

Molecular analysis of $\beta$1,4-galactosyl-transferase localization to the cell surface and participation in cell adhesion

$\beta$1,4-Galactosyltransferase (GalTase) is unusual among the glycosyltransferases in that it is found in two subcellular compartments where it performs different functions. In the trans-Golgi complex, GalTase participates in oligosaccharide biosynthesis as do other glycosyltransferases. GalTase is also found on the cell surface, where it associates with the cytoskeleton and functions as a receptor for extracellular oligosaccharide ligands. Although we know much regarding GalTase function on the cell surface, little is known about the mechanisms underlying its transport to the plasma membrane. Cloning of the GalTase gene revealed that there are two GalTase proteins (i.e., long and short) with different size cytoplasmic tails. This raises the possibility that differences in the cytoplasmic domain of GalTase may influence its subcellular distribution. The object of this study was to examine this hypothesis directly through the use of molecular, immunological, and biochemical approaches.^ To examine whether the two GalTase proteins are targeted to different subcellular compartments, F9 embryonal carcinoma cells were transfected with either long or short GalTase cDNAs and intracellular and cell surface enzyme levels measured. Cell surface GalTase activity was enriched in cells overexpressing the long, but not the form of short GalTase. Furthermore, a dominant negative mutation in cell surface GalTase was created by transfecting cells with GalTase cDNAs encoding a truncated version of long GalTase devoid of the extracellular catalytic domain. Overexpressing the complete cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains of long GalTase led to a loss of GalTase-dependent cellular adhesion by specifically displacing surface GalTase from its cytoskeletal associations. In contrast, overexpressing the analogous truncated protein of short GalTase had no effect on cell adhesion. Finally, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter proteins were used to determine directly whether the cytoplasmic domains of long and short GalTase were responsible for differential subcellular distribution. The cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains of long GalTase led to CAT expression on the ceil surface and its association with the detergent-insoluble cytoskeleton; the analogous fusion protein containing short GalTase was restricted to the Golgi compartment. These results suggest that the cytoplasmic domain unique to long GalTase is responsible for targeting a portion of this protein to the cell surface and associating it with the cytoskeleton, enabling it to function as a cell adhesion molecule. ^

Effects of variable Gs expression on $\beta\sb2$-adrenergic receptor stimulated adenylyl cyclase response

An exact knowledge of the kinetic nature of the interaction between the stimulatory G protein (G$\sb{\rm s}$) and the adenylyl cyclase catalytic unit (C) is essential for interpreting the effects of Gs mutations and expression levels on cellular response to a wide variety of hormones, drugs, and neurotransmitters. In particular, insight as to the association of these proteins could lead to progress in tumor biology where single spontaneous mutations in G proteins have been associated with the formation of tumors (118). The question this work attempts to answer is whether the adenylyl cyclase activation by epinephrine stimulated $\beta\sb2$-adrenergic receptors occurs via G$\sb{\rm s}$ proteins by a G$\sb{\rm s}$ to C shuttle or G$\sb{\rm s}$-C precoupled mechanism. The two forms of activation are distinguishable by the effect of G$\sb{\rm s}$ levels on epinephrine stimulated EC50 values for cyclase activation.^ We have made stable transfectants of S49 cyc$\sp-$ cells with the gene for the $\alpha$ protein of G$\sb{\rm s}$ $(\alpha\sb{\rm s})$ which is under the control of the mouse mammary tumor virus LTR promoter (110). Expression of G$\sb{\rm s}\alpha$ was then controlled by incubation of the cells for various times with 5 $\mu$M dexamethasone. Expression of G$\sb{\rm s}\alpha$ led to the appearance of GTP shifts in the competitive binding of epinephrine with $\sp{125}$ICYP to the $\beta$-adrenergic receptors and to agonist dependent adenylyl cyclase activity. High expression of G$\sb{\rm s}\alpha$ resulted in lower EC50's for the adenylyl cyclase activity in response to epinephrine than did low expression. By kinetic modelling, this result is consistent with the existence of a shuttle mechanism for adenylyl cyclase activation by hormones.^ One item of concern that remains to be addressed is the extent to which activation of adenylyl cyclase occurs by a "pure" shuttle mechanism. Kinetic and biochemical experiments by other investigators have revealed that adenylyl cyclase activation, by hormones, may occur via a Gs-C precoupled mechanism (80, 94, 97). Activation of adenylyl cyclase, therefore, probably does not occur by either a pure "'Shuttle" or "Gs-C Precoupled" mechanism, but rather by a "Hybrid" mechanism. The extent to which either the shuttle or precoupled mechanism contributes to hormone stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity is the subject of on-going research. ^

