Regulation of two P450 isoforms: CYP2D6 and CYP4F11

Cytochromes P450 catalyze a monooxygenase reaction in which molecular oxygen is split and one oxygen atom is incorporated into the substrate. As a whole, P450 researchers have focused most of their attention on substrate metabolism and relatively little on how these enzymes are regulated. This study will focus on the regulation of two P450 isoforms known as, CYP2D6 and CYP4F11. ^ The human CYP2D gene locus contains two pseudogenes and one functional gene known as CYP2D6. This locus is highly polymorphic and produces several alternatively spliced transcripts from the pseudogene CYP2D7. My objective was to understand the role of SV5-in (splice variant 5), one of several alternative splice variants transcribed from the CYP2D7 pseudogene. My results indicate that SV5-in mRNA causes an increase in CYP2D6 protein levels and suggest that there is a role for SV5-in in regulation of CYP2D6 expression. ^ Second, CYP4F11 is a recently discovered and uncharacterized isoform, derived from the CYP4F subfamily. It metabolizes several clinically relevant drugs (i.e.—erythromycin and benzphetamine) and some endogenous inflammatory mediators (i.e.—LTB4). After evaluation of microarray data, I observed an increase in CYP4F11 mRNA levels from wild-type HCT116 cells compared to p53-null cells. Our objectives were to explore and understand this connection between p53 and CYP4F11. Microarray data were confirmed by Q-PCR, after which this effect was again observed at the protein level via Western blot and again at the promoter level via luciferase assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation. Our results indicate that p53 protein regulates expression of CYP4F11 mRNA and protein through CYP4F11 promoter binding (note that p53 binding to CYP4F11 DNA was not shown to be direct). These results signify a whole new level of regulation of drug metabolizing enzymes by p53. ^ An understanding of CYP4F11 regulation by p53 could help us understand another pathway leading to apoptosis or cell growth arrest. This can aid future drug studies and discover new drug metabolism pathways under the control of a tumor suppressor protein. An understanding of the CYP2D6 regulation pathway could illuminate the role of non-coding RNAs in the P450 field and potentially explain several inter-individual drug response variations observed in clinical medicine that are not yet completely explained by genotyping analysis. ^

Alternative carbon metabolism: Virulence and regulation in Candida albicans

The interaction between C. albicans and innate immune cells is a key determinant to disease progression. Transcriptional profiling showed that C. albicans responds to macrophage phagocytosis by inducing pathways required for alternative carbon metabolism (beta-oxidation, the glyoxylate cycle, and gluconeogenesis), suggesting these pathways are important for virulence of C. albicans. ^ We have shown that deleting key genes (FOX2, FBP1) in these pathways results in virulence defects in an in vivo mouse model for systemic infection. Like icl1Δ/Δ mutants, fbp1Δ/Δ mutants are severely attenuated and fox2Δ/Δ mutants are mildly but significantly attenuated, indicating that carbon starvation is a relevant stress in vivo. ^ However, fox2Δ/Δ mutants also had unexpected phenotypes on certain carbon sources, unlike the case in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, suggesting these pathways are regulated differently in C. albicans. To test this, we identified the C. albicans regulators of these pathways based on those from S. cerevisiae and Aspergillus nidulans. ^ C. albicans has a partly conserved framework, but lacks two regulators (Oaf1p, Pip2p) controlling peroxisome biogenesis and beta-oxidation genes in yeast. Instead, C. albicans has a homolog, CTF1, of the A. nidulans fatty acid catabolism regulators FarA and FarB. We have shown that CTF1 is needed for growth on oleate (like FarA and FarB), expression of beta-oxidation and glyoxylate cycle genes, and full virulence. No function for CTF1 has previously been identified in C. albicans. Our data demonstrate a role for alternative carbon metabolism in the virulence of C. albicans and suggest that the regulation of these pathways is a mixture of the filamentous fungi and budding yeast systems. ^

