MECHANISMS OF SPECIES DIFFERENCES IN BRAIN ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE SENSITIVITY TO ORGANOPHOSPHATE INHIBITION

In vitro incubation of acetylcholinesterase from brain tissue of several species with organophosphate compounds indicated that the concentrations required to inhibit 50% of acetylcholinesterase activity (IC(,50)) differed from species to species for the same compound (Murphy, et al., 1968; Andersen, et al., 1972, 1977 and 1978).^ The hypothesis that non-specific binding proteins (Lauwerys and Murphy, 1969a,b) exerts a protective effect on acetylcholinesterase, and thus cause the differences observed in IC(,50) studies was tested by a ('3)H-DFP binding experiment. It was found that differences in the amount of non-specific binding protein cannot explain the observed differences observed in IC(,50) studies.^ An alternative hypothesis, that acetylcholinesterase from different species have different affinities for binding and/or different rates of phosphorylation by organophosphate insecticides was tested by determining the apparent affinity constant (k(,a)) and apparent rate of phosphorylation (k(,p)). Kinetic studies indicated that acetylcholinesterases from different species have different sensitivities to inhibition by organophosphate insecticides, and the differences are due to different affinities for binding and/or different rates of phosphorylation by the same organophosphate compound.^ Studies of the spontaneous reactivation of acetylcholinesterase after inhibition by organophosphate insecticides also indicated that acetylcholinesterases from different species have different rates and extents of spontaneous reactivation. This further substantiates the hypothesis that acetylcholinesterases from different species have different kinetic characteristics with respect to organophosphate insecticides inhibition.^ Eleven paraoxon analogs were synthesized for a quantitative structure-activity relationship study. It was found that the electron-withdrawing power ((sigma)) and hydrophobicity ((PARAGR)) of the substituent are important in determining the anti-cholinesterase activity of paraoxon analogs. Thus, predictions of species differences in acetylcholinesterase sensitivities to paraoxon analogs can be made if the physicochemical parameters ((sigma) and (PARAGR)) of the substituents are known.^ In another approach, i.e. enzyme modeling, the sensitivity of rat brain acetylcholinesterase to organophosphate insecticides was used as the independent variable to predict the sensitivities of acetylcholinesterases from other species to the same compound. Regression equations were derived for each species based on nineteen organophosphate insecticides studied. It was found, that in addition to paraoxon analogs, this method is also applicable to other organophosphate compounds with wide variations in structure. Thus, the sensitivities of acetylcholinesterases from other species can also be predicted from the sensitivity of rat brain acetylcholinesterase. ^

Cytochrome P-450 reductase FAD binding domain: Cloning, enzymatic activity and flavin binding characterization

The Mixed Function Oxidase System metabolizes a wide range of biochemicals including drugs, pesticides and steroids. Cytochrome P450 reductase is a key enzymatic component of this system, supplying reducing equivalents from NADPH to cytochrome P450. The electrons are shuttled through reductase via two flavin moieties: FAD and FMN. Although the exact mechanism of flavins action is not known, the enzymatic features of reductase greatly depleted of either FMN of FAD have been characterized. Additionally, flavin location within reductase has been proposed by homology and chemical modification studies. This study seeks to extend the flavin depletion analysis in a more controlled system by eliminating the proposed FMN binding domain with recombinant DNA techniques and biochemical analysis. Two P450 reductase cDNA clones containing only the FMN and NADPH binding domain were isolated, expressed and the protein products purified and analysed. This study confirms the proposed FAD binding site, role of FAD in electron shuttling pathway and provides new methods to study the FAD binding domain. ^

REPSA: A method for determining the sequence specificity of DNA binding ligands

We developed a novel combinatorial method termed restriction endonuclease protection selection and amplification (REPSA) to identify consensus binding sites of DNA-binding ligands. REPSA uses a unique enzymatic selection based on the inhibition of cleavage by a type IIS restriction endonuclease, an enzyme that cleaves DNA at a site distal from its recognition sequence. Sequences bound by a ligand are protected from cleavage while unprotected sequences are cleaved. This enzymatic selection occurs in solution under mild conditions and is dependant only on the DNA-binding ability of the ligand. Thus, REPSA is useful for a broad range of ligands including all classes of DNA-binding ligands, weakly binding ligands, mixed populations of ligands, and unknown ligands. Here I describe REPSA and the application of this method to select the consensus DNA-binding sequences of three representative DNA-binding ligands; a nucleic acid (triplex-forming single-stranded DNA), a protein (the TATA-binding protein), and a small molecule (Distamycin A). These studies generated new information regarding the specificity of these ligands in addition to establishing their DNA-binding sequences. ^

MONITORING ENZYME REACTIONS BY FAST ATOM BOMBARDMENT MASS SPECTROMETRY

The potential for the direct analysis of enzyme reactions by fast atom bombardment (FAB) mass spectrometry has been investigated. Conditions are presented for the maintenance of enzymatic activity under FAB conditions along with FAB mass spectrometric data showing that these conditions can be applied to solutions of enzyme and substrate to follow enzymatic reactions inside the mass spectrometer in real-time. In addition, enzyme kinetic behavior under FAB mass spectrometric conditions is characterized using trypsin and its assay substrate, TAME, as an enzyme-substrate reaction model. These results show that two monitoring methods can be utilized to follow reactions by FAB mass spectrometry. The advantages of each method are discussed and illustrated by obtaining kinetic parameters from the direct analysis of enzyme reactions with assay or peptide substrates. ^