Pharmacogenetics of the human glutathione S-transferase P1 gene in the metabolism and therapeutic efficacy of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum

The human GSTP1 gene has been shown, conclusively, to be polymorphic. The three main GSTP1 alleles, GSTP1*A, GSTP1*B, and GSTP1*C, encode proteins which differ in the 3-dimensional structure of their active sites and in their function in phase II metabolism of carcinogens, mutagens, and anticancer agents. Although, it is well established that GSTP1 is over expressed in many human tumors and that the levels of GSTP1 expression correlate directly with tumor resistance to chemotherapy and inversely with patient survival, the significance of the polymorphic GSTP1 gene locus on tumor response to chemotherapy remains unclear. The goal of this project was to define the role and significance of the polymorphic GSTP1 gene locus in GSTP1-based tumor drug resistance and as a determinant of patient response to chemotherapy. The hypothesis to be tested was that the polymorphic GSTP1 gene locus will confer to tumors a differential ability to metabolize cisplatin resulting in a GSTP1 genotype-based sensitivity to cisplatin. The study examined: (a) whether the different GSTP 1 alleles confer different levels of cellular protection against cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity, (b) whether the allelic GSTP1 proteins metabolize cisplatin with different efficiencies, and (c) whether the GSTP1 genotype is a determinant of tumor response to cisplatin therapy. The results demonstrate that the GSTP1 alleles differentially protect tumors against cisplatin-induced apoptosis and clonogenic cell kill in the rank order: GSTP1*C > GSTP1*B > GSTP1*A. The same rank order was observed for the kinetics of GSTP1-catalyzed cisplatin metabolism, both in cell-free and cellular systems, to the rate-limiting monoglutathionyl-platinum metabolite, which was characterized, for the first time, by mass spectral analysis. Finally, this study demonstrates that both GSTP1 genotype and the level of GSTP1 expression significantly contribute to tumor sensitivity to cisplatin treatment. Overall, the results of this project show that the polymorphic GSTP1 gene locus plays a significant role in tumor sensitivity to cisplatin treatment. Furthermore, these studies have contributed to the overall understanding of the significance of the polymorphic GSTP1 gene locus in tumor resistance to cancer chemotherapy and have provided the basis for further investigations into how this can be utilized to optimize and individualize cancer chemotherapy for cancer patients. ^

Scaffolding of adenylyl cyclase by A Kinase Anchoring Proteins

Adenylyl cyclase (AC) converts ATP into cAMP, which activates protein kinase A (PKA). Activation of PKA leads to the phosphorylation of specific substrates. The mechanism of specificity of PKA phosphorylation baffled researchers for many years. The discovery of A Kinase Anchoring Proteins (AKAPs) has helped to unravel this mystery. AKAPs function to target PKA to specific regions within the cell. They also anchor other enzymes, receptors, or channels leading to tightly regulated signaling modules. Several studies have suggested an important role for activated PKA in these complexes, including the AKAPs yotiao and muscle AKAP (mAKAP). Yotiao, a plasma membrane AKAP, anchors PP1, NMDA receptors, IP3 receptors, and heart potassium channel subunit KCNQI. PKA phosphorylation of NMDA receptors as well as KCNQI leads to increased channel activity. Patients with mutations in KCNQI or yotiao that cause loss of targeting of KCNQI develop long QT syndrome, which can be fatal. mAKAP anchors several CAMP/PKA-regulated pathways to the nuclear envelope in cardiac myocytes. The necessity of activated PKA in these complexes led to the hypothesis that AC is also anchored. The results indicate that AC does associate with yotiao in brain and heart, specifically with AC types I-III, and IX. Co-expression of AC II or III with yotiao leads to inhibition of each isoform's activity. Binding assays revealed that yotiao binds to the N-terminus of AC II and that this region can reverse the inhibition of AC II, but not AC III, indicating unique binding sites on yotiao. AC II binds directly to as 808-957 of yotiao. Y808-957 acts as a dominant negative as the addition of it to rat brain membranes results in a ∼40% increase in AC activity. Additionally, AC was also found to associate with mAKAP in heart, specifically with AC types II and V. The binding site of AC was mapped to 275-340 of mAKAP, while mAKAP binds to the soluble domains of AC V as a complex. These results indicate that interactions between AC and AKAPs are specific and that AC plays an important role in AKAP-targeted signaling. ^

Neurocognitive impairment in relation to glutathione S-transferase enzyme polymorphisms among medulloblastoma patients