Roles of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Imatinib mesylate, a selective inhibitor of KIT, PDGFR, and Abl kinases, has shown significant success as a therapy for patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the underlying mechanisms of imatinib-induced cytotoxicity are not well understood. Using gene expression profiling and real-time PCR for target validation, we identified insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP3) to be to be up-regulated after imatinib treatment in imatinib-sensitive GISTs. IGFBP3 is a multifunctional protein that regulates cell proliferation and survival and mediates the effects of a variety of anti-cancer agents through IGF-dependent and IGF-independent mechanisms. Therefore, we hypothesized that IGFBP3 mediates GIST cell response to imatinib. To test this hypothesis, we manipulated IGFBP3 protein levels in two KIT mutant, imatinib-sensitive GIST cell lines and assessed the resultant changes in cell viability, survival, and imatinib sensitivity. In GIST882 cells, endogenous IGFBP3 was required for cell viability. However, inhibiting imatinib-induced IGFBP3 up-regulation by RNA interference or neutralization resulted in reduced drug sensitivity, suggesting that IGFBP3 sensitizes GIST882 cells to imatinib. GIST-T1 cells, on the other hand, had no detectable levels of endogenous IGFBP3, nor did imatinib induce IGFBP3 up-regulation, in contrast to our previous findings. IGFBP3 overexpression in GIST-T1 cells reduced viability but did not induce cell death; rather, the cells became polyploid through a mechanism that may involve attenuated Cdc20 expression and securin degradation. Moreover, IGFBP3 overexpression resulted in a loss of KIT activation and decreased levels of mature KIT. Consistent with this, GIST-T1 cells overexpressing IGFBP3 were less sensitive to imatinib. Furthermore, as neither GIST882 cells nor GIST-T1 cells expressed detectable levels of IGF-1R, IGFBP3 is likely not exerting its effects by modulating IGF signaling through IGF-1R or IR/IGF-1R hybrid receptors in these cell lines. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that IGFBP3 has cell-dependent effects and would, therefore, not be an ideal marker for identifying imatinib response in GISTs. Nevertheless, our results provide preliminary evidence that IGFBP3 may have some therapeutic benefits in GISTs. ^

The role of plasmacytoid dendritic cells in the regulation of adaptive immunity

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) selectively express TLR7 which allows them to respond to RNA viruses and TLR9 which allows them to respond to DNA viruses and CpG oligonucleotides. Upon exposure to virus pDCs produce vast amounts of type I interferon (IFN) directly inhibiting viral replication and contributing to the activation of other immune cells. The ability of pDCs to promote B and T cell differentiation through type I IFN has been well documented although the role of additional factors including tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family members has not been thoroughly addressed. Here the expression of selected TNF family members in pDCs was examined and the role of TNF receptor-ligand interactions in the regulation of B and T lymphocyte growth and differentiation by pDCs was investigated. Upon stimulation with CpG-B, pDCs exhibit strong and stable expression of CD70, a TNF family ligand that binds to its receptor CD27 on memory B cells and promotes plasma cell differentiation and Ig secretion. Using an in vitro pDC/B cell co-culture system, it was determined that CpG-B-stimulated pDCs induce the proliferation of CD40L-activated human peripheral B cells and Ig secretion. This occurs independently of IFN and residual CpG, and requires physical contact between pDCs and B cells. CpG-stimulated pDCs induce the proliferation of both naive and memory B cells although Ig secretion is restricted to the memory subset. Blocking the interaction of CD70 with CD27 using an antagonist anti-CD70 antibody reduces the induction of B cell proliferation and IgG secretion by CpG-B-stimulated pDCs. Published studies have also indicated an important role for CD70 in promoting the expansion of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and the development of effector function. CpG-B-stimulated pDCs induce naïve CD4+ T cell proliferation and production of multiple cytokines including IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-10, IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13. Blocking the function of CD70 with an antagonist anti-CD70 antibody significantly reduced the induction of naïve CD4+ T cell proliferation by CpG-B-stimulated pDCs and the production of IL-4 and IL-13. Collectively these data indicate an important role for CD70 in the regulation of B and T lymphocyte growth and differentiation by pDCs. ^

Regulation of squamous cell differentiation in human head and neck carcinoma cells by retinoids

