Regulation of Protein Degradation in the Heart by AMP-Activated Protein Kinase

The degradation of proteins by the ubiquitin proteasome system is essential for cellular homeostasis in the heart. An important regulator of metabolic homeostasis is AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). During nutrient deprivation, AMPK is activated and intracellular proteolysis is enhanced through the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS). Whether AMPK plays a role in protein degradation through the UPS in the heart is not known. Here I present data in support of the hypothesis that AMPK transcriptionally regulates key players in the UPS, which, under extreme conditions can be detrimental to the heart. The ubiquitin ligases MAFbx /Atrogin-1 and MuRF1, key regulators of protein degradation, and AMPK activity are increased during nutrient deprivation. Pharmacologic and genetic activation of AMPK is sufficient for the induction of MAFbx/Atrogin-1 and MuRF1 in cardiomyocytes and in the heart in vivo. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that the molecular mechanism by which AMPK regulates MuRF1 expression is through the transcription factor myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2), which is involved in stress response and cardiomyocyte remodeling. MuRF1 is required for AMPK-mediated protein degradation through the UPS in cardiomyocytes. Consequently, the absence of MuRF1 during chronic fasting preserves cardiac function, possibly by limiting degradation of critical metabolic enzymes. Furthermore, during cardiac hypertrophy, chronic activation of AMPK also leads to cardiac dysfunction, possibly through enhanced protein degradation and metabolic dysregulation. Collectively, my findings demonstrate that AMPK regulates expression of ubiquitin ligases which are required for UPS-mediated protein degradation in the heart. Based on these results, I propose that specific metabolic signals may serve as modulators of intracellular protein degradation in the heart.

REGULATION OF FOXC2 EXPRESSION AND FUNCTION DURING EPITHELIAL-MESENCHYMAL TRANSITION BY GSK-3β

Metastasis is the ultimate cause for the majority of cancer-related deaths. The forkhead box transcription factor FOXC2 is known to be involved in regulating metastasis as well as a variety of developmental processes, including the formation of lymphatic and cardiovascular systems. Previous studies have shown that FOXC2 protein is localized either in the nucleus and/or in the cytoplasm of human breast tumor cells. This pattern of localization is similar to that of another forkhead family member, FOXO3a. Additionally, localization of FOXO3a is known to be differentially regulated by upstream kinase AKT. Therefore, I investigated whether FOXC2 localization could also be regulated by upstream kinases. Analysis of FOXC2 protein sequence revealed two potential phosphorylation sites for GSK-3β. Furthermore, inhibition of GSK-3βsignificantly reduces FOXC2 protein. In addition, exposure of HMLE Twist cells expressing endogenous FOXC2 to the GSK-3β inhibitor, TWS119, results in accumulation of FOXC2 protein in the cytoplasm with concomitant decrease in the nucleus in a time-dependent manner. Furthermore, continued treatment with TWS119 eventually induces epithelial morphology and decreased stem cell properties including sphere formation in these cells. Further characterization of FOXC2- GSK-3β interaction and the associated signaling cascade are necessary to determine the effect of FOXC2 phosphorylation by GSK-3β on EMT and metastasis.

