Autoregulation of the {\it neu\/} oncogene

The neu gene encodes a 185,000-Da membrane glycoprotein that is highly homologous to epidermal growth factor receptor. It is frequently overexpressed or amplified in human breast carcinomas and ovarian cancers, which correlates with a poor prognosis for patients. The importance of neu gene regulation is noted by the fact that many breast cancer cells overexpress the neu gene without proportional gene amplification. The mechanism for that is unclear. My initial finding of neu autoregulation led to a realization that defects in neu autoregulation pathway may contribute to neu overexpression in tumor cells. I have found in the nontransformed NIH 3T3 model system that (i) the neu gene product autorepresses its own promoter activity, (ii) the neu gene promoter contains a novel enhancer, (iii) neu autorepression is mediated through this enhancer by inhibition of the enhancer activity, and (iv) c-myc expression serves as an intermediate step downstream from the membrane bound neu-encoded receptor in this complicated feedback inhibition pathway.^ In addition, a part of my research is studying the neu-encoded receptor molecule. I have generated a construct coding the neu ligand-binding domain and demonstrated that (i) the neu ligand-binding domain is a secretory peptide, (ii) it inhibits the normal neu-associated tyrosine kinase but not activated neu-associated tyrosine kinase. My study provided experimental evidence for the mechanisms of neu gene activation. ^

Autoregulation of TRA-2 pre -mRNA splicing

One of the most elegant and tightly regulated mechanisms for control of gene expression is alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Despite the importance of regulated splicing in a variety of biological processes relatively little is understood about the mechanisms by which specific alternative splice choices are made and regulated. The transformer-2 (tra-2) gene encodes a splicing regulator that controls the use of alternative splicing pathways in the sex determination cascade of D. melanogaster and is particularly interesting because it directs the splicing of several distinct pre-mRNAs in different manners. The tra-2 protein positively regulates the splicing of both doublesex (dsx) and fruitless (fru) pre-mRNAs. Additionally tra-2 controls exuperantia (exu) by directing the choices between splicing and cleavage/polyadenylation and autoregulates the tra-2 pre-mRNA processing by repressing the removal of a specific intron (called M1). The goal of this study is to identify the molecular mechanisms by which TRA-2 protein affects the alternative splicing of pre-mRNA deriving from the tra-2 gene itself.^ The autoregulation of M1 splicing plays a key role in regulation of the relative levels of two functionally distinct TRA-2 protein isoforms expressed in the male germline. We have examined whether the structure, function, and regulation of tra-2 are conserved in Drosophila virilis, a species diverged from D. melanogaster by over 60 million years. We find that the D. virilis homolog of tra-2 produces alternatively spliced RNAs encoding a set of protein isoforms analogous to those found in D. melanogaster. When introduced into the genome of D. melanogaster, this homolog can functionally replace the endogenous tra-2 gene for both normal female sexual differentiation and spermatogenesis. Examination of alternative pre-mRNAs produced in D. virilis testes suggests that the germline-specific autoregulation of tra-2 function is accomplished by a strategy similar to that used in D. melanogaster.^ To identify elements necessary for regulation of tra-2 M1 splicing, we mutagenized evolutionarily conserved sequences within the tra-2 M1 intron and flanking exons. Constructs containing these mutations were used to generate transgenic fly lines that have been tested for their ability to carry out autoregulation. These transgenic fly experiments elucidated several elements that are necessary for setting up a context under which tissue-specific regulation of M1 splicing can occur. These elements include a suboptimal 3$\sp\prime$ splice site, an element that has been conserved between D. virilis and D. melanogaster, and an element that resembles the 3$\sp\prime$ portion of a dsx repeat and other splicing enhancers.^ Although important contextual features of the tra-2 M1 intron have been delineated in the transgenic fly experiments, the specific RNA sequences that interact directly with the TRA-2 protein were not identified. Using Drosophila nuclear extracts from Schneider cells, we have shown that recombinant TRA-2 protein represses M1 splicing in vitro. UV crosslinking analysis suggests that the TRA-2 protein binds to several different sites within and near the M1 intron. ^

BMP-SIGNALING REGULATES A COMMON TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROGRAM TO CONTROL FACIAL FORM AND SKELETAL MORPHOGENESIS

