Lethal giant discs, a novel C2 domain protein, restricts Notch activation during endocytosis

The Notch signaling pathway plays a central role in metazoan growth and patterning, and its deregulation leads to many human diseases, including cancer. It is therefore important to understand the modes of Notch signaling regulation. Recent discoveries have demonstrated that mutations in conserved endosomal pathway components such as Erupted and Vps25 can ectopically activate Notch signaling in Drosophila. Mutations in the tumor suppressor lethal giant discs (lgd) display similar but even stronger and more specific Notch activation than in the erupted and vps25 mutant animals. This Notch activation in lgd mutant tissues causes hyperplastic overgrowth of the Drosophila imaginal discs, and the eventual lethality of the animal. However, the gene that encodes Lgd, and its function in the Notch pathway have not yet been identified. ^ I have found that Lgd is a novel, conserved C2 domain protein that regulates Notch trafficking. Lgd cell-autonomously restricts Notch signaling in the Drosophila wing disc to the target cells in the D/V boundary. The function of Lgd lies at or upstream of Notch S3 activation, but Lgd doesn't affect the binding affinities between Notch and Delta. Lgd is also not required for cis-inhibition of Notch signaling by ligands. Notch accumulates on the early endosome in lgd mutant cells and signals in a ligand-independent manner, a result that has previously been seen in endosomal pathway mutants. Interestingly, Notch activation in lgd mutant cells is dependent on the endosomal protein Hrs, and Lgd activity appears to be downstream of Hrs function in endocytosis. Taken together, my data identify Lgd as a novel tumor suppressor protein that regulates Notch signaling by targeting Notch for degradation or recycling. ^

Identification of a conserved cluster in the RH domain of GRK critical for activation by GPCRs

One of the most critical aspects of G Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) regulation is their rapid and acute desensitization following agonist stimulation. Phosphorylation of these receptors by GPCR kinases (GRK) is a major mechanism of desensitization. Considerable evidence from studies of rhodopsin kinase and GRK2 suggests there is an allosteric docking site for the receptor distinct from the GRK catalytic site. While the agonist-activated GPCR appears crucial for GRK activation, the molecular details of this interaction remain unclear. Recent studies suggested an important role for the N- and C-termini and domains in the small lobe of the kinase domain in allosteric activation; however, neither the mechanism of action of that site nor the RH domain contributions have been elucidated. To search for the allosteric site, we first indentified evolutionarily conserved sites within the RH and kinase domains presumably deterministic of protein function employing evolutionary trace (ET) methodology and crystal structures of GRK6. Focusing on a conserved cluster centered on helices 3, 9, and 10 in the RH domain, key residues of GRK5 and 6 were targeted for mutagenesis and functional assays. We found that a number of double mutations within helices 3, 9, and 10 and the N-terminus markedly reduced (50–90%) the constitutive phosphorylation of the β-2 Adrenergic Receptor (β2AR) in intact cells and phosphorylation of light-activated rhodopsin (Rho*) in vitro as compared to wild type (WT) GRK5 or 6. Based on these results, we designed peptide mimetics of GRK5 helix 9 both computationally and through chemical modifications with the goal of both confirming the importance of helix 9 and developing a useful inhibitor to disrupt the GPCR-GRK interaction. Several peptides were found to block Rho* phosphorylation by GRK5 including the native helix 9 sequence, Peptide Builder designed-peptide preserving only the key ET residues, and chemically locked helices. Most peptidomimetics showed inhibition of GRK5 activity greater than 80 % with an IC50 of ∼ 30 µM. Alanine scanning of helix 9 has further revealed both essential and non-essential residues for inhibition. Importantly, substitution of Arg 169 by an alanine in the native helix 9-based peptide gave an almost complete inhibition at 30 µM with an IC50 of ∼ 10 µM. In summary we report a previously unrecognized crucial role for the RH domain of GRK5 and 6, and the subsequent identification of a lead peptide inhibitor of protein-protein interaction with potential for specific blockade of GPCR desensitization. ^