Regulation of Protein Degradation in the Heart by AMP-Activated Protein Kinase

The degradation of proteins by the ubiquitin proteasome system is essential for cellular homeostasis in the heart. An important regulator of metabolic homeostasis is AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). During nutrient deprivation, AMPK is activated and intracellular proteolysis is enhanced through the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS). Whether AMPK plays a role in protein degradation through the UPS in the heart is not known. Here I present data in support of the hypothesis that AMPK transcriptionally regulates key players in the UPS, which, under extreme conditions can be detrimental to the heart. The ubiquitin ligases MAFbx /Atrogin-1 and MuRF1, key regulators of protein degradation, and AMPK activity are increased during nutrient deprivation. Pharmacologic and genetic activation of AMPK is sufficient for the induction of MAFbx/Atrogin-1 and MuRF1 in cardiomyocytes and in the heart in vivo. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that the molecular mechanism by which AMPK regulates MuRF1 expression is through the transcription factor myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2), which is involved in stress response and cardiomyocyte remodeling. MuRF1 is required for AMPK-mediated protein degradation through the UPS in cardiomyocytes. Consequently, the absence of MuRF1 during chronic fasting preserves cardiac function, possibly by limiting degradation of critical metabolic enzymes. Furthermore, during cardiac hypertrophy, chronic activation of AMPK also leads to cardiac dysfunction, possibly through enhanced protein degradation and metabolic dysregulation. Collectively, my findings demonstrate that AMPK regulates expression of ubiquitin ligases which are required for UPS-mediated protein degradation in the heart. Based on these results, I propose that specific metabolic signals may serve as modulators of intracellular protein degradation in the heart.

Regulation of the heat shock response by thiol-reactive compounds in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Cells govern their activities and modulate their interactions with the environment to achieve homeostasis. The heat shock response (HSR) is one of the most well studied fundamental cellular responses to environmental and physiological challenges, resulting in rapid synthesis of heat shock proteins (HSPs), which serve to protect cellular constituents from the deleterious effects of stress. In addition to its role in cytoprotection, the HSR also influences lifespan and is associated with a variety of human diseases including cancer, aging and neurodegenerative disorders. In most eukaryotes, the HSR is primarily mediated by the highly conserved transcription factor HSF1, which recognizes target hsp genes by binding to heat shock elements (HSEs) in their promoters. In recent years, significant efforts have been made to identify small molecules as potential pharmacological activators of HSF1 that could be used for therapeutic benefit in the treatment of human diseases relevant to protein conformation. However, the detailed mechanisms through which these molecules drive HSR activation remain unclear. In this work, I utilized the baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model system to identify a group of thiol-reactive molecules including oxidants, transition metals and metalloids, and electrophiles, as potent activators of yeast Hsf1. Using an artificial HSE-lacZ reporter and the glucocorticoid receptor system (GR), these diverse thiol-reactive compounds are shown to activate Hsf1 and inhibit Hsp90 chaperone complex activity in a reciprocal, dose-dependent manner. To further understand whether cells sense these reactive compounds through accumulation of unfolded proteins, the proline analog azetidine-2-carboxylic acid (AZC) and protein cross-linker dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate) (DSP) were used to force misfolding of nascent polypeptides and existing cytosolic proteins, respectively. Both unfolding reagents display kinetic HSP induction profiles dissimilar to those generated by thiol-reactive compounds. Moreover, AZC treatment leads to significant cytotoxicity, which is not observed in the presence of the thiol-reactive compounds at the concentrations sufficient to induce Hsf1. Additionally, DSP treatment has little to no effect on Hsp90 functions. Together with the ultracentrifugation analysis of cell lysates that detected no insoluble protein aggregates, my data suggest that at concentrations sufficient to induce Hsf1, thiol-reactive compounds do not induce the HSR via a mechanism based on accumulation of unfolded cytosolic proteins. Another possibility is that thiol-reactive compounds may influence aspects of the protein quality control system such as the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). To address this hypothesis, β-galactosidase reporter fusions were used as model substrates to demonstrate that thiol-reactive compounds do not inhibit ubiquitin activating enzymes (E1) or proteasome activity. Therefore, thiol-reactive compounds do not activate the HSR by inhibiting UPS-dependent protein degradation. I therefore hypothesized that these molecules may directly inactivate protein chaperones, known as repressors of Hsf1. To address this possibility, a thiol-reactive biotin probe was used to demonstrate in vitro that the yeast cytosolic Hsp70 Ssa1, which partners with Hsp90 to repress Hsf1, is specifically modified. Strikingly, mutation of conserved cysteine residues in Ssa1 renders cells insensitive to Hsf1 activation by cadmium and celastrol but not by heat shock. Conversely, substitution with the sulfinic acid and steric bulk mimic aspartic acid led to constitutive activation of Hsf1. Cysteine 303, located in the nucleotide-binding/ATPase domain of Ssa1, was shown to be modified in vivo by a model organic electrophile using Click chemistry technology, verifying that Ssa1 is a direct target for thiol-reactive compounds through adduct formation. Consistently, cadmium pretreatment promoted cells thermotolerance, which is abolished in cells carrying SSA1 cysteine mutant alleles. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that Hsp70 acts as a sensor to induce the cytoprotective heat shock response in response to environmental or endogenously produced thiol-reactive molecules and can discriminate between two distinct environmental stressors.