Retinoids have been found to be effective in the prevention of premalignant lesions and second primary cancers in the upper aerodigestive tract. Further development of retinoids for prevention and therapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) requires a better understanding of their mechanism of action on the growth and differentiation of such cells. I have chosen to employ cultured HNSCC cell lines as a model system for investigating the mechanism underlying the effects of retinoids. These cells are useful because all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) inhibits their proliferation. Furthermore, two HNSCC cell lines were found to express three squamous differentiation (SqD) markers characteristic of normal keratinocytes and ATRA suppressed the expression of these markers as reported for normal keratinocytes. It is thought that nuclear retinoic acid receptors (RARs and RXRs), which act as DNA-binding transcription modulating factors, mediate the effects of retinoids on the growth and differentiation of normal and tumor cells. I found that all four cell lines examined expressed RAR-$\alpha ,$ RAR-$\tau ,$ and RXR-$\alpha$ and three of four expressed RAR-$\beta .$ ATRA treatment increased the level of RAR-$\alpha ,$ -$\beta ,$ and -$\tau$ in four cell lines. Two HNSCC cell lines that exhibited a progressive increase in the expression of SqD markers during growth in culture also showed a concurrent decrease in RAR-$\beta$ level. Moreover, increasing concentrations of RA suppressed the SqD marker while inducing RAR-$\beta$ mRNA. Several synthetic retinoids which exhibit a preference for binding to specific nuclear RARs showed a differential ability to inhibit cell proliferation, transactivate transcription of the reporter genes (CAT and luciferase) from the RA response element (RARE) of the RAR-$\beta$ gene, and induce RAR-$\beta$ expression. Those retinoids that were effective inducers of RAR-$\beta$ also suppressed SqD effectively, indicating an inverse relationship exists between the expression of RAR-$\beta$ and SqD. This inverse relationship suggests a role for RAR-$\beta$ in the suppression of SqD. ^

Metabolic Regulation of mTOR Activation and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in the Heart

When subjected to increased workload, the heart responds metabolically by increasing its reliance on glucose and structurally by increasing the size of myocytes. Whether changes in metabolism regulate the structural remodeling process is unknown. A likely candidate for a link between metabolism and growth in the heart is the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), which couples energy and nutrient metabolism to cell growth. Recently, sustained mTOR activation has also been implicated in the development of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. We explored possible mechanisms by which acute metabolic changes in the hemodynamically stressed heart regulate mTOR activation, ER stress and cardiac function in the ex vivo isolated working rat heart. Doubling the heart’s workload acutely increased rates of glucose uptake beyond rates of glucose oxidation. The concomitant increase in glucose 6-phosphate (G6P) was associated with mTOR activation, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and impaired contractile function. Both rapamycin and metformin restored glycolytic homeostasis, relieved ER stress and rescued contractile function. G6P and ER stress were also downregulated with mechanical unloading of failing human hearts. Taken together, the data support the hypothesis that metabolic remodeling precedes, triggers, and sustains structural remodeling of the heart and implicate a critical role for G6P in load-induced contractile dysfunction, mTOR activation and ER stress. In general terms, the intermediary metabolism of energy providing substrates provides signals for the onset and progression of hypertrophy and heart failure.

REGULATION OF TOXIN SYNTHESIS BY CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE

