The molecular and genetic characterization of the MADS box transcription factor {\it Drosophila\/} MEF2

The myocyte enhancer factor (MEF)-2 family of transcription factors has been implicated in the regulation of muscle transcription in vertebrates, but the precise position of these regulators within the genetic hierarchy leading to myogenesis is unclear. The MEF2 proteins bind to a conserved A/T-rich DNA sequence present in numerous muscle-specific genes, and they are expressed in the cells of the developing somites and in the embryonic heart at the onset of muscle formation in mammals. The MEF2 genes belong to the MADS box family of transcription factors, which control specific programs of gene expression in species ranging from yeast to humans. Each MEF2 family member contains two highly conserved protein motifs, the MADS domain and the MEF2-specific domain, which together provide the MEF2 factors with their unique DNA binding and dimerization properties. In an effort to further define the function of the MEF2 proteins, and to evaluate the degree of conservation shared among these factors and the phylogenetic pathways that they regulate, we sought to identify MEF2 family members in other species. In Drosophila, a homolog of the vertebrate MEF2 genes was identified and termed D-mef2. The D-MEF2 protein binds to the consensus MEF2 element and can activate transcription through tandem copies of that site. During Drosophila embryogenesis, D-MEF2 is specific to the mesoderm germ layer of the developing embryo and becomes expressed in all muscle cell types within the embryo. The role of D-mef2 in Drosophila embryogenesis was examined by generating a loss-of-function mutation in the D-mef2 gene. In embryos homozygous for this mutant allele, somatic, cardiac, and visceral muscles fail to differentiate, but precursors of these myogenic lineages are normally specified and positioned. These results demonstrate that different muscle cell types share a common myogenic differentiation program controlled by MEF2 and suggest that this program has been conserved from Drosophila to mammals. ^

Regulation of XMyoDa transcription by the binding of XMEF2A to the TATA box

MEF2 is a $\underline{\rm m}$yocyte-specific $\underline{\rm e}$nhancer-binding $\underline{\rm f}$actor that binds a conserved DNA sequence, CTA(A/T)$\sb4$TAG. A MEF2 binding site in the XMyoDa promoter overlaps with the TATA box and is required for muscle specific expression. To examine the potential role of MEF2 in the regulation of MyoD transcription during early development, the appearance of MEF2 binding activity in developing Xenopus embryos was analyzed with the electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Two genes were isolated from a X. Laevis stage 24 cDNA library that encode factors that bind the XMyoDa TFIID/MEF2 site. Both genes are highly homologous to each other, belong to the MADS ($\underline{\rm M}$CM1-$\underline{\rm A}$rg80-agamous-$\underline{\rm d}$eficiens-$\underline{\rm S}$RF) protein family, and most highly related to the mammalian MEF2A gene, hence they are designated as XMEF2A1 and XMEF2A2. Proteins encoded by both cDNAs form specific complexes with the MEF2 binding site and show the same binding specificity as the endogenous MEF2 binding activity. XMEF2A transcripts accumulate preferentially in developing somites after the appearance of XMyoD transcripts. XMEF2 protein begins to accumulate in somites at tailbud stages. Transcriptional activation of XMyoD promoter by XMEF2A required only the MADS box and MEF2-specific domain when XMEF2A is bound at the TATA box. However, a different downstream transactivation domain was required when XMEF2A activates transcription through binding to multiple upstream sites. These results suggest that different activation mechanisms are involved, depending on where the factor is bound. Mutations in several basic amino acid clusters in the MADS box inhibit DNA binding suggesting these amino acids are essential for DNA binding. Mutation of Thr-20 and Ser-36 to the negatively charged amino acid residue, aspartic acid, abolish DNA binding. XMEF2A activity may be regulated by phosphorylation of these amino acids. A dominant negative mutant was made by mutating one of the basic amino acid clusters and deleting the downstream transactivation domain. In vivo roles of MEF2 in the regulation of MyoD transcription were investigated by overexpression of wild type MEF2 and dominant negative mutant of XMEF2A in animal caps and assaying for the effects on the level of expression of MyoD genes. Overexpression of MEF2 activates the transcription of endogenous MyoD gene family while expression of a dominant negative mutant reduces the level of transcription of XMRF4 and myogenin genes. These results suggest that MEF2 is downstream of MyoD and Myf5 and that MEF2 is involved in maintaining and amplifying expression of MyoD and Myf5. MEF2 is upstream of MRF4 and myogenin and plays a role in activating their expression. ^