Much of the craniofacial skeleton, such as the skull vault, mandible and midface, develops through direct, intramembranous ossification of the cranial neural crest (CNC) derived progenitor cells. Bmp-signaling plays critical roles in normal craniofacial development, and Bmp4 deficiency results in craniofacial abnormalities, such as cleft lip and palate. We performed an in depth analysis of Bmp4, a critical regulator of development, disease, and evolution, in the CNC. Conditional Bmp4 overexpression, using a tetracycline regulated Bmp4 gain of function allele, resulted in facial form changes that were most dramatic after an E10.5 Bmp4 induction. Expression profiling uncovered a signature of Bmp4 induced genes (BIG) composed predominantly of transcriptional regulators controlling self-renewal, osteoblast differentiation, and negative Bmp autoregulation. The complimentary experiment, CNC inactivation of Bmp2, Bmp4, and Bmp7, resulted in complete or partial loss of multiple CNC derived skeletal elements revealing a critical requirement for Bmp-signaling in membranous bone and cartilage development. Importantly, the BIG signature was reduced in Bmp loss of function mutants indicating similar Bmp-regulated target genes underlying facial form modulation and normal skeletal morphogenesis. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) revealed a subset of the BIG signature, including Satb2, Smad6, Hand1, Gadd45g and Gata3 that was bound by Smad1/5 in the developing mandible revealing direct, Smad-mediated regulation. These data indicate that Bmp-signaling regulates craniofacial skeletal development and facial form by balancing self-renewal and differentiation pathways in CNC progenitors.

Regulation of {\it myogenin\/} transcription during mouse embryogenesis

The formation of skeletal muscle during vertebrate development involves the induction of mesoderm and subsequent generation of myoblasts that ultimately differentiate into mature muscles. The recent identification of a group of myogenic regulators that can convert fibroblasts to myoblasts has contributed to our understanding of the molecular events that underlie the establishment of the skeletal muscle phenotype. Members of this group of myogenic regulators share a helix-loop-helix (HLH) motif that mediates DNA binding. The myogenic HLH proteins bind to the consensus sequence CANNTG, referred to as an E-box, and activate muscle-specific transcription. In addition to E-boxes, other motifs, such as the MEF-2 binding site, have been shown to mediate muscle-specific transcription. The myogenic HLH proteins are expressed in the myogenic precursors in somites and limb buds, and in differentiated muscle fibers during embryogenesis, consistent with their roles as regulators for muscle development. The myogenic HLH proteins appear to auto-activate their own and cross-activate one another's expression in cultured cells. Myogenin is one of the myogenic HLH proteins and likely the regulator for terminal muscle differentiation. Myogenin is a common target of diverse regulatory pathways. To search for upstream regulators of myogenin, we studied regulation of myogenin transcription during mouse embryogenesis. We showed that the myogenin promoter contains a binding site for MEF-2, which can mediate indirectly the autoregulation of myogenin transcription. We found that a transgene under the control of a 1.5 kb 5$\sp\prime$ flanking sequence can recapitulate the temporal and spatial expression pattern of the endogenous myogenin gene during mouse embryogenesis. By tracing embryonic cells that activate myogenin-lacZ during embryogenesis, we found no evidence that lacZ was expressed in myogenic precursors migrating from somites to limb buds, suggesting the existence of regulators other than myogenic HLH proteins that can maintain cells in the myogenic lineage. Mutations of an E-box and a MEF-2 site in the myogenin promoter suppressed transcription in subsets of myogenic precursors in mouse embryos. These results suggest that myogenic HLH proteins and MEF-2 participate in separable regulatory pathways controlling myogenin transcription and provide evidence for positional regulation of myogenic regulators in the embryo. ^