Background. Medulloblastoma is a type of brain cancer that accounts for approximately 7-8% of all intracranial tumors and 20-30% of pediatric brain tumors. It is the most common type of malignant brain tumor in childhood. It was reported that majority of survivors with medulloblastoma have social problems, endocrine deficits, and neurological complications. Furthermore, all had significant deficits in neurocognitive functioning. Glutathione S-transferases belong to a family of isoenzymes that catalyze the glutathione conjugation of a variety of electrophilic compounds. ^ Objective. We aimed to determine whether the development of neurocognitive impairment is associated with GST polymorphisms among children and adolescents diagnosed with medulloblastoma (MB) after radiation therapy. ^ Methods. A pilot study composing of 16 children and adolescents diagnosed with MB at Texas Children's Cancer Center was conducted. The t-test was used to determine if the GST polymorphisms were related to neurocognitive impairment and logistic regression was performed to explore association between GST polymorphisms and gender, age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, and risk group. ^ Results. An association was observed between GSTT1 polymorphism and cognitive impairment one year after radiation and GSTM1 polymorphism two years after radiation. It was observed that patients with GSTT1 null genotype have lower performance IQ (p=0.03) and full scale IQ (p=0.02) one year after radiation and patients with GSTM1 null genotype have lower verbal IQ (p=0.02) two years after radiation. Patients under age 8 have a statistically non-significant higher risk of having not null genotypes compared to those older than age 8 (OR= 7.5, 95%CI: 0.62-90.65 and OR= 2.63, 95%CI: 0.30-23.00 for GSTT1 and GSTM1 respectively). ^ Conclusion. There was a significant association between GSTT1 polymorphism and cognitive impairment one year after radiation and between GSTM1 polymorphism and cognitive impairment two years after radiation. Further large scale studies may be needed to confirm this finding and to examine the underlying mechanism of neurocognitive impairments after treatment of medulloblastoma patients.^

CHARACTERIZATION OF SELECTIVE INHIBITION OF ADENYLYL CYCLASE ACTIVITY BY SMALL MOLECULE INHIBITOR NKY80

The nine membrane-bound isoforms of adenylyl cyclase (AC), via synthesis of the signaling molecule cyclic AMP (cAMP), are involved in many isoform specific physiological functions. Decreasing AC5 activity has been shown to have potential therapeutic benefit, including reduced stress on the heart, pain relief, and attenuation of morphine dependence and withdrawal behaviors. However, AC structure is well conserved, and there are currently no isoform selective AC inhibitors in clinical use. P-site inhibitors inhibit AC directly at the catalytic site, but with an uncompetitive or noncompetitive mechanism. Due to this mechanism and nanomolar potency in cell-free systems, attempts at ligand-based drug design of novel AC inhibitors frequently use P-site inhibitors as a starting template. One small molecule inhibitor designed through this process, NKY80, is described as an AC5 selective inhibitor with low micromolar potency in vitro. P-site inhibitors reveal important ligand binding “pockets” in the AC catalytic site, but specific interactions that give NKY80 selectivity are unclear. Identifying and characterizing unique interactions between NKY80 and AC isoforms would significantly aid the development of isoform selective AC inhibitors. I hypothesized that NKY80’s selective inhibition is conferred by AC isoform specific interactions with the compound within the catalytic site. A structure-based virtual screen of the AC catalytic site was used to identify novel small molecule AC inhibitors. Identified novel inhibitors are isoform selective, supporting the catalytic site as a region capable of more potent isoform selective inhibition. Although NKY80 is touted commercially as an AC5 selective inhibitor, its characterization suggests strong inhibition of both AC5 and the closely related AC6. NKY80 was also virtually docked to AC to determine how NKY80 binds to the catalytic site. My results show a difference between NKY80 binding and the conformation of classic P-site inhibitors. The selectivity and notable differences in NKY80 binding to the AC catalytic site suggest a catalytic subregion more flexible in AC5 and AC6 that can be targeted by selective small molecule inhibitors.

ATP- and carbachol -stimulated 1,2-diacylglycerol production during sensitization of adenylyl cyclase

