Current Resources

Reviews of: Kaplan, L., & Girard, J. L. (1994). Strengthening high-risk families: A handbook for practitioners. New York: Lexington. Reviewed by June Lloyd Schuerman, J.R., Rzepnicki, T. L., & Littell, J. H. (1994). Putting families first: An experiment in family preservation. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. Reviewed by Anthony Maluccio and Kristine Nelson Behavioral Sciences Institute, HOMEBUILDERS Training Division. (1992). Skills for Family and Community Living. Federal Way, WA: Author. Reviewed by Pat Sandau-Beckler

Editorial

After 20 years of development, research and practice, it is time to begin a journal for family preservation and support. There are many exciting opportunities and issues for consumers and practitioners, as well! Last year most states became deeply invested in new collaboration activities across agency lines and with consumers. This is the "high" in which this journal was conceptualized. The need for a family preservation journal has also been made clear by the new Congress which wants to provide orphanages, or the Administration which has proposed residential group homes as the ultimate punishment for children who's parents fail to get off of welfare in two years. These challenges make us more determined to redouble the efforts on behalf of all families and serve as a reminder that we need quality research, dedicated staff and political savvy to help families by employing family preservation values, knowledge and skills.

Behavioral Outcomes of Home-Based Services for Children and Adolescents with Serious Emotional Disorders

The current study evaluates the effectiveness of an intensive home-based treatment program, Families First, on the behaviors of children and adolescents suffering from mental disorders and being at risk for out-ofi home placement. The sample included 85 youngsters and their families from a semi-rural community. The Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents-Revised (DICA-R) was administered to the children, and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) was completed by a parent at pretreatment and posttreatment. The families participated in a 4-6 week, intensive home intervention where crisis intervention, social support services, and needed psychological services were offered. The results indicated that both externalizing and internalizing behavior problems in youngsters with different diagnoses of mental disorders were significantly reduced at posttreatment as indicated by their CBCL scores. Furthermore, youngsters with a diagnosis of Oppositional Defiant Disorder seemed to benefit the most, as evidenced by the improved scores on most subscales of the CBCL. Youngsters with mood disorders and conduct disorders seemed to benefit in their most deficient areas, internalizing behavior problems and delinquent behaviors, respectively. Finally, after participating in Families First, more than half of the youngsters in the sample were able to stay home with their families

The Weekly Adjustment Indicators Checklist: An Application in the Child Welfare Field

Research on the effectiveness of various home-based interventions implemented in the 1980s and 1990s indicates that results have been equivocal. Because of the unique and complex behavioral challenges presented by each family and the need for individualized treatments and long-term interventions for these families, group research and evaluation designs are often insufficient in assessing effectiveness of home-based interventions. Alternative evaluation strategies are needed. The purpose of this exploratory study was two-fold: (a) to investigate the applicability and acceptability of the Weekly Adjustment Indicators Checklist (WAIC) in monitoring adult and child behaviors and (b) to monitor, on an on-going basis, the progress of a family referred to an urban family preservation and reunification program. The target family on whom data were collected consisted of a 13-year old girl and her foster parent who was her maternal aunt. The findings of this study indicate that the WAIC is applicable in monitoring the progress of children and adults in care and that it has the endorsement of its user, namely, the direct care provider. Other results of the study, limitations of the study, and future research needs are discussed.

Current Resources

Review of: Social Work Practice with Children Nancy Boyd Webb. New York: The Guilford Press. Reviewed by Lois Wright

Ordinary Families -Extraordinary Care Giving

Children with severe emotional problems often have multiple needs that require disparate services including child welfare, juvenile justice, health, mental health, substance abuse, and mental retardation (Stroul, 1996). However, the primary care giving responsibilities for these youngsters still remain with their families. It is the family who shelters and clothes them; provides guidance, affection, recreation, nurturing; gets them to appointments with doctors and therapists and to school dayin- and-day-out, year after year (Lourie, 1995). Despite the invaluable and irreplaceable care provided by families, they are often maligned by a system which characterizes them as having their own problems and inadequacies. The purpose of this research is to learn more about the strengths of families who care for children with severe emotional disabilities (SED). This exploratory descriptive study made use of focus groups attended by parents who are caring for such children. In order to improve services to these families, it is important that we understand how the notion of strengths play out in their everyday lives. Observations are made about the care giving plan, which all families devise in the course of caring for their child with special needs. Implications for paid professionals who serve these families are offered by presenting a model for putting family care givers at the hub of the service provision wheel.

Current Resources

Reviews of: Treating the Tough Adolescent: A Family-Based Step-by-St Guide. (1998) Scott P. Sells. New York: The Guilford Press. Reviewed by John P. Nasuti Essential Skills in Family Therapy: From the First Interview to Termination. (1998) JoEllen Patterson, Lee Williams, Claudia Grauf-Grounds, and Larry Chamow. New York: The Guilford Press. Reviewed by Rowena Fong Putting Families First America's Family Support Movement and the Challenge of Change. (1994) Sharon L. Kagan and Bernice Weissbound, Editors. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Reviewed by Anthony N. Maluccio The Work-Family Challenge Rethinking Employment. Edited by Susan Lewis and Jeremy Lewis. 1996. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Ltd. Reviewed by Harry J. Macy

Behavior Problems of Maltreated Children Receiving In-Home Child Welfare Services

This study evaluates the level of behavior problems in a previously little studied group—children with founded cases of abuse and neglect receiving child welfare services in their own homes. A sample of 149 maltreated children, living at home, were evaluated on the CBCL as they entered a service program to which they were referred by a large public child protective service system. These children were found to have elevated levels of behavior problems, with 43.6% scoring in the problematic range, a rate similar to children entering foster care. Practice and policy implications of these findings are discussed and highlighted.