Formalizing a Conceptual Framework of Work Domain Knowledge

Background: The failure rate of health information systems is high, partially due to fragmented, incomplete, or incorrect identification and description of specific and critical domain requirements. In order to systematically transform the requirements of work into real information system, an explicit conceptual framework is essential to summarize the work requirements and guide system design. Recently, Butler, Zhang, and colleagues proposed a conceptual framework called Work Domain Ontology (WDO) to formally represent users’ work. This WDO approach has been successfully demonstrated in a real world design project on aircraft scheduling. However, as a top level conceptual framework, this WDO has not defined an explicit and well specified schema (WDOS) , and it does not have a generalizable and operationalized procedure that can be easily applied to develop WDO. Moreover, WDO has not been developed for any concrete healthcare domain. These limitations hinder the utility of WDO in real world information system in general and in health information system in particular. Objective: The objective of this research is to formalize the WDOS, operationalize a procedure to develop WDO, and evaluate WDO approach using Self-Nutrition Management (SNM) work domain. Method: Concept analysis was implemented to formalize WDOS. Focus group interview was conducted to capture concepts in SNM work domain. Ontology engineering methods were adopted to model SNM WDO. Part of the concepts under the primary goal “staying healthy” for SNM were selected and transformed into a semi-structured survey to evaluate the acceptance, explicitness, completeness, consistency, experience dependency of SNM WDO. Result: Four concepts, “goal, operation, object and constraint”, were identified and formally modeled in WDOS with definitions and attributes. 72 SNM WDO concepts under primary goal were selected and transformed into semi-structured survey questions. The evaluation indicated that the major concepts of SNM WDO were accepted by 41 overweight subjects. SNM WDO is generally independent of user domain experience but partially dependent on SNM application experience. 23 of 41 paired concepts had significant correlations. Two concepts were identified as ambiguous concepts. 8 extra concepts were recommended towards the completeness of SNM WDO. Conclusion: The preliminary WDOS is ready with an operationalized procedure. SNM WDO has been developed to guide future SNM application design. This research is an essential step towards Work-Centered Design (WCD).

CONFORMATIONAL DYNAMICS OF K-RAS AND H-RAS PROTEINS: IS THERE FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICITY AT THE CATALYTIC DOMAIN?

Ras proteins serve as crucial signaling modulators in cell proliferation through their ability to hydrolyze GTP and exist in a GTP “on” state and GTP “off” state. There are three different human Ras isoforms: H-ras, N-ras and K-ras (4A and 4B). Although their sequence identity is very high at the catalytic domain, these isoforms differ in their ability to activate different effectors and hence different signaling pathways. Much of the previous work on this topic has attributed this difference to the hyper variable region of Ras proteins, which contains most of the sequence variance among the isoforms and encodes specificity for differential distribution in the membrane. However, we hypothesize that sequence variation on lobe II of Ras catalytic domain alters dynamics and leads to differential preference for different effectors or modulators. In this work, we used all atom molecular dynamics to analyze the dynamics in the catalytic domain of H-ras and K-ras. We have also analyzed the dynamics of a transforming mutant of H-ras and K-ras and further studied the dynamics of an effectorselective mutant of H-ras. Collectively we have determined that wild type K-ras is more dynamic than H-ras and that the structure of the effector binding loop more closely resembles that of the T35S Raf-selective mutant, possibly giving us a new view and insight into the v mode of effector specificity. Furthermore we have determined that specific mutations at the same location perturb the conformational equilibrium differently in H-ras and K-ras and that an enhanced oncogenic potential may arise from different structural perturbations for each point mutation of a specific isoform.

