THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE RHEOENCEPHALOGRAM AND CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW

The rheoencephalogram (REG) is the change in the electrical impedance of the head that occurs with each heart beat. Without knowledge of the relationship between cerebral blood flow (Q) and the REG, the utility of the REG in the study of the cerebral vasculature is greatly limited. The hypothesis is that the relationship between the REG and Q when venous outflow is nonpulsatile is^ (DIAGRAM, TABLE OR GRAPHIC OMITTED...PLEASE SEE DAI)^ where K is a proportionality constant and Q is the mean Q.^ Pulsatile CBF was measured in the goat via a chronically implanted electromagnetic flowmeter. Electrodes were implanted in the ipsilateral cerebral hemisphere, and the REG was measured with a two electrode impedance plethysmograph. Measurements were made with the animal's head elevated so that venous flow pulsations were not transmitted from the heart to the cerebral veins. Measurements were made under conditions of varied cerebrovascular resistance induced by altering blood CO(,2) levels and under conditions of high and low cerebrospinal fluid pressures. There was a high correlation (r = .922-.983) between the REG calculated from the hypothesized relationship and the measured REG under all conditions.^ Other investigators have proposed that the REG results from linear changes in blood resistivity proportional to blood velocity. There was little to no correlation between the measured REG and the flow velocity ( r = .022-.306). A linear combination of the flow velocity and the hypothesized relationship between the REG and Q did not predict the measured REG significantly better than the hypothesized relationship alone in 37 out of 50 experiments.^ Jacquy proposed an index (F) of cerebral blood flow calculated from amplitudes and latencies of the REG. The F index was highly correlated (r = .929) with measured cerebral blood flow under control and hypercapnic conditions, but was not as highly correlated under conditions of hypocapnia (r = .723) and arterial hypotension (r = .681).^ The results demonstrate that the REG is not determined by mean cerebral blood flow, but by the pulsatile flow only. Thus, the utility of the REG in the determination of mean cerebral blood flow is limited. ^

A comparison of lipoprotein measurements from the Dallas Heart Study

Conventional cholesterol markers in clinical practice today may systematically underestimate the true atherosclerotic risk of populations with high prevalence of metabolic perturbations. It has been suggested that atherogenic risk indexes that measure the concentration of atherogenic particle concentration rather then cholesterol may improve the recognition of atherogenic risk in a clinical setting. Particle concentration is strongly correlated with cholesterol markers, but only a fair concordance with cholesterol has been seen in male populations with low prevalence of metabolic perturbations. Little is known about the concordance of particle concentration and cholesterol markers in multiethnic populations with high prevalence of metabolic perturbations including both men and women. Furthermore, no study has looked at atherosclerosis while exploring the concordance of particle concentration and cholesterol. NMR total atherogenic particle concentration (LipoScience, Inc.), Non-HDL-C, and coronary CT were performed on 3054 subjects ages 30-65 from the Dallas Heart Study, a multi-ethnic probability-based population study. Patients were stratified into four groups: subjects with a low Non-HDL-C and low particle concentration (n = 929), subjects with high Non-HDL-C and low particle concentration (n = 88), subjects with low Non-HDL-C and high particle concentration, and subjects with high Non-HDL-C and high particle concentration (n = 950). When discordance was defined as two quintiles or more of disagreement, discordant groups were relatively small (n= 389, 12.6% of population). There was no statistically significant difference in prevalence of coronary calcification for the group with high Non-HDL-C and low particle concentration compared to the group with low Non-HDL-C and low particle concentration. The discordant group with low Non-HDL-C and low particle concentration, which included 88 subjects, had the highest prevalence of coronary calcification out of the four groups. Out of the 3054 subjects tested in this study, 88 subjects were considered to be part of the discordant group with low Non-HDL-C and a high particle concentration. Although this group is relatively small and comprise approximately 3% of the total population, they did have the highest prevalence of coronary calcification.^