Clostridium difficile is the leading definable cause of nosocomial diarrhea worldwide due to its virulence, multi-drug resistance, spore-forming ability, and environmental persistence. The incidence of C. difficile infection (CDI) has been increasing exponentially in the last decade. Virulent strains of C. difficile produce either toxin A and/or toxin B, which are essential for the pathogenesis of this bacterium. Current methods for diagnosing CDI are mostly qualitative tests that detect the bacterium, the toxins, or the toxin genes. These methods do not differentiate virulent C. difficile strains that produce active toxins from non-virulent strains that do not produce toxins or produce inactive toxins. Based on the knowledge that C. difficile toxins A and B cleave a substrate that is stereochemically similar to the native substrate of the toxins, uridine diphosphoglucose, a quantitative, cost-efficient assay, the Cdifftox activity assay, was developed to measure C. difficile toxin activity. The concept behind the activity assay was modified to develop a novel, rapid, sensitive, and specific assay for C. difficile toxins in the form of a selective and differential agar plate culture medium, the Cdifftox Plate assay (CDPA). This assay combines in a single step the specific identification of C. difficile strains and the detection of active toxin(s). The CDPA was determined to be extremely accurate (99.8% effective) at detecting toxin-producing strains based on the analysis of 528 C. difficile isolates selected from 50 tissue culture cytotoxicity assay-positive clinical stool samples. This new assay advances and improves the culture methodology in that only C. difficile strains will grow on this medium and virulent strains producing active toxins can be differentiated from non-virulent strains. This new method reduces the time and effort required to isolate and confirm toxin-producing C. difficile strains and provides a clinical isolate for antibiotic susceptibility testing and strain typing. The Cdifftox activity assay was used to screen for inhibitors of toxin activity. Physiological levels of the common human conjugated bile salt, taurocholate, was found to inhibit toxin A and B in vitro activities. When co-incubated ex vivo with purified toxin B, taurocholate protected Caco-2 colonic epithelial cells from the damaging effects of the toxin. Furthermore, using a caspase-3 detection assay, taurocholate reduced the extent of toxin B-induced Caco-2 cell apoptosis. These results suggest that bile salts can be effective in protecting the gut epithelium from C. difficile toxin damage, thus, the delivery of physiologic amounts of taurocholate to the colon, where it is normally in low concentration, could be useful in CDI treatment. These findings may help to explain why bile rich small intestine is spared damage in CDI, while the bile salt poor colon is vulnerable in CDI. Toxin synthesis in C. difficile occurs during the stationary phase, but little is known about the regulation of these toxins. It was hypothesized that C. difficile toxin synthesis is regulated by a quorum sensing mechanism. Two lines of evidence supported this hypothesis. First, a small (KDa), diffusible, heat-stable toxin-inducing activity accumulates in the medium of high-density C. difficile cells. This conditioned medium when incubated with low-density log-phase cells causes them to produce toxin early (2-4 hrs instead of 12-16 hrs) and at elevated levels when compared with cells grown in fresh medium. These data suggested that C. difficile cells extracellularly release an inducing molecule during growth that is able to activate toxin synthesis prematurely and demonstrates for the first time that toxin synthesis in C. difficile is regulated by quorum signaling. Second, this toxin-inducing activity was partially purified from high-density stationary-phase culture supernatant fluid by HPLC and confirmed to induce early toxin synthesis, even in C. difficile virulent strains that over-produce the toxins. Mass spectrometry analysis of the purified toxin-inducing fraction from HPLC revealed a cyclic compound with a mass of 655.8 Da. It is anticipated that identification of this toxin-inducing compound will advance our understanding of the mechanism involved in the quorum-dependent regulation of C. difficile toxin synthesis. This finding should lead to the development of even more sensitive tests to diagnose CDI and may lead to the discovery of promising novel therapeutic targets that could be harnessed for the treatment C. difficile infections.

The regulation of mTORC2 kinase activity and complex integrity

Growth factor signaling promotes anabolic processes via activation of the PI3K-Akt kinase cascade. Deregulation of the growth factor-dependent PI3K-Akt pathway was implicated in tumorigenesis. Akt is an essential serine/threonine protein kinase that controls multiple physiological functions such as cell growth, proliferation, and survival to maintain cellular homeostasis. Recently, the mammalian Target of Rapamycin Complex 2 (mTORC2) was identified as the main Akt Ser-473 kinase, and Ser-473 phosphorylation is required for Akt hyperactivation. However, the detailed mechanism of mTORC2 regulation in response to growth factor stimulation or cellular stresses is not well understood. In the first project, we studied the regulation of the mTORC2-Akt signaling under ER stress. We identified the inactivation of mTORC2 by glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β). Under ER stress, the essential mTORC2 component, rictor, is phosphorylated by GSK-3β at Ser-1235. This phosphorylation event results in the inhibition of mTORC2 kinase activity by interrupting Akt binding to mTORC2. Blocking rictor Ser-1235 phosphorylation can attenuate the negative impacts of GSK-3β on mTORC2/Akt signaling and tumor growth. Thus, our work demonstrated that GSK-3β-mediated rictor Ser-1235 phosphorylation in response to ER stress interferes with Akt signaling by inhibiting mTORC2 kinase activity. In the second project, I investigated the regulation of the mTORC2 integrity. We found that basal mTOR kinase activity depends on ATP level, which is tightly regulated by cell metabolism. The ATP-sensitive mTOR kinase is required for SIN1 protein phosphorylation and stabilization. SIN1 is an indispensable subunit of mTORC2 and is required for the complex assembly and mTORC2 kinase activity. Our findings reveal that mTOR-mediated phosphorylation of SIN1 is critical for maintaining complex integrity by preventing SIN1 from lysosomal degradation. In sum, our findings verify two distinct mTORC2 regulatory mechanisms via its components rictor and SIN1. First, GSK-3β-mediated rictor Ser-1235 phosphorylation results in mTORC2 inactivation by interfering its substrate binding ability. Second, mTOR-mediated Ser-260 phosphorylation of SIN1 preserves its complex integrity. Thus, these two projects provide novel insights into the regulation of mTORC2.