NOVEL INDUCERS OF GLIOTOXIN PRODUCTION IN ASPERGILLUS FUMIGATUS

Secondary metabolites are produced by numerous organisms and can either be benign to humans or harmful. Genes involved in the synthesis and transport of these secondary metabolites are frequently found in gene clusters, which are often located in subtelomeric regions of the chromosome. These clusters are often coordinately regulated, being almost exclusively dependent on transcription factors that are located within the clusters themselves. Secondary metabolites are also regulated by a variety of factors, including nutritional factors, environmental factors and developmental processes. Gliotoxin, which is produced by a variety of Aspergillus species, Trichoderma species, and Penicillium species, exhibits immunosuppressive properties and has therefore been the subject of research for many laboratories. There have been a few proteins shown to regulate the gliotoxin cluster, most notably GliZ, a Zn2Cys6 binuclear finger transcription factor that lies within the cluster, and LaeA, a putative methyltransferase that globally regulates secondary metabolism clusters within numerous fungal organisms, although no study has demonstrated the direct binding of any protein to a promoter region in the gliotoxin cluster. I report here two novel proteins, GipA, a C2H2 transcription factor and GipB, a hybrid sensor kinase, which are involved in regulating the gliotoxin biosynthetic cluster. GipA plays an important role in gliotoxin production, as high-copy expression of gipA induces gliotoxin biosynthesis and loss of gipA reduces gliotoxin biosynthesis by 50%. GipB is also involved in regulating gliotoxin production, as high-copy expression of gipB induces gliotoxin biosynthesis, but only during certain stages of asexual development. Furthermore, loss of gipB reduces gliotoxin biosynthesis by 10%. Based on data obtained from this project, I propose a model for the regulation of gliA, the efflux pump of the gliotoxin cluster, which involves GipB signaling through both GliZ and GipA. I propose that GliZ and GipA are interdependent, as mutation of the GipA DNA binding site in the gliA promoter negatively affects both GliZ-mediated and GipA-mediated induction of gliA. This is further supported by the fact that GliZ cannot fully induce gliA in the absence of GipA and vice versa. This is the first time that anyone has shown evidence of a protein directly binding to the gliotoxin cluster. Even though biosynthetic clusters are often coordinately regulated, my model raises the possibility that gliA is independently regulated, as the layout of the binding site in the gliA promoter is not present upstream of any other genes in the gliotoxin cluster, except for gliZ.

Targeted Deletion Of Functionally Validated Enhancers Defines Their Role in Mouse Limb Development