Stimulation of LM5 cells with the phorbol ester 4$\beta$-phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), causes a 2-4 fold sensitization of hormonally-stimulated adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity. This effect is thought to be due to protein kinase C (PKC)-mediated phosphorylation of either G$\sb{\rm i}$ or the catalytic subunit of AC. PKC are components of the phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate phospholipase C (PIP$\sb2$-PLC) pathway. The currently accepted model of this pathway is that its activation by an agonist results in the production of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP$\sb3$) which causes Ca$\sp{++}$ mobilization, and 1,2-diacylglycerols (DAG) which activate PKC. Based on this model, we predicted that stimulation of purinergic and muscarinic receptors with the agonists ATP and carbachol (CCh), respectively in the LM5 cells, should sensitize AC. Surprisingly we found that only stimulation of the purinergic receptors in these cells caused a sensitization of PGE$\sb1$-stimulated AC measured in cell-free assays.^ We hypothesized that ATP-and CCh-stimulated differential DAG production contributes to the effectiveness of these two agonists to sensitize PGE$\sb1$-stimulated AC activity. To test this hypothesis directly, we performed a combined high-performance liquid chromatography and gas-liquid chromatography analysis of the DAG produced in the LM5 cells in response to stimulation with ATP and CCh.^ We found that both ATP and CCh increased levels of 23 species of DAG. Relative to the control levels (0.261 nmol DAG/100 nmol phospholipid) the CCh-induced increase in DAG levels was 280% (0.738 $\pm$ 0.051 nmol DAG/100 nmol phospholipid) whereas the ATP-induced levels increased 180% (0.441 t 0.006 nmol DAG/100 nmol phospholipid). Neither agonist created new species or eliminated the existing ones. The major species which comprised $\approx$50% of the total cellular DAG in all of the groups were 16:0-18:1, 18:0-18:1, 18:1-18:1, and 18:0-20:4. CCh was more effective than ATP at stimulating these major DAG species.^ It is concluded that factor(s) other than DAG contribute(s) to the differences between ATP-and CCh-sensitization of PGE$\sb1$-stimulated AC activity in the LM5 cells. ^

Signaling pathways in the transcriptional and post-translational regulation of the human glutathione S -transferase P1 gene

The human glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) protein is an endogenous inhibitor of c-jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs) and an important phase II detoxification enzyme. ^ Recent identification of a cAMP response element (CRE) in the 5 ′-region of the human GSTP1 gene and several putative phosphorylation sites for the Ser/Thr protein kinases, including, cAMP-dependent protein kinases (PKAs), protein kinases C (PKCs), and JNKs in the GSTP1 protein raised the possibility that signaling pathways may play an important role in the transcriptional and post-translational regulation of GSTP1 gene. This study examined (a) whether the signaling pathway mediated by CAMP, via the GSTP1 CRE, is involved in the transcriptional regulation of the GSTP1 gene, (b) whether signaling pathways mediated by the Ser/Thr protein kinases (PKAs, PKCs, and JNKs) induce post-translational modification, viz. phosphorylation of the GSTP1 protein, and (c) whether such phosphorylation of the GSTP1 protein alters its functions in metabolism and in JNK signaling. ^ The first major finding in this study is the establishment of the human GSTP1 gene as a novel CAMP responsive gene in which transcription is activated via an interaction between PKA activated CRE binding protein-1 (CREB-1) and the CRE in the 5′-regulatory region. ^ The second major finding in this study is the observation that the GSTP1 protein undergoes phosphorylation and functionally activated by second messenger-activated protein kinases, PKA and PKC, in tumor cells with activated signaling pathways. Following phosphorylation by PKA or PKC, the catalytic activity of the GSTP1 protein was significantly enhanced, as indicated by a decrease in its Km (2- to 3.6-fold) and an increase in Kcat/ Km (1.6- to 2.5-fold) for glutathione. Given the frequent over-expression of GSTP1 and the aberrant PKA/PKC signaling cascade observed in tumors, these findings suggest that phosphorylation of GSTP1 may contribute to the malignant progression and drug-resistant phenotype of these tumors. ^ The third major finding in this study is that the GSTP1 protein, an inhibitor of JNKs, undergoes significant phosphorylation in tumor cells with activated JNK signaling pathway and in those under oxidative stress. Following phosphorylation by JNK, the ability of GSTP1 to inhibit JNK downstream function, i.e. c-jun phosphorylation, was significantly enhanced, suggesting a feedback mechanism of regulation of JNK-mediated cellular signaling. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) ^

Role of the glutathione S -transferase P1 (GSTP1) electrophile binding site (H-site) in protection from doxorubicin -mediated cytotoxicity