Functional characterization of transcription factor USF

USF, Upstream Stimulatory Factor, is a family of ubiquitous transcription factors that contain highly conserved basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper DNA binding domains and recognize the core DNA sequence CACGTG. In human and mouse, two members of the USF family, USF1 and USF2, encoded by two different genes, contribute to the USF activity. In order to gain insights into the mechanisms by which USFs function as transcriptional activators, different approaches were used to map the domains of USF2 responsible for nuclear localization and transcriptional activation. Two stretches of amino acids, one in the basic region of the DNA binding domain, the other in a highly conserved N-terminal region, were found to direct nuclear localization independently of one another. Two distinct activation domains were also identified. The first one, located in the conserved N-terminal region that overlaps the C-terminal nuclear localization signal, functioned only in the presence of an initiator element in the promoter of the reporter. The second, in a nonconserved region, activated transcription in the absence of an initiator element or when fused to a heterologous DNA binding domain. These results suggest that USF2 functions in different promoter contexts by selectively utilizing different activation domains.^ The deletion analysis of USF2 also identified two dominant negative mutants of USF, one lacking the activation domain, the other lacking the basic domain. The latter proved useful for testing the direct involvement of USFs in the transcriptional activation mediated by the viral protein IE62.^ To investigate the biological function of USFs, foci and colony formation assays were used to study the growth regulation by USFs. It was found that USFs had a strong antagonistic effect on cellular transformation mediated by the bHLH/LZ protein Myc. This effect required the DNA binding activity of either USF 1 or USF2. Moreover, USF2, but not USF1 or other mutants of USFs, was also found to have strong inhibitory effect on the cellular transformation by E1a and on the growth of HeLa cells. These results demonstrate that USFs could potentially regulate growth through two mechanisms, one by antagonizing the function of Myc in cellular transformation, the other by mediating a more general growth inhibitory effect. ^

Biochemical characterization of PICK1, a PKC binding protein

Protein kinase C (PKC) is a family of serine-threonine kinases that are activated by a wide variety of hormones, neurotransmitters and growth factors. A single cell type contains multiple isoforms that are translocated to distinct and different subcellular sites upon mitogenic stimulus. Many different cellular responses are attributed to PKC activity though relatively few substrates or binding proteins have been definitively characterized. We used the hinge and catalytic domain of PKC$\alpha$ (PKC7) in a yeast two-hybrid screen to clone proteins that interact with C-kinase (PICKs). One protein which we have termed PICK1 may be involved in PKC$\alpha$-specific function at the level of the nuclear membrane after activation. Binding of PICK1 to PKC$\alpha$ has been shown to be isoform specific as it does not bind to PKC$\beta$II or PKC$\alpha$ in the yeast two-hybrid system. PICK1 mRNA expression level is highest in testis and brain with lower levels of expression in skeletal muscle, heart, kidney, lung and liver. PICK1 protein contains five PKC consensus phosphorylation sites and serves as an in vitro substrate for PKC. The PICK1 protein also contains a P-Loop motif that has been shown to bind ATP or GTP in the Ras family of oncoproteins as well as the G-Protein family. Proteins which bind ATP or GTP using this motif all have some sort of catalytic function although none has been identified for PICK1 as yet. PICK1 contains a DHR/GLGF motif at the N-terminus of the protein. The DHR/GLGF motif is contained in a number of recently described proteins and has been shown to mediate protein-protein interactions at the level of membranes and cytoskeleton. When both PKC$\alpha$ and PICK1 are co-expressed in Cos1 cells the two proteins co-localize to the perinucleus in immunoflouresence studies and co-immunoprecipitate. The binding site for PKC7 has been localized to amino acids 1-358 on PICK1 which contains the DHR/GLGF motif. Binding of PICK1 to PKC$\alpha$ requires the hinge and C-terminal domains of PKC$\alpha$. In vitro, PICK1 binds to PKC$\alpha$ and inhibits its activity as assayed by myelin basic protein phosphorylation. PICK1 also binds to TIS21, a primary response gene that is expressed in response to phorbol ester and growth factor treatment. The Caenorhabditis elegans homologue of PICK1 has been cloned and sequenced revealing a high degree of conservation in the DHR/GLGF motif. A more C-terminal region also shows a high degree of conservation, and the C. elegans PICK1 homologue binds to PKC7 suggesting a conservation of function. Taken together these results suggest that PICK1 may be involved in a PKC$\alpha$-specific function at the level of the nuclear membrane. ^