Transcriptional enhancers are genomic DNA sequences that contain clustered transcription factor (TF) binding sites. When combinations of TFs bind to enhancer sequences they act together with basal transcriptional machinery to regulate the timing, location and quantity of gene transcription. Elucidating the genetic mechanisms responsible for differential gene expression, including the role of enhancers, during embryological and postnatal development is essential to an understanding of evolutionary processes and disease etiology. Numerous methods are in use to identify and characterize enhancers. Several high-throughput methods generate large datasets of enhancer sequences with putative roles in embryonic development. However, few enhancers have been deleted from the genome to determine their roles in the development of specific structures, such as the limb. Manipulation of enhancers at their endogenous loci, such as the deletion of such elements, leads to a better understanding of the regulatory interactions, rules and complexities that contribute to faithful and variant gene transcription – the molecular genetic substrate of evolution and disease. To understand the endogenous roles of two distinct enhancers known to be active in the mouse embryo limb bud we deleted them from the mouse genome. I hypothesized that deletion of these enhancers would lead to aberrant limb development. The enhancers were selected because of their association with p300, a protein associated with active transcription, and because the human enhancer sequences drive distinct lacZ expression patterns in limb buds of embryonic day (E) 11.5 transgenic mice. To confirm that the orthologous mouse enhancers, mouse 280 and 1442 (M280 and M1442, respectively), regulate expression in the developing limb we generated stable transgenic lines, and examined lacZ expression. In M280-lacZ mice, expression was detected in E11.5 fore- and hindlimbs in a region that corresponds to digits II-IV. M1442-lacZ mice exhibited lacZ expression in posterior and anterior margins of the fore- and hindlimbs that overlapped with digits I and V and several wrist bones. We generated mice lacking the M280 and M1442 enhancers by gene targeting. Intercrosses between M280 -/+ and M1442 -/+, respectively, generated M280 and M1442 null mice, which are born at expected Mendelian ratios and manifest no gross limb malformations. Quantitative real-time PCR of mutant E11.5 limb buds indicated that significant changes in transcriptional output of enhancer-proximal genes accompanied the deletion of both M280 and M1442. In neonatal null mice we observed that all limb bones are present in their expected positions, an observation also confirmed by histology of E18.5 distal limbs. Fine-scale measurement of E18.5 digit bone lengths found no differences between mutant and control embryos. Furthermore, when the developmental progression of cartilaginous elements was analyzed in M280 and M1442 embryos from E13.5-E15.5, transient development defects were not detected. These results demonstrate that M280 and M1442 are not required for mouse limb development. Though M280 is not required for embryonic limb development it is required for the development and/or maintenance of body size – adult M280 mice are significantly smaller than control littermates. These studies highlight the importance of experiments that manipulate enhancers in situ to understand their contribution to development.

{\it cis\/} -acting elements and {\it trans\/} -acting factors that control serum amyloid A gene expression during inflammation

To understand how the serum amyloid A (SAA) genes are regulated, the cis-acting elements and trans-acting factors involved in the regulation of mouse SAA3 and rat SAA1 genes expression during inflammation were analyzed.^ To identify DNA sequences involved in the liver-specific expression of the mouse SAA3 gene, the 5$\sp\prime$ flanking region of this gene was analyzed by transient transfection studies. Results suggest that C/EBP, a liver-enriched transcription factor, plays an important role for the enhanced expression of the mouse SAA3 gene in hepatocytes.^ Transfection studies of the regulation of the expression of rat SAA1 gene indicated that a 322 bp fragment ($-$304 to +18) of the gene contains sufficient information for cytokine-induced expression of the reporter gene in a liver cell-specific manner. Further functional analysis of the 5$\sp\prime$ flanking region of the rat SAA1 gene demonstrated that a 65 bp DNA fragment ($-$138/$-$73) can confer cytokine-inducibility onto a heterologous promoter both in liver and nonliver cells. DNase I footprint and gel retardation assays identified five putative cis-regulatory elements within the 5$\sp\prime$ flanking region of the gene: one inducible element, a NF$\kappa$B binding site and four constitutive elements. Two constitutive elements, footprint regions I and III, were identified as C/EBP binding sites with region III having over a 10-fold higher affinity for C/EBP binding than region I. Functional analysis of the cis-elements indicated that C/EBP(I) and C/EBP(III) confer liver cell-specific activation onto a heterologous promoter, while sequences corresponding to the NF$\kappa$B element and C/EBP(I) impart cytokine responsiveness onto the heterologous promoter. These results suggest that C/EBP(I) possesses two functions: liver-specific activation and cytokine responsiveness. The identification of two cytokine responsive elements (NF$\kappa$B and C/EBP(I)), and two liver-specific elements (C/EBP(I) and C/EBP(III)) implies that multiple cis-acting elements are involved in the regulation of the expression of the rat SAA1 gene. The tissue-specific and cytokine-induced expression of rat SAA1 gene is likely the result of the interactions of these cis-acting elements with their cognate trans-acting factors as well as the interplay between the different cis-acting elements and their binding factors. (Abstract shortened with permission of author.) ^

