Fatty acylated proteins and the protein kinase C signaling pathway

Numerous proteins in intracellular signaling pathways are known to be covalently modified by long chain fatty acids. The objective of this project was to identify potentially novel components of the protein kinase C signaling pathway by virtue of their fatty acylation. A 64 kDa palmitoylated protein (p64) was identified that became deacylated following stimulation of quiescent cells with serum, FGF, or PDBu, suggesting that stimulus-dependent deacylation might alter interactions between p64 and other membrane/cytoskeletal components. A myristoylated protein of 68 kDa observed during these studies was identified as the "80K" PKC substrate. This protein was acylated cotranslationally with myristate through an amide linkage. The majority of the 80K protein was tightly associated with the plasma membrane, with approximately 20% in the cytosol. Although phosphorylation of the membrane-bound and soluble forms of the protein was increased 6-fold in response to PDBu, no changes in the subcellular distribution or myristoylation of the protein were observed. A cDNA encoding the murine form of this protein was cloned, and its deduced amino acid sequence revealed the presence of an N-terminal myristoylation consensus and five potential sites for phosphorylation by PKC. A mutant in which the N-terminal glycine residue was changed to alanine was no longer a substrate for NMT and consequently lost its membrane-binding potential. However, its ability to be phosphorylated in response to purified growth factors and phorbol esters was unimpaired. These results indicate that the myristoylated N-terminus of the 80K protein is required for its association with the plasma membrane, and that the cytoplasmic form of the protein can be phosphorylated independently of the membrane-bound form. Mutants of PKC were constructed in which the regulatory domain was removed and replaced by the N-terminus of the 80K or Al proteins. Unexpectedly, both the myristoylated and nonmyristoylated fusion proteins were tightly associated with the nuclear envelope. Further deletion analyses mapped nuclear targeting signals to the hinge region and a portion of the catalytic domain of PKC, explaining the ability of PKC to be translocated to the nucleus in response to certain stimuli. ^

Regulation of the {\it neu\/} oncogene by the GTG element binding proteins

A previous study in our lab has shown that the transforming neu oncogene ($neu\sp\*$) was able to initiate signals that lead to repression of the neu promoter activity. Further deletion mapping of the neu promoter identified that the GTG element (GGTGGGGGGG), located between $-$243 and $-$234 relative to the translation initiation codon, mediates such a repression effect. I have characterized the four major protein complexes that interact with this GTG element. In situ UV-crosslinking indicated that each complex contains proteins of different molecular weights. The slowest migrating complex (S) contain Sp1 or Sp1-related proteins, as indicated by the data that both have similar molecular weights, similar properties in two affinity chromatographies, and both are antigenically related in gel shift analysis. Methylation protection and interference experiments demonstrated these complexes bind to overlapping regions of the GTG element. Mutations within the GTG element that either abrogate or enhance complex S binding conferred on the neu promoter with lower activity, indicating that positive factors other than Sp1 family proteins also contribute to neu promoter activity. A mutated version (mutant 4) of the GTG element, which binds mainly the fastest migrating complex that contains a very small protein of 26-kDa, can repress transcription when fused to a heterologous promoter. Further deletion and mutation studies suggested that this GTG mutant and its binding protein(s) may cooperate with some DNA element within a heterologous promoter to lock the basal transcription machinery; such a repressor might also repress neu transcription by interfering with the DNA binding of other transactivators. Our results suggest that both positive and negative trans-acting factors converge their binding sites on the GTG element and confer combinatorial control on the neu gene expression. ^