Transcription factor SEF: Purification and functional characterization

Cytokine-induced transcription of the serum amyloid A3 (SAA3) gene promoter requires a transcriptional enhancer that contains three functional elements: two C/EBP-binding sites and a third site that interacts with a constitutively expressed transcription factor, SAA3 enhancer factor (SEF). Deletion or site-specific mutations in the SEF-binding site drastically reduced SAA3 promoter activity, strongly suggesting that SEF is important in SAA3 promoter function. To further elucidate its role in the regulation of the SAA3 gene, we purified SEF from HeLa cell nuclear extracts to near homogeneity by using conventional liquid chromatography and DNA-affinity chromatography. Ultraviolet cross-linking and Southwestern experiments indicated that SEF consisted of a single polypeptide with an apparent molecular mass of 65 kDa. Protein sequencing, oligonucleotide competition and antibody supershift experiments identified SEF as transcription factor LBP-1c/CP2/LSF. Cotransfection of SEF expression plasmid with SAA3-luciferase reporter resulted in 3- to 5-fold activation of SAA3 promoter. Interestingly, when SEF-transfected cells were treated with either conditioned medium (CM) or interleukin (IL) 1, the SAA3 promoter was synergistically activated in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, when SEF-binding site was mutated, the response of SAA3 promoter to IL-1 or CM stimulation was abolished or drastically decreased, suggesting that SEF may functionally cooperate with an IL-1-inducible transcription factor. Indeed, our functional studies showed that NFκB is a key transcription factor that mediates the IL-1-induced expression of SAA3 gene, and that SEF can synergize with NFκBp65 to activate SAA3 promoter. By coimmunoprecipitation experiments, we found that SEF could specifically interact with NFκBp65, and that the association of these two factors was enhanced upon IL-1 and CM stimulation. This suggests that the molecular basis for the functional synergy between SEF and NFκB may be due to the ability of SEF to physically interact with NPκB. In addition to its interaction with SEF, NFκB-dependent activation also requires the weak κB site in the C element and its interaction with C/EBP. Besides its role in regulating SAA3 gene expression, we provide evidence that SEF could also bind in a sequence-specific manner to the promoters of α2-macroglobulin, Aα fibrinogen, and 6–16 genes and to an intronic enhancer of the human Wilm's tumor 1 gene, suggesting a functional role in the regulation of these genes. By coimmunoprecipitation experiments, we determined that SEF could specifically associate with both Stat3 and Stat2 upon cytokine stimulation. To examine the functional roles of such interactions, we evaluated the effects of SEF on the transcriptional regulation of two reporter genes: Aα fibrinogen and 6–16, which are IL-6- and interferon-α-responsive, respectively. Our results showed that cotransfection of SEF expression plasmid can activate the expression of Aα fibrinogen gene and 6–16 gene. Moreover, SEF can dramatically enhance the interferon-α-induced expression of 6–16 gene and IL-6-induced expression of Aα fibrinogen gene, suggesting that SEF may functionally cooperate with ISGF3 and Stat3 to mediate interferon-α and IL-6 signaling. ^ Our findings that SEF can interact with multiple cytokine-inducible transcription factors to mediate the expression of target genes open a new avenue of investigation of cooperative transcriptional regulation of gene expression, and should further our understanding of differential gene expression in response to a specific stimulus. In summary, our data provide evidence that SEF can mediate the signaling of different cytokines by interacting with various cytokine-inducible transcription factors. ^

Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in human pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is currently the fifth-leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Like with other solid tumors, the growth and metastasis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma are dependent on angiogenesis. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key angiogenic molecule that plays an important role in angiogenesis, growth and metastasis of many types of human cancer, including pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, the expression and regulation of VEGF in human pancreatic cancer cells are mostly unknown. ^ To examine the hypothesis that VEGF is constitutively expressed in human pancreatic cancer cells, and can be further induced by tumor environment factors such as nitric oxide, a panel of human pancreatic cancer cell lines were studied for constitutive and inducible VEGF expression. All the cell lines examined were shown to constitutively express various levels of VEGF. To identify the mechanisms responsible for the elevated expression of VEGF, its rates of turnover and transcription were then investigated. While the half-live of VEGF was unaffected, higher transcription rates and increased VEGF promoter activity were observed in tumor cells that constitutively expressed elevated levels of VEGF. Detailed VEGF promoter analyses revealed that the region from −267 to +50, which contains five putative Sp1 binding sites, was responsible for this VEGF promoter activity. Further deletion and point mutation analyses indicated that deletion of any of the four proximal Sp1 binding sites significantly diminished VEGF promoter activity and when all four binding sites were mutated, it was completely abrogated. Consistent with these observations, high levels of constitutive Sp1 expression and DNA binding activities were detected in pancreatic cancer cells expressing high levels of VEGF. Collectively, our data indicates that constitutively expressed Sp1 leads to the constitutive expression of VEGF, and implicates that both molecules involve in the aggressive pathogenesis of human pancreatic cancer. ^ Although constitutively expressed in pancreatic cancer cells, VEGF can be further induced. In human pancreatic cancer specimens, we found that in addition to VEGF, both inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) were overexpressed, suggesting that nitric oxide might upregulate VEGF expression. Indeed, a nitric oxide donor S-nitroso-N-acetyl-D,L-penicillamine (SNAP) significantly induced VEGF mRNA expression and protein secretion in pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells in a time- and dose-dependant manner. Using a luciferase reporter containing both the VEGF promoter and the 3′ -UTR, we showed that SNAP significantly increased luciferase activity in human pancreatic cancer cells. Notwithstanding its ability to induce VEGF in vitro, pancreatic cancer cells genetically engineered to produce NO did not exhibit increased tumor growth. This inability of NO to promote tumor growth appears to be related to NO-mediated cytotoxicity. The balance between NO mediated effects on pro-angiogenesis and cytotoxicity would determine the biological outcome of NO action on tumor cells. ^ In summary, we have demonstrated that VEGF is constitutively expressed in human pancreatic cancer cells, and that overexpression of transcription factor Sp1 is primarily responsible. Although constitutively expressed in these cells, VEGF can be further induced by NO. However, using a mouse model, we have shown that NO inhibited tumor growth by promoting cytotoxicity. These studies suggest that both Sp1 and NO may be important targets for designing potentially effective therapies of human pancreatic cancer and warrant further investigation. ^

An analysis of the function of region 1.2 of the primary sigma factor, sigma 70, from Escherichia coli

