A COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF FECAL POLLUTION IN DRINKING WATER (HYDROGEN SULFIDE, INDICATOR, MODIFICATION)

A new technique for the detection of microbiological fecal pollution in drinking and in raw surface water has been modified and tested against the standard multiple-tube fermentation technique (most-probable-number, MPN). The performance of the new test in detecting fecal pollution in drinking water has been tested at different incubation temperatures. The basis for the new test was the detection of hydrogen sulfide produced by the hydrogen sulfide producing bacteria which are usually associated with the coliform group. The positive results are indicated by the appearance of a brown to black color in the contents of the fermentation tube within 18 to 24 hours of incubation at 35 (+OR-) .5(DEGREES)C. For this study 158 water samples of different sources have been used. The results were analyzed statistically with the paired t-test and the one-way analysis of variance. No statistically significant difference was noticed between the two methods, when tested 35 (+OR-) .5(DEGREES)C, in detecting fecal pollution in drinking water. The new test showed more positive results with raw surface water, which could be due to the presence of hydrogen sulfide producing bacteria of non-fecal origin like Desulfovibrio and Desulfomaculum. The survival of the hydrogen sulfide producing bacteria and the coliforms was also tested over a 7-day period, and the results showed no significant difference. The two methods showed no significant difference when used to detect fecal pollution at a very low coliform density. The results showed that the new test is mostly effective, in detecting fecal pollution in drinking water, when used at 35 (+OR-) .5(DEGREES)C. The new test is effective, simple, and less expensive when used to detect fecal pollution in drinking water and raw surface water at 35 (+OR-) .5(DEGREES)C. The method can be used for qualitative and/or quantitative analysis of water in the field and in the laboratory. ^

Health significance of chlorination byproducts in drinking water: The Houston experience: A continuation study

Background. Houston, Texas, once obtained all its drinking water from underground sources. However, in 1853, the city began supplementing its water from the surface source Lake Houston. This created differences in the exposure to disinfection byproducts (DBPs) in different parts of Houston. Trihalomethanes (THMs) are the most common DBP and are useful indicators of DBPs in treated drinking water. This study examines the relationship between THMs in chlorinated drinking water and the incidence of bladder cancer in Houston. ^ Methods. Individual bladder cancer deaths, from 1975 to 2004, were assigned to four surface water exposure areas in Houston utilizing census tracts—area A used groundwater the longest, area B used treated lake water the longest, area C used treated lake water the second longest, and area D used a combination of groundwater and treated lake water. Within each surface water exposure area mortality rates were calculated in 5 year intervals by four race-gender categories. Linear regression models were fitted to the bladder cancer mortality rates over the entire period of available data (1990–2004). ^ Results. A decrease in bladder cancer mortality was observed amongst white males in area B (p = 0.030), white females in area A (p = 0.008), non-white males in area D (p = 0.003), and non-white females in areas A and B (p = 0.002 & 0.001). Bladder cancer mortality differed by race-gender and time (p ≤ 0.001 & p ≤ 0.001), but not by surface water exposure area (p = 0.876). ^ Conclusion. The relationship between bladder cancer mortality and the four surface water exposure areas (signifying THM exposure) was insignificant. This result could be attributable to Houston controlling for THMs starting in the early 1980’s by using chloramine as a secondary disinfectant in the drinking water purification process.^

Impact of environmental regulations on lead concentrations in Texas ambient air and water: 1970--1990

In the last two decades, the significance of lead has been addressed in a number of environmental regulations at the national and state levels. This project investigated the environmental regulations (Clean Air Act and Amendments, 1970-1990 and Clean Water Act of 1977) and their cumulative effects on lead in ambient air and water in the state of Texas. For this purpose, historical records from the Texas Water Development Board, Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission, and the United States Geological Survey have been assembled and analyzed for temporal and spatial trends. These trends might correspond to the phase out of lead in gasoline and other regulations.^ This study concluded that there is a significant correlation (p $\leq$.001) between environmental regulations of lead in gasoline and the concentration of lead in ambient air. Lead concentrations in ambient air have been reduced by over 90 percent in the past twenty years. An overall significant difference (p $\leq$.001) was found in mean (94, 15 respectively) lead concentrations in surface water between two time periods, one at the beginning of the twenty year period and one at the end of the study period. There has been an overall reduction of lead concentrations in surface water in Texas of approximately 84 percent. However, this reduction cannot be statistically associated with any one regulation. Groundwater data could not be analyzed for lead concentrations because of limitations of reporting data as "less than". Approximately two percent of the groundwater data was analyzed by Oneway ANOVA and no significant difference was found between the means (18, 19 respectively) of two time periods, 1977-1979 and 1988-1990. This data is consistent with the regulations having a contributory affect on declining concentrations, but other factors cannot be ruled out as having added to these declines. This study can also serve as a starting point for a more in-depth study of environmental regulations and their impact on the environment. ^