Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in human pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is currently the fifth-leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Like with other solid tumors, the growth and metastasis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma are dependent on angiogenesis. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key angiogenic molecule that plays an important role in angiogenesis, growth and metastasis of many types of human cancer, including pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, the expression and regulation of VEGF in human pancreatic cancer cells are mostly unknown. ^ To examine the hypothesis that VEGF is constitutively expressed in human pancreatic cancer cells, and can be further induced by tumor environment factors such as nitric oxide, a panel of human pancreatic cancer cell lines were studied for constitutive and inducible VEGF expression. All the cell lines examined were shown to constitutively express various levels of VEGF. To identify the mechanisms responsible for the elevated expression of VEGF, its rates of turnover and transcription were then investigated. While the half-live of VEGF was unaffected, higher transcription rates and increased VEGF promoter activity were observed in tumor cells that constitutively expressed elevated levels of VEGF. Detailed VEGF promoter analyses revealed that the region from −267 to +50, which contains five putative Sp1 binding sites, was responsible for this VEGF promoter activity. Further deletion and point mutation analyses indicated that deletion of any of the four proximal Sp1 binding sites significantly diminished VEGF promoter activity and when all four binding sites were mutated, it was completely abrogated. Consistent with these observations, high levels of constitutive Sp1 expression and DNA binding activities were detected in pancreatic cancer cells expressing high levels of VEGF. Collectively, our data indicates that constitutively expressed Sp1 leads to the constitutive expression of VEGF, and implicates that both molecules involve in the aggressive pathogenesis of human pancreatic cancer. ^ Although constitutively expressed in pancreatic cancer cells, VEGF can be further induced. In human pancreatic cancer specimens, we found that in addition to VEGF, both inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) were overexpressed, suggesting that nitric oxide might upregulate VEGF expression. Indeed, a nitric oxide donor S-nitroso-N-acetyl-D,L-penicillamine (SNAP) significantly induced VEGF mRNA expression and protein secretion in pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells in a time- and dose-dependant manner. Using a luciferase reporter containing both the VEGF promoter and the 3′ -UTR, we showed that SNAP significantly increased luciferase activity in human pancreatic cancer cells. Notwithstanding its ability to induce VEGF in vitro, pancreatic cancer cells genetically engineered to produce NO did not exhibit increased tumor growth. This inability of NO to promote tumor growth appears to be related to NO-mediated cytotoxicity. The balance between NO mediated effects on pro-angiogenesis and cytotoxicity would determine the biological outcome of NO action on tumor cells. ^ In summary, we have demonstrated that VEGF is constitutively expressed in human pancreatic cancer cells, and that overexpression of transcription factor Sp1 is primarily responsible. Although constitutively expressed in these cells, VEGF can be further induced by NO. However, using a mouse model, we have shown that NO inhibited tumor growth by promoting cytotoxicity. These studies suggest that both Sp1 and NO may be important targets for designing potentially effective therapies of human pancreatic cancer and warrant further investigation. ^

Molecular mechanisms of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) protein function in hematopoiesis

Hematopoietic growth factors play important roles in regulating blood cell growth and development in vivo. In this work, we investigated the signaling mechanisms of two growth factors with clinical significance, erythropoietin (Epo) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Epo is essential for the survival, proliferation and differentiation of red blood cell progenitors, while G-CSF plays an important role in controlling mature neutrophil production. To identify which amino acid(s) and/or motif in EpoR is responsible for cell survival, wild type or mutant EpoR isoforms were transfected into the growth factor-dependent 32D cell line. Proliferation and apoptosis assays demonstrated that an EpoR isoform that lacks intracellular tyrosine residues and is truncated after 321 amino acids in the cytoplasmic tail (EpoR 1-321) mediates Epo-dependent cell survival. Furthermore, in absence of fetal calf serum (FCS), Epo signaling through wild type or mutant receptors supported anti-apoptosis, but not proliferation during 72 hours in response to Epo. To investigate the signaling pathway by which EpoR regulates cell survival, a dominant negative Stat5b (dnStat5b) isoform was generated and coexpressed with EpoR in stable cell lines. Expression of dnStat5b causes a significant induction of apoptosis in the presence of Epo in cells expressing EpoR 1-321, indicating that Stat5 is essential for survival signaling through tyrosine independent sequences in the EpoR. In a second project to investigate G-CSF signaling, we studied mechanisms by which G-CSF regulates the expression of PU.1, an important transcription factor in myeloid and B cell development. We demonstrated, by immunoblot and real time RT-PCR, that PU.1 is induced by G-CSF ex vivo as well as in vivo. To test whether G-CSF signaling through Stat3 is required for PU.1 regulation, the upstream region of the PU.1 gene was analyzed for potential Stat3 binding motifs. Four potential sites were identified; chromatin immunoprecipitations demonstrated that G-CSF activated Stat3 binds to 3 of the 4 binding motifs. In addition, PU.1 induction by G-CSF was completely abrogated in bone marrow from hematopoietic conditional Stat3 knockout mice. These results indicate an important role for Stat3 in G-CSF-dependent PU.1 gene regulation. Collectively, our works demonstrate that Stat protein play important and diverse roles in hematopoietic growth factor signaling. ^