ADHERENS JUNCTIONS AND THE ACTOMYOSIN NETWORK REGULATE ORGAN GROWTH BY MODULATING HIPPO PATHWAY ACTIVITY IN DROSOPHILA

Adherens junctions (AJs) and basolateral modules are important for the establishment and maintenance of apico-basal polarity. Loss of AJs and basolateral module members lead to tumor formation, as well as poor prognosis for metastasis. Recently, in mammalian studies it has been shown that loss of either AJ or basolateral module members deregulate Yorkie activity, the downstream transcriptional effector of the Hippo pathway. Importantly, it is unclear if AJ and basolateral components act through the same or parallel mechanisms to regulate Yorkie activity. Here, we dissect how loss of AJ and basolateral components affects Hippo signaling in Drosophila. Surprisingly, while scrib knock-down tissue displays increased reporter activity autonomously, α-cat knock-down tissue shows a cell autonomous decrease and a cell non-autonomous increase of Hippo reporter activity. We provided several lines of evidence to show the differential regulation in polarity protein localizations and oncogenic cooperative overgrowth by AJs and basolateral complexes. Finally, we show that Hippo pathway activity is induced in α-cat and scrib double knocked-down tissue. Taken together, our results provide evidence to show that basolateral modules and AJs act in parallel to modulate Hippo pathway activity. Non-muscle myosin II is an actomyosin component that interacts with the actin. Non-muscle myosin II also interacts with lgl, though the function of this interaction is not clear. Our lab demonstrated that modulating F-actin regulates Hippo pathway activity, and lgl also has been described as a Hippo pathway regulator. Therefore we suspect that myosin II is also involved in Hippo pathway regulation. We first characterized non-muscle Myosin II as a novel tumor suppressor gene by affecting Hippo pathway activity. Upstream regulators of Myosin II, members in the Rho signaling pathway, also displayed similar phenotypes as the Myosin II knock-down tissues. Apoptosis is also induced in myosin II knock-down tissues, however, blocking cell death does not affect myosin II knock-down induced Hippo activation. Our data suggested hyperactivating myosin II induced F-actin accumulation so therefore induces Hippo target activation. Unexpectedly, we also observed that reducing F-actin activity induced Hippo target activation in vivo. These controversial data indicated that actomyosin may regulate the Hippo pathway through multiple mechanisms.

Regulation of myogenesis and suppression of {\it mck\/} 5$\sp\prime$ enhancer elements by TGF$\beta$ and RAS

