Analysis of p53 function and regulation

p53 is a tumor suppressor gene that is the most frequent target inactivated in cancers. Overexpression of wild-type p53 in rat embryo fibroblasts suppresses foci formation by other cooperating oncogenes. Introduction of wild-type p53 into cells that lack p53 arrests them at the G1/S boundary and reverses the transformed phenotype of some cells. The function of p53 in normal cells is illustrated by the ability of p53 to arrest cells at G1 phase of the cell cycle upon exposure to DNA-damaging agents including UV-irradiation and biosynthesis inhibitors.^ Since the amino acid sequence of p53 suggested that it may function as a transcription factor, we used GAL4 fusion assays to test that possibility. We found that wild-type p53 could specifically activate transcription when anchored by the GAL4 DNA binding domain. Mutant p53s, which have lost the ability to suppress foci formation by other oncogenes, were not able to activate transcription in this assay. Thus, we established a direct correlation between the tumor suppression and transactivation functions of p53.^ Having learned that p53 was a transcriptional activator, we next sought targets of p53 activation. Because many transcription factors regulate their own expression, we tested whether p53 had this autoregulatory property. Transient expression of wild-type p53 in cells increased the levels of endogenous p53 mRNA. Cotransfection of p53 together with a reporter bearing the p53 promoter confirmed that wild-type p53 specifically activates its own promoter. Deletion analysis from both the 5$\sp\prime$ and 3$\sp\prime$ ends of the promoter minimized the region responsible for p53 autoregulation to 45 bp. Methylation interference identified nucleotides involved in protein-DNA interaction. Mutations within this protected site specifically eliminated the response of the promoter to p53. In addition, multiple copies of this element confer responsiveness to wild-type p53 expression. Thus, we identified a F53 responsive element within the p53 promoter.^ The presence of a consensus NF-$\kappa$B site in the p53 promoter suggested that NF-KB may regulate p53 expression. Gel-shift experiments showed that both the p50 homodimer and the p50/p65 heterodimer bind to the p53 promoter. In addition, the p65 subunit of NF-$\kappa$B activates the p53 promoter in transient transfection experiments. TNF $\alpha$, a natural NF-$\kappa$B inducer, also activates the p53 promoter. Both p65 activation and TNF $\alpha$ induction require an intact NF-$\kappa$B site in the p53 promoter. Since NF-$\kappa$B activation occurs as a response to stress and p53 arrests cells in G1/S, where DNA repair occurs, activation of p53 by NF-$\kappa$B could be a mechanism by which cells recover from stress.^ In conclusion, we provided the first data that wild-type p53 functions as a transcriptional activator, whereas mutant p53 cannot. The correlation between growth suppression and transcriptional activation by p53 implies a pathway of tumor suppression. We have analyzed upstream components of the pathway by the identification of both p53 and NF-$\kappa$B as regulators of the p53 promoter. ^

Regulation of p53 antiproliferative function by transactivation domain phosphorylation at threonine 18 and serine 20

