ΔNp63 REGULATES A COMPLEX NETWORK OF TARGET GENES IN LIMB AND EPIDERMAL DEVELOPMENT

The skin is composed of two major compartments, the dermis and epidermis. The epidermis forms a barrier to protect the body. The stratified epithelium has self-renewing capacity throughout life, and continuous turnover is mediated by stem cells in the basal layer. p63 is structurally and functionally related to p53. In spite of their structural similarities, p63 is critical for the development and maintenance of stratified epithelial tissues, unlike p53. p63 is highly expressed in the epidermis and previously has been shown to play a critical role in the development and maintenance of the epidermis. The study of p63 has been complicated due to the existence of multiple isoforms: those with a transactivation domain (TAp63) and those lacking this domain (ΔNp63). Mice lacking p63 cannot form skin, have craniofacial and skeletal defects and die within hours after birth. These defects are due to the ability of p63 to regulate multiple processes in skin development including epithelial stem cell proliferation, differentiation, and adherence programs. To determine the roles of these isoforms in skin development and maintenance, isoform specific p63 conditional knock out mice were generated by our lab. TAp63-/- mice age prematurely, develop blisters, and display wound-healing defects that result from hyperproliferation of dermal stem cells. That results in premature depletion of these cells, which are necessary for wound repair, that indicates TAp63 plays a role in dermal/epidermal maintenance. To study the role of ΔNp63, I generated a ΔNp63-/- mouse and analyzed the skin by performing immunofluorescence for markers of epithelial differentiation. The ΔNp63-/- mice developed a thin, disorganized epithelium but differentiation markers were expressed. Interestingly, the epidermis from ΔNp63-/- mice co-expressed K14 and K10 in the same cell suggesting defects in epidermal differentiation and stratification. This phenotype is reminiscent of the DGCR8fl/fl;K14Cre and Dicerfl/fl;K14Cre mice skin. Importantly, DGCR8-/- embryonic stem cells (ESCs) display a hyperproliferation defect by failure to silence pluripotency genes. Furthermore, I have observed that epidermal cells lacking ΔNp63 display a phenotype reminiscent of embryonic stem cells instead of keratinocytes. Thus, I hypothesize that genes involved in maintaining pluripotency, like Oct4, may be upregulated in the absence of ΔNp63. To test this, q-RT PCR was performed for Oct4 mRNA with wild type and ΔNp63-/- 18.5dpc embryo skin. I found that the level of Oct4 was dramatically increased in the absence of ΔNp63-/-. Based on these results, I hypothesized that ΔNp63 induces differentiation by silencing pluripotency regulators, Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog directly through the regulation of DGCR8. I found that DGCR8 restoration resulted in repression of Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog in ΔNp63-/- epidermal cells and rescue differentiation defects. Loss of ΔNp63 resulted in pluripotency that caused defect in proper differentiation and stem cell like phenotype. This led me to culture the ΔNp63-/- epidermal cells in neuronal cell culture media in order to address whether restoration of DGCR8 can transform epidermal cells to neuronal cells. I found that DGCR8 restoration resulted in a change in cell fate. I also found that miR470 and miR145 play a role in the induction of pluripotency by repressing Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog. This indicates that ΔNp63 induces terminal differentiation through the regulation of DGCR8.

The role of Lmx1b in the control of dorsoventral compartmentalization in the distal mesenchyme of the developing mouse limb

Lmx1b encodes a LIM-homeodomain transcription factor required for dorso-ventral (D-V) patterning in the mesenchyme of the vertebrate limb. In the absence of Lmx1b function, limbs exhibit a bi-ventral pattern indicating that Lmx1b is required for cells to adopt a dorsal cell fate. However, how Lmx1b specifies dorsal cell fates in the mesenchyme of the distal limb is unknown. Lmx1b is initially expressed throughout the dorsal and ventral limb bud mesenchyme, then becomes dorsally restricted around E10.5. At this stage, there is a sharp boundary between Lmx1b expressing and Lmx1b non-expressing cells. How the dorso-ventral Lmx1b expression boundary is formed and maintained is currently unknown. One mechanism that may contribute to establishing and/or maintaining the Lmx1b expression boundary is if the dorsal mesenchyme is a lineage-based compartment, where different groups of non-mingling cells are separated. Compartment formation has been proposed to rely on compartment-specific selector gene activity which functions to restrict cells to a compartment and specifies the identity of cells within that compartment. Based on the evidence that the dorsal limb identity relies on the expression of Lmx1b in the dorsal half of the limb mesenchyme, we hypothesized that Lmx1b might function as a dorsal limb bud mesenchyme selector gene to set up a dorsal compartment. To test this hypothesis, we developed an inducible CreERT2/ loxP based fate mapping approach that permanently marks Lmx1b wild-type and mutant cells and examined the distribution of their descendents in the developing limb. Our data is the first to show that dorso-ventral lineage compartments exist in the limb bud mesenchyme. Furthermore, Lmx1b is required for maintenance of the dorso-ventral compartment lineage boundary. The behavior of Lmx1b mutant cells that cross into the ventral mesenchyme, as well as previous chimera analysis in which mutant cells spread evenly in the ventral limb and form patches in the dorsal side, suggest that cell affinity differences prevent intermingling of dorsal and ventral cells. ^