The regulation of muscle differentiation, like cell differentiation in general, is only now beginning to be understood. Here are described several key features to myogenesis: a beginning, some intermediary events, and an endpoint. Muscle differentiation proceeds spontaneously when myoblasts are cultured in serum-poor medium. Transforming growth factor type $\beta$ (TGF$\beta$), a component of fetal serum, was found to potently suppress muscle differentiation. Prolonged blockade of differentiation required replenishing TGF$\beta$. When TGF$\beta$ was removed, cells rapidly differentiated. Both TGF$\beta$ and RAS, which also blocks myogenesis, suppress the genes for a series of muscle-specific proteins. Regions that regulate transcription of one such gene, muscle creatine kinase (mck), were located by linking progressively smaller parts of the mck 5$\sp\prime$ region to the marker gene cat and testing the constructs for regulated expression of cat in myoblasts and muscle cells. The mck promoter is not muscle-specific but requires activation. Two enhancers were found: a weak, developmentally regulated enhancer within the first intron, and a strong, compact, and tightly developmentally regulated enhancer about 1.2 Kb upstream of the transcription start site. Activity of this enhancer is eliminated by activated ras. Suppression of activated N-RAS restores potency to the upstream enhancer. Further deletion shows the mck 5$\sp\prime$ enhancer to contain an enhancer core with low but significant muscle-specific activity, and at least one peripheral element that augments core activity. The core and this peripheral element were comprised almost entirely of factor-binding motifs. The peripheral element was inactive as a single copy, but was constitutively active in multiple copies. Regions flanking the peripheral element augmented its activity and conferred partial muscle-specificity. The enhancer core is also modulated by its 5$\sp\prime$ flanking region in a complex manner. Site-specific mutants covering most of the enhancer core and interesting flanking sequences have been made; all mutants tested diminish the activity of the 5$\sp\prime$ enhancer. Alteration of the site to which MyoD1 is reported to bind completely inactivates the enhancer. A theoretical analysis of cooperativity is presented, through which the binding of a constitutively expressed nuclear factor is shown to have weak positive cooperativity. In summary, TGF$\beta$, RAS, and enhancer-binding factors are found to be initial, intermediary, and final regulators, respectively, of muscle differentiation. ^

Regulation of mRNA splicing in Moloney murine sarcoma virus mutants

Cells infected with the conditionally defective MuSVts110 mutant of Moloney murine sarcoma virus are transformed at 33$\sp\circ$C but appear morphologically normal at 39$\sp\circ$C. The molecular basis for this phenotype is as follows: MuSVts110 contains a 1487 nucleotide central deletion that has truncated the 3$\sp\prime$ end to the gag gene and the 5$\sp\prime$ end of the mos gene. The resulting gag-mos junction is out-of-frame and the v-mos protein is not expressed. At 33$\sp\circ$C or lower, a splicing event is activated such that a 431 base intron is removed to realign the gag and mos gene in-frame, allowing the expression of a transforming protein P85$\sp{gag-mos}$. Temperature-dependent splicing appeared to be an intrinsic property of MuSVts110 transcripts and not a general feature of pre-mRNA splicing in 6m2 cells since splicing activity of a heterologous transcript in the same cells did not vary with temperature. The possibility that the splice event was not temperature-sensitive, but that the accumulation of spliced transcript at the lower growth temperatures was due to its selective thermolability was ruled out as stability studies revealed that the relative turnover rates of the unspliced and spliced MuSVts110 transcripts were not affected by temperature.^ The consensus sequences containing the splice sites activated in the MuSVts110 mutant (5$\sp\prime$ gag and 3$\sp\prime$ mos) are present, but not utilized, in wild-type MuSV-124. To test the hypothesis that it was the reduction of the 1919 base intervening sequence in MuSV-124 to 431 bases in MuSVts110 which activated splicing, the identical 1487 base deletion was introduced into cloned wild-type MuSV-124 DNA to create the MuSVts110 equivalent, ts32.^ To examine conditions permissive for splicing, we assayed splice site activation in a series of MuSV-124 "intron-modification" mutants. Data suggest that splicing in wild-type MuSV-124 may be blocked due to the lack of a proximal branchpoint sequence, but can be activated by those intron mutations which reposition a branch site closer to the 3$\sp\prime$ splice site. (Abstract shortened with permission of author.) ^

Transcriptional regulation of the {\it neu\/} oncogene and its negative regulation by the c-{\it myc\/} oncogene