We investigated the induction and physiological role of Thr18 and Ser20 phosphorylation of p53 in response to DNA damage caused by treatment with ionizing (IR) or ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Polyclonal antibodies specifically recognizing phospho-Thr18 and phospho-Ser20 were used to detect p53 phosphorylation in vivo. Analyses of five wild-type (wt) p53 containing cell lines revealed lineage specific differences in phosphorylation of Thr18 and Ser20 after treatment with IR or UV. Importantly, the phosphorylation of p53 at Thr18 and Ser20 correlated with induction of the p53 downstream targets p21Waf1/Cip1 (p21) and Mdm-2, suggesting a transactivation enhancing role for Thr18 and Ser20 phosphorylation. Whereas Thr18 phosphorylation appears to abolish side-chain hydrogen bonding between Thr18 and Asp21, Ser20 phosphorylation may introduce charge attraction between Ser20 and Lys24. Both of these interactions could contribute to stabilizing α-helical conformation within the p53 transactivation domain. Mutagenesis-derived phosphorylation mimicry of p53 at Thr18 and Ser20 by Asp substitution (p53T18D/S20D) altered transactivation domain conformation and significantly reduced the interaction of p53 with the transactivation repressor Mdm-2. Mdm-2 interaction was also reduced with p53 containing a single site Asp substitution at Ser20 (p53S20D) and with the Thr18/Asp21 hydrogen bond disrupting p53 mutants p53T18A, p53T18D and p53D21A. In contrast, no direct effect was observed on the interaction of p53T18A, p53T18D and p53D21A with the basal transcription factor TAF II31. However, prior incubation of p53T18A, p53T18D and p53D21A with Mdm-2 modulated TAFII31 interaction, suggesting Mdm-2 blocks the accessibility of p53 to TAFII31. Consistently, p53-null cells transfected with p53S20D and p53T18A, p53T18D and p53D21A demonstrated enhanced endogenous p21 expression; transfection with p53T18D/S20D most significantly enhanced p21 and fas/APO-1 (fas ) expression. Expression of p53T18A, p53T18D and p53D21A in p53/Mdm-2-double null cells exhibited no discernible differences in p21 expression. Cell proliferation was also significantly curtailed in p53-null cells transfected with p53T18D/S20D relative to cells transfected with wt p53. We conclude the irradiation-induced phosphorylation of p53 at Thr18 and Ser20 alters the α-helical conformation of its transactivation domain. Altered conformation reduces direct interaction with the transrepressor Mdm-2, enhancing indirect recruitment of the basal transcription factor TAFII31, facilitating sequence-specific transactivation function resulting in proliferative arrest. ^

The function of the murine complement *C3a and *C5a anaphylatoxin receptors in endotoxemia, bacteremia and septic shock

The complement system functions as a major effector for both the innate and adaptive immune response. Activation of the complement cascade by either the classical, alternative, or lectin pathway promotes the proteolysis of C3 and C5 thereby generating C3a and C5a. Referred to as anaphylatoxins, the C3a and C5a peptides mediate biological effects upon binding to their respective receptors; C3a binds to the C3a receptor (C3aR) while C5a binds to the C5a receptor (C5aR, CD88). Both C3a and C5a are known for their broad proinflammatory effects. Elevated levels of both peptides have been isolated from patients with a variety of inflammatory diseases such as COPD, asthma, RA, SLE, and sepsis. Recent studies suggest that C5a is a critical component in the acquired neutrophil dysfunction, coagulopathy, and progressive multi-organ dysfunction characteristic of sepsis. The primary hypothesis of this dissertation was that preventing C3a-C3aR and C5a-C5aR mediated pro-inflammatory effects would improve survival in endotoxic, bacteremic and septic shock. To test this hypothesis, the murine C3aR and C5aR genes were disrupted. Following disruption of both the C3aR and C5aR genes, no abnormalities were identified other than the absence of their respective mRNA and protein. In models of both endotoxic and bacteremic shock, C3aR deficient mice suffered increased mortality when compared to their wild type littermates. C3aR deficient mice also had elevated circulating IL-1β levels. Using a model of sepsis, C3aR deficient mice had a higher circulating concentration of IL-6 and decreased peritoneal inflammatory infiltration. While these results were unexpected, they support an emerging role for C3a in immunomodulation. In contrast, following endotoxic or bacteremic shock, C5aR deficient mice experienced increased survival, less hemoconcentration and less thrombocytopenia. It was later determined that C5a mediated histamine release significantly contributes to host morbidity and mortality in bacteremic shock. These studies provide evidence that C5a functions primarily as a proinflammatory molecule in models of endotoxic and bacteremic shock. In the same models, C3a-C3aR interactions suppress the inflammatory response and protect the host. Collectively, these results present in vivo evidence that C3a and C5a have divergent biological functions. ^