Comparative studies of Hox genes in mammalian limb and vertebral pattern formation

Divergence of anterior-posterior (AP) limb pattern and differences in vertebral column morphology are the two main examples of mammalian evolution. The Hox genes (homeobox containing gene) have been implicated in driving evolution of these structures. However, regarding Hox genes, how they contribute to the generation of mammalian morphological diversities, is still unclear. Implementing comparative gene expression and phenotypic rescue studies for different mammalian Hox genes could aid in unraveling this mystery. In the first part of this thesis, the expression pattern of Hoxd13 gene, a key Hox gene in the establishment of the limb AP pattern, was examined in developing limbs of bats and mice. Bat forelimbs exhibit a pronounced asymmetric AP pattern and offer a good model to study the molecular mechanisms that contribute to the variety of mammalian limbs. The data showed that the expression domain of bat Hoxd13 was shifted prior to the asymmetric limb plate expansion, whereas its domain in mice was much more symmetric. This finding reveals a correlation between the divergence of Hoxd13 expression and the AP patterning difference in limb development. The second part of this thesis details a phenotypic rescue approach by human HOXB1-9 transgenes in mice with Hoxb1-9 deletion, The mouse mutants displayed homeosis in cervical and anterior thoracic vertebrae. The human transgenes entirely rescued the mouse mutants, suggesting that these human HOX genes have similar functions to their mouse orthologues in anterior axial skeletal patterning. The anterior expressing human HOXB transgenes such as HOXB1-3 were expressed in the mouse embryonic trunk in a similar manner as their murine orthologues. However, the anterior boundary of human HOXB9 expression domain was more posterior than that of the mouse Hoxb9 by 2-3 somites. These data provide the molecular support for the hypothesis that Hox genes are responsible for maintaining similar anterior axial skeletal architectures cervical and anterior thoracic regions, but different architectures in lumbar and posterior thoracic regions between humans and mice. ^

Birth prevalence of isolated congenital limb reduction defects in Texas 1999--2001

Objective. Congenital limb defects are common birth defects occurring in approximately 2-7/10,000 live births. Because congenital limb defects are pervasive throughout all populations, and the conditions profoundly affect quality of life, they represent a significant public health concern. Currently there is a paucity of etiologic information in the literature regarding congenital limb reduction defects which represents a major limitation in developing treatment strategies as well as identifying high risk pregnancies. ^ Additionally, despite the fact that the majority of congenital limb reduction defects are isolated, most previous studies have not separated them from those occurring as part of a known syndrome or with multiple additional congenital anomalies of unknown etiology. It stands to reason that factors responsible for multiple congenital anomalies that happen to include congenital limb reduction defects may be quite different from those factors leading to an isolated congenital limb reduction defect. ^ As a first step toward gaining etiologic understanding, this cross-sectional study was undertaken to determine the birth prevalence and obtain demographic information about non-syndromic (isolated) congenital limb reduction defects that occurred in Texas from 1999-2001. ^ Methods. The study population included all infants/fetuses with isolated congenital limb reduction defects born in Texas during 1999-2001; the comparison population was all infants who were born to mothers who were residents of Texas during the same period of time. The overall birth prevalence of limb reduction defects was determined and adjusted for ethnicity, gender, site of defect (upper limb versus lower limb), county of residence, maternal age and maternal education. ^ Results. In Texas, the overall birth prevalence of isolated CLRDs was 2.1/10,000 live births (1.5 and 0.6/10,000 live births for upper limb and lower limb, respectively). ^ The risk of isolated lower limb CLRDs in Texas was significantly lower in females when gender was examined individually (crude prevalence odds ratio of 0.57, 95% CI of 0.36-0.91) as well as in relation to all other variables used in the analysis (adjusted prevalence odds ratio of 0.58, 95% CI of 0.36-0.93). ^ Harris County (which includes the Houston metropolitan area) had significantly lower risks of all (upper limb and lower limb combined) isolated CLRDs when examined in relation to other counties in Texas, with a crude prevalence odds ratio of 0.4 (95% CI: 0.29-0.72) and an adjusted prevalence odds ratio of 0.50 (95% CI: 0.31-0.80). The risk of isolated upper limb CLRDs was significantly lower in Harris County (crude prevalence odds ratio of 0.45, CI of 0.26-0.76 and adjusted prevalence odds ratio of 0.49, CI of 0.28-0.84). This trend toward decreased risk in Harris County was not observed for isolated lower limb reduction defects (adjusted prevalence odds ratio of 0.50, 95% confidence interval: 0.22-1.12). ^ Conclusions. The birth prevalence of isolated congenital limb reduction defects in Texas is in the lower limits of the range of rates that have been reported by other authors for other states (Alabama, Arkansas, California, Georgia, Hawaii, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Utah, Washington) and other countries (Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Denmark, Ecuador, England, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Lithuania, Mexico, Norway, Paraguay, Peru, Spain, Scotland, Sweden, Switzerland, Uruguay, and Venezuela). In Texas, the birth prevalence of isolated congenital lower limb reduction defects was greater for males than females, while the birth prevalence of isolated congenital upper limb reduction defects was not significantly different between males and females. The reduced rates of limb reduction defects in Harris County warrant further investigation. This study has provided an important first step toward gaining etiologic understanding in the study of isolated congenital limb reduction defects. ^