The first part of my research involved the characterization of the neu gene promoter. I subcloned a 2.2-kb sequence located upstream to the extreme 5$\sp\prime$ end of the neu gene, in front of the bacterial reporter gene, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT). Transfection of this construct into different cell lines and subsequent CAT assays demonstrated that this 2.2-kb fragment was functional as a promoter. A series of deletion constructs was engineered to study the contribution of different fragments to transcription. Subcloning of individual fragments was followed by a cotransfection competition experiment, which demonstrated the involvement of protein factors interacting with the promoter. A gel retardation assay was also performed to show the physical binding of protein factors to the promoter. The combined results suggested that both positively and negatively acting protein factors are involved in interacting with different regions of the promoter, contributing to the overall transcription activity. My findings provide an insight into the regulation of neu gene expression, which in turn provides the tools to understand the molecular mechanisms of overexpression of the neu gene in some breast cancer and ovarian cancer cell lines.^ In the second part of my research, I discovered that another oncogene, c-myc, was able to reverse the transformed morphology that was induced by the neu oncogene. Utilizing the promoter constructs that I made, I was able to show that the c-myc oncogene has a negative regulatory effect on the expression of the neu oncogene. Further studies suggested that c-myc is able to lower the effective concentration of a positive factor(s) that interact with a 139-bp fragment of the neu gene promoter. These findings may provide a direct evidence of the long suspected role of the c-myc gene in transcriptional regulation. The neu gene may very well be the first identified mammalian target gene that is regulated by the c-myc oncogene. Since c-myc is known to be stimulated by various mitogenic signals and the neu gene is likely to be a growth factor receptor, it is possible that c-myc, when stimulated by the signal transduction pathway of the neu gene, would function as a negative feedback regulator on the neu gene receptor. (Abstract shortened with permission of author.) ^

The transcriptional regulation of the {\it neu\/} gene: Examples of activation, repression, and cell-specific expression

The neu oncogene encodes a growth factor receptor-like protein, p185, with an intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity. A single point mutation, an A to T transversion resulting in an amino acid substitution from valine to glutamic acid, in the transmembrane domain of the rat neu gene was found to be responsible for the transforming and tumorigenic phenotype of the cells that carry it. In contrast, the human proto-neu oncogene is frequently amplified in tumors and cell lines derived from tumors and the human neu gene overexpression/amplification in breast and ovarian cancers is known to correlate with poor patient prognosis. Examples of the human neu gene overexpression in the absence of gene amplification have been observed, which may suggest the significant role of the transcriptional and/or post-transcriptional control of the neu gene in the oncogenic process. However, little is known about the transcriptional mechanisms which regulate the neu gene expression. In this study, three examples are presented to demonstrate the positive and negative control of the neu gene expression.^ First, by using band shift assays and methylation interference analyses, I have identified a specific protein-binding sequence, AAGATAAAACC ($-$466 to $-$456), that binds a specific trans-acting factor termed RVF (for EcoRV factor on the neu promoter). The RVF-binding site is required for maximum transcriptional activity of the rat neu promoter. This same sequence is also found in the corresponding regions of both human and mouse neu promoters. Furthermore, this sequence can enhance the CAT activity driven by a minimum promoter of the thymidine kinase gene in an orientation-independent manner, and thus it behaves as an enhancer. In addition, Southwestern (DNA-protein) blot analysis using the RVF-binding site as a probe points to a 60-kDa polypeptide as a potential candidate for RVF.^ Second, it has been reported that the E3 region of adenovirus 5 induces down-regulation of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor through endocytosis. I found that the human neu gene product, p185, (an EGF receptor-related protein) is also down-regulated by adenovirus 5, but via a different mechanism. I demonstrate that the adenovirus E1a gene is responsible for the repression of the human neu gene at the transcriptional level.^ Third, a differential expression of the neu gene has been found in two cell model systems: between the mouse fibroblast Swiss-Webster 3T3 (SW3T3) and its variant NR-6 cells; and between the mouse liver tumor cell line, Hep1-a, and the mouse pancreas tumor cell line, 266-6. Both NR-6 and 266-6 cell lines are not able to express the neu gene product, p185. I demonstrate that, in both cases, the transcriptional repression of the neu gene may account for the lack of the p185 expression in these two cell lines. ^

Regulation of {\it neu\/} gene expression by the simian virus 40 large T antigen and tumor suppressors Rb and p53