The sigma (σ) subunit of eubacterial RNA polymerase is required for recognition of and transcription initiation from promoter DNA sequences. One family of sigma factors includes those related to the primary sigma factor from E. coli, σ70. Members of the σ70 family have four highly conserved domains, of which regions 2 through 4 are present in all members. Region 1 can be subdivided into regions 1.1 and 1.2. Region 1.1 affects DNA binding by σ 70 alone, as well as transcription initiation by holoenzyme. Region 1.2, present and highly conserved in most sigma factors, has not yet been assigned a putative function, although previous work demonstrated that it is not required for either association with the core subunits of RNA polymerase or promoter specific binding by holoenzyme. This study primarily investigates the functional role of region 1.2 during transcription initiation. In vivo and in vitro characterization of thirty-two single amino acid substitutions targeted to region 1.2 of E. coli σ70 as well as a deletion of region 1.2, revealed that mutations in region 1.2 can affect promoter binding, open complex formation, initiated complex formation, and the transition from abortive transcription to elongation. The relative degree of solvent exposure of several positions in region 1.2 has been determined, with positions 116 and 122 likely to be located near the surface of σ70. ^ During the course of this study, the existence of two “wild type” variants of E. coli σ70 was discovered. The identity of amino acid 149 has been reported variably as either arginine or aspartic acid in published articles and in online databases. In vivo and in vitro characterization of the two reported variations of E. coli σ70 (N149 and D149) has determined that the two variants are functionally equivalent. However, in vivo and in vitro characterization of single amino acid substitutions and a region 1.2 deletion in the context of each variant background revealed that the behavior of some mutations are greatly affected by the identity of amino acid 149. ^

NFkappaB and STAT binding elements participate in regulation of MUC1 expression in normal and transformed mammary epithelial cells

The MUC1 gene encodes a transmembrane mucin glycoprotein that is overexpressed in several cancers of epithelial origin, including those of breast, pancreas, lung, ovary, and colon. Functions of MUC1 include protection of mucosal epithelium, modulation of cellular adhesion, and signal transduction. Aberrantly increased expression of MUC1 in cancer cells promotes tumor progression through adaptation of these functions. Some regulatory elements participating in MUC1 transcription have been described, but the mechanisms responsible for overexpression are largely unknown. A region of MUC1 5′ flanking sequence containing two conserved potential cytokine response elements, an NFκB site at −589/−580 and a STAT binding element (SBE) at −503/−495, has been implicated in high level expression in breast and pancreatic cancer cell lines. Persistent stimulation by proinflammatory cytokines may contribute to increased MUC1 transcription by tumor cells. ^ T47D breast cancer cells and normal human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC) were used to determine the roles of the κB site and SBE in basal and stimulated expression of MUC1. Treatment of T47D cells and HMEC with interferon-γ (IFNγ) alone enhanced MUC1 expression at the level of transcription, and the effect of IFNγ was further stimulated by tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα). MUC1 responsiveness to these cytokines was modest in T47D cells but clearly evident in HMEC. Transient transfection of T47D cells with mutant MUC1 promoter constructs revealed that the κB site at −589/−580 and the SBE at −503/−495 and were required for cooperative stimulation by TNFα and IFNγ. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) revealed that the synergy was mediated not by cooperative binding of transcription factors but by the independent actions of STAT1α and NFκB p65 on their respective binding sites. Independent mutations in the κB site and SBE abrogated cytokine responsiveness and reduced basal MUC1 promoter activity by 45–50%. However, only the κB site appeared to be constitutively activated in T47D cells, in part by NFκB p65. These findings implicate two cytokine response elements in the 5 ′ flanking region of MUC1, specifically a κB site and a STAT binding element, in overexpression of MUC1 in breast cancer cells. ^

Role of the transcription factor activator protein-2alpha in prostate carcinogenesis

