LOCALIZATION OF DNA REPAIR FUNCTIONS TO THE NUCLEAR MATRIX

The nucleus of a eukaryotic cell contains both structural and functional elements that contribute to the controlled operation of the cell. In this context, functional components refers to those nuclear constituents that perform metabolic activities such as DNA replication and RNA transcription. Structural nuclear components, designated nuclear matrix, organize the DNA into loops or domains and appear to provide a framework for nuclear DNA organization. However, the boundary between structural and functional components is not clear cut as evinced by reports of associations between metabolic functions and the nuclear matrix. The studies reported here attempt to determine the relationship of another nuclear function, DNA repair, to the nuclear matrix.^ One objective of these studies was to study the initiation of DNA repair by directly measuring the UV-incision activities in human cells and determine the influence of various extractable nuclear components on these activities. The assay for incision activities required the development of a nuclear isolation protocol that produced nuclei with intact DNA; the conformation of the nuclear DNA and its physical characteristics in response to denaturing conditions were determined.^ The nuclei produced with this protocol were then used as substrates for endogenous UV-specific nuclease activities. The isolated nuclei were shown to contain activities that cause breaks in nuclear DNA in response to UV-irradiation. These UV-responsive activities were tightly associated with nuclear components, being unextractable with salt concentration of up to 0.6 M.^ The tight association of the incision activities with salt-extracted nuclei suggested that other repair function might also be associated with salt-stable components of the nucleus. The site of unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) was determined in salt-extracted nuclei (nucleoids) using autoradiography and fluorescent microscopy. UDS was found to occur in association with the nuclear matrix following low-doses (2.55 J/M('2)) of ultraviolet light, but the association became looser after higher doses of ultraviolet light (10-30 J/m('2)). ^

Function and regulation of the Pem homeobox gene in vivo

Pem, a member of the PEPP homeobox family, is expressed in somatic cells in male and female reproductive tissues. In the adult murine testis, Pem is specifically expressed in Sertoli cells, where it is restricted to stages IV–VIII of the seminiferous epithelial cycle. To identify Pem's function in Sertoli cells, transgenic mice were generated that express Pem in Sertoli cells during all stages of the seminiferous epithelial cycle. This resulted in an increase in double-strand DNA breaks in preleptotene spermatocytes and single-strand DNA breaks in elongating spermatids. My results suggest that Pem regulates Sertoli-cell genes that encode secreted or cell-surface proteins that serve to control premeiotic DNA replication, DNA repair, and/or chromatin remodeling in the adjacent germ cells. Three additional transgenic mouse containing varying lengths of the Pem male-specific promoter (Pp) were generated to identify the sequences responsible for regulating Pem expression in the testis and epididymis. My analysis suggests that there are at least two regulatory regions in the Pem Pp. In the testis, region II directs androgen-dependent expression specifically in Sertoli cells whereas region I fine-tunes stage-specific expression by acting as a negative regulator. In the epididymis, region II confers androgen-dependent, developmentally-regulated expression in the caput whereas region I prevents inappropriate expression in the corpus. I also report the identification and characterization of two human PEPP family members related to Pem that I have named hPEPP1 and hPEPP2. The hPEPP1 and hPEPP2 homeodomains are more closely related to PEPP subfamily homeodomains than to any other homeodomain subfamily. Both genes are localized to the specific region of the human X chromosome that shares synteny with the region on the murine X chromosome containing three PEPP homeobox genes, Pem, Psx-1, and Psx-2. hPEPP1 and hPEPP2 mRNA expression is restricted to the testis but is aberrantly expressed in tumor cells of different origins, analogous to the expression pattern of Pem but not of Psx-1 or Psx-2. Unlike all known PEPP members, neither hPEPP1 nor hPEPP2 are expressed in placenta, which suggests that the regulation of the PEPP family has undergone significant alteration since the split between hominids and rodents. ^

Non B-DNA structures and genomic instability associated with myotonic dystrophy type 2 (CCTG).(CAGG) repeats