A novel DNA damage inducible inhibitor of p53

p53 is required for the maintenance of the genomic stability of cells. Mutations in the p53 tumor-suppressor gene occur in more than 50% of human cancers of diverse types. In addition, 70% of families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome have a germline mutation in p53, predisposing these individuals to multiple forms of cancer. In response to DNA damage, p53 becomes stabilized and activated. However the exact mechanism by which DNA damage signals the stabilization and activation of p53 still remains elusive. The biochemical activity of p53 that is required for tumor suppression, and presumably the cellular response to DNA damage, involves the ability of the protein to bind to specific DNA sequences and to function as a transcription factor. For the downstream targets, p53 transactivates many genes involved in growth arrest, apoptosis and DNA repair such as p21, Bax and GADD45, respectively. An open question in the field is how cells can determine the downstream effects of p53. ^ We hypothesize that, through its associated proteins, p53 can differentially transactivate its target genes, which determine its downstream effect. Additionally, p53 interacting proteins may be involved in signaling for the stabilization and activation of p53. Therefore, a key aspect to understanding p53 function is the identification and analysis of proteins that interact with it. We have employed the Sos recruitment system (SRS), a cytoplasmic yeast two-hybrid screen to identify p53 interacting proteins. The SRS is based on the ability of Sos to activate Ras when it becomes localized to the plasma membrane. The system takes advantage of an S. cerevisiae strain, cdc25-2 temperature sensitive mutant, harboring a mutation in Sos. In this strain, fusion proteins containing a truncated Sos will only localize to the membrane by protein-protein interaction, which allows growth at non-permissive temperature. This system allows the use of intact transcriptional activators such as p53. ^ To date, using a modified SRS library screen to identify p53 interacting proteins, I have identified p53 (known to interact with itself) and a novel p53-interacting protein (PIP). PIP is a specific p53 interacting protein in the SRS. The interaction of p53 and PIP was further confirmed by performing in vitro and in vivo binding assays. In the in vivo binding study, the interaction can only be detected in the presence of ionizing radiation suggesting that this interaction might be involved in DNA-damage induced p53-signalling pathway. After screening cDNA and genomic libraries, a full-length PIP-cDNA clone ( ∼ 3kb) was obtained which encodes a protein of 429 amino acids with calculated molecular weight of 46 kDa. The results of genebank search indicated that the PIP is an unidentified gene and contains a conserved ring-finger domain, which is present in a diverse family of regulatory proteins involved in different aspects of cellular function. Northern blot analysis revealed that the size of its messenge is approximately 3 kb preferentially expressed in brain, heart, liver and kidney. The PIP protein is mainly located in the cytoplasm as determined by the cellular localization of a green fluorescence fusion protein. Preliminary functional analysis revealed that PIP downregulated the transactivation activity of p53 on both p21 and mdm2 promoters. Thus, PIP may be a novel negative regulator of p53 subsequent to DNA damage. ^

A distinct element involved in the lipopolysaccharide activation of the tumor necrosis factor -alpha promoter in a promonocytic cell line, THP-1

