Association between severity of Clostridium difficile disease and different types of toxins---A systematic review

Clostridium difficile is the most important and common cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea. Toxin A and B are two important protein toxins responsible for C. difficile disease. This systematic review was undertaken to summarize the association between severity of C. difficile disease and different types of toxins. Only 5 studies were found that met the inclusion criteria. Only two studies reported results that were statistically significant and that the C. difficile disease was more severe in patient with binary toxin genes. Other three studies did not report significant findings but the authors stated that these studies were too small to detect true association. The main difference between the studies which detect association and those which did not detect association was the sample size. Well-designed and large scale studies are needed to strengthen the relationship between severe disease and toxin types. ^

The effects of Medicaid physician fees on access to care for Medicaid enrollees: A systematic review

This thesis is concerned with conducting a systematic review of the literature into the effects of Medicaid physician fees on access to care for Medicaid beneficiaries. In general these fees are significantly lower than those provided by both Medicare and private insurance. A literature search was conducted via Medline and Sumsearch and seven articles were reviewed. Of these seven, only one showed that higher Medicaid physician fees resulted in higher acceptance rates of Medicaid enrollees among physicians. On the other hand, the other six articles did not show a significant effect of physician Medicaid fees on access to care. Although most of the articles did not show a significant association between physician fees and access to care, no definitive conclusions can be made until future studies are completed. ^

Systematic review of genetic risk score in coronary heart disease and other diseases

In order to better take advantage of the abundant results from large-scale genomic association studies, investigators are turning to a genetic risk score (GRS) method in order to combine the information from common modest-effect risk alleles into an efficient risk assessment statistic. The statistical properties of these GRSs are poorly understood. As a first step toward a better understanding of GRSs, a systematic analysis of recent investigations using a GRS was undertaken. GRS studies were searched in the areas of coronary heart disease (CHD), cancer, and other common diseases using bibliographic databases and by hand-searching reference lists and journals. Twenty-one independent case-control studies, cohort studies, and simulation studies (12 in CHD, 9 in other diseases) were identified. The underlying statistical assumptions of the GRS using the experience of the Framingham risk score were investigated. Improvements in the construction of a GRS guided by the concept of composite indicators are discussed. The GRS will be a promising risk assessment tool to improve prediction and diagnosis of common diseases.^

Plasma homocysteine levels and Alzheimer's Disease: A systematic review

Objective. To systematically review studies published in English on the relationship between plasma total homocysteine (Hcy) levels and the clinical and/or postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in subjects who are over 60 years old.^ Method. Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO and Academic Search Premier, were searched by using the keywords "homocysteine", "Alzheimer disease" and "dementia", and "cognitive disorders". In addition, relevant articles in PubMed using the "related articles" link and by cross-referencing were identified. The study design, study setting and study population, sample size, the diagnostic criteria of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (NINCDS) and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (ADRDA), and description of how Hcy levels were measured or defined had to have been clearly stated. Empirical investigations reporting quantitative data on the epidemiology of the relationship between plasma total Hcy (exposure factor) and AD (outcome) were included in the systematic review.^ Results. A total of 7 studies, which included a total of 2,989 subjects, out of 388 potential articles met the inclusion criteria: four case control and three cohort studies were identified. All 7 studies had association statistics, such as the odds ratio (OR), the relative rates (RR), and the hazard ratio (HR) of AD, examined using multivariate and logistic regression analyses. Three case - comparison studies: Clarke et al. (1998) (OR: 4.5, 95% CI.: 2.2 - 9.2); McIlroy et al. (2002) (OR: 2.9, 95% CI.: 1.00–8.1); Quadri et al. (2004) (OR: 3.7, 95% CI.: 1.1 - 13.1), and two cohort studies: Seshadri et al. (2002) (RR: 1.8, 95% CI.: 1.3 - 2.5); Ravaglia et al. (2005) (HR: 2.1, 95% CI.: 1.7 - 3.8) found a significant association between serum total Hcy and AD. One case-comparison study, Miller et al. (2002) (OR: 2.2, 95% C.I.: 0.3 -16), and one cohort study, Luchsinger et al. (2004) (HR: 1.4, 95% C.I.: 0.7 - 2.3) failed to reject H0.^ Conclusions. The purpose of this review is to provide a thorough analysis of studies that examined the relationship between Hcy levels and AD. Five studies showed a positive statistically significant association between elevated total Hcy values and AD but the association was not statistically significant in two studies. Further research is needed in order to establish evidence of the strong, consistent association between serum total Hcy and AD as well as the presence of the appropriate temporal relationship. To answer these questions, it is important to conduct more prospective studies that examine the occurrence of AD in individuals with and without elevated Hcy values at baseline. In addition, the international standardization of measurements and cut-off points for plasma Hcy levels across laboratories is a critical issue to be addressed for the conduct of future studies on the topic.^

The influence of socioeconomic status on the relationship between diabetes and amputations: A systematic review of the literature

This paper synthesizes the current knowledge available regarding the impact of socioeconomic status on diabetes and amputations. In September 2009, searches in the OVID Medline and PubMed databases were performed using keywords associated with race/ethnicity, educational level, insurance status, veteran status, low income, diabetes, and lower extremity amputation. Articles published between 1996 and the search date were used. The pertinent articles were analyzed, summarized, and synthesized. ^ The majority of the articles agreed that African American, American Indian, and Latino minorities experience significantly higher rates of diabetes-related lower extremity amputation (LEA) when compared to whites. Few articles suggested that the disparity experienced by minorities and others of low SES was due to biology; most articles link it to a combination of lower income, lower educational attainment, uninsured or underinsured status, and a greater prevalence of detrimental health behaviors such as smoking. These, in turn, are linked to decreased knowledge of self-care, delayed health care seeking, delayed diagnoses and treatment, discrimination, and low quality health care. Interventions focused on patient education, established regimens of treatment, foot care, and control of diabetes have been shown to be effective, although none have lowered the rate of diabetes-related LEA to rates found in the general population.^