Mechanism of subunit interaction and DNA binding of the heterotrimeric CCAAT binding factor CBF

Many eukaryotic promoters contain a CCAAT element at a site close ($-$80 to $-$120) to the transcription initiation site. CBF (CCAAT Binding Factor), also called NF-Y and CP1, was initially identified as a transcription factor binding to such sites in the promoters of the Type I collagen, albumin and MHC class II genes. CBF is a heteromeric transcription factor and purification and cloning of two of the subunits, CBF-A and CBF-B revealed that it was evolutionarily conserved with striking sequence identities with the yeast polypeptides HAP3 and HAP2, which are components of a CCAAT binding factor in yeast. Recombinant CBF-A and CBF-B however failed to bind to DNA containing CCAAT sequences. Biochemical experiments led to the identification of a third subunit, CBF-C which co-purified with CBF-A and complemented the DNA binding of recombinant CBF-A and CBF-B. We have recently isolated CBF-C cDNAs and have shown that bacterially expressed purified CBF-C binds to CCAAT containing DNA in the presence of recombinant CBF-A and CBF-B. Our experiments also show that a single molecule each of all the three subunits are present in the protein-DNA complex. Interestingly, CBF-C is also evolutionarily conserved and the conserved domain between CBF-C and its yeast homolog HAP5 is sufficient for CBF-C activity. Using GST-pulldown experiments we have demonstrated the existence of protein-protein interaction between CBF-A and CBF-C in the absence of CBF-B and DNA. CBF-B on other hand, requires both CBF-A and CBF-C to form a ternary complex which then binds to DNA. Mutational studies of CBF-A have revealed different domains of the protein which are involved in CBF-C interaction and CBF-B interaction. In addition, CBF-A harbors a domain which is involved in DNA recognition along with CBF-B. Dominant negative analogs of CBF-A have also substantiated our initial observation of assembly of CBF subunits. Our studies define a novel DNA binding structure of heterotrimeric CBF, where the three subunits of CBF follow a particular pathway of assembly of subunits that leads to CBF binding to DNA and activating transcription. ^

A distinct element involved in the lipopolysaccharide activation of the tumor necrosis factor -alpha promoter in a promonocytic cell line, THP-1

TNF-α is a pleiotropic cytokine involved in normal homeostasis and plays a key role in defending the host from infection and malignancy. However when deregulated, TNF-α can lead to various disease states. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms by which TNF-α is regulated may aid in its control. In spite of the knowledge gained regarding the transcriptional regulation of TNF-α further characterization of specific TNF-α promoter elements remains to be elucidated. In particular, the T&barbelow;NF-α A&barbelow;P-1/C&barbelow;RE-like (TAC) element of the TNF-α promoter has been shown to be important in the regulation of TNF-α in lymphocytes. Activating transcription factor-2 (ATF-2) and c-Jun were shown to bind to and transactivate the TAC element However, the role of TAC and transcription factors ATF-2 and c-Jun in the regulation of TNF-α in monocytes is not as well characterized. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a potent activator of TNF-α in monocytes, provides a good model to study the involvement of TAC in TNF-α regulation. On the other hand, all-tram retinoic acid (ATRA), a physiological monocyte-differentiation agent, is unable to induce TNF-α protein release. ^ To delineate the functional role of TAC, we transfected the wildtype or the TAC deleted TNF-α promoter-CAT construct into THP-1 promonocytic cells before stimulating them with LPS. CAT activity was induced 17-fold with the wildtype TNF-α promoter, whereas the CAT activity was uninducible when the TAC deletion mutant was used. This daft suggests that TAC is vital for LPS to activate the TNF-α promoter. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays using the TAC element as a probe showed a unique pattern for LPS-activated cells: the disappearance of the upper band of a doublet seen in untreated and ATRA treated cells. Supershift analysis identified c-Jun and ATF-2 as components of the LPS-stimulated binding complex. Transient transfection studies using dominant negative mutants of JNK, c-Jun, or ATF-2 suggest that these proteins we important for LPS to activate the TNF-α promoter. Furthermore, an increase in phosphorylated or activated c-Jun was bound to the TAC element in LPS-stimulated cells. Increased c-Jun activation was correlated with increased activity of Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), a known upstream stimulator of c-Jun and ATF-2, in LPS-stimulated monocytes. On the other hand, ATRA did not induce TNF-α protein release nor changes in the phosphorylation of c-Jun or JNK activity, suggesting that pathways leading to ATRA differentiation of monocytic cells are independent of TNF-α activation. Together, the induction of TNF-α gene expression seems to require JNK activation, and activated c-Jun binding to the TAC element of the TNF-α promoter in THP-1 promonocytic cells. ^