The hypothesis addressed in this project was that novel variants of naturally occurring human glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) can be created by random mutagenesis of the GSTP1 active site to yield polypeptides with increased enzymatic activity against electrophilic substrates. Specifically, the mutant proteins would metabolize and inactivate selected electrophiles more efficiently than wild-type GSTP1 and confer significant cytoprotection, as measured by reduced apoptosis and increased clonogenic survival. Glutathione S-transferase P1, a major electrophile metabolizing and detoxifying enzyme, is encoded by a polymorphic genetic locus. This locus contains nucleotide transitions in the region encoding the active site of the peptide that yields proteins with significant structural and functional differences. The method of Degenerate Oligonucleotide Mediated Random Mutagenesis (DOMRM) was used to generate cDNAs encoding unique GSTP1 polypeptides with mutations within electrophile binding site (H-site) while leaving the glutathione binding site unaffected. A prokaryotic expression library of the mutant GSTP1 polypeptides was created and screened for increased resistance to cisplatin. This screen resulted in the isolation of 96 clones representing 22 distinct mutant cDNA sequences. To investigate the effects of the changes in the H-site on the biological activity of GSTP1, the cDNA of wild-type GSTP1c and two of the identified mutants were stably transfected into human LNCaP-Pro5 prostate cancer cells that do not endogenously express GSTP1. Wild-type transfectants were resistant to doxorubicin-induced apoptosis and displayed increased clonogenic survival compared to vector controls. However, contrary to the hypothesis, in both assays the mutant transfectants were no more resistant to doxorubicin than the wild-type transfectants. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying GSTP1-mediated survival, an in-vitro assay was developed to determine whether active GSTP1 protein directly metabolizes doxorubicin by conjugation to reduced glutathione (GSH). Although GSH did promote the appearance of a unique doxorubicin conjugate, conjugate formation was not substantially increased by the addition of GSTP1 in a variety of reaction conditions. ^

GSTM1 and GSTT1 null polymorphisms and risk of salivary gland carcinoma.

Glutathione S-transferase (GST) genes detoxify and metabolize carcinogens, including oxygen free radicals which may contribute to salivary gland carcinogenesis. This cancer center-based case-control association study included 166 patients with incident salivary gland carcinoma (SGC) and 511 cancer-free controls. We performed multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based polymorphism genotyping assays for GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, tobacco use, family history of cancer, alcohol use and radiation exposure. In our results, 27.7% of the SGC cases and 20.6% of the controls were null for the GSTT1 (P = 0.054), and 53.0% of the SGC cases and 50.9% of the controls were null for the GSTM1 (P = 0.633). The results of the adjusted multivariale regression analysis suggested that having GSTT1 null genotype was associated with a significantly increased risk for SGC (odds ratio 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.0-2.3). Additionally, 13.9% of the SGC cases but only 8.4% of the controls were null for both genes and the results of the adjusted multivariable regression analysis suggested that having both null genotypes was significantly associated with an approximately 2-fold increased risk for SGC (odds ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.0-3.5). The presence of GSTT1 null genotype and the simultaneous presence of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes appear associated with significantly increased SGC risk. These findings warrant further study with larger sample sizes.

Phosphorylation of the proline-rich domain of Xp95 modulates Xp95 interaction with partner proteins.

The mammalian adaptor protein Alix [ALG-2 (apoptosis-linked-gene-2 product)-interacting protein X] belongs to a conserved family of proteins that have in common an N-terminal Bro1 domain and a C-terminal PRD (proline-rich domain), both of which mediate partner protein interactions. Following our previous finding that Xp95, the Xenopus orthologue of Alix, undergoes a phosphorylation-dependent gel mobility shift during progesteroneinduced oocyte meiotic maturation, we explored potential regulation of Xp95/Alix by protein phosphorylation in hormone-induced cell cycle re-entry or M-phase induction. By MALDI-TOF (matrix-assisted laser-desorption ionization-time-of-flight) MS analyses and gel mobility-shift assays, Xp95 is phosphorylated at multiple sites within the N-terminal half of the PRD during Xenopus oocyte maturation, and a similar region in Alix is phosphorylated in mitotically arrested but not serum-stimulated mammalian cells. By tandem MS, Thr745 within this region, which localizes in a conserved binding site to the adaptor protein SETA [SH3 (Src homology 3) domain-containing, expressed in tumorigenic astrocytes] CIN85 (a-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamate)/SH3KBP1 (SH3-domain kinase-binding protein 1), is one of the phosphorylation sites in Xp95. Results from GST (glutathione S-transferase)-pull down and peptide binding/competition assays further demonstrate that the Thr745 phosphorylation inhibits Xp95 interaction with the second SH3 domain of SETA. However, immunoprecipitates of Xp95 from extracts of M-phase-arrested mature oocytes contained additional partner proteins as compared with immunoprecipitates from extracts of G2-arrested immature oocytes. The deubiquitinase AMSH (associated molecule with the SH3 domain of signal transducing adaptor molecule) specifically interacts with phosphorylated Xp95 in M-phase cell lysates. These findings establish that Xp95/Alix is phosphorylated within the PRD during M-phase induction, and indicate that the phosphorylation may both positively and negatively modulate their interaction with partner proteins.