There are many diseases associated with the expansion of DNA repeats in humans. Myotonic dystrophy type 2 is one of such diseases, characterized by expansions of a (CCTG)•(CAGG) repeat tract in intron 1 of zinc finger protein 9 (ZNF9) in chromosome 3q21.3. The DM2 repeat tract contains a flanking region 5' to the tract that consists of a polymorphic repetitive sequence (TG)14-25(TCTG)4-11(CCTG) n. The (CCTG)•(CAGG) repeat is typically 11-26 repeats in persons without the disease, but can expand up to 11,000 repeats in affected individuals, which is the largest expansion seen in DNA repeat diseases to date. This DNA tract remains one of the least characterized disease-associated DNA repeats, and mechanisms causing the repeat expansion in humans have yet to be elucidated. Alternative, non B-DNA structures formed by the expanded repeats are typical in DNA repeat expansion diseases. These sequences may promote instability of the repeat tracts. I determined that slipped strand structure formation occurs for (CCTG)•(CAGG) repeats at a length of 42 or more. In addition, Z-DNA structure forms in the flanking human sequence adjacent to the (CCTG)•(CAGG) repeat tract. I have also performed genetic assays in E. coli cells and results indicate that the (CCTG)•(CAGG) repeats are more similar to the highly unstable (CTG)•(CAG) repeat tracts seen in Huntington's disease and myotonic dystrophy type 1, than to those of the more stable (ATTCT)•(AGAAT) repeat tracts of spinocerebellar ataxia type 10. This instability, however, is RecA-independent in the (CCTG)•(CAGG) and (ATTCT)•(AGAAT) repeats, whereas the instability is RecA-dependent in the (CTG)•(CAG) repeats. Structural studies of the (CCTG)•(CAGG) repeat tract and the flanking sequence, as well as genetic selection assays may reveal the mechanisms responsible for the repeat instability in E. coli, and this may lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms contributing to the human disease state. ^

Molecular consequences of the loss of 3'→5' exonuclease activity of DNA polymerases delta and epsilon

The DNA replication polymerases δ and ϵ have an inherent proofreading mechanism in the form of a 3'→5' exonuclease. Upon recognition of errant deoxynucleotide incorporation into DNA, the nascent primer terminus is partitioned to the exonuclease active site where the incorrectly paired nucleotide is excised before resumption of polymerization. The goal of this project was to identify the cellular and molecular consequences of an exonuclease deficiency. The proofreading capability of model system MEFs with EXOII mutations was abolished without altering polymerase function.^ It was hypothesized that 3'→5' exonucleases of polymerases δ and ϵ are critical for prevention of replication stress and important for sensitization to nucleoside analogs. To test this hypothesis, two aims were formulated: Determine the effect of the exonuclease active site mutation on replication related molecular signaling and identify the molecular consequences of an exonuclease deficiency when replication is challenged with nucleoside analogs.^ Via cell cycle studies it was determined that larger populations of exonuclease deficient cells are in the S-phase. There was an increase in levels of replication proteins, cell population growth and DNA synthesis capacity without alteration in cell cycle progression. These findings led to studies of proteins involved in checkpoint activation and DNA damage sensing. Finally, collective modifications at the level of DNA replication likely affect the strand integrity of DNA at the chromosomal level.^ Gemcitabine, a DNA directed nucleoside analog is a substrate of polymerases δ and ϵ and exploits replication to become incorporated into DNA. Though accumulation of gemcitabine triphosphate was similar in all cell types, incorporation into DNA and rates of DNA synthesis were increased in exonuclease defective cells and were not consistent with clonogenic survival. This led to molecular signaling investigations which demonstrated an increase in S-phase cells and activation of a DNA damage response upon gemcitabine treatment.^ Collectively, these data indicate that the loss of exonuclease results in a replication stress response that is likely required to employ other repair mechanisms to remove unexcised mismatches introduced into DNA during replication. When challenged with nucleoside analogs, this ongoing stress response coupled with repair serves as a resistance mechanism to cell death.^