Coordination of murine limb muscle, skeleton and connective tissue development by Lmx1b

The underlying genetic defects of a congenital disease Nail-Patella Syndrome are loss-of-function mutations in the LMX1B gene. Lmx1b encodes a LIM-homeodomain transcription factor that is expressed specifically in the dorsal limb bud mesenchyme. Gain- and loss-of-function experiments suggest that Lmx1b is both necessary and sufficient to specify dorsal limb patterning. However, how Lmx1b coordinates patterning of the dorsal tissues in the limb, including muscle, skeleton and connective tissues, remains unknown. One possibility is that each tissue specifies its own pattern cell-autonomously, i.e., Lmx1b is expressed in tissues in which it functions and different tissues do not communicate with each other. Another possibility is that tissues that express Lmx1b interact with adjacent tissues and provide patterning information thereby directing the development of tissues non-cell-autonomously. Previous results showed that Lmx1b is expressed in limb connective tissue and skeleton, but is not expressed in muscle tissue. Moreover, muscles and muscle connective tissue are closely associated during development. Therefore, we hypothesize that Lmx1b controls limb muscle dorsal-ventral (DV) patterning through muscle connective tissue, but regulates skeleton and tendon/ligament development cell-autonomously. ^ To test this hypothesis, we first examined when and where the limb dorsal-ventral asymmetry is established during development. Subsequently, conditional knockout and overexpression experiments were performed to delete or activate Lmx1b in different tissues within the limb. Our results show that deletion of Lmx1b from whole limb mesenchyme results in all dorsal tissues, including muscle, tendon/ligament and skeleton, transforming into ventral structures. Skeleton-specific knockout of Lmx1b led to the dorsal duplication of distal sesamoid and metacarpal bones, but did not affect the pattern formation of other tissues, suggesting that Lmx1b controls skeleton development cell-autonomously. In addition, this skeleton-specific pattern alteration only occurs in distal limb tissues, not proximal limb tissues, indicating different regulatory mechanisms operate along the limb proximal-distal axis. Moreover, skeleton-specific ectopic expression of Lmx1b reveals a complementary skeletal-specific dorsalized phenotype. This result supports a cell-autonomous role for Lmx1b in dorsal-ventral skeletal patterning. This study enriched our understanding of limb development, and the insights from this research may also be applicable for the development of other organs. ^

Targeted Deletion Of Functionally Validated Enhancers Defines Their Role in Mouse Limb Development