Activator protein 2α (AP-2) is a transcription factor known to play a crucial role in the progression of malignant melanoma, colorectal carcinoma, and breast cancer. Several AP-2 target genes are known to be deregulated in prostate cancer, therefore, we hypothesize that loss AP-2 expression plays a causal role in prostate carcinogenesis. Immunofluorescent staining for AP-2 of 30 radical prostatectomy specimens demonstrated that while AP-2 was highly expressed in normal prostate epithelium, its expression was lost in most cases of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and all cases of prostate cancer studied. Additional analyses demonstrated that AP-2 was associated with normal luminal differentiation and it was not expressed in the basal cell layer. In cell lines, AP-2 was strongly expressed in immortalized normal prostate epithelial cells, whereas low expression was observed in the LNCaP, LNCaP-LN3, and PC3M-LN4 prostate cancer cell lines. Transfection of the highly tumorigenic and metastatic cell line PC3M-LN4 with the AP-2 gene significantly decreased tumor growth in the prostate of nude mice (p = 0.032) and inhibited metastases to the lymph nodes. Moreover, transfection of the low tumorigenic, low metastatic cell line LNCaP-LN3 with full length AP-2; resulted in complete inhibition of tumor incidence in the AP-2 transfectants (0/19) vs. neo control (10/16). A potential mechanism for this loss of tumorigenicity was the modulation of gene expression in prostate cancer cells that mimicked the normal phenotype. Analysis of differential expression between neo control- and AP-2-transfected cells in vitro and in tumors demonstrated low VEGF expression in AP-2 transfectants. We further demonstrated that AP-2 acted as a transcriptional repressor of the VEGF promoter by binding to a GC-rich region located between −88 and −66. This region contains an AP-2 consensus element overlapping two Sp1 consensus elements. We found that Sp3 and AP-2 bound to this region in a mutually exclusive manner to promote activation or repression. Increased VEGF expression has been observed in high grade PIN and in prostate cancer. Here we provide evidence that this early molecular change could be a result of loss of AP-2 expression in the prostatic epithelium. ^

POU domain transcription factor Brn3b is critical for the normal development and survival of retinal ganglion cells

The POU domain transcription factor Brn3b/POU4F2 plays a critical role regulating gene expression in mouse retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). Previous investigations have shown that Brn3b is not required for initial cell fate specification or migration; however, it is essential for normal RGC differentiation. In contrast to wild type axons, the mutant neurites were phenotypically different: shorter, rougher, disorganized, and poorly fasciculated. Wild type axons stained intensely with axon specific marker tau-1, while mutant projections were weakly stained and the mutant projections showed strong labeling with dendrite specific marker MAP2. Brn-3b mutant axonal projections contained more microtubules and fewer neurofilaments, a dendritic characteristic, than the wild type. The mutant neurites also exhibited significantly weaker staining of neurofilament low-molecular-weight (NF-L) in the axon when compared to the wild type, and NF-L accumulation in the neuron cell body. The absence of Brn-3b results in an inability to form normal axons and enhanced apoptosis in RGCs, suggesting that Brn-3b may control a set of genes involved in axon formation. ^ Brn3b contains several distinct sequence motifs: a glycine/serine rich region, two histidine rich regions, and a fifteen amino acid conserved sequence shared by all Brn3 family members in the N-terminus and a POU specific and POU homeodomain in the C-terminus. Brn3b activates a Luciferase reporter over 25 fold in cell culture when binding to native brn3 binding sites upstream of a minimal promoter. When fused to the Gal4 DNA Binding domain (DBD) and driven by either a strong (CMV) or weaker (pAHD) promoter, the N-terminal of Brn3b is capable of similar activation when binding to Gal4 UAS sites, indicating a presumptive activator of transcription. Both full length Brn3b or the C-terminus fused to the Gal4DBD and driven by pCMV repressed a Luciferase reporter downstream of UAS binding sites. Lower levels of expression of the fusion protein driven by pADH resulted in an alleviation of repression. This repression appears to be a limitation of this system of transcriptional analysis and a potential pitfall in conventional pCMV based transfection assays. ^