TNF-α is a pleiotropic cytokine involved in normal homeostasis and plays a key role in defending the host from infection and malignancy. However when deregulated, TNF-α can lead to various disease states. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms by which TNF-α is regulated may aid in its control. In spite of the knowledge gained regarding the transcriptional regulation of TNF-α further characterization of specific TNF-α promoter elements remains to be elucidated. In particular, the T&barbelow;NF-α A&barbelow;P-1/C&barbelow;RE-like (TAC) element of the TNF-α promoter has been shown to be important in the regulation of TNF-α in lymphocytes. Activating transcription factor-2 (ATF-2) and c-Jun were shown to bind to and transactivate the TAC element However, the role of TAC and transcription factors ATF-2 and c-Jun in the regulation of TNF-α in monocytes is not as well characterized. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a potent activator of TNF-α in monocytes, provides a good model to study the involvement of TAC in TNF-α regulation. On the other hand, all-tram retinoic acid (ATRA), a physiological monocyte-differentiation agent, is unable to induce TNF-α protein release. ^ To delineate the functional role of TAC, we transfected the wildtype or the TAC deleted TNF-α promoter-CAT construct into THP-1 promonocytic cells before stimulating them with LPS. CAT activity was induced 17-fold with the wildtype TNF-α promoter, whereas the CAT activity was uninducible when the TAC deletion mutant was used. This daft suggests that TAC is vital for LPS to activate the TNF-α promoter. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays using the TAC element as a probe showed a unique pattern for LPS-activated cells: the disappearance of the upper band of a doublet seen in untreated and ATRA treated cells. Supershift analysis identified c-Jun and ATF-2 as components of the LPS-stimulated binding complex. Transient transfection studies using dominant negative mutants of JNK, c-Jun, or ATF-2 suggest that these proteins we important for LPS to activate the TNF-α promoter. Furthermore, an increase in phosphorylated or activated c-Jun was bound to the TAC element in LPS-stimulated cells. Increased c-Jun activation was correlated with increased activity of Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), a known upstream stimulator of c-Jun and ATF-2, in LPS-stimulated monocytes. On the other hand, ATRA did not induce TNF-α protein release nor changes in the phosphorylation of c-Jun or JNK activity, suggesting that pathways leading to ATRA differentiation of monocytic cells are independent of TNF-α activation. Together, the induction of TNF-α gene expression seems to require JNK activation, and activated c-Jun binding to the TAC element of the TNF-α promoter in THP-1 promonocytic cells. ^

Constitutive expression of interleukin-6 in renal cell carcinoma is modulated by p53

Several studies indicate that interleukin-6 (IL-6) production is elevated in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cells, and that IL-6 can serve as an autocrine growth factor in this malignancy. Wild type (wt) p53 represses transcription from the IL-6 promoter in an inducible system. The objective of this study was to determine the role of p53 in regulating constitutive IL-6 production in RCC cells. RCC cell lines containing mutant (mut) p53 produced significantly higher levels of IL-6 than those containing wt p53 (p < 0.05). Transfection of wt p53 into RCC cell lines resulted in significant repression of IL-6 promoter CAT activity p < 0.05). Mutant p53 was less effective at repressing IL-6 promoter activity in ACHN cells, and actually enhanced IL-6 promoter activity in the A498 cell line. A498 cells stably transfected with mutant p53 produced significantly higher levels of IL-6 than A498 cells transfected with an empty expression vector (p < 0.05). Electrophoretic mobility shift assay showed a significant decrease in binding of C/EBP, CREB, and NF-kB transcription factors to the IL-6 promoter in A498 cells transfected with wt p53. Mut p53 was unable to inhibit transcription factor binding to the IL-6 promoter in these cells. Mutant p53-expressing UOK 121LN cells showed decreased binding of C/EBP and CREB, but not NF-kB, following wt p53 transfection. These data suggest that (i) mutation of p53 contributes to the over-expression of IL-6 in RCC; and (ii) wt p53 represses IL-6 expression at least in part by interfering with the binding of C/EBP, CREB, and in some cases, NF-kB transcription factors to the IL-6 promoter. ^

Identification and characterization of cellular genes differentially expressed in a subset of tumors with non -functional WT1

