Immunology and HIV expression in skin, in vitro, and in response to ultraviolet light

HIV can enter the body through Langerhans cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages in skin mucosa, and spreads by lysis or by syncytia. Since UVL induces of HIV-LTR in transgenic mice mid in cell lines in vitro, we hypothesized that UVB may affect HIV in people and may affect HIV in T cells in relation to dose, apoptosis, and cytokine expression. To determine whether HIV is induced by UVL in humans, a clinical study of HIV+ patients with psoriasis or pruritus was conducted during six weeks of UVB phototherapy, Controls were HIV-psoriasis patients receiving UVB and HIV+ KS subjects without UVB.Blood and skin biopsy specimens were collected at baseline, weeks 2 and 6, and 4 weeks after UVL. AIDS-related skin diseases showed unique cytokine profiles in skin and serum at baseline. In patients and controls on phototherapy, we observed the following: (1) CD4+ and CD8+ T cell numbers are not significantly altered during phototherapy, (2) p24 antigen levels, and also HIV plasma levels increase in patients not on antiviral therapy, (3) HIV-RNA levels in serum or plasma. (viral load) can either increase or decrease depending on the patient's initial viral load, presence of antivirals, and skin type, (4) HIV-RNA levels in the periphery are inversely correlated to serum IL-10 and (5) HIV+ cell in skin increase after UVL at 2 weeks by RT-PCR in situ hybridization mid we negatively correlated with peripheral load. To understand the mechanisms of UVB mediated HIV transcription, we treated Jurkat T cell lines stably transfected with an HIV-LTR-luciferase plasmid only or additionally with tat-SV-40 early promoter with UVB (2 J/m2 to 200 J/m2), 50 to 200 ng/ml rhIL-10, and 10 μg/ml PHA as control. HIV promoter activity was measured by luciferase normalized to protein. Time points up to 72 hours were analyzed for HIV-LTR activation. HIV-LTR activation had the following properties: (1) requires the presence of Tat, (2) occurs at 24 hours, and (3) is UVB dose dependent. Changes in viability by MTS (3-(4,5-dimethyhhiazol-2-y1)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphonyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) mixed with PMS (phenazine methosulfate) solution and apoptosis by propidium iodide and annexin V using flow cytometry (FC) were seen in irradiated Jurkat cells. We determined that (1) rhIL-10 moderately decreased HIV-LTR activation if given before radiation and greatly decreases it when given after UVB, (2) HIV-LTR activation was low at doses of greater than 70 J/m2, compared to activation at 50 J/m2. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)^

Dual role of interleukin-12 on ultraviolet -induced immune suppression

Skin cancer is the most prevalent form of neoplasia, with over one million newcases diagnosed this year. UV radiation is a ubiquitous environmental agent that induces skin cancer. In addition to its carcinogenic effect, UV radiation also suppresses cell-mediated immune responses. This immune suppression is not only observed at the site of irradiation, but UV radiation also induces systemic immune suppression. Since UV radiation has a limited ability to penetrate the skin, the question of the mechanism of this systemic immune suppression arises. A number of studies have suggested that UV radiation induce systemic effects through the production of immunoregulatory cytokines, such as IL-4 and IL-10. These cytokines affect the immune response by altering systemic antigen presentation, specifically by suppressing the activation of Th1 cells while allowing the activation of Th2 cells. Because IL-12 is an important regulator of Th1 cell activation, we tested the hypothesis that administration of IL-12 could overcome UV-induced immune suppression. ^ The studies presented here are divided into dime specific aims. In the first specific aim, the ability of IL-12 to overcome UV-induced immune suppression was examined. IL-12 could overcome UV-induced immune suppression as well as prevent the generation of and neutralize the activity of preformed suppressor cells induced by UV radiation. In the second specific aim, the mechanism by which IL-12 overcomes UV-induced immune suppression was examined. IL-12 overcame UV-induced immune suppression by blocking the production of immunoregulatory cytokines such as IL-4, IL-10 and TNF-α. In the third specific aim, the effect of UV radiation on antigen presentation was investigated. UV radiation was found to decrease the production of biologically active IL-12. In addition, UV also increased the production of IL-12p40 homodimer, an antagonist of IL-12p70 heterodimer. This result suggests that IL-12 may have a dual role in the immune suppression induced by, UV radiation. On one hand the biologically active IL-12p70 heterodimer blocks UV-induced immune suppression. In contrast, IL-12p40 homodimer may mediate the suppressive effect of UV radiation. This paradox indicates that IL-12 may have a greater regulatory role in the immune response than was previously suspected. ^