Intercellular adhesion and membrane polarity in rat hepatocytes: Localization of cell -CAM 105 and other domain-specific membrane proteins {\it in situ\/} and {\it in vitro\/} by electron microscopy

Cell-CAM 105 has been identified as a cell adhesion molecule (CAM) based on the ability of monospecific and monovalent anti-cell-CAM 105 antibodies to inhibit the reaggregation of rat hepatocytes. Although one would expect to find CAMs concentrated in the lateral membrane domain where adhesive interactions predominate, immunofluorescence analysis of rat liver frozen sections revealed that cell-CAM 105 was present exclusively in the bile canalicular (BC) domain of the hepatocyte. To more precisely define the in situ localization of cell-CAM 105, immunoperoxidase and electron microscopy were used to analyze intact and mechanically dissociated fixed liver tissue. Results indicate that although cell-CAM 105 is apparently restricted to the BC domain in situ, it can be detected in the pericanalicular region of the lateral membranes when accessibility to lateral membranes is provided by mechanical dissociation. In contrast, when hepatocytes were labeled following incubation in vitro under conditions used during adhesion assays, cell-CAM 105 had redistributed to all areas of the plasma membrane. Immunofluorescence analysis of primary hepatocyte cultures revealed that cell-CAM 105 and two other BC proteins were localized in discrete domains reminscent of BC while cell-CAM 105 was also present in regions of intercellular contact. These results indicate that the distribution of cell-CAM 105 under the experimental conditions used for cell adhesion assays differs from that in situ and raises the possibility that its adhesive function may be modulated by its cell surface distribution. The implications of these and other findings are discussed with regard to a model for BC formation.^ Analysis of molecular events involved in BC formation would be accelerated if an in vitro model system were available. Although BC formation in culture has previously been observed, repolarization of cell-CAM 105 and two other domain-specific membrane proteins was incomplete. Since DMSO had been used by Isom et al. to maintain liver-specific gene expression in vitro, the effect of this differentiation system on the polarity of these membrane proteins was examined. Based on findings presented here, DMSO apparently prolongs the expression and facilitates polarization of hepatocyte membrane proteins in vitro. ^

Molecular interactions of the central conserved domain of p53

p53 mutations are the most commonly observed genetic alterations in human cancers to date. A majority of these point mutations cluster in four evolutionarily conserved domains spanning amino acids 100-300. This region of p53 has been called its central conserved, or conformational domain. This domain of p53 is also targeted by the SV40 T antigen. Mutation, as well as interaction with SV40 T antigen results in inactivation of p53. We hypothesized that mutations and SV40 T antigen disrupt p53 function by interfering with the molecular interactions of the central conserved domain. Using a chimeric protein consisting of the central conserved domain of wild-type p53 (amino acids 115-295) and a protein A affinity tail, we isolated several cellular proteins that interact specifically with this domain of p53. These proteins range in size from 30K to 90K M$\rm\sb{r}.$ We also employed the p53 fusion protein to demonstrate that the central conserved domain of p53 possesses sequence-specific DNA-binding activity. Interestingly, the cellular proteins binding to the central conserved domain of p53 enhance the sequence-specific DNA-binding activity of full length p53. Partial purification of the individual proteins binding to the conformational domain of p53 by utilizing a sodium chloride step-gradient enabled further characterization of two proteins: (1) a 42K M$\rm\sb{r}$ protein that eluted at 0.5M NaCl, and bound DNA nonspecifically, and (2) a 35K M$\rm\sb{r}$ protein eluting into the 1.0M NaCl fraction, capable of enhancing the sequence-specific DNA-binding activity of p53. In order to determine the physiologic relevance of the molecular interactions of the conformational domain of p53, we examined the biochemical processes underlying the TNF-$\alpha$ mediated growth suppression of the NSCLC cell line H460. While growth suppression was accompanied by enhanced sequence-specific p53-DNA binding activity in TNF-$\alpha$ treated H460 nuclei, there was no increase in p53 protein levels. Furthermore, p35 was upregulated in TNF-$\alpha$ treated H460 cells, suggesting that the enhanced p53-DNA binding seen in these cells may be mediated by p35. Our studies define two novel interactions involving the central conserved domain of p53 that appear to be functionally relevant: (1) sequence-specific DNA-binding, and (2) interaction with other cellular proteins. ^