The Effectiveness of Court Mandated Intervention Versus Voluntary Services in Child Protective Services:

The general objective of this research was to compare the relative effectiveness of court mandated services versus a voluntary service plan in preventing in child maltreatment recidivism. Four-thirty-two children were selected at random from among children in a large California County who were receiving in-home services under a court mandate or a voluntary plan. Protective services files of study children were reviewed to derive study data. Type of plan did not make a difference on case outcome. Children were more likely to remain in the home at the end of the service delivery period in families that received voluntary plans. However, when other factors are controlled, the advantage of a voluntary plan disappears. Moreover, similar rates of recidivism were noted between both types of plans after the case was closed.

Current Resources

Reviews include: The Managed Care Answer Book for Mental Health Professionals. ( 1997) Gayle McCracken Tuttle and Dianne Rush Woods. Bristol, P A: Brunner/Mazel, Inc. Reviewed by Patricia Newlin Somebody Else's Children: and the Struggle to Save America's Troubled Families. (1996) John Hubner and Jill Wolfson. New York: Three Rivers Press. Reviewed by John Nasuti Assessing the Long-Term Effects of Foster Care-A Research Synthesis. (1996) Thomas P. McDonald, Reva I. Allen, Alex Westerfield, and Irving Piliavin. Washington, D.C.: CWLA Press. Reviewed by Anthony N. Ma/uccio

Current Resources

Reviews of: Children Who Could Have Been: The Legacy of Child Welfare in Wealthy America. (1999) William M. Epstein Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press Reviewed by: Leroy H Pelton Skills for Families Skills for Life. (1999) Linda M. Shadoin, Joni Cook-Griffin, and JaneL. Peterson. Nebraska: Boys Town Press. Reviewed by Shelley Leavitt Attachment Disorganization. (1999) J. and George C. Solomon, Eds. New York: The Guilford Press. Reviewed by Alice Chornesky Infants. Toddlers. and Families: A Framework for Support and Intervention. (1999) Martha Farrell Erickson and Karen Kurz-Riemer.New York: The Guilford Press.Reviewed by Halaevalu F. Vakalahi Solution-Based Casework: An Introduction to Clinical and Case Management Skills in Casework Practice. (1999) D. N. Christensen, J. Todahl, and W. C. Barrett New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Reviewed by Charles H Huber Childhood Sexual Abuse: An Evidence-Based Perspective. (1999) David M. Fergusson and Paul E. Mullen Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, Inc.Reviewed by Elaine S. LeVine Spiritual Resources in Family Therapy. (1999) F. Walsh. New York: Guilford Press.Reviewed by David Derezotes

Current Resources

Reviews of: The Book of David: How Preserving Families Can Cost Children's Lives. Richard J. Gelles. New York: Basic Books. Reviewed by Marianne Berry Children in Families at Risk: Maintaining the Connections. Edited by Lee Combrinck-Graham. New York: TheGuilford Press. Reviewed by Lois Wright Fantily-Centered Behavior Scale and User's Manual. Reva I. Allen, Christopher G. Peter, & Beverlyn F. Cay Brown. The University of Kansas. Reviewed by Miriam J. Landsman

Current Resources

Reviews include: Family Centered Services: A Handbook for Practitioners.Bonnie K. Williams (Ed.). The National Resource Center for Family Centered Practice, School of Social Work, The University of Iowa. Iowa City, Iowa.Reviewed by Lois Wright Building Skills in High-Risk Families: Strategies for the Home-Based Practitioner. Jane Peterson, Paula E. Kohrt, Linda M. Shadoin, Karen J. Authier. Boys Town, Nebraska. Boys Town Press. Reviewed by Sharon Alpert

Commentary on "Strengthening Families: Parents' Voices on Discipline and Child Rearing"

There is a growing consensus among professionals working with parents and children, and advocates for child rights, that a ban on the use of corporal punishment (CP) in raising children is justified in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC, 1989). However, this is an issue which seems to polarize people and opponents of banning CP have attacked the scientific literature and made dire predictions of adverse consequences if parents are not allowed to use CP. The problem is that so much attention has been focused on the “to spank or not to spank” issue, the developmental benefits for children and parents stemming from positive parenting have been largely ignored. There is increasing evidence that public health approaches to increasing parenting support reduces coercive parenting practices. Breshears' study represents an effort to gain a clearer understanding of the reasons many parents continue to support CP and draws on innovative qualitative methods to argue that parents’ views about CP are important and must be taken into account in planning intervention programs.

Front Matter

Title pages, table of contents, etc.