Transcriptional enhancers are genomic DNA sequences that contain clustered transcription factor (TF) binding sites. When combinations of TFs bind to enhancer sequences they act together with basal transcriptional machinery to regulate the timing, location and quantity of gene transcription. Elucidating the genetic mechanisms responsible for differential gene expression, including the role of enhancers, during embryological and postnatal development is essential to an understanding of evolutionary processes and disease etiology. Numerous methods are in use to identify and characterize enhancers. Several high-throughput methods generate large datasets of enhancer sequences with putative roles in embryonic development. However, few enhancers have been deleted from the genome to determine their roles in the development of specific structures, such as the limb. Manipulation of enhancers at their endogenous loci, such as the deletion of such elements, leads to a better understanding of the regulatory interactions, rules and complexities that contribute to faithful and variant gene transcription – the molecular genetic substrate of evolution and disease. To understand the endogenous roles of two distinct enhancers known to be active in the mouse embryo limb bud we deleted them from the mouse genome. I hypothesized that deletion of these enhancers would lead to aberrant limb development. The enhancers were selected because of their association with p300, a protein associated with active transcription, and because the human enhancer sequences drive distinct lacZ expression patterns in limb buds of embryonic day (E) 11.5 transgenic mice. To confirm that the orthologous mouse enhancers, mouse 280 and 1442 (M280 and M1442, respectively), regulate expression in the developing limb we generated stable transgenic lines, and examined lacZ expression. In M280-lacZ mice, expression was detected in E11.5 fore- and hindlimbs in a region that corresponds to digits II-IV. M1442-lacZ mice exhibited lacZ expression in posterior and anterior margins of the fore- and hindlimbs that overlapped with digits I and V and several wrist bones. We generated mice lacking the M280 and M1442 enhancers by gene targeting. Intercrosses between M280 -/+ and M1442 -/+, respectively, generated M280 and M1442 null mice, which are born at expected Mendelian ratios and manifest no gross limb malformations. Quantitative real-time PCR of mutant E11.5 limb buds indicated that significant changes in transcriptional output of enhancer-proximal genes accompanied the deletion of both M280 and M1442. In neonatal null mice we observed that all limb bones are present in their expected positions, an observation also confirmed by histology of E18.5 distal limbs. Fine-scale measurement of E18.5 digit bone lengths found no differences between mutant and control embryos. Furthermore, when the developmental progression of cartilaginous elements was analyzed in M280 and M1442 embryos from E13.5-E15.5, transient development defects were not detected. These results demonstrate that M280 and M1442 are not required for mouse limb development. Though M280 is not required for embryonic limb development it is required for the development and/or maintenance of body size – adult M280 mice are significantly smaller than control littermates. These studies highlight the importance of experiments that manipulate enhancers in situ to understand their contribution to development.

Functional studies of a LIM -homeodomain transcription factor lmx1b in murine mid -hindbrain and limb development

This thesis is centered on applying molecular genetics to study pattern formation during animal development. More specifically, this thesis describes the functional studies of a LIM-homeodomain gene called lmx1b during murine embryogenesis. Lmx1b expression is restricted to the mid-hindbrain junction as well as to the dorsal mesenchyme of the limb, suggesting important functions during mid-hindbrain and limb development. To test these possibilities, lmx1b homozygous mutant mice were generated and their limb and CNS phenotypes examined. Lmx1b homozygous mutant mice exhibit a large reduction of mid-hindbrain structures, and that their limbs are symmetrical along the dorsal-ventral axis as the result of a dorsal to ventral transformation. Taken together, these studies define essential functions for lmx1b in mid-hindbrain patteming and in dorsal limb cell fate determination. However, the molecular mechanisms which accounts for these phenotypes are unknown, and whether lmx1b has same or distinctive functions during the mid-hindbrain and limb development is also unclear. ^ Recently, insight into molecular mechanisms of mid-hindbrain patterning and limb development has resulted from the identification of several factors with restricted expression patterns within these regions. These include the secreted factors wnt-1, fgf-8, wnt-7a and the transcription factors pax-2, and en-1. Targeted disruption of any of these genes in mice suggests that these genes might be involved in similar regulatory pathways. Analysis of the expression of these genes in lmx1b mutants demonstrates that lmxlb is not required for the initiation, but is required to maintain their expression at the mid-hindbrain junction. Thus, lmxlb is not required for specifying mid-hindbrain cell fates, rather, it functions to ensure the establishment or maintenance of a proper organizing center at the mid-hindbrain junction. Interestingly, lmxlb functions cell non-autonomously in chimera analysis, which indicates that lmx1b might regulate the expression of secreted factors such as wnt-1 and/or fgf-8 in the organizing center. In contrast, lmx1b functions cell autonomously in the dorsal limb to govern dorsal ventral limb development and its expression is regulated by with wnt-7a and en-1. However, single and double mutant analysis suggest that all three genes have partially overlapping functions as well as independent functions. The results point toward a complicated network of cross-talks among all three limb axes. ^