Regulation of p53 antiproliferative function by transactivation domain phosphorylation at threonine 18 and serine 20

We investigated the induction and physiological role of Thr18 and Ser20 phosphorylation of p53 in response to DNA damage caused by treatment with ionizing (IR) or ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Polyclonal antibodies specifically recognizing phospho-Thr18 and phospho-Ser20 were used to detect p53 phosphorylation in vivo. Analyses of five wild-type (wt) p53 containing cell lines revealed lineage specific differences in phosphorylation of Thr18 and Ser20 after treatment with IR or UV. Importantly, the phosphorylation of p53 at Thr18 and Ser20 correlated with induction of the p53 downstream targets p21Waf1/Cip1 (p21) and Mdm-2, suggesting a transactivation enhancing role for Thr18 and Ser20 phosphorylation. Whereas Thr18 phosphorylation appears to abolish side-chain hydrogen bonding between Thr18 and Asp21, Ser20 phosphorylation may introduce charge attraction between Ser20 and Lys24. Both of these interactions could contribute to stabilizing α-helical conformation within the p53 transactivation domain. Mutagenesis-derived phosphorylation mimicry of p53 at Thr18 and Ser20 by Asp substitution (p53T18D/S20D) altered transactivation domain conformation and significantly reduced the interaction of p53 with the transactivation repressor Mdm-2. Mdm-2 interaction was also reduced with p53 containing a single site Asp substitution at Ser20 (p53S20D) and with the Thr18/Asp21 hydrogen bond disrupting p53 mutants p53T18A, p53T18D and p53D21A. In contrast, no direct effect was observed on the interaction of p53T18A, p53T18D and p53D21A with the basal transcription factor TAF II31. However, prior incubation of p53T18A, p53T18D and p53D21A with Mdm-2 modulated TAFII31 interaction, suggesting Mdm-2 blocks the accessibility of p53 to TAFII31. Consistently, p53-null cells transfected with p53S20D and p53T18A, p53T18D and p53D21A demonstrated enhanced endogenous p21 expression; transfection with p53T18D/S20D most significantly enhanced p21 and fas/APO-1 (fas ) expression. Expression of p53T18A, p53T18D and p53D21A in p53/Mdm-2-double null cells exhibited no discernible differences in p21 expression. Cell proliferation was also significantly curtailed in p53-null cells transfected with p53T18D/S20D relative to cells transfected with wt p53. We conclude the irradiation-induced phosphorylation of p53 at Thr18 and Ser20 alters the α-helical conformation of its transactivation domain. Altered conformation reduces direct interaction with the transrepressor Mdm-2, enhancing indirect recruitment of the basal transcription factor TAFII31, facilitating sequence-specific transactivation function resulting in proliferative arrest. ^

The role of the conserved N -terminal domain of STAT3 in STAT3 dephosphorylation and nuclear export