The neu gene (also c-erbB-2 or HER2) encodes a 185 kilodalton protein that is frequently overexpressed in breast, ovarian and non-small cell lung cancers. Study of the regulation of neu indicates that neu gene expression can be modulated by c-myc or by the adenovirus 5 E1a gene product. This study demonstrates that the transforming protein, large T antigen, of the simian virus 40 represses neu promoter activity. Repression of neu by large T antigen is mediated through the region $-$172 to $-$79 (relative to first ATG) of the neu promoter--unlike through $-$312 to $-$172 for c-myc or E1a. This suggests a different pathway for repression of neu by large T antigen. The 10 amino acid region of large T required for binding the tumor suppressor, retinoblastoma gene product, Rb, is not necessary for repression of neu. Moreover, the tumor suppressors, Rb and p53 can independently inhibit neu promoter activity. Rb inhibits neu through a 10 base pair G-rich enhancer (GTG element) ($-$243 to $-$234) and also through regions close to transcription initiation sites ($-$172 to $-$79). Mutant Rb unable to complex large T is able to repress the region close to transcription initiation but not the GTG enhancer. Thus, Rb inhibits the two regulatory domains of the neu gene by different mechanisms. Both Rb and p53 can repress the transforming activity of activated neu in focus forming assays. These data provide evidence that tumor suppressors regulate expression of growth stimulatory genes such as neu. Therefore, one reason for the overexpression of neu that is frequently seen in breast cancer cells may be due to functional inactivation of Rb and p53 which is also a common occurrence in breast cancer cells. ^

Analysis of p53 function and regulation

p53 is a tumor suppressor gene that is the most frequent target inactivated in cancers. Overexpression of wild-type p53 in rat embryo fibroblasts suppresses foci formation by other cooperating oncogenes. Introduction of wild-type p53 into cells that lack p53 arrests them at the G1/S boundary and reverses the transformed phenotype of some cells. The function of p53 in normal cells is illustrated by the ability of p53 to arrest cells at G1 phase of the cell cycle upon exposure to DNA-damaging agents including UV-irradiation and biosynthesis inhibitors.^ Since the amino acid sequence of p53 suggested that it may function as a transcription factor, we used GAL4 fusion assays to test that possibility. We found that wild-type p53 could specifically activate transcription when anchored by the GAL4 DNA binding domain. Mutant p53s, which have lost the ability to suppress foci formation by other oncogenes, were not able to activate transcription in this assay. Thus, we established a direct correlation between the tumor suppression and transactivation functions of p53.^ Having learned that p53 was a transcriptional activator, we next sought targets of p53 activation. Because many transcription factors regulate their own expression, we tested whether p53 had this autoregulatory property. Transient expression of wild-type p53 in cells increased the levels of endogenous p53 mRNA. Cotransfection of p53 together with a reporter bearing the p53 promoter confirmed that wild-type p53 specifically activates its own promoter. Deletion analysis from both the 5$\sp\prime$ and 3$\sp\prime$ ends of the promoter minimized the region responsible for p53 autoregulation to 45 bp. Methylation interference identified nucleotides involved in protein-DNA interaction. Mutations within this protected site specifically eliminated the response of the promoter to p53. In addition, multiple copies of this element confer responsiveness to wild-type p53 expression. Thus, we identified a F53 responsive element within the p53 promoter.^ The presence of a consensus NF-$\kappa$B site in the p53 promoter suggested that NF-KB may regulate p53 expression. Gel-shift experiments showed that both the p50 homodimer and the p50/p65 heterodimer bind to the p53 promoter. In addition, the p65 subunit of NF-$\kappa$B activates the p53 promoter in transient transfection experiments. TNF $\alpha$, a natural NF-$\kappa$B inducer, also activates the p53 promoter. Both p65 activation and TNF $\alpha$ induction require an intact NF-$\kappa$B site in the p53 promoter. Since NF-$\kappa$B activation occurs as a response to stress and p53 arrests cells in G1/S, where DNA repair occurs, activation of p53 by NF-$\kappa$B could be a mechanism by which cells recover from stress.^ In conclusion, we provided the first data that wild-type p53 functions as a transcriptional activator, whereas mutant p53 cannot. The correlation between growth suppression and transcriptional activation by p53 implies a pathway of tumor suppression. We have analyzed upstream components of the pathway by the identification of both p53 and NF-$\kappa$B as regulators of the p53 promoter. ^