Transcriptional regulation and functional analysis of the Wilms' tumor gene WT1

The Wilms' tumor gene, WT1, encodes a zinc finger transcription factor which functions as a tumor suppressor. Defects in the WT1 gene can result in the development of nephroblastoma. WT1 is expressed during development, primarily in the metanephric kidney, the mesothelial lining of the abdomen and thorax, and the developing gonads. WT1 expression is tightly regulated and is essential for renal development. The WT1 gene encodes a protein with a proline-rich N-terminus which functions as a transcriptional repressor and C-terminus contains 4 zinc fingers that mediate DNA binding. WT1 represses transcription from a number of growth factors and growth factor receptors. WT1 mRNA undergoes alternative splicing at two sites, resulting in 4 mRNA species and polypeptide products. Exon 5, encoding 17 amino acids is alternatively spliced, and is located between the transcriptional repression domain and the DNA binding domain. The second alternative splice is the terminal 9 nucleotides of zinc finger 3, encoding the tripeptide Lys-Thr-Ser (KTS). The presence or absence of KTS within the zinc fingers of WT1 alters DNA binding.^ I have investigated transcriptional regulation of WT1, characterizing two means of repressing WT1 transcription. I have cloned a transcriptional silencer of the WT1 promoter which is located in the third intron of the WT1 gene. The silencer is 460 bp in length and contains an Alu repeat. The silencer functions in cells of non-renal origin.^ I have found that WT1 protein can autoregulate the WT1 promoter. Using the autoregulation of the WT1 promoter as a functional assay, I have defined differential consensus DNA binding motifs of WT1 isoforms lacking and containing the KTS tripeptide insertion. With these refined consensus DNA binding motifs, I have identified two additional targets of WT1 transcriptional repression, the proto-oncogenes bcl-2 and c-myc.^ I have investigated the ability of the alternatively spliced exon 5 to influence cell growth. In cell proliferation assays, isoforms of WT1 lacking exon 5 repress cell growth. WT1 isoforms containing exon 5 fail to repress cell growth to the same extent, but alter the morphology of the cells. These experiments demonstrate that the alternative splice isoforms of WT1 have differential effects on the function of WT1. These findings suggest a role for the alternative splicing of WT1 in metanephric development. ^

DETERMINING THE GENOTYPE-PHENOTYPE CONNECTION IN SYNTHETIC INDUCIBLE GENE EXPRESSION SYSTEMS

Introduction Gene expression is an important process whereby the genotype controls an individual cell’s phenotype. However, even genetically identical cells display a variety of phenotypes, which may be attributed to differences in their environment. Yet, even after controlling for these two factors, individual phenotypes still diverge due to noisy gene expression. Synthetic gene expression systems allow investigators to isolate, control, and measure the effects of noise on cell phenotypes. I used mathematical and computational methods to design, study, and predict the behavior of synthetic gene expression systems in S. cerevisiae, which were affected by noise. Methods I created probabilistic biochemical reaction models from known behaviors of the tetR and rtTA genes, gene products, and their gene architectures. I then simplified these models to account for essential behaviors of gene expression systems. Finally, I used these models to predict behaviors of modified gene expression systems, which were experimentally verified. Results Cell growth, which is often ignored when formulating chemical kinetics models, was essential for understanding gene expression behavior. Models incorporating growth effects were used to explain unexpected reductions in gene expression noise, design a set of gene expression systems with “linear” dose-responses, and quantify the speed with which cells explored their fitness landscapes due to noisy gene expression. Conclusions Models incorporating noisy gene expression and cell division were necessary to design, understand, and predict the behaviors of synthetic gene expression systems. The methods and models developed here will allow investigators to more efficiently design new gene expression systems, and infer gene expression properties of TetR based systems.

