The differential expression of the $\beta\sb2$-adrenergic receptor modifies agonist-dependent adenylylcyclase activation

There have been multiple reports which indicate that variations in $\beta$AR expression affect the V$\sb{\rm max}$ observed for the agonist-dependent activation of adenylylcyclase. This observation has been ignored by most researchers when V$\sb{\rm max}$ values obtained for wild type and mutant receptors are compared. Such an imprecise analysis may lead to erroneous conclusions concerning the ability of a receptor to activate adenylylcyclase. Equations were derived from the Cassel-Selinger model of GTPase activity and Tolkovsky and Levitzki's Collision Coupling model which predict that the EC$\sb{50}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$ for the activation of adenylylcyclase are a function of receptor number. Experimental results for L cell clones in which either hamster or human $\beta$AR were transfected at varying levels showed that EC$\sb{50}$ decreases and V$\sb{\rm max}$ increases as receptor number increases. Comparison of these results with simulations obtained from the equations describing EC$\sb{50}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$ showed a close correlation. This documents that the kinetic parameters of adenylylcyclase activation change with the level of receptor expression and relates this phenomenon to a theoretical framework concerning the mechanisms involved in $\beta$AR signal transduction.^ One of the terms used in the equations which expressed the EC$\sb{50}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$ as a function of receptor number is coupling efficiency, defined as $\rm k\sb1/k\sb{-1}$. Calculation of $\rm k\sb1/k\sb{-1}$ can be accomplished for wild type receptors with the easily measured experimental values of agonist K$\sb{\rm d}$, EC$\sb{50}$ and receptor number. This was demonstrated for hamster $\beta$AR which yielded a coupling efficiency of 0.15 $\pm$ 0.003 and human $\beta$AR which yielded a coupling efficiency of 0.90 $\pm$ 0.031. $\rm k\sb1/k\sb{-1}$ replaces the traditional qualitative evaluation of the ability to activate adenylylcyclase, which utilizes V$\sb{\rm max}$ without correction for variation in receptor number, with a quantitative definition that more accurately describes the ability of $\beta$AR to couple to G$\sb{\rm s}$.^ The equations which express the EC$\sb{50}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$ for adenylylcyclase activation as a function of receptor number and coupling efficiency were tested to determine whether they could accurately simulate the changes seen in these parameters during desensitization. Data from original desensitization experiments and data from the literature (24,25,52,54,83) were compared to simulated changes in EC$\sb{50}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$. In a variety of systems the predictions of the equations were consistent with the changes observed in EC$\sb{50}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$. In addition reductions in the calculated value of $\rm k\sb1/k\sb{-1}$ was shown to correlate well with $\beta$AR phosphorylation and to be minimally affected by sequestration and down-regulation. ^

Development of a standard sign-out procedure for clinicians in a pediatric intensive care unit

Background: Poor communication among health care providers is cited as the most common cause of sentinel events involving patients. Sign-out of patient data at the change of clinician shifts is a component of communication that is especially vulnerable to errors. Sign-outs are particularly extensive and complex in intensive care units (ICUs). There is a paucity of validated tools to assess ICU sign-outs. ^ Objective: To design a valid and reliable survey tool to assess the perceptions of Pediatric ICU (PICU) clinicians about sign-out. ^ Design: Cross-sectional, web-based survey ^ Setting: Academic hospital, 31-bed PICU ^ Subjects: Attending faculty, fellows, nurse practitioners and physician assistants. ^ Interventions: A survey was designed with input from a focus group and administered to PICU clinicians. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency and validity of the survey tool were assessed. ^ Measurements and Main Results: Forty-eight PICU clinicians agreed to participate. We had 42(88%) and 40(83%) responses in the test and retest phases. The mean scores for the ten survey items ranged from 2.79 to 3.67 on a five point Likert scale with no significant test-retest difference and a Pearson correlation between pre and post answers of 0.65. The survey item scores showed internal consistency with a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.85. Exploratory factor analysis revealed three constructs: efficacy of sign-out process, recipient satisfaction and content applicability. Seventy eight % clinicians affirmed the need for improvement of the sign-out process and 83% confirmed the need for face- to-face verbal sign-out. A system-based sign-out format was favored by fellows and advanced level practitioners while attendings preferred a problem-based format (p=0.003). ^ Conclusions: We developed a valid and reliable survey to assess clinician perceptions about the ICU sign-out process. These results can be used to design a verbal template to improve and standardize the sign-out process.^