Catalytic antibody response to the Staphylococcus aureus virulence factor Efb

Staphylococcus aureus is a globally prevalent pathogen that can cause a wide variety of acute and chronic diseases in both adults and children, in both immune susceptible populations and healthy individuals. Its ability to cause persistent infections has been linked to multiple immune evasion strategies, including Efb-mediated complement inhibition. As new multi-drug-resistant strains emerge, therapeutic alternatives to traditional antibiotics must be developed. These experiments assessed the ability of healthy patient immunoglobulin to cleave Efb and disable the complement-inhibitory properties of Efb in vitro. Levels of immunoglobulin-mediated Efb catalysis varied both between immunoglobulin isoform/isotype and between individuals. Serum IgG showed the strongest catalytic activity of the immunoglobulin isotypes tested. Additionally, IgG hydrolyzed the virulence factor in a way that enabled only minimal binding to the complement component C3b, effectively blocking Efb-mediated inhibition of complement lysis. Salivary IgA and serum IgM did not block Efb-mediated inhibition of complement. Catalytic IgG selectively cleaved Efb and showed no cleavage of a variety of other proteins tested. Catalytic activity of IgG was inhibited by serine protease inhibitors, but not by other protease inhibitors, suggesting a serine-protease mechanism of catalysis. It is proposed that varying concentrations and activity levels of catalytic IgG between healthy individuals and those with current or recurrent S. aureus infections in both adult and pediatric populations be studied in order to assess the potential effectiveness of passive immunization therapy with catalytic monoclonal IgG. ^

Glioma-specific alternative RNA splicing: A role for polypyrimidine tract binding protein-1

Alternative RNA splicing plays an integral role in cell fate determination and function, especially in the cells of the brain. Errors in RNA processing contribute to diseases such as cancer, where it leads to the production of oncogenic proteins or the loss of tumor suppressors. In silica mining suggests that hundreds of splice isoforms are misexpressed in the glial cell-derived glioma. However, there is little experimental evidence of the prevalence and contribution of these changes and whether they contribute to the formation and progression of this devastating malignancy. To determine the frequency of these aberrant events, global profiling of alternative RNA splice patterns in glioma and nontumor brain was conducted using an exon array. Most splicing changes were less than 5-fold in magnitude and 14 cassette exon events were validated, including 7 previously published events. To determine the possible causes of missplicing, the differential expression levels of splicing factors in these two tissues were also analyzed. Six RNA splicing factors had greater than 2-fold changes in expression. The highest differentially expressed factor was polypyrimidine tract binding protein-1 (PTB). Evaluation by immunohistochemistry determined that this factor was elevated in both early and late stages of glioma. Glial cell-specific PTB expression in the adult brain led me to examine the role of PTB in gliomagenesis. Downregulation of PTB slowed glioma cell proliferation and migration and enhanced cell adhesion to fibronectin and vitronectin. To determine whether PTB was affecting these processes through splicing, genome-wide exon expression levels were correlated with PTB levels. Surprisingly, previously reported PTB target transcripts were insensitive to changes in PTB levels in both patient samples and PTB-depleted glioma cells. Only one validated glioma-specific splice target, RTN4/Nogo, had a significant PTB-mediated splicing change. Downregulation of PTB enhanced inclusion of its alternative exon 3, which encodes an auxiliary domain within a neurite inhibitor protein. Overexpression of this splice isoform in glioma cells slowed proliferation in a manner similar to that observed in PTB knockdown cells. In summary, aberrant expression of splicing factors such as PTB in glioma may elicit changes in splicing patterns that enhance tumorigenesis. ^

The critical role and regulation of transcription factor FoxM1 in gastric cancer development and progression