Rapid redistribution of STAT subcellular localization is an essential feature of cytokine signaling. To elucidate the molecular basis of STAT3 function, which plays a critical role in controlling innate immune responses in vivo, we initiated studies to determine the mechanisms controlling STAT3 nuclear trafficking. We found that STAT3 is transported to the nucleus in the absence of cytokine treatment, as judged by indirect immunofluorescence studies in the presence of leptomycin B, an inhibitor of CRM1-dependent nuclear export, suggesting that the non-phosphorylated STAT3 protein contains a functional nuclear import signal. An isoform lacking the STAT3 N-terminal domain (Δ133STAT3) retains the ability to undergo constitutive nuclear localization, indicating that this region is not essential for cytokine-independent nuclear import. Δ133STAT3 is also transported to the nucleus following stimulation with interleukin-6 (IL-6). Interestingly, IL-6-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of Δ133STAT3 appears to be prolonged and the nuclear export of the protein delayed in cells expressing endogenous STAT3, consistent with defective Δ133STAT3 dephosphorylation. Endogenous STAT3 does not promote the nuclear export of Δ133STAT3, although dimerization between endogenous Stat3 and Δ133STAT3 is detected readily. Thus, the STAT3 N-terminal domain is not required for dimerization with full-length STAT3, yet appears to play a role in proper export of Stat3 from the nucleus following cytokine stimulation. STAT3-deficient cells reconstituted with Δ133STAT3 show enhanced and prolonged Stat1 signaling in response to IL-6, suggesting that induction of the STAT3-dependent negative regulator SOCS3 is impaired. In fact, Δ133STAT3 fails to induce SOCS3 mRNA efficiently. These studies collectively indicate that the STAT3 N-terminal region may be important for IL-6-dependent target gene activation and nuclear dephosphorylation, while dispensable for nuclear import. STAT3 is an oncogene. STAT3 is constitutively activated in primary tumors of many types. Thus far, research in the design of STAT3 protein inhibitors has focused on the SH2 and DNA-binding domains of STAT3. Interference with these domains eliminates all signaling through STAT3. If the N-terminal domain is involved in tetramerization on a subset of target genes, inhibition of this region may lead to a more selective inhibition of some STAT3 functions while leaving others intact. ^

Heregulin -beta 1 directly associates with RhoA via the immunoglobulin -like domain thereby modulating breast cancer metastasis-related properties

Heregulins constitute a family of growth factors belonging to the epidermal growth factor (EGF) family. Breast cancers that overexpress specific members of the EGF receptor family (EGFR, ErbB2, ErbB3, ErbB4) have increased metastatic potential, and Heregulin-β1 (HRGβ1), a ligand for ErbB3 and ErbB4, has also been shown to induce metastasis-related properties in breast cancer cells in vitro. The secreted form of the HRGβ1 is composed of five distinct structural domains, including the N-terminal domain, an immunoglobulin-like domain (IgG-like), a glycosylation domain, an EGF-like domain, and a β1-specific domain. Of these, the EGF-like domain is well characterized for its function in metastasis-related properties as well as its structure. However, the contributions of the other HRGβ1 domains in breast cancer metastasis remains unclear. ^ To investigate this, HRGβ1 proteins with targeted domain deletions were purified and subjected to assays for metastasis-related properties, including aggregation, invasion, activation of EGFR family members, and motility of breast cancer cells. These assays showed that retaining the EGF-like domain of HRGβ1 is important for activation of EGFRs. Interestingly, the HRGβ1 protein lacking the IgG-like domain (NGEB) led to a decrease in breast cancer cell motility, indicating the IgG-like domain modulates cell motility, an important step in cancer metastasis. ^ To understand the underlying mechanisms, I performed protein sequence and structural analysis of HRGβ1 and identified that the IgG-like domain of HRGβ1 shares sequence homology and three-dimensional structural similarity with the IgG-like domain of TRIO. TRIO is a cytoplasmic protein that directly associates with RhoA, a GTPase involved in cell reorganization and cell motility. Therefore, I hypothesized that HRGβ1 may translocate inside the breast cancer cells through receptor mediated endocytosis and bind to RhoA via its IgG-like domain. I show wild type HRGβ1 but not NGEB binds RhoA in vitro and in vivo, leading to RhoA activation. Inhibition of HRG-β1 internalization via endocytosis disrupted HRGβ1 binding to RhoA. Additionally, breast cancer cell motility induced by HRG-β1 is reduced after treatment with inhibitors to both endocytosis and RhoA function, similar to levels seen with NGEB treatment. ^ Thus, in addition to the well-known role of HRGβ1 as an extracellular stimulator of the EGFR family members, HRGβ1 also functions within the cell as a binding partner and activator of RhoA to modulate cancer cell motility. ^