Analysis of p53 function and regulation

p53 is a tumor suppressor gene that is the most frequent target inactivated in cancers. Overexpression of wild-type p53 in rat embryo fibroblasts suppresses foci formation by other cooperating oncogenes. Introduction of wild-type p53 into cells that lack p53 arrests them at the G1/S boundary and reverses the transformed phenotype of some cells. The function of p53 in normal cells is illustrated by the ability of p53 to arrest cells at G1 phase of the cell cycle upon exposure to DNA-damaging agents including UV-irradiation and biosynthesis inhibitors.^ Since the amino acid sequence of p53 suggested that it may function as a transcription factor, we used GAL4 fusion assays to test that possibility. We found that wild-type p53 could specifically activate transcription when anchored by the GAL4 DNA binding domain. Mutant p53s, which have lost the ability to suppress foci formation by other oncogenes, were not able to activate transcription in this assay. Thus, we established a direct correlation between the tumor suppression and transactivation functions of p53.^ Having learned that p53 was a transcriptional activator, we next sought targets of p53 activation. Because many transcription factors regulate their own expression, we tested whether p53 had this autoregulatory property. Transient expression of wild-type p53 in cells increased the levels of endogenous p53 mRNA. Cotransfection of p53 together with a reporter bearing the p53 promoter confirmed that wild-type p53 specifically activates its own promoter. Deletion analysis from both the 5$\sp\prime$ and 3$\sp\prime$ ends of the promoter minimized the region responsible for p53 autoregulation to 45 bp. Methylation interference identified nucleotides involved in protein-DNA interaction. Mutations within this protected site specifically eliminated the response of the promoter to p53. In addition, multiple copies of this element confer responsiveness to wild-type p53 expression. Thus, we identified a F53 responsive element within the p53 promoter.^ The presence of a consensus NF-$\kappa$B site in the p53 promoter suggested that NF-KB may regulate p53 expression. Gel-shift experiments showed that both the p50 homodimer and the p50/p65 heterodimer bind to the p53 promoter. In addition, the p65 subunit of NF-$\kappa$B activates the p53 promoter in transient transfection experiments. TNF $\alpha$, a natural NF-$\kappa$B inducer, also activates the p53 promoter. Both p65 activation and TNF $\alpha$ induction require an intact NF-$\kappa$B site in the p53 promoter. Since NF-$\kappa$B activation occurs as a response to stress and p53 arrests cells in G1/S, where DNA repair occurs, activation of p53 by NF-$\kappa$B could be a mechanism by which cells recover from stress.^ In conclusion, we provided the first data that wild-type p53 functions as a transcriptional activator, whereas mutant p53 cannot. The correlation between growth suppression and transcriptional activation by p53 implies a pathway of tumor suppression. We have analyzed upstream components of the pathway by the identification of both p53 and NF-$\kappa$B as regulators of the p53 promoter. ^

Inactivation and self -association of CaM kinase: Effects of ATP, substrate binding domains, and isozymic forms

Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaM kinase) is a multifunctional Ser/Thr protein kinase, that is highly enriched in brain and is involved in regulating many aspects of neuronal function. We observed that forebrain CaM kinase from crude homogenates, cytosolic fractions and purified preparations inactivates and translocates into the particulate fraction following autophosphorylation. Using purified forebrain CaM kinase as well as recombinant $\alpha$ isozyme, we determined that the formation of particulate enzyme was due to enzyme self-association. The conditions of autophosphorylation determine whether enzyme self-association and/or inactivation will occur. Self-association of CaM kinase is sensitive to pH, ATP concentration, and enzyme autophosphorylation. This process is prevented by saturating concentrations of ATP. However, in limiting ATP, pH is the dominant factor, and enzyme self-association occurs at pH values $\rm{<}7.0.$ Site-specific mutants were produced by substituting Ala for Thr286, Thr253, or Thr305,306 to determine whether these sites of autophosphorylation affect enzyme inactivation and self-association. The only mutation that influenced these processes was Ala286, which removed the protective effect afforded by autophosphorylation in saturating ATP. Enzyme inactivation occurs in the presence and absence of self-association and appears predominantly sensitive to nucleotide concentration, because saturating concentrations of $\rm Mg\sp{2+}/ADP$ or $\rm Mg\sp{2+}/ATP$ prevent this process. These data implicate the ATP binding pocket in both inactivation and self-association. We also observed that select peptide substrates and peptide inhibitors modeled after the autoregulatory domain of CaM kinase prevented these processes. The $\alpha$ and $\beta$ isozymes of CaM kinase were characterized independently, and were observed to exhibit differences in both enzyme inactivation and self-association. The $\beta$ isozyme was less sensitive to inactivation, and was never observed to self-associate. Biophysical characterization, and transmission electron microscopy coupled with image analysis indicated both isozymes were multimeric, however, the $\alpha$ and $\beta$ isozymes appeared structurally different. We hypothesize that the $\alpha$ subunit of CaM kinase plays both a structural and enzymatic role, and the $\beta$ subunit plays an enzymatic role. The ramifications for the functional differences observed for inactivation and self-association are discussed based on potential structural differences and autoregulation of the $\alpha$ and $\beta$ isozymes in both calcium-induced physiological and pathological processes. ^