The mammalian Forkhead Box (Fox) transcription factor (FoxM1) is implicated in tumorgenesis. However, the role and regulation of FoxM1 in gastric cancer remain unknown.^ I examined FoxM1 expression in 86 cases of primary gastric cancer and 57 normal gastric tissue specimens. I found weak expression of FoxM1 protein in normal gastric mucosa, whereas I observed strong staining for FoxM1 in tumor-cell nuclei in various gastric tumors and lymph node metastases. The aberrant FoxM1 expression is associated with VEGF expression and increased angiogenesis in human gastric cancer. A Cox proportional hazards model revealed that FoxM1 expression was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. Furthermore, overexpression of FoxM1 by gene transfer significantly promoted the growth and metastasis of gastric cancer cells in orthotopic mouse models, whereas knockdown of FoxM1 expression by small interfering RNA did the opposite. Next, I observed that alteration of tumor growth and metastasis by elevated FoxM1 expression was directly correlated with alteration of VEGF expression and angiogenesis. In addition, promotion of gastric tumorigenesis by FoxM1 directly and significantly correlated with transactivation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and elevation of angiogenesis. ^ To further investigate the underlying mechanisms that result in FoxM1 overexpression in gastric cancer, I investigated FoxM1 and Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) expressions in primary gastric cancer and normal gastric tissue specimens. Concomitance of increased expression of FoxM1 protein and decreased expression of KLF4 protein was evident in human gastric cancer. Enforced KLF4 expression suppressed FoxM1 protein expression. Moreover, a region within the proximal FoxM1 promoter was identified to have KLF4-binding sites. Finally, I found an increased FoxM1 expression in gastric mucosa of villin-Cre -directed tissue specific Klf4-null mice.^ In summary, I offered both clinical and mechanistic evidence that dysregulated expression of FoxM1 play an important role in gastric cancer development and progression, while KLF4 mediates negative regulation of FoxM1 expression and its loss significantly contributes to FoxM1 dysregulation. ^

ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING STUDIES OF STEROID BINDING PROTEINS

Steroid binding proteins are an obvious choice in the search for genetic factors in plasma that might predispose to upper body obesity, a risk factor for non-insulin dependent diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The two steroid binding proteins studied by isoelectric focusing were sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), the transport protein for sex hormones and corticosteroid binding globulin (CBG), the transport protein for corticosteroids. Auto-radiography and immunoblotting on polyacrylamide gels were used to detect polymorphism in SHBG. Immunoblotting on agarose gels was used to visualize corticosteroid binding globulin. SHBG showed similar structural variation in American Caucasians, American Blacks and Canadian Indians. Two alleles (1, 2) were hypothesized with highly polymorphic frequencies in all three ethnic groups. CBG was not found to be polymorphic, but two variants were found in Caucasian male twins and in a Black individual. The finding of a good assay and a polymorphic system for SHBG are the first steps for additional studies into disease associations. ^

INTERACTION OF BACILLUS ANTHRACIS EXOSPORIUM PROTEIN BCLA WITH COMPLEMENT FACTOR H AND SPORE PERSISTENCE IN THE LUNG

Anthrax outbreaks in the United States and Europe and its potential use as a bioweapon have made Bacillus anthracis an interest of study. Anthrax infections are caused by the entry of B. anthracis spores into the host via the respiratory system, the gastrointestinal tract, cuts or wounds in the skin, and injection. Among these four forms, inhalational anthrax has the highest lethality rate and persistence of spores in the lungs of animals following pulmonary exposure has been noted for decades. However, details or mechanisms of spore persistence were not known. In this study, we investigated spore persistence in a mouse model. The results suggest that B. anthracis spores have special properties that promote persistence in the lung, and that there may be multiple mechanisms contributing to spore persistence. Moreover, recent discoveries from our laboratory suggest that spores evolved a sophisticated mechanism to interact with the host complement system. The complement system is a crucial part of the host defense mechanism against foreign microorganisms. Knowledge of the specific interactions that occur between the complement system and B. anthracis was limited. Studies performed in our laboratory have suggested that spores of B. anthracis can target specific proteins, such as Factor H (fH) of the complement system. Spores of B. anthracis are enclosed by an exosporium, which consists of a basal layer surrounded by a nap of hair-like filaments. The major structural component of the filaments is called Bacillus collagen-like protein of anthracis (BclA), which comprises a central collagen-like region and a globular C-terminal domain. BclA is the first point of contact with the innate system of an infected host. In this study, we investigated the molecular details of BclA-fH interaction with respect to the specific binding mechanism and the functional significance of this interaction in a murine model of anthrax infection. We hypothesized that the recruitment of fH to the spore surface by BclA limits the extent of complement activation and promotes pathogen survival and persistence in the infected host. Findings from this study are significant to understanding how to treat post-exposure prophylaxis and improve our knowledge of spores with the host immune system.