Occupational injuries among day laborers in Houston

Research has indicated that day laborers engage in higher risk occupations and suffer a high number of occupationally related fatal and non-fatal injuries. Although there have been some studies focusing on immigrant workers and their occupational injuries, none to our knowledge has studied Houston’s day laborers. An exploratory study of Houston’s day laborer population was conducted in 2008 by Dr. Fernández-Esquer from the University of Texas. ^ The aims of the current study are to analyze secondary data from this parent study and describe the prevalence of the self reported occupational injuries among Houston immigrant day laborers seeking work during the months of October through December 2008. The study also aims to determine if the reported injuries varied by age group, education level, length of time living in the U.S. and length of time working as day laborers and describe if injuries were more common by the number of different job types or job conditions reported or the use of personal protective equipment used (PPE). ^ This study analyzed 325 questionnaires that included job-related information from the parent study. One hundred and nine workers (35 %) reported an occupational injury or illness in the year before the interview. The most frequent injuries or illnesses reported were falls (26.7 %), cuts and lacerations (23.3 %) and being struck by an object (18.3 %). Over half of the workers (57 %) reported working 4 to 6 different jobs in the year before the interview, followed by 22.5 % reporting 1 to 3 different jobs. A combined 79 % of day laborers in Houston reported exposure to 7 or more of the job conditions listed and 69 % of those workers also reported an injury or illness. PPE use varied from 44 % of workers reporting using 4 to 6 PPE items to 6.8 % reporting not using any type of PPE. Thirty two percent of workers reporting not using any PPE also reported an injury or illness. ^ Injuries were found not to have varied significantly by age group, time living in the US, time working as a day laborer, numbers of different job types and the number of PPE used. Injuries did vary significantly by education level of the participants and the number of different job conditions reported (education, X2 (4, N = 315) = 12.651, p =0.013; and job conditions, X2 (3, N = 319) = 14.698, p = 0.002). ^ Although this first study of Houston’s day laborers was successful at engaging the population and getting background information regarding the occupational health of these workers, more studies are needed to further characterize the day laborers occupational experiences and injuries along with determining what specific job types and job conditions were present when injuries occurred and what kind of PPE was being used at the time. It is also clear that these workers need better safety training programs regarding working in potentially dangerous jobs and job conditions. They would also benefit from programs that would help empower them to negotiate for safer conditions.^

Association of TNF-alpha genetic variants with HPV-associated oral cancer risk---a case-control study

The incidence of OSCC in younger population and in those who never smoked or drank has increased since the last decade. This increase may be attributable to increase of infection with HPV. The pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-&agr; has the role in the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory diseases and was found to control HPV infection in cervical cancer studies. Our study aimed to investigate the association between the four polymorphisms located in TNF-&agr; promoter region, -308(rs1800629), -857(rs1799724), -863(rs1800630) and -1031(rs1799964), and the risk of HPV-related OSCC. In this hospital-based case-control study, 325 cases and 335 controls were included. We found that HPV 16 seropositivity was associated with an increased risk of oral cancer (OR = 3.1, 95% CI, 2.1–4.6). Each of the polymorphism showed to increase the risk of HPV-related OSCC. And after combining the risk genotypes and using the low-risk group (0–1 combined risk genotypes) and HPV16 seronegativity as the reference group, only the high-risk groups (3–4 combined risk genotypes) and HPV16 seronegativity were associated with a low OR of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.1–2.8), while the low-risk and high-risk groups and HPV16 seropositivity were significantly associated with a higher OR of 2.7 (95% CI, 1.3–5.8) and 8.5 (95% CI, 3.7–19.4), respectively. In addition, the joint effects were greater among the young subjects (aged<50), males, never smokers or never drinkers, and patients with oropharyngeal cancer. Overall, the four TNF-&agr; polymorphisms, individually or collectively, would result in a significantly increased risk for HPV16-associated oral cancer in a non-Hispanic white population. More large sized studies are needed for future investigation.^