Gender disparities in utilization, unmet need and expenditure for mental health care

Objectives: To compare mental health care utilization regarding the source, types, and intensity of mental health services received, unmet need for services, and out of pocket cost among non-institutionalized psychologically distressed women and men. ^ Method: Cross-sectional data for 19,325 non-institutionalized mentally distressed adult respondents to the “The National Survey on Drug Use and Health” (NSDUH), for the years 2006 -2008, representing over twenty-nine millions U.S. adults was analyzed. To assess the relative odds for women compared to men, logistic regression analysis was used for source of service, for types of barriers, for unmet need and cost; zero inflated negative binomial regression for intensity of utilization; and ordinal logistic regression analysis for quantifying out-of-pocket expenditure. ^ Results: Overall, 43% of mentally distressed adults utilized a form of mental health treatment; representing 12.6 million U.S psychologically distressed adults. Females utilized more mental health care compared to males in the previous 12 months (OR: 1. 70; 95% CI: 1.54, 1.83). Similarly, females were 54% more likely to get help for psychological distress in an outpatient setting and females were associated with an increased probability of using medication for mental distress (OR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.63, 1.98). Women were 1.25 times likelier to visit a mental health center (specialty care) than men. ^ Females were positively associated with unmet needs (OR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.29, 1.75) after taking into account predisposing, enabling, and need (PEN) characteristics. Women with perceived unmet needs were 23% (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.99) less likely than men to report societal accommodation (stigma) as a barrier to mental health care. At any given cutoff point, women were 1.74 times likelier to be in the higher payment categories for inpatient out of pocket cost when other variables in the model are held constant. Conclusions: Women utilize more specialty mental healthcare, report more unmet need, and pay more inpatient out of pocket costs than men. These gender disparities exist even after controlling for predisposing, enabling, and need variables. Creating policies that not only provide mental health care access but also de-stigmatize mental illness will bring us one step closer to eliminating gender disparities in mental health care.^

Indigent care and infant mortality in Texas

Infant Mortality has been made a point of emphasis by the Department of Health and Human Services in the Healthy People 2000, 2010, and 2020 priorities. This study used the Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations to consider a number of factors which impact infant mortality in the indigent populations in the State of Texas. The primary focus of this study was the enabling factor of community resources, specifically the program used by each county to provide care to their indigent population. The Legislature of the State of Texas requires that each state have a program set up within a Hospital District, Public Hospital or develop a County Indigent Health Care Program (CIHCP) in order to provide the basic health care needs of their most vulnerable residents. We sought to determine whether the development of a CICHP without an appointed hospital to provide the care would have an adverse effect on residents seeking care and increase infant mortality. A Poisson Regression Analysis was used to analyze incidence rate ratios adjusting for race/ethnicity and wealth/poverty variables. Our study showed that counties using a CIHCP had significantly lower infant mortality rates when compared to counties using a hospital district and were statistically equivalent to counties using a public hospital program or a combination of service programs. This relationship was maintained when adjusted incidence rate ratios were calculated. This may give evidence that counties struggling to fund a public hospital or hospital district may be able to find a more cost-effective alternative in the CIHCP without adversely affecting the health status of their residents. More cost-benefit analysis and controlling analysis must be done to further characterize this relationship. ^