Wilms tumor (WT) or nephroblastoma is a genetically heterogeneous pediatric renal tumor that accounts for 6–7% of all childhood cancers in the U.S. WT1, located at 11p13, is the sole WT gene cloned to date. Additional genomic regions containing genes that play a role in the development of Wilms tumor include 11p15, 7p, 16q, 1p, 17q and 19q. This heterogeneity has made it extremely difficult to develop an understanding of the pathways involved in the development of WT, even in the 5–20% of tumors that show mutations at the WT1 locus. My research addresses this gap in our current comprehension of the development of WT. ^ I have used two complementary approaches to extend the current understanding of molecular changes involved in the development of WT. In order to minimize complexities due to genetic heterogeneity, I confined my analysis to the WT1 pathway by assessing those genetically defined tumors that carry WT1 mutations. WT1 encodes a zinc finger transcription factor, and in vitro studies have identified many genes that are potentially regulated in vivo by WT1. However, there is very little in vivo data that suggests that they are transcriptionally regulated endogenously by WT1. In one approach I assessed the role of WT1 in the in vivo regulation of PDGFA and IGF2, two genes that are strong contenders for endogenous regulation by WT1. Using primary tissue samples, I found no correlation between the level of RNA expression of WT1 with either PDGFA or IGF2, suggesting that WT1 does not play a critical role in their expression in either normal kidney or WT. ^ In a parallel strategy, using differential display analysis I compared global gene expression in a subset of tumors with known homozygous inactivating WT1 mutations (WT1-tumors) to the gene expression in a panel of appropriate control tissues (fetal kidney, normal kidney, rhabdoid tumor and pediatric renal cell carcinoma). Transcripts that are aberrantly expressed in this subset of Wilms tumors are candidates for endogenous transcriptional regulation by WT1 as well as for potentially functioning in the development of WT. By this approach I identified several differentially expressed transcripts. I further characterized two of these transcripts, identifying a candidate WT gene in the process. I then performed a detailed analysis of this WT candidate gene, which maps to 7p. Future studies will shed more light on the role of these differentially expressed genes in WT. ^

*Ras proteins and human tumor cell radiosensitivity

Ras proteins (H-, N-, K4A-, and K4B) are associated with cellular resistance to ionizing radiation (IR) and, consequently, may provide a potential target for radiosensitization strategies in cancer treatment. Several approaches have been used to compromise Ras activity and enhance IR-induced cell killing; however, these techniques either target proteins in addition to Ras or only target one member of the Ras family. In this study, I have used an adenovirus (AV1Y28) that expresses a single-chain antibody fragment directed against Ras proteins to investigate the mechanism(s) responsible for Ras-mediated radiation resistance. AV1Y28 enhanced the radiosensitivity of a number of human tumor cell lines without affecting the radiosensitivity of normal human fibroblasts. Whereas AV1Y28-mediated sensitization was independent of ras gene mutational status, it was dependent on active Ras proteins suggesting that AV1Y28 may be useful against a broad range of tumors. AV1Y28-mediated cell killing was not the result of redistributing cells into a more radiosensitive phase of the cell cycle and did not enhance IR-induced apoptosis. Given that Ras proteins transduce environmental signals to the nucleus, the effect of AV1Y28 on the IR-inducible transcription factor NF-κB were determined. Although AV1Y28 inhibited IR-induced NF-κB through the suppression of IKK, additional work established that NF-κB did not play a role in AV1Y28-mediated radiosensitization. However, a novel component of the signaling pathway responsible for IR-induced NF-κB was identified. Previous studies had suggested a relationship between mutant ras genes and IR-induced G2 delay; therefore the effects of AV1Y28 on the progression of cells from G2 to M after IR were determined. Pretreatment of cells with AV1Y28 prevented the IR-induced G2 arrest. AV1Y28-mediated abrogation of IR-induced G2 arrest correlated with those cell line lines that were sensitized by AV1Y28. Moreover, a significant increase in cells undergoing mitotic catastrophe was found after IR in AV1Y28 treated cells. The abrogation of G2 arrest by AV1Y28 was the result of maintaining the active form of cdc2, an inducer of mitosis, after exposure to IR. This study identified the mechanism of AV1Y28-mediated radiosensitization and has provided insight into the signal transduction pathways responsible for Ras-mediated radiation resistance. ^